Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread
-
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@ikasnu_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
Create a stadium deep dive?
I've got a [Use your imagination]
Ikasnu- "A cat licking the nacho cheese off my fingers as a foul ball plunks me in the rah rahs?"
Don't tempt me with a good time.
-
....and, GrizzBear55, a Forbes Editor basically said the same thing I am saying in the review below.
-
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@thegreedyg103 said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
The "Next Gen" improvements are basically non existent. What a let down. Especially graphically.
I agree with you, TheGreedyG103. Stadium Creator is one feature, and I understand it required the new systems in order to run, but that is not the definition of "next-gen". Agreed, this stream was a letdown, and it didn't answer the technical questions I wanted answered. It was a Stadium Creator stream, not a "next-gen" stream.
Coincidentally, here are the questions I want answered and was expecting some answers in the stream about that were not answered.
Okay, so I know 4k@120 is not going to happen this year. However, what about 1440@120 or 1080p@120? Did 1440 get dropped because the PS5 does not support it natively? (The Xbox Series X|S support 1440@120 natively, so I sure hope 1440 (balanced) was not dropped in '21.)
1440@120 or 1080@120 is a cakewalk for the next-gen Xbox systems, with tons of horsepower leftover to still run SC. In addition, Microsoft has a 120fps patch for Xbox Series S|X that can make games be able to support 120 w/ minimal effort by the development team. Does the Xbox Series S|X version support this, and if not, why not? These are technical questions that I'd expect/want answered in a "next-gen" stream.
Instead, all we got was a 30-minute advertisement/commercial for Stadium Creator.
I don't feel it is sony's obligation to tell others what thier competitors system can or cannot do. SDS = Sony San Diego "not" microsoft or xbox. I feel like from a business perpective it falls into a liability issue at that point.
They covered the controller and talked about how it's features will be used in game. I think peoples expectation were a little high with next gen games being ready coming out of the gate.
They talked about a feature people been asking for years and they were able to take thier time and present the creator in a manor to say "we brought this aspect to you at least for next gen." I feel like covid kept alot of developers from being able to meet goals, that doesn't fall on them.
I would say take it for what is and with everything we all have gone through give a pass to them this year. And be grateful they pushed this feature out for you guys.
Next year hold them to higher standard if you want to, but personally due to rules from Govt, Head Corporate Offices i just don't think it is fair after what we have all gone through.
And not to sound to arrogant, but they have showed off alot of changes within the game to this point! So considering the trials and tribulations they busted thier butts for us this year from "my perspective." jmho
"I don't feel it is sony's obligation to tell others what thier competitors system can or cannot do. SDS = Sony San Diego "not" microsoft or xbox. I feel like from a business perpective it falls into a liability issue at that point."
I understand your statement, yet that is not what I am saying. So, to make a product that is inferior on a competitors platform because your platform can't also take advantage of the optimization to give your product time to catch-up so it could also take advantage of the same optimization due to a design flaw in your own product platform (the PS5)...doesn't seem right.
Also, in my explanations I give SDS kudos. I fully agree with you that they deserve credit for all they have done the past year, and I have thanked them in multiple posts.
However, the Microsoft patch to make the game better is coming from Microsoft for free. SDS may just need to compile the code with the optimization from Microsoft for the frames boost. It also appears that the patch can be done relatively easy ......"we can make the experience even better, all with no work required by the developer, and no update needed by the gamer." Sounds like there could be very little for SDS to actually code on their end. (My guess it is a recompile of the code with the optimization enabled.)
https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2021/02/17/making-backward-compatible-games-even-better-with-fps-boost/
Maybe I am wrong, and if so I am fine with that, yet a more detailed explanation of the issues and why from SDS is all I am asking for.
I agree that SDS has worked hard. What I am asking from them are technical answers to very specific technical questions. That doesn't seem too much to ask, especially since they would fall under the "next-gen" umbrella of questions.
I hear ya man i'm not calling you a naysayer or anything just pointing out how i viewed it and based off history i've had with franchie. But how are they supposed to answer your question about resolution when next person might have a different setup than you? Surely you can't expect them to talk about every tv or monitor on the market? Like i said Covid couldv'e kept them from doing some things.
I am optimistic and i think you will be pleased when you get it. Look at it this way, they had the specs for ps5 long b4 public did since they are Sony affiliated.
As far as that Editor goes eh it's one critic from someone who probablly vlogs as a side job, and probabally doesn't spend more than 100 hours on game.
-
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@thegreedyg103 said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
The "Next Gen" improvements are basically non existent. What a let down. Especially graphically.
I agree with you, TheGreedyG103. Stadium Creator is one feature, and I understand it required the new systems in order to run, but that is not the definition of "next-gen". Agreed, this stream was a letdown, and it didn't answer the technical questions I wanted answered. It was a Stadium Creator stream, not a "next-gen" stream.
Coincidentally, here are the questions I want answered and was expecting some answers in the stream about that were not answered.
Okay, so I know 4k@120 is not going to happen this year. However, what about 1440@120 or 1080p@120? Did 1440 get dropped because the PS5 does not support it natively? (The Xbox Series X|S support 1440@120 natively, so I sure hope 1440 (balanced) was not dropped in '21.)
1440@120 or 1080@120 is a cakewalk for the next-gen Xbox systems, with tons of horsepower leftover to still run SC. In addition, Microsoft has a 120fps patch for Xbox Series S|X that can make games be able to support 120 w/ minimal effort by the development team. Does the Xbox Series S|X version support this, and if not, why not? These are technical questions that I'd expect/want answered in a "next-gen" stream.
Instead, all we got was a 30-minute advertisement/commercial for Stadium Creator.
I don't feel it is sony's obligation to tell others what thier competitors system can or cannot do. SDS = Sony San Diego "not" microsoft or xbox. I feel like from a business perpective it falls into a liability issue at that point.
They covered the controller and talked about how it's features will be used in game. I think peoples expectation were a little high with next gen games being ready coming out of the gate.
They talked about a feature people been asking for years and they were able to take thier time and present the creator in a manor to say "we brought this aspect to you at least for next gen." I feel like covid kept alot of developers from being able to meet goals, that doesn't fall on them.
I would say take it for what is and with everything we all have gone through give a pass to them this year. And be grateful they pushed this feature out for you guys.
Next year hold them to higher standard if you want to, but personally due to rules from Govt, Head Corporate Offices i just don't think it is fair after what we have all gone through.
And not to sound to arrogant, but they have showed off alot of changes within the game to this point! So considering the trials and tribulations they busted thier butts for us this year from "my perspective." jmho
"I don't feel it is sony's obligation to tell others what thier competitors system can or cannot do. SDS = Sony San Diego "not" microsoft or xbox. I feel like from a business perpective it falls into a liability issue at that point."
I understand your statement, yet that is not what I am saying. So, to make a product that is inferior on a competitors platform because your platform can't also take advantage of the optimization to give your product time to catch-up so it could also take advantage of the same optimization due to a design flaw in your own product platform (the PS5)...doesn't seem right.
Also, in my explanations I give SDS kudos. I fully agree with you that they deserve credit for all they have done the past year, and I have thanked them in multiple posts.
However, the Microsoft patch to make the game better is coming from Microsoft for free. SDS may just need to compile the code with the optimization from Microsoft for the frames boost. It also appears that the patch can be done relatively easy ......"we can make the experience even better, all with no work required by the developer, and no update needed by the gamer." Sounds like there could be very little for SDS to actually code on their end. (My guess it is a recompile of the code with the optimization enabled.)
https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2021/02/17/making-backward-compatible-games-even-better-with-fps-boost/
Maybe I am wrong, and if so I am fine with that, yet a more detailed explanation of the issues and why from SDS is all I am asking for.
I agree that SDS has worked hard. What I am asking from them are technical answers to very specific technical questions. That doesn't seem too much to ask, especially since they would fall under the "next-gen" umbrella of questions.
I hear ya man. But how are they supposed to answer your question about resolution when next person might have a different setup than you? Surely you can't expect them to talk about every tv or monitor on the market? Like i said Covid couldv'e kept them from doing some things. I am optimistic and i think you will be pleased when you getit. Look at it this way they had the specs for ps5 b4 public did since they are Sony affiliated.
As far as that Editor goes eh it's one critic from someone who probablly vlogs as a side job, and probabally doesn't spend more than 100 hours on game.
Console resolutions are standard, as they are controlled by the operating systems and windowing systems. All they have to do is explicitly state what they support. Great, we know 4k@60 .... yet they should also mention the other resolutions and frame rates that the game will support.
Also, they would not have to mention every TV in the world, they would only have to state which resolutions and frame rates the game will support, on which consoles. The consoles then drive those rates out to the display ....and it's up to the display whether they can handle them or not. The highest available configuration will be negotiated between the console and the display, so they don't have to answer the question for every TV. All I am asking them to do is explicitly state what the game will support going out from the console, and if the spec isn't what it could be, why not, ....and if they can install the patch to make it better if they can (or an explanation of why the patch wouldn't solve the issue if they can't go that route).
Also, they had the hardware specs for both systems around the same time they got access to the software SDK's for the port. They had to sign NDA's and had MOU's in place to not talk about the specs externally, yet they have known for quite some time.
-
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@thegreedyg103 said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
The "Next Gen" improvements are basically non existent. What a let down. Especially graphically.
I agree with you, TheGreedyG103. Stadium Creator is one feature, and I understand it required the new systems in order to run, but that is not the definition of "next-gen". Agreed, this stream was a letdown, and it didn't answer the technical questions I wanted answered. It was a Stadium Creator stream, not a "next-gen" stream.
Coincidentally, here are the questions I want answered and was expecting some answers in the stream about that were not answered.
Okay, so I know 4k@120 is not going to happen this year. However, what about 1440@120 or 1080p@120? Did 1440 get dropped because the PS5 does not support it natively? (The Xbox Series X|S support 1440@120 natively, so I sure hope 1440 (balanced) was not dropped in '21.)
1440@120 or 1080@120 is a cakewalk for the next-gen Xbox systems, with tons of horsepower leftover to still run SC. In addition, Microsoft has a 120fps patch for Xbox Series S|X that can make games be able to support 120 w/ minimal effort by the development team. Does the Xbox Series S|X version support this, and if not, why not? These are technical questions that I'd expect/want answered in a "next-gen" stream.
Instead, all we got was a 30-minute advertisement/commercial for Stadium Creator.
I don't feel it is sony's obligation to tell others what thier competitors system can or cannot do. SDS = Sony San Diego "not" microsoft or xbox. I feel like from a business perpective it falls into a liability issue at that point.
They covered the controller and talked about how it's features will be used in game. I think peoples expectation were a little high with next gen games being ready coming out of the gate.
They talked about a feature people been asking for years and they were able to take thier time and present the creator in a manor to say "we brought this aspect to you at least for next gen." I feel like covid kept alot of developers from being able to meet goals, that doesn't fall on them.
I would say take it for what is and with everything we all have gone through give a pass to them this year. And be grateful they pushed this feature out for you guys.
Next year hold them to higher standard if you want to, but personally due to rules from Govt, Head Corporate Offices i just don't think it is fair after what we have all gone through.
And not to sound to arrogant, but they have showed off alot of changes within the game to this point! So considering the trials and tribulations they busted thier butts for us this year from "my perspective." jmho
"I don't feel it is sony's obligation to tell others what thier competitors system can or cannot do. SDS = Sony San Diego "not" microsoft or xbox. I feel like from a business perpective it falls into a liability issue at that point."
I understand your statement, yet that is not what I am saying. So, to make a product that is inferior on a competitors platform because your platform can't also take advantage of the optimization to give your product time to catch-up so it could also take advantage of the same optimization due to a design flaw in your own product platform (the PS5)...doesn't seem right.
Also, in my explanations I give SDS kudos. I fully agree with you that they deserve credit for all they have done the past year, and I have thanked them in multiple posts.
However, the Microsoft patch to make the game better is coming from Microsoft for free. SDS may just need to compile the code with the optimization from Microsoft for the frames boost. It also appears that the patch can be done relatively easy ......"we can make the experience even better, all with no work required by the developer, and no update needed by the gamer." Sounds like there could be very little for SDS to actually code on their end. (My guess it is a recompile of the code with the optimization enabled.)
https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2021/02/17/making-backward-compatible-games-even-better-with-fps-boost/
Maybe I am wrong, and if so I am fine with that, yet a more detailed explanation of the issues and why from SDS is all I am asking for.
I agree that SDS has worked hard. What I am asking from them are technical answers to very specific technical questions. That doesn't seem too much to ask, especially since they would fall under the "next-gen" umbrella of questions.
I hear ya man. But how are they supposed to answer your question about resolution when next person might have a different setup than you? Surely you can't expect them to talk about every tv or monitor on the market? Like i said Covid couldv'e kept them from doing some things. I am optimistic and i think you will be pleased when you getit. Look at it this way they had the specs for ps5 b4 public did since they are Sony affiliated.
As far as that Editor goes eh it's one critic from someone who probablly vlogs as a side job, and probabally doesn't spend more than 100 hours on game.
Console resolutions are standard, as they are controlled by the operating systems and windowing systems. All they have to do is explicitly state what they support. Great, we know 4k@60 .... yet they should also mention the other resolutions and frame rates that the game will support.
Also, they would not have to mention every TV in the world, they would only have to state which resolutions and frame rates the game will support, on which consoles. The consoles then drive those rates out to the display ....and it's up to the display whether they can handle them or not. The highest available configuration will be negotiated between the console and the display, so they don't have to answer the question for every TV. All I am asking them to do is explicitly state what the game will support going out from the console, and if the spec isn't what it could be, why not, ....and if they can install the patch to make it better if they can (or an explanation of why the patch wouldn't solve the issue if they can't go that route).
Also, they had the hardware specs for both systems around the same time they got access to the software SDK's for the port. They had to sign NDA's and had MOU's in place to not talk about the specs externally, yet they have known for quite some time.
I'm not trying to discredit what you are saying i understand your concern. But it's your concern (Your meaning fans not you specfically) If it was something they couldn't do for whatever reason we won't know until game comes out. But to be honest i would rather hear about the features of game rather than something that may not even be an issue.
Like I said i am very optimistic about it b/c i feel if it was an issue i think they would've discussed it, but b/c they didn't i like to think that they were excited about the stadium creator feature and just wanted to share it with us.
-
@pennstatefencer said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@dolenz_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
I have always said that Offline DD has given it's players very few reasons to collect stadiums. You just don't get to choose them. Conquest, moments, showdowns, even March to October does not give you any chance to choose a stadium.
Well in their stream they just showed a list of modes that do not support created stadiums
- Conquest
- Showdown
- Moments
- DD Casual
- March To October
- Online HR Derby
- Online Play with Friends
So if you spend the bulk of your DD time offline it may not be worth it to spend hours and hours crafting the perfect stadium.
It's disappointing, but I kind of get most of them. You're always the away team in conquest, moments are typically based on a real scenario in a real stadium, and showdowns are basically an extension of moments. I also feel like March to October should stick to MLB stadiums. The head scratcher for me is online play with friends. If you can played with a custom stadium in ranked, I don't see why that would be an issue.
They should allow some home games in conquest. Even though I understand that thematically your team is on the road. Maybe randomize home/away games.
-
I think someone attacked my stronghold once. (On accident, I'm sure.) Maybe a Conquest game could be played in CaS under those circumstances.
-
@savefarris_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
I think someone attacked my stronghold once. (On accident, I'm sure.) Maybe a Conquest game could be played in CaS under those circumstances.
I wanna say they will attack ones you take over but not original. I think they just surround it. Can't say for certain b/c i always keep reinforcements just in case on original.
-
Will Sounds of the show be in ‘21?
-
@destructocid731_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
Will Sounds of the show be in ‘21?
Been there since 2010 or b4 no reason to think it won't. They want xbox and new users to experience what ps players have so I would say yes.
-
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@thegreedyg103 said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
The "Next Gen" improvements are basically non existent. What a let down. Especially graphically.
I agree with you, TheGreedyG103. Stadium Creator is one feature, and I understand it required the new systems in order to run, but that is not the definition of "next-gen". Agreed, this stream was a letdown, and it didn't answer the technical questions I wanted answered. It was a Stadium Creator stream, not a "next-gen" stream.
Coincidentally, here are the questions I want answered and was expecting some answers in the stream about that were not answered.
Okay, so I know 4k@120 is not going to happen this year. However, what about 1440@120 or 1080p@120? Did 1440 get dropped because the PS5 does not support it natively? (The Xbox Series X|S support 1440@120 natively, so I sure hope 1440 (balanced) was not dropped in '21.)
1440@120 or 1080@120 is a cakewalk for the next-gen Xbox systems, with tons of horsepower leftover to still run SC. In addition, Microsoft has a 120fps patch for Xbox Series S|X that can make games be able to support 120 w/ minimal effort by the development team. Does the Xbox Series S|X version support this, and if not, why not? These are technical questions that I'd expect/want answered in a "next-gen" stream.
Instead, all we got was a 30-minute advertisement/commercial for Stadium Creator.
I don't feel it is sony's obligation to tell others what thier competitors system can or cannot do. SDS = Sony San Diego "not" microsoft or xbox. I feel like from a business perpective it falls into a liability issue at that point.
They covered the controller and talked about how it's features will be used in game. I think peoples expectation were a little high with next gen games being ready coming out of the gate.
They talked about a feature people been asking for years and they were able to take thier time and present the creator in a manor to say "we brought this aspect to you at least for next gen." I feel like covid kept alot of developers from being able to meet goals, that doesn't fall on them.
I would say take it for what is and with everything we all have gone through give a pass to them this year. And be grateful they pushed this feature out for you guys.
Next year hold them to higher standard if you want to, but personally due to rules from Govt, Head Corporate Offices i just don't think it is fair after what we have all gone through.
And not to sound to arrogant, but they have showed off alot of changes within the game to this point! So considering the trials and tribulations they busted thier butts for us this year from "my perspective." jmho
"I don't feel it is sony's obligation to tell others what thier competitors system can or cannot do. SDS = Sony San Diego "not" microsoft or xbox. I feel like from a business perpective it falls into a liability issue at that point."
I understand your statement, yet that is not what I am saying. So, to make a product that is inferior on a competitors platform because your platform can't also take advantage of the optimization to give your product time to catch-up so it could also take advantage of the same optimization due to a design flaw in your own product platform (the PS5)...doesn't seem right.
Also, in my explanations I give SDS kudos. I fully agree with you that they deserve credit for all they have done the past year, and I have thanked them in multiple posts.
However, the Microsoft patch to make the game better is coming from Microsoft for free. SDS may just need to compile the code with the optimization from Microsoft for the frames boost. It also appears that the patch can be done relatively easy ......"we can make the experience even better, all with no work required by the developer, and no update needed by the gamer." Sounds like there could be very little for SDS to actually code on their end. (My guess it is a recompile of the code with the optimization enabled.)
https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2021/02/17/making-backward-compatible-games-even-better-with-fps-boost/
Maybe I am wrong, and if so I am fine with that, yet a more detailed explanation of the issues and why from SDS is all I am asking for.
I agree that SDS has worked hard. What I am asking from them are technical answers to very specific technical questions. That doesn't seem too much to ask, especially since they would fall under the "next-gen" umbrella of questions.
I hear ya man. But how are they supposed to answer your question about resolution when next person might have a different setup than you? Surely you can't expect them to talk about every tv or monitor on the market? Like i said Covid couldv'e kept them from doing some things. I am optimistic and i think you will be pleased when you getit. Look at it this way they had the specs for ps5 b4 public did since they are Sony affiliated.
As far as that Editor goes eh it's one critic from someone who probablly vlogs as a side job, and probabally doesn't spend more than 100 hours on game.
Console resolutions are standard, as they are controlled by the operating systems and windowing systems. All they have to do is explicitly state what they support. Great, we know 4k@60 .... yet they should also mention the other resolutions and frame rates that the game will support.
Also, they would not have to mention every TV in the world, they would only have to state which resolutions and frame rates the game will support, on which consoles. The consoles then drive those rates out to the display ....and it's up to the display whether they can handle them or not. The highest available configuration will be negotiated between the console and the display, so they don't have to answer the question for every TV. All I am asking them to do is explicitly state what the game will support going out from the console, and if the spec isn't what it could be, why not, ....and if they can install the patch to make it better if they can (or an explanation of why the patch wouldn't solve the issue if they can't go that route).
Also, they had the hardware specs for both systems around the same time they got access to the software SDK's for the port. They had to sign NDA's and had MOU's in place to not talk about the specs externally, yet they have known for quite some time.
I'm not trying to discredit what you are saying i understand your concern. But it's your concern (Your meaning fans not you specfically) If it was something they couldn't do for whatever reason we won't know until game comes out. But to be honest i would rather hear about the features of game rather than something that may not even be an issue.
Like I said i am very optimistic about it b/c i feel if it was an issue i think they would've discussed it, but b/c they didn't i like to think that they were excited about the stadium creator feature and just wanted to share it with us.
So, 120 is something that many people want. It's game changing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc3t84C84pI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPu7a6GHcD4
Microsoft gave them a patch and the platform to achieve the 120. I think any 120 issues would be more on the Playstation side than the Xbox side. Coincidentally, that would mean there are reasons SDS may not want to discuss it (like possibly why the game can run better at launch on the Xbox than the Playstation).
-
I’m excited! Going to be awesome.
-
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@tvsectog_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
@thegreedyg103 said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
The "Next Gen" improvements are basically non existent. What a let down. Especially graphically.
I agree with you, TheGreedyG103. Stadium Creator is one feature, and I understand it required the new systems in order to run, but that is not the definition of "next-gen". Agreed, this stream was a letdown, and it didn't answer the technical questions I wanted answered. It was a Stadium Creator stream, not a "next-gen" stream.
Coincidentally, here are the questions I want answered and was expecting some answers in the stream about that were not answered.
Okay, so I know 4k@120 is not going to happen this year. However, what about 1440@120 or 1080p@120? Did 1440 get dropped because the PS5 does not support it natively? (The Xbox Series X|S support 1440@120 natively, so I sure hope 1440 (balanced) was not dropped in '21.)
1440@120 or 1080@120 is a cakewalk for the next-gen Xbox systems, with tons of horsepower leftover to still run SC. In addition, Microsoft has a 120fps patch for Xbox Series S|X that can make games be able to support 120 w/ minimal effort by the development team. Does the Xbox Series S|X version support this, and if not, why not? These are technical questions that I'd expect/want answered in a "next-gen" stream.
Instead, all we got was a 30-minute advertisement/commercial for Stadium Creator.
I don't feel it is sony's obligation to tell others what thier competitors system can or cannot do. SDS = Sony San Diego "not" microsoft or xbox. I feel like from a business perpective it falls into a liability issue at that point.
They covered the controller and talked about how it's features will be used in game. I think peoples expectation were a little high with next gen games being ready coming out of the gate.
They talked about a feature people been asking for years and they were able to take thier time and present the creator in a manor to say "we brought this aspect to you at least for next gen." I feel like covid kept alot of developers from being able to meet goals, that doesn't fall on them.
I would say take it for what is and with everything we all have gone through give a pass to them this year. And be grateful they pushed this feature out for you guys.
Next year hold them to higher standard if you want to, but personally due to rules from Govt, Head Corporate Offices i just don't think it is fair after what we have all gone through.
And not to sound to arrogant, but they have showed off alot of changes within the game to this point! So considering the trials and tribulations they busted thier butts for us this year from "my perspective." jmho
"I don't feel it is sony's obligation to tell others what thier competitors system can or cannot do. SDS = Sony San Diego "not" microsoft or xbox. I feel like from a business perpective it falls into a liability issue at that point."
I understand your statement, yet that is not what I am saying. So, to make a product that is inferior on a competitors platform because your platform can't also take advantage of the optimization to give your product time to catch-up so it could also take advantage of the same optimization due to a design flaw in your own product platform (the PS5)...doesn't seem right.
Also, in my explanations I give SDS kudos. I fully agree with you that they deserve credit for all they have done the past year, and I have thanked them in multiple posts.
However, the Microsoft patch to make the game better is coming from Microsoft for free. SDS may just need to compile the code with the optimization from Microsoft for the frames boost. It also appears that the patch can be done relatively easy ......"we can make the experience even better, all with no work required by the developer, and no update needed by the gamer." Sounds like there could be very little for SDS to actually code on their end. (My guess it is a recompile of the code with the optimization enabled.)
https://news.xbox.com/en-us/2021/02/17/making-backward-compatible-games-even-better-with-fps-boost/
Maybe I am wrong, and if so I am fine with that, yet a more detailed explanation of the issues and why from SDS is all I am asking for.
I agree that SDS has worked hard. What I am asking from them are technical answers to very specific technical questions. That doesn't seem too much to ask, especially since they would fall under the "next-gen" umbrella of questions.
I hear ya man. But how are they supposed to answer your question about resolution when next person might have a different setup than you? Surely you can't expect them to talk about every tv or monitor on the market? Like i said Covid couldv'e kept them from doing some things. I am optimistic and i think you will be pleased when you getit. Look at it this way they had the specs for ps5 b4 public did since they are Sony affiliated.
As far as that Editor goes eh it's one critic from someone who probablly vlogs as a side job, and probabally doesn't spend more than 100 hours on game.
Console resolutions are standard, as they are controlled by the operating systems and windowing systems. All they have to do is explicitly state what they support. Great, we know 4k@60 .... yet they should also mention the other resolutions and frame rates that the game will support.
Also, they would not have to mention every TV in the world, they would only have to state which resolutions and frame rates the game will support, on which consoles. The consoles then drive those rates out to the display ....and it's up to the display whether they can handle them or not. The highest available configuration will be negotiated between the console and the display, so they don't have to answer the question for every TV. All I am asking them to do is explicitly state what the game will support going out from the console, and if the spec isn't what it could be, why not, ....and if they can install the patch to make it better if they can (or an explanation of why the patch wouldn't solve the issue if they can't go that route).
Also, they had the hardware specs for both systems around the same time they got access to the software SDK's for the port. They had to sign NDA's and had MOU's in place to not talk about the specs externally, yet they have known for quite some time.
I'm not trying to discredit what you are saying i understand your concern. But it's your concern (Your meaning fans not you specfically) If it was something they couldn't do for whatever reason we won't know until game comes out. But to be honest i would rather hear about the features of game rather than something that may not even be an issue.
Like I said i am very optimistic about it b/c i feel if it was an issue i think they would've discussed it, but b/c they didn't i like to think that they were excited about the stadium creator feature and just wanted to share it with us.
So, 120 is something that many people want. It's game changing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nc3t84C84pI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WPu7a6GHcD4
Microsoft gave them a patch and the platform to achieve the 120. I think any 120 issues would be more on the Playstation side than the Xbox side. Coincidentally, that would mean there are reasons SDS may not want to discuss it (like possibly why the game can run better at launch on the Xbox than the Playstation).
Ok agree to disagree then but i will remain optimistic. Not ready to jump ship and pronounce doomsday theories simply b/c peoples questions didn't get answered on a pre recorded stream sorry. I took it for what it was a promotion of thier product that's it.
-
They do attack your strongholds. But only if they have 3 or more and ur stronghold has 1. Which if you are careful doesn't happen.
-
@foresticek_psn said in Feature Premiere - Next-Gen Thread:
How dual entitlement works? What should I do, if I bought Digital Deluxe Edition on PS4 and now I have PS5, where in my library shows PS4 version of 21? Which version is gonna predownload on PS5?
I have the same questions mine shows I can download both might just do that and remove the ps4 version
-
I love the idea of what the controller can do in game. But what concerns me is What will all the rumbling and vibrations do if constantly on to the electrical components? I don't want to replace controller every 6 months?
-
A admin locked this topic on
