• Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
Skins
  • Default (The Show 26)
  • No Skin
  • The Show 23
  • Dark
  • The Show 24
  • The Show 25
  • The Show 26
Collapse
THESHOW.COM
Game Games Support Support My Account My Account

Community Forum

Bullpen Bash 1

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Diamond Dynasty
29 Posts 18 Posters 1.9k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Dolenz_PSND Online
    Dolenz_PSND Online
    Dolenz_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #16

    @Ledfoot_19_PSN said:

    Fair enough but 30,000 for a pack you're most likely going to get an 88 worth less than 15,000 is too much of a gamble. The

    Oh, I agree which is why I never buy these packs but as I said this is nothing new. Tiered packs that are almost guaranteed to be a net loss have been around for years

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • NotesOfJohn_PSNN Offline
    NotesOfJohn_PSNN Offline
    NotesOfJohn_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #17

    @Rhyno1986_XBL Whilst I agree it's not a huge issue, but dictating to others what should bother them is rather obnoxious.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dodgers_1890_PSND Offline
    Dodgers_1890_PSND Offline
    Dodgers_1890_PSN
    wrote last edited by
    #18

    Didn't they used to have packs like this years ago?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • LHUBison58_XBLL Online
    LHUBison58_XBLL Online
    LHUBison58_XBL
    wrote last edited by LHUBison58_XBL
    #19

    Yes, and the market dictates profitability. These cards will fluctuate in price as collections and the reissue of the packs as rewards happen. As always, caveat emptor when spending stubs or real money on packs. It is like playing scratch offs. You are always better off saving your stubs and buying the card you want. That doesn’t scratch your gambling itch, but it does make much more sense mathematically and logically.

    And in full disclosure, later in the game cycle I will start buying these packs. I do like the rush. Sometimes you find one that is profitable to rip in high volumes. The all star 3 pack last year was one. I ripped well over a hundred of them and profited over 100k stubs when the dust settled.

    Teak2112_MLBTST Sarge1387_PSNS 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • Teak2112_MLBTST Offline
    Teak2112_MLBTST Offline
    Teak2112_MLBTS
    wrote last edited by
    #20

    These packs potentially have good long term value because of collections and feel like the type of pack that wont be rereleased other than Ultra packs, which I assume will be as rare as last year. Its a risky investment, and I wont be doing it, but I don't think the pack value is the real issue.

    We just got off a content drop of 4 program cards and 12 pack cards. There is no major content coming this weekend as per the calendar (could change, doubtful). Dropping a contentless pack in the middle of WBC would have been much more palatable then during a time where content has slowed a bit

    Dolenz_PSND 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Teak2112_MLBTST Offline
    Teak2112_MLBTST Offline
    Teak2112_MLBTS
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #21

    @LHUBison58_XBL said:

    And in full disclosure, later in the game cycle I will start buying these packs. I do like the rush. Sometimes you find one that is profitable to rip in high volumes. The all star 3 pack last year was one. I ripped well over a hundred of them and profited over 100k stubs when the dust settled.

    As I dont rush live series I typically will buy the Ultra pack. I know its not 50k well spent, but I like the gamble. 30k for one card is much less enticing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Dolenz_PSND Online
    Dolenz_PSND Online
    Dolenz_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #22

    @Teak2112_MLBTS said:

    There is no major content coming this weekend as per the calendar (could change, doubtful)

    Do we not consider a new inning program content. Weekend Classic seems like content even though I don't play it.

    4/10 Weekend Classic
    4/10 2nd Inning XP Path
    4/10 New Cornerstone
    4/10 April Spotlight program

    There is an outside chance they throw in a conquest or something and just did not list it.

    Speaking of April Spotlight - I don't expect it but how about a Jordan Walker card? Hitting .300 with 3 HRs and 8 RBIs in his last 4 games. His live series is a 67 with almost no contact or power.

    Teak2112_MLBTST 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Teak2112_MLBTST Offline
    Teak2112_MLBTST Offline
    Teak2112_MLBTS
    replied to Guest last edited by Teak2112_MLBTS
    #23

    @Dolenz_PSN said:

    @Teak2112_MLBTS said:

    There is no major content coming this weekend as per the calendar (could change, doubtful)

    Do we not consider a new inning program content. Weekend Classic seems like content even though I don't play it.

    I don't personally. Last year's inning format was strictly the battle pass with no accompanying miniseason/conquest/themed program/etc. It doesnt create anything new to do in game.

    Spotlight and Cornerstone are minor content, the first spotlight was 30 minutes and I doubt that will change.

    Obviously weekend classic is supposed to be THE content and they are scared to give something for offline people to do because it might impact the online player pool I guess. Weekend classic belongs int he final weekend of an inning, not the first.

    WBC, Breakout, and New Threads were good drops, and really egg hunt is fine too but the novelty is kind of wearing off I suppose. But the number of cards given by these is declining which is not a good trend.

    If they have something major planned for the 15th for Jackie Robinson (return of 42 set?) then Ill feel a lot better, but we dont get that big of a roadmap (and to be fair SDS gives more of a roadmap than most UT modes give)

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Sarge1387_PSNS Online
    Sarge1387_PSNS Online
    Sarge1387_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #24

    @LHUBison58_XBL said:

    It is like playing scratch offs

    Isn't this what EA got in legal trouble over? The whole loot-box fiasco was deemed to be gambling and predatory or something along those lines?

    Either way, the rest of your statement is also good advice...just earn the stubs and buy the cards themselves.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • WillyDub_PSNW Offline
    WillyDub_PSNW Offline
    WillyDub_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #25

    @Ledfoot_19_PSN Shocked we didn't see Hader.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • DeleteyourTTVBTW_MLBTSD Offline
    DeleteyourTTVBTW_MLBTSD Offline
    DeleteyourTTVBTW_MLBTS
    wrote last edited by
    #26

    It’s just a new strategy. There is no reason to buy these packs but weirdos like ParallelVGuy who loves dropping $100 to lose the race to PV will instantly buy these all year.

    Gotcha games are NEVER about getting money from the maximum amount of people. It’s about getting the maximum amount from the small group of idiots. I can assure you SDS is raking in money while the community gets to buy cards for less than the value of the pack. This way nobody can hit a huge jackpot that lets them make any stubs once they give you the pack for free in conquest or wherever.

    It’s not as fun, but it’s cheap.

    Sarge1387_PSNS 1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • Sarge1387_PSNS Online
    Sarge1387_PSNS Online
    Sarge1387_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #27

    @DeleteyourTTVBTW_MLBTS said:

    It’s about getting the maximum amount from the small group of idiots

    Been gaming all my life, obviously including the inception of "DLC" etc...and this is the best, simplest explanation of micro-transactions I've ever heard.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • AppleLemon560_MLBTSA Offline
    AppleLemon560_MLBTSA Offline
    AppleLemon560_MLBTS
    wrote last edited by
    #28

    ok, it bugs me when people say that buying packs is gambling. I like gambling, and here's the problem....the value is just way too low. Like, you should have about a 45 percent chance of coming out ahead by buying the packs - the house still makes money in the long run (which is what gambling is about), and it's a fair risk for people to take. Like betting on black at the roulette table.

    But, these odds are way way lower. You have like a 10 percent chance (maybe lower?) of coming out better by purchasing the pack. I don't know who is doing that besides noobs who don't understand. Maybe they get enough silly gooses to do it - and that's why the packs cost what they do - but it ain't gambling, it's just pickpocketing.

    TripleH-4481_PSNT 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • TripleH-4481_PSNT Do not disturb
    TripleH-4481_PSNT Do not disturb
    TripleH-4481_PSN
    replied to Guest last edited by
    #29

    @AppleLemon560_MLBTS

    Yes, all veterans of this game preach “don’t buy packs” because we know how bad they are.

    To your point I’ve argued that if SDS increased the odds significantly it would have a massive impact on player satisfaction with the game. I’m at the point now where I’m missing 13 of the bigger live series diamonds and I’m burned out on grinding only to get a bunch of nothing in packs.

    I feel like I have zero chance and am making very little progress at this point. I can’t be alone feeling this way and a month into the game cycle that can’t be a good thing.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0

X Instagram Facebook YouTube Twitch Discord TikTok
Major League Baseball Players Association Major League Baseball Sony Interactive Entertainment PlayStation Studios San Diego Studio ESRB ESRB Certificate
Terms of Use Privacy Policy TheShow.com Community Code of Conduct MLB The Show Online Code of Conduct MLB The Show Games

“PlayStation Family Mark”, “PlayStation”, “PlayStation Studios logo”, “PS5 Logo”, and “Play Has No Limits” are registered trademarks or trademarks of Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc. ©2026 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC. MLB and MiLB trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com. Officially Licensed Product of MLB Players, Inc. MLBPA trademarks, copyrighted works and other intellectual property rights are owned and/or held by MLBPA and may not be used without the written consent of MLBPA or MLB Players, Inc. Visit MLBPLAYERS.com, the Players Choice on the web. The Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc., as applicable. Visit the official website of the Hall of Fame at BaseballHall.org. Official Licensee-Major League Alumni Marketing, Inc. © MLAM. Officially Licensed by the Negro Leagues Baseball Museum, Inc. Kansas City, MO. Stubs is a registered trademark or trademark of Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC. Nintendo Switch is a trademark of Nintendo. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.