The DDA is dismal
-
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@drewshbag420_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
What is DDA?
It’s what we call rng. It’s the randomness of certain parts of the game that seemingly helps those that are not as good as their opponent to keep that person coming back because it gives them a sense that they are better than they actually are. It also doesn’t exist. RNG is not tilted in one direction or the other. It’s just that, random outcomes which could be influenced by what the player does prior to the outcome. A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times. Those that are complaining about what this dill hole post is complaining about are not as good as they think they are and come to these forums to complain that they are being cheated by the game. And DDA is an EA sports outcome/decision table. It is also trademarked by EA and cannot be used by SDS. So this OP is misinformed and throwing around stupidity because he thinks he is better than you. He should be ignored and not responded to. Hope this explanation makes sense.
"A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times" Absolute nonsense.
Player will beat player..regardless of skill level..when the AI decides it will happen. That simple.
-
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@hoboadam_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@hoboadam_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
HAL?
You must be thinking that this is strat-o-matic.
It's not bruh.
Bruh, are you 9? Most cringe-worthy slang term of all time. Find a different one.
Ironically, in 1982 when I was 9, the computer lab was right next to the baseball field at summer camp. I learned to program on rainy days.
Using python today, here's a basic RNG script.
print(random.randint(0,9))
Number randomizers are as common in programming as cornfields in Iowa. For anyone to suggest, not only this game, but most every software game is not littered with DDA and it's components are delusional.
I won't use the overly regurgitated "conspiracy theory" cause it's a dumb term for dumb folks. I'll just call ya Delusional. It fits.
Or, have an agenda to attempt to convince the young and naive customers this game is all about practice, strategy, 99 Diamonds, and skill.
Those 4 traits and $2.50 might buy a small coffee at Starbucks..but it's not going to carry you far in this game. What will carry you is if you lose a couple on RS..just wait..you're going to then win a couple.
Those 40-4 records ppl brag about..made up by the company in a veiled attempt to support their insinuations of competition. Not "conspiracy theory" just programmers generating false standings. And, generating bot games and posting frequent winners names to the standings.
If you play RS even a little, it's not difficult to understand skill will not carry you to much better than a .500 record. Whether you have the most high level hand-eye coordination in this world..can just read every pitch and react..HAL will intervene.
He'll animate those Perfect swings as "TOO Late", "Too Early", whatever nonsense warning-track shots or spectacular plays the defense makes. Further, he'll then take those Perfect pitches you throw and turn one into a tater so you lose 1-0. There are also the frequent disconnects that no one can avoid.
So, for anyone to suggest a REAL 40-4 record is just insulting to those of us that know how the game works and, personally, we believe you to be a liar.
And anyone with 2 brain-cells to rub together, and sees the AI predetermining outcomes again and again.. know this.
I bet the guy with a 40-4 record beats you 9-10 times. The number one player in the world is like 400-20. He is also a streamer and went like 900-60 last year. I’m sure that RNG and DDA garbage you profess is screwing you over was magically in his favor for the whole year. So stfu troll!!!
I know I throw the term "Ramone" around too much. So, I won't use it again. I'll just say "Right, Ramone's momma".
-
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@drewshbag420_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
What is DDA?
It’s what we call rng. It’s the randomness of certain parts of the game that seemingly helps those that are not as good as their opponent to keep that person coming back because it gives them a sense that they are better than they actually are. It also doesn’t exist. RNG is not tilted in one direction or the other. It’s just that, random outcomes which could be influenced by what the player does prior to the outcome. A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times. Those that are complaining about what this dill hole post is complaining about are not as good as they think they are and come to these forums to complain that they are being cheated by the game. And DDA is an EA sports outcome/decision table. It is also trademarked by EA and cannot be used by SDS. So this OP is misinformed and throwing around stupidity because he thinks he is better than you. He should be ignored and not responded to. Hope this explanation makes sense.
"A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times" Absolute nonsense.
Player will beat player..regardless of skill level..when the AI decides it will happen. That simple.
You have zero credibility kid so do yourself a favor and stop embarrassing yourself. Just shut your trap and stop posting nonsense. When you came in this forum spouting DDA you lost all credibility. DDA is an EA sports logic table which makes decisions based on input. It is also trademarked. So take you butthurt complaints somewhere else!!!
-
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@drewshbag420_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
What is DDA?
It’s what we call rng. It’s the randomness of certain parts of the game that seemingly helps those that are not as good as their opponent to keep that person coming back because it gives them a sense that they are better than they actually are. It also doesn’t exist. RNG is not tilted in one direction or the other. It’s just that, random outcomes which could be influenced by what the player does prior to the outcome. A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times. Those that are complaining about what this dill hole post is complaining about are not as good as they think they are and come to these forums to complain that they are being cheated by the game. And DDA is an EA sports outcome/decision table. It is also trademarked by EA and cannot be used by SDS. So this OP is misinformed and throwing around stupidity because he thinks he is better than you. He should be ignored and not responded to. Hope this explanation makes sense.
"A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times" Absolute nonsense.
Player will beat player..regardless of skill level..when the AI decides it will happen. That simple.
You have zero credibility kid so do yourself a favor and stop embarrassing yourself. Just shut your trap and stop posting nonsense. When you came in this forum spouting DDA you lost all credibility. DDA is an EA sports logic table which makes decisions based on input. It is also trademarked. So take you butthurt complaints somewhere else!!!
You are probably young and gullible yourself. You may have some success at this game and really want to validate yourself by using the game as proof. OR, some other agenda I'm not going to get into.
But, the reason I think you're relatively young (or not the sharpest tool in the shed) is you present your arguments based on half-azzed information.
First, DDA is a generic term. It's not owned, copyrighted, patented, trademarked..or anyone's intellectual property. It's merely a term used in the software gaming industry referring to code specific to "equalizing" a player's experience.
EA does have a "patent"..much different than "trademark" that you mentioned..on THEIR version of DDA. My understanding is, they do sell it to other companies. I've never suggested SDS bought or utilize it. They have their own DDA code which probably doesn't line up with EA's.
Ever think the nonsense might be on your end? I know...deeeep, right?
-
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@drewshbag420_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
What is DDA?
It’s what we call rng. It’s the randomness of certain parts of the game that seemingly helps those that are not as good as their opponent to keep that person coming back because it gives them a sense that they are better than they actually are. It also doesn’t exist. RNG is not tilted in one direction or the other. It’s just that, random outcomes which could be influenced by what the player does prior to the outcome. A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times. Those that are complaining about what this dill hole post is complaining about are not as good as they think they are and come to these forums to complain that they are being cheated by the game. And DDA is an EA sports outcome/decision table. It is also trademarked by EA and cannot be used by SDS. So this OP is misinformed and throwing around stupidity because he thinks he is better than you. He should be ignored and not responded to. Hope this explanation makes sense.
"A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times" Absolute nonsense.
Player will beat player..regardless of skill level..when the AI decides it will happen. That simple.
You have zero credibility kid so do yourself a favor and stop embarrassing yourself. Just shut your trap and stop posting nonsense. When you came in this forum spouting DDA you lost all credibility. DDA is an EA sports logic table which makes decisions based on input. It is also trademarked. So take you butthurt complaints somewhere else!!!
You are probably young and gullible yourself. You may have some success at this game and really want to validate yourself by using the game as proof. OR, some other agenda I'm not going to get into.
But, the reason I think you're relatively young (or not the sharpest tool in the shed) is you present your arguments based on half-azzed information.
First, DDA is a generic term. It's not owned, copyrighted, patented, trademarked..or anyone's intellectual property. It's merely a term used in the software gaming industry referring to code specific to "equalizing" a player's experience.
EA does have a "patent"..much different than "trademark" that you mentioned..on THEIR version of DDA. My understanding is, they do sell it to other companies. I've never suggested SDS bought or utilize it. They have their own DDA code which probably doesn't line up with EA's.
Ever think the nonsense might be on your end? I know...deeeep, right?
This guy’s an idiot ^^^ and I’ve stupidly allowed myself to get irritated by his patently false interpretation of this DDA garbage. So I’ll leave it at that. I’ll just laugh on my end while he continues making an a s s of himself.
-
IF anyone loyal to the company is intentionally trolling me to get a reaction that is "over the ban line" it ain't happening. 'Cause the silly troll replies are just allowing me to offer more fodder for these 2 very important issues most of us want to see addressed in the game.
1st and foremost...not even a close second..reassess the DDA code..spend some time with QA and do your level best to make sure before the next release you don't have holes in the animation representation so big you could drive a mack-truck through. At least try to consider and address all the repeated issues we've seen that drive us to negativity. That will eventually drive us to quit purchasing your product.
2nd and not quite as important. And, some ppl might actually like it..but I imagine most do not. Stop with all the Diamonds. It's no fun playing a game that is called Diamond Dynasty when you have Diamonds raining down on you. At the end of the season there should be very few teams (those that have just grinded themselves silly) that have an all diamond team. By guaranteeing that you go far in assuring diversity of rosters. Teams ain't playing against the same exact players time after time. it also rewards those that DO put a manic amount of time into the game. Take care of those folks..they earned it. I've played very little this year and have awesome cards up and down my lineup. I shouldn't have. Great cards should only go to those that put in the hours. Just my opinion.
And, these 2 actually tie together. Give the grinders their big-time rare Diamonds and tune your over-hauled DDA so that they actually do benefit from hours spent. Reward them the 50-10 records like the bot teams have now. You can code it that way..you know you can.
-
someone is in denial. I do not think I could win a game vs someone who is at the top level, Not happening not possible. maybe 1 out maybe 100 tries, 1 out 500 or maybe 1 out 1,000. Still think I would lose all of them. I can pitch well enough to hold my own but my hitting is below the mendoza line.
-
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@drewshbag420_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
What is DDA?
It’s what we call rng. It’s the randomness of certain parts of the game that seemingly helps those that are not as good as their opponent to keep that person coming back because it gives them a sense that they are better than they actually are. It also doesn’t exist. RNG is not tilted in one direction or the other. It’s just that, random outcomes which could be influenced by what the player does prior to the outcome. A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times. Those that are complaining about what this dill hole post is complaining about are not as good as they think they are and come to these forums to complain that they are being cheated by the game. And DDA is an EA sports outcome/decision table. It is also trademarked by EA and cannot be used by SDS. So this OP is misinformed and throwing around stupidity because he thinks he is better than you. He should be ignored and not responded to. Hope this explanation makes sense.
"A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times" Absolute nonsense.
Player will beat player..regardless of skill level..when the AI decides it will happen. That simple.
You have zero credibility kid so do yourself a favor and stop embarrassing yourself. Just shut your trap and stop posting nonsense. When you came in this forum spouting DDA you lost all credibility. DDA is an EA sports logic table which makes decisions based on input. It is also trademarked. So take you butthurt complaints somewhere else!!!
You are probably young and gullible yourself. You may have some success at this game and really want to validate yourself by using the game as proof. OR, some other agenda I'm not going to get into.
But, the reason I think you're relatively young (or not the sharpest tool in the shed) is you present your arguments based on half-azzed information.
First, DDA is a generic term. It's not owned, copyrighted, patented, trademarked..or anyone's intellectual property. It's merely a term used in the software gaming industry referring to code specific to "equalizing" a player's experience.
EA does have a "patent"..much different than "trademark" that you mentioned..on THEIR version of DDA. My understanding is, they do sell it to other companies. I've never suggested SDS bought or utilize it. They have their own DDA code which probably doesn't line up with EA's.
Ever think the nonsense might be on your end? I know...deeeep, right?
I wouldn't waste my time arguing with these people. Anyone with half a brain knows it is in every sports game made. It is why in Madden when you are up 2 td's going for 3rd you magically fumble. When you are up by 10 in NBA and suddenly can't make a shot. These people won't believe it until it comes out which eventually it will. I still enjoy the game most of the time but I know how this stuff works. I don't get mad at losses.
-
How do you explain the guys with record of like 66-3 that absolutely murder anything and everything in the strike zone and don't even consider swinging at anything just off the plate?
-
@dbarmonstar_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
someone is in denial. I do not think I could win a game vs someone who is at the top level, Not happening not possible. maybe 1 out maybe 100 tries, 1 out 500 or maybe 1 out 1,000. Still think I would lose all of them. I can pitch well enough to hold my own but my hitting is below the mendoza line.
You can’t reason with people who believe they are being cheated by forces out of their control. They are victim divas that believe that everyone is out to get them or out to make a quick buck at someone else’s expense. He’s the epitome of a perpetual victim.
-
@necessaryninja31 said in The DDA is dismal:
How do you explain the guys with record of like 66-3 that absolutely murder anything and everything in the strike zone and don't even consider swinging at anything just off the plate?
lol dont ask here, they will claim SDS is giving them a boost and/or they simply have better internet
-
Ever heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect?
-
@kovz88_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
Ever heard of the Dunning-Kruger effect?
That is a perfect assessment!!! The OP epitomizes this mindset!!!
-
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@dbarmonstar_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
someone is in denial. I do not think I could win a game vs someone who is at the top level, Not happening not possible. maybe 1 out maybe 100 tries, 1 out 500 or maybe 1 out 1,000. Still think I would lose all of them. I can pitch well enough to hold my own but my hitting is below the mendoza line.
You can’t reason with people who believe they are being cheated by forces out of their control. They are victim divas that believe that everyone is out to get them or out to make a quick buck at someone else’s expense. He’s the epitome of a perpetual victim.
Nope..Not even a good try. But keep throwing darts..ya might stick one eventually.
-
@necessaryninja31 said in The DDA is dismal:
How do you explain the guys with record of like 66-3 that absolutely murder anything and everything in the strike zone and don't even consider swinging at anything just off the plate?
It's called software bots. Sometimes just fabricated records generated by the fabricated game. But, don't take my word for it..just do some deep and open-minded assessments of your own personal experiences with RS.
It's so slanted towards creating prefabricated outcomes..you gotta know it aint only happening to you. And if it's happening the same way to everyone...no one is really 66-3. Ain't possible.
But, they sure can manufacture standings and records that would make the gullible believe this. I could, in 10 minutes literally, create a set of standings for this game..just made up..and have them on a web-site.
These guys just automate it and it's spun off in nano-seconds. But, rest assured, 66-3 is as fake as a set of boobs on a porn-star.
One thing to do..start matching those high win guys with their box-scores. They don't match for the most part. Inconsistency all over the place that don't fit the records. Mysterious games missing...just all sorts of glaring tell-tale signs.
Of all the great the developers do in this game..and the animation is freakishly spectacular..they don't do some of the really easy stuff well. Like accuracy in box-scores and what not. Something they should focus on for next year.
-
So they don't have the time to fix the game but they have time to come up with fake standings, box scores, usernames etc and keep constantly updating them? And people wonder why the words Conspiracy Theory get thrown around
-
@kovz88_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
So they don't have the time to fix the game but they have time to come up with fake standings, box scores, usernames etc and keep constantly updating them? And people wonder why the words Conspiracy Theory get thrown around
It's automated chief. Probably been part of the code-set since they went online. Ain't no trouble..it's just generated data.
-
I just started reading this thread and it makes me feel like I made a wrong turn at Albuquerque and onto a conspiracy website.
-
@dbarmonstar_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
someone is in denial. I do not think I could win a game vs someone who is at the top level, Not happening not possible. maybe 1 out maybe 100 tries, 1 out 500 or maybe 1 out 1,000. Still think I would lose all of them. I can pitch well enough to hold my own but my hitting is below the mendoza line.
In real life..Dustin Johnson would destroy you 100 out of 100 rounds of golf. Usain Bolt would leave you sucking his vapor trail 100 times out of 100 in a sprint. And on..and on.
This is software pal. It's not real life. They don't at all have to honor physics, ability, skill, or card stats. Code will do what it's programmed to do. So, if the developers wanted to code it so..you could win 100 out of 100 against these RS heroes (I can't recall the names because they are likely generated).
You really got to have perspective.
-
@d_e_m_i_s_e_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
@killerpresence4 said in The DDA is dismal:
@drewshbag420_psn said in The DDA is dismal:
What is DDA?
It’s what we call rng. It’s the randomness of certain parts of the game that seemingly helps those that are not as good as their opponent to keep that person coming back because it gives them a sense that they are better than they actually are. It also doesn’t exist. RNG is not tilted in one direction or the other. It’s just that, random outcomes which could be influenced by what the player does prior to the outcome. A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times. Those that are complaining about what this dill hole post is complaining about are not as good as they think they are and come to these forums to complain that they are being cheated by the game. And DDA is an EA sports outcome/decision table. It is also trademarked by EA and cannot be used by SDS. So this OP is misinformed and throwing around stupidity because he thinks he is better than you. He should be ignored and not responded to. Hope this explanation makes sense.
"A great player will beat a terrible player 100 out of 100 times" Absolute nonsense.
Player will beat player..regardless of skill level..when the AI decides it will happen. That simple.
You have zero credibility kid so do yourself a favor and stop embarrassing yourself. Just shut your trap and stop posting nonsense. When you came in this forum spouting DDA you lost all credibility. DDA is an EA sports logic table which makes decisions based on input. It is also trademarked. So take you butthurt complaints somewhere else!!!
You are probably young and gullible yourself. You may have some success at this game and really want to validate yourself by using the game as proof. OR, some other agenda I'm not going to get into.
But, the reason I think you're relatively young (or not the sharpest tool in the shed) is you present your arguments based on half-azzed information.
First, DDA is a generic term. It's not owned, copyrighted, patented, trademarked..or anyone's intellectual property. It's merely a term used in the software gaming industry referring to code specific to "equalizing" a player's experience.
EA does have a "patent"..much different than "trademark" that you mentioned..on THEIR version of DDA. My understanding is, they do sell it to other companies. I've never suggested SDS bought or utilize it. They have their own DDA code which probably doesn't line up with EA's.
Ever think the nonsense might be on your end? I know...deeeep, right?
I wouldn't waste my time arguing with these people. Anyone with half a brain knows it is in every sports game made. It is why in Madden when you are up 2 td's going for 3rd you magically fumble. When you are up by 10 in NBA and suddenly can't make a shot. These people won't believe it until it comes out which eventually it will. I still enjoy the game most of the time but I know how this stuff works. I don't get mad at losses.
Yeah, but I get tired of seeing the same fan-boyz/SDS-affiliates jumping on people that report problems. They hate people posting truth that detracts from the fake experience they try to fabricate in this game.
When they really go predatory is when someone complains about a game they lost.
Then they just jump on with both feet and try to deflect the real problem in the game someone is irritated about by telling them they suck. It's the exact definition of bullying.
And these guys are so easy to slice and dice because all they got in their arsenal is "get gud", "conspiracy theory", or "quit being negative..you suck".
I don't like bullies.
