Tatis question
-
@whiplash0013_PSN said in Tatis question:
@DlGlTAL-ATHLETE_PSN said in Tatis question:
@BobbyRomano24_NSW said in Tatis question:
Based on 40 man rosters, he’s been on the 60 day IL all season so technically he shouldn’t have been on the Padres all year. Since he’s such a high diamond, why would they decide to move him now?
Because they pulled him from The Show packs. Right now the only way to get him is from the market.
Which means that anyone that still needs him would have to buy him as they can't earn him now. Thus why he went up to 300+K
Is this confirmed, that he is no longer available in packs?
I have not checked but people are saying that the location tab of the card does not show packs as an option anymore
-
@whiplash0013_PSN said in Tatis question:
@DlGlTAL-ATHLETE_PSN said in Tatis question:
@BobbyRomano24_NSW said in Tatis question:
Based on 40 man rosters, he’s been on the 60 day IL all season so technically he shouldn’t have been on the Padres all year. Since he’s such a high diamond, why would they decide to move him now?
Because they pulled him from The Show packs. Right now the only way to get him is from the market.
Which means that anyone that still needs him would have to buy him as they can't earn him now. Thus why he went up to 300+K
Is this confirmed, that he is no longer available in packs?
If you go into the card and click on the locations tab it no longer shows that it is available in show packs. This is why the price has skyrocketed....there are less out there and people are panic buying because they think they will need it for the Padres collection. No way they keep him in the collection if it is not in packs.
-
@BobbyRomano24_NSW said in Tatis question:
Based on 40 man rosters, he’s been on the 60 day IL all season so technically he shouldn’t have been on the Padres all year. Since he’s such a high diamond, why would they decide to move him now?
Because you can't pull him anymore, he is at like 400k on the market now
-
They should remove him from the set. It’s ridiculous how much he is and required for a team set he’s not even playing with this year.
For those that traded him in, move his trade in value to 200k
That would be fair and right
-
@The-Harvest_XBL said in Tatis question:
They should remove him from the set. It’s ridiculous how much he is and required for a team set he’s not even playing with this year.
For those that traded him in, move his trade in value to 200k
That would be fair and right
We have to wait until the next Roster Update.
Removing a card from packs is done server side. But changing the team/free agency of a player requires a roster update be pushed. So hopefully Friday, assuming that is the next roster update.
-
Pretty much all the non playing and injured diamonds have remained. That would have saved people so many stubs if they were FA
-
-
@Dolenz_PSN said in Tatis question:
@The-Harvest_XBL said in Tatis question:
They should remove him from the set. It’s ridiculous how much he is and required for a team set he’s not even playing with this year.
For those that traded him in, move his trade in value to 200k
That would be fair and right
We have to wait until the next Roster Update.
Removing a card from packs is done server side. But changing the team/free agency of a player requires a roster update be pushed. So hopefully Friday, assuming that is the next roster update.
Why would they make him a FA? He’s still on the team
-
@DlGlTAL-ATHLETE_PSN said in Tatis question:
hich means that anyone that still needs him would have to buy him as they can't earn him now. Thus why he went up to 300+K
Was there another way to get him beyond opening packs?
-
@cjhanz84_PSN said in Tatis question:
Pretty much all the non playing and injured diamonds have remained. That would have saved people so many stubs if they were FA
Ramon Laureano was removed last year for PEDs.
-
@Skittlz_L21_PSN said in Tatis question:
@cjhanz84_PSN said in Tatis question:
Pretty much all the non playing and injured diamonds have remained. That would have saved people so many stubs if they were FA
Ramon Laureano was removed last year for PEDs.
I was trying to think of his name yesterday. Thank you for reminding me. That’s why I originally said they might move a Tatis to free agency.
-
I think it’s a little shady they wouldn’t either move him to FA now or make a statement saying he will be. Looks like they’re trying to benefit from the situation and milk people from their stubs.
If he’s not in packs, he should not be apart of the collection.
-
@Skittlz_L21_PSN said in Tatis question:
@cjhanz84_PSN said in Tatis question:
Pretty much all the non playing and injured diamonds have remained. That would have saved people so many stubs if they were FA
Ramon Laureano was removed last year for PEDs.
Ramon Laureano was an 83 overall and was gold (see here)
Tatis is a 95 overall and a high diamond....
HUGE difference! No way you can compare these two!!!
-
@The-Harvest_XBL said in Tatis question:
@DlGlTAL-ATHLETE_PSN said in Tatis question:
which means that anyone that still needs him would have to buy him as they can't earn him now. Thus why he went up to 300+K
Was there another way to get him beyond opening packs?
Nope. Just from packs. Unless you were lucky and got him as a Daily Log In cars. But that would be very rare.
-
@The-Harvest_XBL said in Tatis question:
@DlGlTAL-ATHLETE_PSN said in Tatis question:
hich means that anyone that still needs him would have to buy him as they can't earn him now. Thus why he went up to 300+K
Was there another way to get him beyond opening packs?
12 win reward in BR or market.
-
@dap1234567890 said in Tatis question:
@Skittlz_L21_PSN said in Tatis question:
@cjhanz84_PSN said in Tatis question:
Pretty much all the non playing and injured diamonds have remained. That would have saved people so many stubs if they were FA
Ramon Laureano was removed last year for PEDs.
Ramon Laureano was an 83 overall and was gold (see here)
Tatis is a 95 overall and a high diamond....
HUGE difference! No way you can compare these two!!!
Whats the huge difference??? Just cause he's assigned a diamond rating doesn't change the fact that he has been handed a suspension from MLB. SDS set the precedent with Laureano by removing him for the same violation. Doing anything less with Tatis is suspect and appears to only be a cash grab, especially since he's been removed from packs. It won't be a good look for SDS.
-
@The-Harvest_XBL said in Tatis question:
@Dolenz_PSN said in Tatis question:
@The-Harvest_XBL said in Tatis question:
They should remove him from the set. It’s ridiculous how much he is and required for a team set he’s not even playing with this year.
For those that traded him in, move his trade in value to 200k
That would be fair and right
We have to wait until the next Roster Update.
Removing a card from packs is done server side. But changing the team/free agency of a player requires a roster update be pushed. So hopefully Friday, assuming that is the next roster update.
Why would they make him a FA? He’s still on the team
For the average player they almost always go on the FA list when they are on the Injured Reserved list.
Luis Severino is listed as a Free Agent
Michael King is listed as a free agent
Jack Flaherty is listed as a free agent
Stephen Strasburg is listed as a free agentThey have usually avoided making that move for diamond players, especially high diamonds like Tatis and Harper. iI assume they do that to keep collections more expensive.
But if they have taken Tatis out of packs and there are no more being pulled then his card will become too prohibitively expensive to reasonably expect people to be able to finish the collection.
-
@Skittlz_L21_PSN said in Tatis question:
@dap1234567890 said in Tatis question:
@Skittlz_L21_PSN said in Tatis question:
@cjhanz84_PSN said in Tatis question:
Pretty much all the non playing and injured diamonds have remained. That would have saved people so many stubs if they were FA
Ramon Laureano was removed last year for PEDs.
Ramon Laureano was an 83 overall and was gold (see here)
Tatis is a 95 overall and a high diamond....
HUGE difference! No way you can compare these two!!!
Whats the huge difference??? Just cause he's assigned a diamond rating doesn't change the fact that he has been handed a suspension from MLB. SDS set the precedent with Laureano by removing him for the same violation. Doing anything less with Tatis is suspect and appears to only be a cash grab, especially since he's been removed from packs. It won't be a good look for SDS.
Same huge difference between Mike Trout being on the DL and Stephen Strasburg bing on the DL! Where are those two sitting in the LS Collection binder and what are their ratings?
You are in denial thinking that there is no difference between Laureano and Tatis Jr and you are only kidding yourself! The rest of us aren't fooled!
-
@dap1234567890 said in Tatis question:
@Skittlz_L21_PSN said in Tatis question:
@dap1234567890 said in Tatis question:
@Skittlz_L21_PSN said in Tatis question:
@cjhanz84_PSN said in Tatis question:
Pretty much all the non playing and injured diamonds have remained. That would have saved people so many stubs if they were FA
Ramon Laureano was removed last year for PEDs.
Ramon Laureano was an 83 overall and was gold (see here)
Tatis is a 95 overall and a high diamond....
HUGE difference! No way you can compare these two!!!
Whats the huge difference??? Just cause he's assigned a diamond rating doesn't change the fact that he has been handed a suspension from MLB. SDS set the precedent with Laureano by removing him for the same violation. Doing anything less with Tatis is suspect and appears to only be a cash grab, especially since he's been removed from packs. It won't be a good look for SDS.
Same huge difference between Mike Trout being on the DL and Stephen Strasburg bing on the DL! Where are those two sitting in the LS Collection binder and what are their ratings?
You are in denial thinking that there is no difference between Laureano and Tatis Jr and you are only kidding yourself! The rest of us aren't fooled!
If the card can't be pulled from packs anymore then it doesn't need to be part of the LS Collection.
Nobody is kidding anyone.
If SDS doesn't move him to the FA collection, or put him back in packs, then that will be a very bad business decision and would tick alot of people off.
-
@DlGlTAL-ATHLETE_PSN said in Tatis question:
@dap1234567890 said in Tatis question:
@Skittlz_L21_PSN said in Tatis question:
@dap1234567890 said in Tatis question:
@Skittlz_L21_PSN said in Tatis question:
@cjhanz84_PSN said in Tatis question:
Pretty much all the non playing and injured diamonds have remained. That would have saved people so many stubs if they were FA
Ramon Laureano was removed last year for PEDs.
Ramon Laureano was an 83 overall and was gold (see here)
Tatis is a 95 overall and a high diamond....
HUGE difference! No way you can compare these two!!!
Whats the huge difference??? Just cause he's assigned a diamond rating doesn't change the fact that he has been handed a suspension from MLB. SDS set the precedent with Laureano by removing him for the same violation. Doing anything less with Tatis is suspect and appears to only be a cash grab, especially since he's been removed from packs. It won't be a good look for SDS.
Same huge difference between Mike Trout being on the DL and Stephen Strasburg bing on the DL! Where are those two sitting in the LS Collection binder and what are their ratings?
You are in denial thinking that there is no difference between Laureano and Tatis Jr and you are only kidding yourself! The rest of us aren't fooled!
If the card can't be pulled from packs anymore then it doesn't need to be part of the LS Collection.
Nobody is kidding anyone.
If SDS doesn't move him to the FA collection, or put him back in packs, then that will be a very bad business decision and would tick alot of people off.
Ok, so, if all you cry babies cry harder and all together, maybe SDS will give you what you want?!?
This isn't a [censored] nursery!
