Clarification on Alvarado and Scott Moonshot Cards

[SDS_JoeK_PSN]

As many of you know, this week, we replaced the Jose Alvarado Moonshot Series card with the Tanner Scott Moonshot Series card and as a result, the community had some questions that we wanted to clarify.

-Earning Tanner Scott
-PXP Missions
-Collections

Earning Tanner Scott

There’s some confusion around how to get the Tanner Scott Moonshot card. If you earned the Alvarado card before this change was made, you would not automatically have the Scott card in your inventory. To ease this confusion, we’re awarding the Scott card to all player accounts that already had Alvarado.

PXP Missions

Alongside this change, on Tuesday, we replaced the corresponding Alvarado PXP mission with one for the Tanner Scott card. This new PXP mission can be completed by all players for 5 Stars towards completing the Moonshot Program.

Collections

We’ve removed the Alvarado Moonshot card from the Moonshot Collection, so it will not count towards completion progress. This is to help minimize any potential future confusion. This means Scott simply replaces Alvarado in the Collection as one of the 41 cards you need to complete. Please note: There is no advantage to having both cards, and Alvarado cannot be acquired moving forward, nor given through Support requests.

Thank you!

[Dolenz_PSN]

Thanks for the resolution and clarification. I just looked and Scott is indeed in my Inventory

[YOSHI24_XBL]

@SDS_JoeK_PSN Good job … especially explaining it in this detail

[RealPudgyPanda_MLBTS]

@SDS_JoeK_PSN

What I got out of this is that me pointing out that you could collect both ensured SDS would get flooded with support tickets asking for the swap and that wasn’t SDS’s intention.

Just like I pointed out the mass rating tanking that would occur for Weekend Classic all the way back on March 12 (https://forums.theshow.com/post/687968).

Perhaps SDS should actually communicate with the people that actually play your game regularly instead of just constantly emailing back & forth with content creators and they could then proactively address things instead of constantly end up scrambling to fix mistakes. But then again, maybe content creators that make people laugh by talking about their [censored] are just giving that valuable of feedback. I suppose it’s possible.

I guess I will get back to reporting players for boosting BR that you guys will ignore because I’m not a content creator and a content creator’s email is important, but enforcing your rules on people that have boosted 59 flawless rewards isn’t.