Babe Ruth or Devers?
-
I was grinding to complete the Takashi collection for Baby Ruth and think now Devers is the move (pending a 1st base secondary)
Should I sell the cards I did collect since it will be xmas by the time I get George Brett? I need to buy deGrom, Max Scherzer, Josh Hader, and Arenado for the LS collection. Oh yeah Brett Baty at 3rd is going nowhere BTW. -
Devers is free. Free is better.
-
Babe Ruth wears Stirrups... Stirrups> Low Pants.
-
I'll take what is both for $1,000 Alex. I'm doing Devers at 3rd, Delgado at 1st and Babe in the OF. That means Pujols needs to be in the OF too. So be it. The beauty of not caring about wins and losses. I'll get to WS eventually plus my 300 innings.
-
@d_e_m_i_s_e_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
I'll take what is both for $1,000 Alex. I'm doing Devers at 3rd, Delgado at 1st and Babe in the OF. That means Pujols needs to be in the OF too. So be it. The beauty of not caring about wins and losses. I'll get to WS eventually plus my 300 innings.
I enjoy rank season so much now with the change to innings, my goal is just to keep it close other wise I dont stress about giving up a lead or silly hits and errors and so far the innings are going quickly should surpass 100 tonight
-
You could definitely pass on Brett, problem is they are going to have more big collections that you need to build upon. Last year Mo did not excite me and Kershaw was terrible but Betts and Griffey were amazing. And you had to complete Mo before you got Betts and you had to complete Mo, Betts and Kershaw before you got Griffey.
-
I’m a legend player 1050+ rating Babe imo is just as good if not better than Brett. Babe is a must have imo on any difficulty.
-
Adding rewards to ranked was the best thing SDS did. There’s been less quits no matter what score is and you can play your favorite players and not worry about wins and losses to achieve the 300 innings
-
I have both Babe and Brett and I don’t know if I would know hitting wise that one was a 97 and the other a 99. I have absolutely loved Babe. I am playing him in RF and the defense has not been a problem. Balls in the gap are fine…the only thing he really doesn’t get to is balls in fouled territory that a 90 speed guy would get to.
-
@cdnmoneymaker93_xbl said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
@d_e_m_i_s_e_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
I'll take what is both for $1,000 Alex. I'm doing Devers at 3rd, Delgado at 1st and Babe in the OF. That means Pujols needs to be in the OF too. So be it. The beauty of not caring about wins and losses. I'll get to WS eventually plus my 300 innings.
I enjoy rank season so much now with the change to innings, my goal is just to keep it close other wise I dont stress about giving up a lead or silly hits and errors and so far the innings are going quickly should surpass 100 tonight
How many games/days/hours have you played so far to achieve your 100 innings?
I'm just trying to get an idea to see if I can budget time over the course of a ranked season, to see if I'd be able to achieve the 300 inning mark.
-
@minimul-contact_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
I’m a legend player 1050+ rating Babe imo is just as good if not better than Brett. Babe is a must have imo on any difficulty.
Doesn’t Ruth’s defense in the outfield hurt you?
-
@cdnmoneymaker93_xbl said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
@d_e_m_i_s_e_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
I'll take what is both for $1,000 Alex. I'm doing Devers at 3rd, Delgado at 1st and Babe in the OF. That means Pujols needs to be in the OF too. So be it. The beauty of not caring about wins and losses. I'll get to WS eventually plus my 300 innings.
I enjoy rank season so much now with the change to innings, my goal is just to keep it close other wise I dont stress about giving up a lead or silly hits and errors and so far the innings are going quickly should surpass 100 tonight
Exact same for me. I've been rolling out silly team builds to get mission points. When I lose.. eh. I've got a bad team. When I win, I feel like the best player ever.
-
@minimul-contact_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
I’m a legend player 1050+ rating Babe imo is just as good if not better than Brett. Babe is a must have imo on any difficulty.
Can confirm. Babe is a monster and Delgado has been great as well
-
@irishfist412_xbl said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
@minimul-contact_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
I’m a legend player 1050+ rating Babe imo is just as good if not better than Brett. Babe is a must have imo on any difficulty.
Doesn’t Ruth’s defense in the outfield hurt you?
I got him in RF, Delgado in LF so Frank can have 1B
I’ve honestly recalled maybe once or twice where Babe or Delgado has cost me in multiple ranked and event games
-
@irishfist412_xbl said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
@minimul-contact_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
I’m a legend player 1050+ rating Babe imo is just as good if not better than Brett. Babe is a must have imo on any difficulty.
Doesn’t Ruth’s defense in the outfield hurt you?
You can't listen to the goons in the 1000's that play a different game. I made WS with Cruz in RF last season and I honestly can't remember him giving up that many runs. As someone stated, he just doesn't get to foul balls. I am hitting almost .400 with Cruz. Problem is I can't put him, Delgado, Ruth, Pujols and Devers all in the same lineup unless Ruth goes to center. Now, that could cost a lot of runs but no so much on the corner spots from what I've seen. Pujols is P5 so I'll probably sit him for a bit.
-
@aam34_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
I was grinding to complete the Takashi collection for Baby Ruth and think now Devers is the move (pending a 1st base secondary)
Should I sell the cards I did collect since it will be xmas by the time I get George Brett? I need to buy deGrom, Max Scherzer, Josh Hader, and Arenado for the LS collection. Oh yeah Brett Baty at 3rd is going nowhere BTW.You should definitely do what you want.
-
@d_e_m_i_s_e_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
I'll take what is both for $1,000 Alex. I'm doing Devers at 3rd, Delgado at 1st and Babe in the OF. That means Pujols needs to be in the OF too. So be it. The beauty of not caring about wins and losses. I'll get to WS eventually plus my 300 innings.
Yeah I may go that route too. I just want to finish this stupid LS collection by selling joe morgan and others but Ill wait. Thanks!
-
@cdnmoneymaker93_xbl said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
@d_e_m_i_s_e_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
I'll take what is both for $1,000 Alex. I'm doing Devers at 3rd, Delgado at 1st and Babe in the OF. That means Pujols needs to be in the OF too. So be it. The beauty of not caring about wins and losses. I'll get to WS eventually plus my 300 innings.
I enjoy rank season so much now with the change to innings, my goal is just to keep it close other wise I dont stress about giving up a lead or silly hits and errors and so far the innings are going quickly should surpass 100 tonight
Yes I could care less about my record now. Makes the game much more enjoyable. Events are a nice break from RS too.
-
@mubby_33_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
You could definitely pass on Brett, problem is they are going to have more big collections that you need to build upon. Last year Mo did not excite me and Kershaw was terrible but Betts and Griffey were amazing. And you had to complete Mo before you got Betts and you had to complete Mo, Betts and Kershaw before you got Griffey.
Good point. I will need babe for sure!
-
@minimul-contact_psn said in Babe Ruth or Devers?:
I’m a legend player 1050+ rating Babe imo is just as good if not better than Brett. Babe is a must have imo on any difficulty.
Cool thanks. Any tips for hitting 900 points in ranked? Around 825-850 things get really sweaty. Thanks again.