So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.
-
I'm not buying this at all. You can see your perfects in the analysis and, at least in showdown, i go 2-5 a lot more than i go 4-5 or 5-5, which you would have had to consistently been doing. PP grounders are definitely under .500 with how the game plays right now.
-
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
I'm not buying this at all. You can see your perfects in the analysis and, at least in showdown, i go 2-5 a lot more than i go 4-5 or 5-5, which you would have had to consistently been doing. PP grounders are definitely under .500 with how the game plays right now.
You are going off memory, which can be faulty. I'd encourage you to do something similar and jot down every time it happens. I did so in an excel spreadsheet. The way it "seems", isn't always reality.
-
You should track "good squared up" and see what the average is. That specific type of contact results in mostly lineouts and flyouts
-
So if you break this down , it Is 3.7 perfect perfects a day And 1.7 homeruns a day . That’s not that good.
-
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
I'm not buying this at all. You can see your perfects in the analysis and, at least in showdown, i go 2-5 a lot more than i go 4-5 or 5-5, which you would have had to consistently been doing. PP grounders are definitely under .500 with how the game plays right now.
Love those P/P double plays
-
I’ve had great success with perfect perfects lately except my last game on hof, I only had two one w gywwn liner to cf. then giambi perfect perfect center cut , which made it a liner , against a righty. Went right to cf’r again. That ball should have been out of the park, if I hit the ball absolutely perfect in the center with a power hitter. FB top of the zone that ball should be gone all the time, would have won me the game too. You actually get punished for not being slightly below the ball, seems stupid
-
@beanball0571 said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
So if you break this down , it Is 3.7 perfect perfects a day And 1.7 homeruns a day . That’s not that good.
Some days I didn't play because of coursework, but also I never claimed to be great.
-
@esmlb_rop said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
You should track "good squared up" and see what the average is. That specific type of contact results in mostly lineouts and flyouts
I've thought about tackling that next
-
Sweet. I love research projects.
Now I'm just a few curious questions..
- RS or Events?
- Did you take into account vs Which Pitchers these came across?
- Did you just worry about High Power? Or did Contact / vision play a role in your selections as well?.
-
IM going to assume this is mostly AS because there is no way those are HOF and legend stats
On HOF and legend IM going to guess those avgs are closer to .400-.500
-
Even for a diehard loyalist these seem a bit high. Maybe because the Event has no relievers, tired starters and 15 runs a game smh
-
Skill. Gap.
-
@louieepthree said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
Sweet. I love research projects.
Now I'm just a few curious questions..
- RS or Events?
- Did you take into account vs Which Pitchers these came across?
- Did you just worry about High Power? Or did Contact / vision play a role in your selections as well?.
- A mixture, but majority events, the ranked games were HOF
- No I didn't.
- I just played with my normal lineup, which is mostly power except for a few exceptions like Brujan, that is why guys with 80+ power have way more data for me.
-
@ChArTeRBuS said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
Even for a diehard loyalist these seem a bit high. Maybe because the Event has no relievers, tired starters and 15 runs a game smh
Def a possibility that the numbers could be lower if I mostly played ranked. I don't think it would drastically drop to some number like .400/.500 like Windmills claims it would, but I wouldn't be surprised if it settled somewhere in the .750/.800 range.
I just can't stomach playing ranked more than one or two games a day, so collecting a useful amount of data would take a while for ranked.
-
@j9milz said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
I'm not buying this at all. You can see your perfects in the analysis and, at least in showdown, i go 2-5 a lot more than i go 4-5 or 5-5, which you would have had to consistently been doing. PP grounders are definitely under .500 with how the game plays right now.
Love those P/P double plays
I see your double plays and raise you P/P "grounders" that never hit the ground.
-
@eatyum said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
I'm not buying this at all. You can see your perfects in the analysis and, at least in showdown, i go 2-5 a lot more than i go 4-5 or 5-5, which you would have had to consistently been doing. PP grounders are definitely under .500 with how the game plays right now.
You are going off memory, which can be faulty. I'd encourage you to do something similar and jot down every time it happens. I did so in an excel spreadsheet. The way it "seems", isn't always reality.
No, I'm saying I don't believe your numbers. You're either fudging them to come to a pre-determined conclusion or just making them up entirely.
Unless there's massive DDA in this game (which is entirely possible) and it has ID'd you as a terrible player, nobody is getting close to these numbers.
Now, if you were to have gotten this data from publicly available videos on twitch, it would be a different story.
-
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@eatyum said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
I'm not buying this at all. You can see your perfects in the analysis and, at least in showdown, i go 2-5 a lot more than i go 4-5 or 5-5, which you would have had to consistently been doing. PP grounders are definitely under .500 with how the game plays right now.
You are going off memory, which can be faulty. I'd encourage you to do something similar and jot down every time it happens. I did so in an excel spreadsheet. The way it "seems", isn't always reality.
No, I'm saying I don't believe your numbers. You're either fudging them to come to a pre-determined conclusion or just making them up entirely.
Unless there's massive DDA in this game (which is entirely possible) and it has ID'd you as a terrible player, nobody is getting close to these numbers.
Now, if you were to have gotten this data from publicly available videos on twitch, it would be a different story.
Why don’t you do it and see for yourself?
-
@IIJACKINTHBOXII said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@eatyum said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
I'm not buying this at all. You can see your perfects in the analysis and, at least in showdown, i go 2-5 a lot more than i go 4-5 or 5-5, which you would have had to consistently been doing. PP grounders are definitely under .500 with how the game plays right now.
You are going off memory, which can be faulty. I'd encourage you to do something similar and jot down every time it happens. I did so in an excel spreadsheet. The way it "seems", isn't always reality.
No, I'm saying I don't believe your numbers. You're either fudging them to come to a pre-determined conclusion or just making them up entirely.
Unless there's massive DDA in this game (which is entirely possible) and it has ID'd you as a terrible player, nobody is getting close to these numbers.
Now, if you were to have gotten this data from publicly available videos on twitch, it would be a different story.
Why don’t you do it and see for yourself?
Because I'm not the one posting outlandish, unverifiable data as fact. And I don't care enough to.
-
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@IIJACKINTHBOXII said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@eatyum said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
I'm not buying this at all. You can see your perfects in the analysis and, at least in showdown, i go 2-5 a lot more than i go 4-5 or 5-5, which you would have had to consistently been doing. PP grounders are definitely under .500 with how the game plays right now.
You are going off memory, which can be faulty. I'd encourage you to do something similar and jot down every time it happens. I did so in an excel spreadsheet. The way it "seems", isn't always reality.
No, I'm saying I don't believe your numbers. You're either fudging them to come to a pre-determined conclusion or just making them up entirely.
Unless there's massive DDA in this game (which is entirely possible) and it has ID'd you as a terrible player, nobody is getting close to these numbers.
Now, if you were to have gotten this data from publicly available videos on twitch, it would be a different story.
Why don’t you do it and see for yourself?
Because I'm not the one posting outlandish, unverifiable data as fact. And I don't care enough to.
This is the most 'Merica train of thought:
"You're wrong, despite documenting your evidence and I don't care enough to produce verifiable data to counter your verifiable data. But you're fudging the numbers. Oh also, I'm right and you're wrong. Did I mention I don't care?"
You can easily verify someone's claims of P/P by going through their box scores in their game history. Until you do that, just stop talking.
-
@LankyRyan said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@IIJACKINTHBOXII said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@eatyum said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
@Hoofartid said in So I tracked my perfect/perfects over the last two weeks.:
I'm not buying this at all. You can see your perfects in the analysis and, at least in showdown, i go 2-5 a lot more than i go 4-5 or 5-5, which you would have had to consistently been doing. PP grounders are definitely under .500 with how the game plays right now.
You are going off memory, which can be faulty. I'd encourage you to do something similar and jot down every time it happens. I did so in an excel spreadsheet. The way it "seems", isn't always reality.
No, I'm saying I don't believe your numbers. You're either fudging them to come to a pre-determined conclusion or just making them up entirely.
Unless there's massive DDA in this game (which is entirely possible) and it has ID'd you as a terrible player, nobody is getting close to these numbers.
Now, if you were to have gotten this data from publicly available videos on twitch, it would be a different story.
Why don’t you do it and see for yourself?
Because I'm not the one posting outlandish, unverifiable data as fact. And I don't care enough to.
This is the most 'Merica train of thought:
"You're wrong, despite documenting your evidence and I don't care enough to produce verifiable data to counter your verifiable data. But you're fudging the numbers. Oh also, I'm right and you're wrong. Did I mention I don't care?"
You can easily verify someone's claims of P/P by going through their box scores in their game history. Until you do that, just stop talking.
Thank you.
