FVCKING TERRIBLE
-
@xElRojo44x honestly that pissed me off the most you know they did that on purpose
-
Whoever it was that was wondering why they weren't hyping the program today?
Now you know.
-
I am not one to normally agree with over the top complaining or getting around the profanity filter with creative spelling but I kind of have to agree that I hate the new format for these cards.
-
Not loving this format like many of you. I think if they could have given Trout 59 vision instead of 60, I'd feel different.
I'll just stick with my Buxton squad for now and keep saving them stubs. If I decide to play ranked I'll grab me a unit for 30k
-
@dantheranman said in FVCKING TERRIBLE:
I think if they could have given Trout 59 vision instead of 60, I'd feel different.
Great point...
-
I think it is crazy that I never see a single Dev communicating on the forums in the controversial threads like they used to. They just ban anyone in the live streams that brings up a topic they don't want to address and ignore the forums. I thoroughly enjoy playing the game but it is already getting boring not being able to "Play how I want". I would play for 4-6 hours in the past on any given day that I had nothing planned but now I hit that cap and turn it off. If I am not being rewarded for playing, I'll just go play something else. I hate to agree with the habitual complainers but it does seem to be going downhill fast.
-
Yeah this is what I was afraid of when they said no more POTM and they were changing Topps Now. It’s like, “here’s possibly 20-30 minutes worth of content for some [censored] rated players. But oh, check out this fancy new pack with good players!!”
I’m fine with them selling packs. I just don’t buy them. But don’t make it to where the only way to get usable players is through packs or the market. Idc if they’re not sellable, let me earn them through content!!
-
@flaw7420 said in FVCKING TERRIBLE:
Yeah this is what I was afraid of when they said no more POTM and they were changing Topps Now. It’s like, “here’s possibly 20-30 minutes worth of content for some [censored] rated players. But oh, check out this fancy new pack with good players!!”
I’m fine with them selling packs. I just don’t buy them. But don’t make it to where the only way to get usable players is through packs or the market. Idc if they’re not sellable, let me earn them through content!!
I started to get worried last year when in programs became less and less free choice packs
-
Player of Month program was a fixture for how many years now? To take something away alot people looked forward to is pure garbage. Bad for business. We need Ramon
-
Took them an hour ish before they made a post on X to promote the program unlike most of the time they do it an hour or more before it even drops. It's like I said the people who do the live streams KNOW this is garbage but are only following orders so try and aim your hate to the suites who only care about one thing -- MONEY
-
@DEF266 It was one of the most popular programs since 2019. Why 2019? That's the year they took POTM away from packs and made it all earnable in the program.
-
@Skarmaen I forgot that they did that.
-
@UnsaferRainbows said in FVCKING TERRIBLE:
At least they gave us Ohtani and trout I mean it’s brutal but could’ve been even worse
That was a poor feeble attempt to shut us up.
Btw, those cards are like playing with Hall of Famers 40 yr old veteran cards.. They aren't making my team. If Trout had 59 vision instead of 60, his card would be competitively better.
They know how to be scumbags even though they still don't know what they're doing. -
Trout won’t be making my ranked lineup, but I’m using him in the event for the missions and he still hits bombs and crushes the ball. His swing is just so nice.
-
I see them putting in a poor man's version of Trouty and Bet-boy as a way to calm us that haven't pulled their LS versions yet, knowing 'Blandard' pack odds are a joke. Instead, it stoked the flames even higher. Insulting our intelligence is a dangerous road to travel, SDS.
-
So a couple of things:
- SDS is a business designed to make money. The wider the net for supported systems and end users, the higher the overhead. We are essentially mad at them for being what most other online sports games are because they never used to be that way? It was always going to be this way and you they are still doing better than other game developers.
2.) There might be a pack incoming. If you want X player early you pay now, but if you wait there isn't a fee to obtain that same player. Seems like it is pay to play this second, but free to play in a week. I would give them a bit of grace until we see how it plays out. They said they have a plan and I believe them.
-
@FellsPointGuy said in FVCKING TERRIBLE:
So a couple of things:
- SDS is a business designed to make money. The wider the net for supported systems and end users, the higher the overhead. We are essentially mad at them for being what most other online sports games are because they never used to be that way? It was always going to be this way and you they are still doing better than other game developers.
2.) There might be a pack incoming. If you want X player early you pay now, but if you wait there isn't a fee to obtain that same player. Seems like it is pay to play this second, but free to play in a week. I would give them a bit of grace until we see how it plays out. They said they have a plan and I believe them.
This hasn’t been true yet this year
-
@Dolenz said in FVCKING TERRIBLE:
I am not one to normally agree with over the top complaining or getting around the profanity filter with creative spelling but I kind of have to agree that I hate the new format for these cards.
This attempt at a whole new format as well as hiding cards behind paywalls is pretty scummy. I can't support this style, its an underhanded yet blatant way of just assuming your player base is dumb enough to fall for it...they could have at least called it rain.
-
@MarioMendoza935 said in FVCKING TERRIBLE:
A sub-par Trout? No thank you.
I just hit a 507 foot HR with sub-par Trout in RS. I take back everything I said.
-
@Sarge1387 said in FVCKING TERRIBLE:
This attempt at a whole new format as well as hiding cards behind paywalls is pretty scummy. I can't support this style, its an underhanded yet blatant way of just assuming your player base is dumb enough to fall for it...they could have at least called it rain.
What's scummier is not knowing what a paywall is.
