Question about Collections.
-
@schnauzerface said in Question about Collections.:
And the White Sox are going to trade for Trout
I have it on good authority he's going to the Pirates.
-
@irishjedi412_xbl said in Question about Collections.:
Team collections don’t change. Whatever team his card is on launch day is where it will be all season. All that will change is his card art if he gets traded.
Not correct at all. If a player gets traded to another team, he is now on that team in DD.
-
He will still be on the squad. To be taken off the collections list the player needs to be off the 40-man roster.
-
@savefarris_psn said in Question about Collections.:
Normally, you shouldn't lock down a player until you're ready to lock down the entire team.
Didn't this issue arise with the Rockies last year, when everyone was fighting for a Common A.J. Ramos? Maybe it was because it was late in the cycle. I can't remember.... but I know you do.
And it probably wasn't A.J Ramos... but it WAS a Common that took forever to get.
-
AJ Ramos is correct!
-
@arvcpa_psn said in Question about Collections.:
@savefarris_psn said in Question about Collections.:
Normally, you shouldn't lock down a player until you're ready to lock down the entire team.
Didn't this issue arise with the Rockies last year, when everyone was fighting for a Common A.J. Ramos? Maybe it was because it was late in the cycle. I can't remember.... but I know you do.
And it probably wasn't A.J Ramos... but it WAS a Common that took forever to get.
Yep. I mad bc I pulled Arenado and went to lock it in but I see another I needed and just waited for week or two for him to go down....even tho I had the Stubbs it’s was out of principle lol
-
As for the op I’d just sell eloy for 5-8 k or whatever he will go for day one and save it up. Even if he remains on the Sox roster you can fine back and but him for cheap within a week when people start to realize he is out and not a good diamond gamble card.
-
@ikasnu_psn said in Question about Collections.:
He will still be on the squad. To be taken off the collections list the player needs to be off the 40-man roster.
The thing is that a long term injury like this allows the team to put him on the 60 day DL and remove him from the 40 man roster while still keeping him, as long as he is on that 60 day.
-
@wk680_psn said in Question about Collections.:
@ikasnu_psn said in Question about Collections.:
He will still be on the squad. To be taken off the collections list the player needs to be off the 40-man roster.
The thing is that a long term injury like this allows the team to put him on the 60 day DL and remove him from the 40 man roster while still keeping him, as long as he is on that 60 day.
Right but he will still be on the teams collection page. Verlander will be on the Astros page all year despite never picking up a ball.
-
@ikasnu_psn said in Question about Collections.:
@wk680_psn said in Question about Collections.:
@ikasnu_psn said in Question about Collections.:
He will still be on the squad. To be taken off the collections list the player needs to be off the 40-man roster.
The thing is that a long term injury like this allows the team to put him on the 60 day DL and remove him from the 40 man roster while still keeping him, as long as he is on that 60 day.
Right but he will still be on the teams collection page. Verlander will be on the Astros page all year despite never picking up a ball.
So that has to mean that the 'The Show' 40 man roster is not exactly the same as the actual 40 man roster. There is no way a team would leave a 40 man spot open for a guy who is out for the year with TJS rehab. They need those spots for guys they can plug in to various roles over the course of the 162 game/6 month marathon.
-
@wk680_psn said in Question about Collections.:
So that has to mean that the 'The Show' 40 man roster is not exactly the same as the actual 40 man roster.
Correct.
There is no way a team would leave a 40 man spot open for a guy who is out for the year with TJS rehab.
There are ways SDS can cheat around that though. Over the past couple of years, the Astros have been notorious for not having a full 40 on SDS's rosters. Usually, it's because they're hiding a couple of Rule V guys on the back end of the roster and since they haven't played a game in the majors yet, SDS can't give them LS cards.
-
@wk680_psn said in Question about Collections.:
@ikasnu_psn said in Question about Collections.:
@wk680_psn said in Question about Collections.:
@ikasnu_psn said in Question about Collections.:
He will still be on the squad. To be taken off the collections list the player needs to be off the 40-man roster.
The thing is that a long term injury like this allows the team to put him on the 60 day DL and remove him from the 40 man roster while still keeping him, as long as he is on that 60 day.
Right but he will still be on the teams collection page. Verlander will be on the Astros page all year despite never picking up a ball.
So that has to mean that the 'The Show' 40 man roster is not exactly the same as the actual 40 man roster. There is no way a team would leave a 40 man spot open for a guy who is out for the year with TJS rehab. They need those spots for guys they can plug in to various roles over the course of the 162 game/6 month marathon.
Yessir. In rare occasions they've even had 41-42 players on the collection screen.
-
A admin locked this topic on
