99 ovr George Springer
-
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@imnotThatg00d_94 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
Who cares lol quit your whining.
Yeah, who cares that a proven cheater is being propped up on a pedestal when tons of other cards could’ve been used instead.
True. Why care?
Why prop up a cheater for no reason?
Why prop up Jose Ramirez for no reason?
I agree, they could’ve used a number of other cards instead of Jose Ramirez. But Jose Ramirez hasn’t been proven guilty of cheating in a World Series like Springer and the rest of the astros have been.
Keep supporting cheaters though.
You are mistaken. My stance has nothing to do with supporting George Springer, and everything to do with wondering why you would even care about a virtual card in a video game being on a team that cheated. I wouldn't freak out if Ugeth Urbina was in the game, nor would I complain if any of the banned 1919 White Sox players made it
It’s about having principles, and not wanting to see cheating scumbags get praised in any way.
Not sure why that’s so controversial to you.
-
Honestly I use him in showdown and he is a beast. I could care less because it’s a game and you use the best possible cards to give the best chance to win
-
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@imnotThatg00d_94 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
Who cares lol quit your whining.
Yeah, who cares that a proven cheater is being propped up on a pedestal when tons of other cards could’ve been used instead.
True. Why care?
Why prop up a cheater for no reason?
Why prop up Jose Ramirez for no reason?
I agree, they could’ve used a number of other cards instead of Jose Ramirez. But Jose Ramirez hasn’t been proven guilty of cheating in a World Series like Springer and the rest of the astros have been.
Keep supporting cheaters though.
You are mistaken. My stance has nothing to do with supporting George Springer, and everything to do with wondering why you would even care about a virtual card in a video game being on a team that cheated. I wouldn't freak out if Ugeth Urbina was in the game, nor would I complain if any of the banned 1919 White Sox players made it
It’s about having principles, and not wanting to see cheating scumbags get praised in any way.
Not sure why that’s so controversial to you.
Not controversial, puzzling. It's pointless to have fury over a 99 ovr card that played for a team that is mired in scandal (Nothing to mention of Springer's individual numbers). Especially when there's a man who is a notorious bigot getting the silent treatment. I guess because nobody was alive to experience it means it didn't happen
-
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@imnotThatg00d_94 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
Who cares lol quit your whining.
Yeah, who cares that a proven cheater is being propped up on a pedestal when tons of other cards could’ve been used instead.
True. Why care?
Why prop up a cheater for no reason?
Why prop up Jose Ramirez for no reason?
I agree, they could’ve used a number of other cards instead of Jose Ramirez. But Jose Ramirez hasn’t been proven guilty of cheating in a World Series like Springer and the rest of the astros have been.
Keep supporting cheaters though.
You are mistaken. My stance has nothing to do with supporting George Springer, and everything to do with wondering why you would even care about a virtual card in a video game being on a team that cheated. I wouldn't freak out if Ugeth Urbina was in the game, nor would I complain if any of the banned 1919 White Sox players made it
It’s about having principles, and not wanting to see cheating scumbags get praised in any way.
Not sure why that’s so controversial to you.
Not controversial, puzzling. It's pointless to have fury over a 99 ovr card that played for a team that is mired in scandal (Nothing to mention of Springer's individual numbers). Especially when there's a man who is a notorious bigot getting the silent treatment. I guess because nobody was alive to experience it means it didn't happen
So me taking 5 seconds to voice my dislike of it mean I’m having fury over it? The only reason we’re still on this is because you have sarcastic remarks against anybody that says anything about the issue.
And you’re talking about Cobb? Or somebody else?
-
I think it would have been hilarious if they made that card available, with the same card art and everything, but massively nerf his hitting stats and overall rating.
-
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@imnotThatg00d_94 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
Who cares lol quit your whining.
Yeah, who cares that a proven cheater is being propped up on a pedestal when tons of other cards could’ve been used instead.
True. Why care?
Why prop up a cheater for no reason?
Why prop up Jose Ramirez for no reason?
I agree, they could’ve used a number of other cards instead of Jose Ramirez. But Jose Ramirez hasn’t been proven guilty of cheating in a World Series like Springer and the rest of the astros have been.
Keep supporting cheaters though.
You are mistaken. My stance has nothing to do with supporting George Springer, and everything to do with wondering why you would even care about a virtual card in a video game being on a team that cheated. I wouldn't freak out if Ugeth Urbina was in the game, nor would I complain if any of the banned 1919 White Sox players made it
Your stance? You don’t really have a stance. You’re just arguing to argue.
-
@smalltownkid1990 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@imnotThatg00d_94 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
Who cares lol quit your whining.
Yeah, who cares that a proven cheater is being propped up on a pedestal when tons of other cards could’ve been used instead.
True. Why care?
Why prop up a cheater for no reason?
Why prop up Jose Ramirez for no reason?
I agree, they could’ve used a number of other cards instead of Jose Ramirez. But Jose Ramirez hasn’t been proven guilty of cheating in a World Series like Springer and the rest of the astros have been.
Keep supporting cheaters though.
You are mistaken. My stance has nothing to do with supporting George Springer, and everything to do with wondering why you would even care about a virtual card in a video game being on a team that cheated. I wouldn't freak out if Ugeth Urbina was in the game, nor would I complain if any of the banned 1919 White Sox players made it
Your stance? You don’t really have a stance. You’re just arguing to argue.
"You don't really have a stance"
I guess not caring about the card's existence doesn't count. -
@FranklinSabers16 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
What other card could they have chosen lmao. They can only pick cards that are created by sds, like the finest, POTM and in this case Postseason cards. The only other options they have are future stars, and all of those are underwhelming compared to springer
Dude, you literally just said it yourself. Between Finest, POTM, and Postseason cards alone there are well over 100 cards over the last three installments of the game. There were PLENTY of cards they could have chosen.
-
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@smalltownkid1990 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@imnotThatg00d_94 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
Who cares lol quit your whining.
Yeah, who cares that a proven cheater is being propped up on a pedestal when tons of other cards could’ve been used instead.
True. Why care?
Why prop up a cheater for no reason?
Why prop up Jose Ramirez for no reason?
I agree, they could’ve used a number of other cards instead of Jose Ramirez. But Jose Ramirez hasn’t been proven guilty of cheating in a World Series like Springer and the rest of the astros have been.
Keep supporting cheaters though.
You are mistaken. My stance has nothing to do with supporting George Springer, and everything to do with wondering why you would even care about a virtual card in a video game being on a team that cheated. I wouldn't freak out if Ugeth Urbina was in the game, nor would I complain if any of the banned 1919 White Sox players made it
Your stance? You don’t really have a stance. You’re just arguing to argue.
"You don't really have a stance"
I guess not caring about the card's existence doesn't count.Precisely
-
@smalltownkid1990 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@smalltownkid1990 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@imnotThatg00d_94 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
Who cares lol quit your whining.
Yeah, who cares that a proven cheater is being propped up on a pedestal when tons of other cards could’ve been used instead.
True. Why care?
Why prop up a cheater for no reason?
Why prop up Jose Ramirez for no reason?
I agree, they could’ve used a number of other cards instead of Jose Ramirez. But Jose Ramirez hasn’t been proven guilty of cheating in a World Series like Springer and the rest of the astros have been.
Keep supporting cheaters though.
You are mistaken. My stance has nothing to do with supporting George Springer, and everything to do with wondering why you would even care about a virtual card in a video game being on a team that cheated. I wouldn't freak out if Ugeth Urbina was in the game, nor would I complain if any of the banned 1919 White Sox players made it
Your stance? You don’t really have a stance. You’re just arguing to argue.
"You don't really have a stance"
I guess not caring about the card's existence doesn't count.Precisely
according to conditions you deem fair, what IS a stance? because your logic indicates that neutrality isn't(which is completely false)
-
@smalltownkid1990 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@FranklinSabers16 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
What other card could they have chosen lmao. They can only pick cards that are created by sds, like the finest, POTM and in this case Postseason cards. The only other options they have are future stars, and all of those are underwhelming compared to springer
Dude, you literally just said it yourself. Between Finest, POTM, and Postseason cards alone there are well over 100 cards over the last three installments of the game. There were PLENTY of cards they could have chosen.
I’m talking maxed out 99 overall cards. There was like now postseason cards over 90 besides springer finest and potm I get but they want variation in card type
-
@FranklinSabers16 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@smalltownkid1990 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@FranklinSabers16 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
What other card could they have chosen lmao. They can only pick cards that are created by sds, like the finest, POTM and in this case Postseason cards. The only other options they have are future stars, and all of those are underwhelming compared to springer
Dude, you literally just said it yourself. Between Finest, POTM, and Postseason cards alone there are well over 100 cards over the last three installments of the game. There were PLENTY of cards they could have chosen.
I’m talking maxed out 99 overall cards. There was like now postseason cards over 90 besides springer finest and potm I get but they want variation in card type
Yeah, I guess over the last 4 years of the game they only had three 99 ovr cards to choose from. You’re right...
-
I agree, it is a puzzling and disappointing move to release a card like that now.
The thing is, as this thread demonstrates, there are plenty of us in this community who have no problem using such a card, or a Vazquez card.
Some of us will go to any length to win online. I personally plunked Fotf Correa yesterday in a BR game and it felt good.
-
I honestly cant believe of ALL the issues this game has that THIS is one of them.
Worry about this garbage after the game gets fixed ffs.
-
@MaxHarvest said in 99 ovr George Springer:
People who pick and use that card will do it to [censored] people off, like Vazquez last year. Although vaz was admittingly more atrocious in every way. Still it’s a similar type of person that loves to get under other players skin and probably salvating over this card
I'm gonna pick it cause its a 99 overall with crazy hitting stats, good fielding and a good swing. Also because its a card in a video game and not real life.
-
That Springer card actually has guess pitch enabled.
-
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@ImDFC said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
@imnotThatg00d_94 said in 99 ovr George Springer:
Who cares lol quit your whining.
Yeah, who cares that a proven cheater is being propped up on a pedestal when tons of other cards could’ve been used instead.
True. Why care?
Why prop up a cheater for no reason?
Why prop up Jose Ramirez for no reason?
I agree, they could’ve used a number of other cards instead of Jose Ramirez. But Jose Ramirez hasn’t been proven guilty of cheating in a World Series like Springer and the rest of the astros have been.
Keep supporting cheaters though.
You are mistaken. My stance has nothing to do with supporting George Springer, and everything to do with wondering why you would even care about a virtual card in a video game being on a team that cheated. I wouldn't freak out if Ugeth Urbina was in the game, nor would I complain if any of the banned 1919 White Sox players made it
Can we get a Pete Rose card. We need a Shoeless Joe Card
-
By the time we unlock him there will be a multitude of 99 overall CF including Griffey and nobody will use him. So it's whatever really.
-
@ComebackLogic said in 99 ovr George Springer:
By the time we unlock him there will be a multitude of 99 overall CF including Griffey and nobody will use him. So it's whatever really.
It’s really just a puzzling pick by sds, accompanied by the worst the actual game play has been in the 3 years I’ve been playing. Out of all the cards they chose the one with the worst moral aesthetic, nice move guys
-
@halfbutt said in 99 ovr George Springer:
I agree, it is a puzzling and disappointing move to release a card like that now.
The thing is, as this thread demonstrates, there are plenty of us in this community who have no problem using such a card, or a Vazquez card.
Some of us will go to any length to win online. I personally plunked Fotf Correa yesterday in a BR game and it felt good.
Yeah, I won’t fault anyone for using Springer, just a really odd choice from SDS given the multitude of cards at their disposal.
