@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:

@LankyRyan said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:

@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:

@IIJACKINTHBOXII said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:

@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:

@eatyum said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:

@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:

I'm not buying this at all. You can see your perfects in the analysis and, at least in showdown, i go 2-5 a lot more than i go 4-5 or 5-5, which you would have had to consistently been doing. PP grounders are definitely under .500 with how the game plays right now.

You are going off memory, which can be faulty. I'd encourage you to do something similar and jot down every time it happens. I did so in an excel spreadsheet. The way it "seems", isn't always reality.

No, I'm saying I don't believe your numbers. You're either fudging them to come to a pre-determined conclusion or just making them up entirely.

Unless there's massive DDA in this game (which is entirely possible) and it has ID'd you as a terrible player, nobody is getting close to these numbers.

Now, if you were to have gotten this data from publicly available videos on twitch, it would be a different story.

Why don’t you do it and see for yourself?

Because I'm not the one posting outlandish, unverifiable data as fact. And I don't care enough to.

This is the most 'Merica train of thought:

"You're wrong, despite documenting your evidence and I don't care enough to produce verifiable data to counter your verifiable data. But you're fudging the numbers. Oh also, I'm right and you're wrong. Did I mention I don't care?"

You can easily verify someone's claims of P/P by going through their box scores in their game history. Until you do that, just stop talking.

LOL!

The only "evidence" is the initial post from a notorious SDS white knight (ie. heavy bias). There's literally no verifiable data to back up the claims.

It's the equivalent of a Huffpost or Breitbart story predicated entirely on anonymous sources.

If the "Merica train of thought" = reading past the headline then... zing? I guess?

You really have no grasp on what you are talking about? It is pathetic. You are literally calling him a liar because he does not despise the game like you do. You are a child pretending to be an adult. Leave this to the educated people while you throw a fit because someone proved you wrong.

Community Forum

DrewshBag420_PSN