Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS)
-
@Dolenz_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
Maybe I will post this as a reminder to Red Sox fans that they are not being neglected.
This was just 11 days ago. Red Sox had the 5th most cards in the game. So you will understand why others lack sympathy to your cause. Things may have changed a little since then but I can probably still guarantee that the Red Sox are in the top 3rd of all teams.
Sure. I agree. Top third of all teams.
Is that the same as being the clearcut #1? By nerfing their captain that's what they're saying.
Plus since your data doesn't reflect the last 11 days, well that's exactly the timeframe I was talking about!
So your pretty graph is irrelevant to this conversation.
-
Red Sox have gotten plenty of love and have a very solid squad for people who do theme teams.
-
@dbub_PSN I'm NMS and have clemens. He's pretty easily obtainable if you just play the game. And the adding all the spotlight drops into one is not "the most recent" lmao
They don't have a moonshot card and you're mad. Get over it.
-
@trfatboy22_MLBTS said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@dbub_PSN I'm NMS and have clemens. He's pretty easily obtainable if you just play the game. And the adding all the spotlight drops into one is not "the most recent" lmao
They don't have a moonshot card and you're mad. Get over it.
I'm over it. More mad at these comments.
-
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
It's been a long time since March when the Red Sox had good cards. Check out these unbelievable statistics for arecent drops.
Moonshot - 0 for 41 Red Sox
Spotlight/Topps Now 0 for 86 Red SoxAnd on top of that you STILL have the Red Sox captain nerfed? Pathetic.
This is really wild. Even with the nerfed captain boost you had THE best theme team … for WEEKS … and still managed to create this post.
I am not into team-based theme teams, but you have to be fair when evaluating that maaayybeee (okay, this is a crazy take
) some other folks would like it to be their turn having valid team-based theme teamsEDIT: And yes, read the stats … Do the same for the early released cards and maybe check the stats @Dolenz_PSN posted
-
@YOSHI24_XBL said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
It's been a long time since March when the Red Sox had good cards. Check out these unbelievable statistics for arecent drops.
Moonshot - 0 for 41 Red Sox
Spotlight/Topps Now 0 for 86 Red SoxAnd on top of that you STILL have the Red Sox captain nerfed? Pathetic.
This is really wild. Even with the nerfed captain boost you had THE best theme team … for WEEKS … and still managed to create this post.
I am not into team-based theme teams, but you have to be fair when evaluating that maaayybeee (okay, this is a crazy take
) some other folks would like it to be their turn having valid team-based theme teamsEDIT: And yes, read the stats … Do the same for the early released cards and maybe check the stats @Dolenz_PSN posted
But I was only looking at recent drops. I acknowledge they had great cards, probably the best, back in March.
0 for 127 is pretty wild you have to admit.
-
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@Dolenz_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
Maybe I will post this as a reminder to Red Sox fans that they are not being neglected.
This was just 11 days ago. Red Sox had the 5th most cards in the game. So you will understand why others lack sympathy to your cause. Things may have changed a little since then but I can probably still guarantee that the Red Sox are in the top 3rd of all teams.
Sure. I agree. Top third of all teams.
Is that the same as being the clearcut #1? By nerfing their captain that's what they're saying.
Plus since your data doesn't reflect the last 11 days, well that's exactly the timeframe I was talking about!
So your pretty graph is irrelevant to this conversation.
I find this hilarious. Pretty nice commentary on how you get to choose counter arguments and dismiss facts because your feelings are hurt. Bahahahaha
Just watch the second Netflix documentary on the Red Sox. Spoiler alert…they don’t win the World Series in this one.
-
Welcome to the mlb forum. If someone disagrees with your opinion they will gaslight you into thinking you are wrong and the one with the problem while they are of course right and completely justified with flawless opinions of their own.
-
@brucey1005_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@Dolenz_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
Maybe I will post this as a reminder to Red Sox fans that they are not being neglected.
This was just 11 days ago. Red Sox had the 5th most cards in the game. So you will understand why others lack sympathy to your cause. Things may have changed a little since then but I can probably still guarantee that the Red Sox are in the top 3rd of all teams.
Sure. I agree. Top third of all teams.
Is that the same as being the clearcut #1? By nerfing their captain that's what they're saying.
Plus since your data doesn't reflect the last 11 days, well that's exactly the timeframe I was talking about!
So your pretty graph is irrelevant to this conversation.
I find this hilarious. Pretty nice commentary on how you get to choose counter arguments and dismiss facts because your feelings are hurt. Bahahahaha
Just watch the second Netflix documentary on the Red Sox. Spoiler alert…they don’t win the World Series in this one.
Are you a Yankee fan? If you are, spoiler alert, you would have to be about 20 years old to even remember their last championship.
And the first Netflix documentary was AMAZING. Haha.
-
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@YOSHI24_XBL said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
It's been a long time since March when the Red Sox had good cards. Check out these unbelievable statistics for arecent drops.
Moonshot - 0 for 41 Red Sox
Spotlight/Topps Now 0 for 86 Red SoxAnd on top of that you STILL have the Red Sox captain nerfed? Pathetic.
This is really wild. Even with the nerfed captain boost you had THE best theme team … for WEEKS … and still managed to create this post.
I am not into team-based theme teams, but you have to be fair when evaluating that maaayybeee (okay, this is a crazy take
) some other folks would like it to be their turn having valid team-based theme teamsEDIT: And yes, read the stats … Do the same for the early released cards and maybe check the stats @Dolenz_PSN posted
But I was only looking at recent drops. I acknowledge they had great cards, probably the best, back in March.
0 for 127 is pretty wild you have to admit.
1 for 127. They dropped the Gold Justin Turner from his Cornerstone path.
-
@x-814-x-MAFIA-x_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@YOSHI24_XBL said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
It's been a long time since March when the Red Sox had good cards. Check out these unbelievable statistics for arecent drops.
Moonshot - 0 for 41 Red Sox
Spotlight/Topps Now 0 for 86 Red SoxAnd on top of that you STILL have the Red Sox captain nerfed? Pathetic.
This is really wild. Even with the nerfed captain boost you had THE best theme team … for WEEKS … and still managed to create this post.
I am not into team-based theme teams, but you have to be fair when evaluating that maaayybeee (okay, this is a crazy take
) some other folks would like it to be their turn having valid team-based theme teamsEDIT: And yes, read the stats … Do the same for the early released cards and maybe check the stats @Dolenz_PSN posted
But I was only looking at recent drops. I acknowledge they had great cards, probably the best, back in March.
0 for 127 is pretty wild you have to admit.
1 for 127. They dropped the Gold Justin Turner from his Cornerstone path.
Ok...I guess. Lol. I wouldn't count the lesser versions in an evolution program.
-
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@x-814-x-MAFIA-x_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@YOSHI24_XBL said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
It's been a long time since March when the Red Sox had good cards. Check out these unbelievable statistics for arecent drops.
Moonshot - 0 for 41 Red Sox
Spotlight/Topps Now 0 for 86 Red SoxAnd on top of that you STILL have the Red Sox captain nerfed? Pathetic.
This is really wild. Even with the nerfed captain boost you had THE best theme team … for WEEKS … and still managed to create this post.
I am not into team-based theme teams, but you have to be fair when evaluating that maaayybeee (okay, this is a crazy take
) some other folks would like it to be their turn having valid team-based theme teamsEDIT: And yes, read the stats … Do the same for the early released cards and maybe check the stats @Dolenz_PSN posted
But I was only looking at recent drops. I acknowledge they had great cards, probably the best, back in March.
0 for 127 is pretty wild you have to admit.
1 for 127. They dropped the Gold Justin Turner from his Cornerstone path.
Ok...I guess. Lol. I wouldn't count the lesser versions in an evolution program.
Omg! They have zero Red Sox players added. Well except for the one I refuse to acknowledge.
-
Your statistic might be more revealing or useful if you had provided how many every other team had received in the same time period. Ignoring that you ignored the Justin Turner card, 0 for 127 is rather meaningless if other teams also got 0 or other teams only got 1 or 2.
You shouldn’t ignore the Justin Turner card though. You ignore it because the Red Sox can field an all diamond lineup without it. They actually have a couple diamonds left over for the bench. But a lot of other teams cannot even field an all gold or better line up. The Royals have a better record than the Red Sox this year and a better record than the Red Sox last year and their theme team requires 2 silvers and 1 bronze in the line up.
The real question to ask about theme teams is why hasn’t Babe Ruth’s boost been obliterated. The Yankees have so many diamonds that multiple don’t even make it onto the bench.
-
@dbub_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
0 for 127 is pretty wild you have to admit.
Yes, but 1000% justified (if you look at it from a neutral standpoint … which you cannot (I can read this thread) and it is understandable :). You are a fan of a team, that is good
-
@TripleH-4481_PSN said in Absolutely unreal (Red Sox/SDS):
Welcome to the mlb forum. If someone disagrees with your opinion they will gaslight you into thinking you are wrong and the one with the problem while they are of course right and completely justified with flawless opinions of their own.
One day I will get how you … as a person … function
… I know, this internet will never be like „there is only one truth“ … but this thread is close to one … and still there is a TripleH, that is always on the other side … #hillarious … -
You wanted current Data - I'll give you current data.
Number of Cards added since May 6th when I made the last chart.
- 4 teams were worse off than the Red Sox.
- 3 other teams are in the same boat with only a single card added.
- 6 of the the 7 teams with Equal or fewer (read none) additions have significantly fewer cards overall than the Red Sox.
- The Phillies only added card was a 64 moonshot pitcher (Justin Turner looks better now huh?)
- 7 different Teams did not get any Moonshot Cards.
- 3 Teams only got a 64 pitcher moonshot card in the Moonshot program.
- The Red Sox only dropped from 5th overall to 7th overall in total cards
- Only 4 teams have a 99 overall - Red Sox are one of them.
It's fine and normal to want more players for your favorite team. But be careful about acting like your team is ignored or persecuted unfairly above all others.
Overall the Red Sox have had it good but are in a bit of a drought but that will eventually change, while teams like the Royals and Diamondbacks, both of who have better records, perennially live at the bottom of the list.
