BR Should Be On HOF
-
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
-
I get tons of Ks on AS, what are you on?
I'd like to see your stats because I'm 28-4 in ranked seasons so far this year and my universal profile says I average 1.67 k/9 online.
I don’t think the universal profile stats are accurate. Look in the RS standings for your actual amount of K’s.
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
-
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
-
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
Even the best players in the world aren’t going to go 12-0 if they’re playing the best players in the world every game, BR is an open mode to all, to offer the best rewards in the game on all star is just illogical
-
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc.
-
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
To put it into a real life situation what you’re saying is Mike Trout should only have to face pitchers like Jacob Degrom and Max Scherzer every at bat because he’s the best and someone like say Randall Grichuk should only have to face someone like Chris Archer
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc.
That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it
-
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc.
That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it
You do have every chance to get the best rewards, you just need to be better to get them
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc.
That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it
You do have every chance to get the best rewards, you just need to be better to get them
I'm 50 yrs old my eyes and reflexes will only take me so far and that is all you top tier guys have to say get good it's funny but I'm sure your not out there with your hands raised to play the best because then you would look silly and then be told to go get good
-
For the record, I dont care if BR is on HoF or whatever. I dont play it for the rewards personally. But if you put it on HoF there needs to be another mode on all star that isnt RS.
Again, I dont care about rewards, I just want to play games against people on my skill bracket on a setting where I dont strike out 19 times a game.
-
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc.
That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it
You do have every chance to get the best rewards, you just need to be better to get them
I'm 50 yrs old my eyes and reflexes will only take me so far and that is all you top tier guys have to say get good it's funny but I'm sure your not out there with your hands raised to play the best because then you would look silly and then be told to go get good
I have played the best, I have beaten guys in the top 20 before, I’ve lost to guys in the top 20 before, the difference between you and I is if I match up with a top player in a BR game I know I have to be at my best to get it done, I’m not thinking “I shouldn’t have to play this player to get a great reward”
-
@maskedgrappler said in BR Should Be On HOF:
For the record, I dont care if BR is on HoF or whatever. I dont play it for the rewards personally. But if you put it on HoF there needs to be another mode on all star that isnt RS.
Again, I dont care about rewards, I just want to play games against people on my skill bracket on a setting where I dont strike out 19 times a game.
Events should be that mode, it’s a more casual mode with lesser rewards. The difficulty should be adjusted accordingly
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
To put it into a real life situation what you’re saying is Mike Trout should only have to face pitchers like Jacob Degrom and Max Scherzer every at bat because he’s the best and someone like say Randall Grichuk should only have to face someone like Chris Archer
again your trying to put RL aspect into a video GAME..It's not a competition for all of us.You maybe me no.I play all modes and do the best I can but should that limit me from being rewarded?Your saying yes because you really don't care because you have already been to the mountain top so instead of reaching down to lend a hand you cut the rope and let them fall so again tell me how you really feel.My money for a GAME should fund your rewards and good game play because your better than me right?
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc.
That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it
You do have every chance to get the best rewards, you just need to be better to get them
I'm 50 yrs old my eyes and reflexes will only take me so far and that is all you top tier guys have to say get good it's funny but I'm sure your not out there with your hands raised to play the best because then you would look silly and then be told to go get good
I have played the best, I have beaten guys in the top 20 before, I’ve lost to guys in the top 20 before, the difference between you and I is if I match up with a top player in a BR game I know I have to be at my best to get it done, I’m not thinking “I shouldn’t have to play this player to get a great reward”
well that's because your in the WS bracket of people who should be playing guys in that type of bracket.Do you just win WS and quit playing until the next inning?Just because I have the same rewards doesn't make me better than you my skill would have to come into play if we ever faced each other and you being the better player should win and most likely would 99% unless I got stupid lucky
-
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
To put it into a real life situation what you’re saying is Mike Trout should only have to face pitchers like Jacob Degrom and Max Scherzer every at bat because he’s the best and someone like say Randall Grichuk should only have to face someone like Chris Archer
again your trying to put RL aspect into a video GAME..It's not a competition for all of us.You maybe me no.I play all modes and do the best I can but should that limit me from being rewarded?Your saying yes because you really don't care because you have already been to the mountain top so instead of reaching down to lend a hand you cut the rope and let them fall so again tell me how you really feel.My money for a GAME should fund your rewards and good game play because your better than me right?
BR is supposed to be “competitive” though, they’ve stated as such on a stream 2 years ago when they called it there most competitive game mode. That’s why it offers the best rewards, you’re not limited in being rewarded, you have just as much of a chance as the next guy, if you want to be “lent a hand” go play events, but if BR is going to offer the best rewards then the difficulty should adjusted accordingly, what you’re saying is like “hey I’m at 890 right now playing to get into World Series this game should be in veteran to give me a better chance”
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@maskedgrappler said in BR Should Be On HOF:
For the record, I dont care if BR is on HoF or whatever. I dont play it for the rewards personally. But if you put it on HoF there needs to be another mode on all star that isnt RS.
Again, I dont care about rewards, I just want to play games against people on my skill bracket on a setting where I dont strike out 19 times a game.
Events should be that mode, it’s a more casual mode with lesser rewards. The difficulty should be adjusted accordingly
My thinking too, and I'd be fine with that.
-
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
To put it into a real life situation what you’re saying is Mike Trout should only have to face pitchers like Jacob Degrom and Max Scherzer every at bat because he’s the best and someone like say Randall Grichuk should only have to face someone like Chris Archer
again your trying to put RL aspect into a video GAME..It's not a competition for all of us.You maybe me no.I play all modes and do the best I can but should that limit me from being rewarded?Your saying yes because you really don't care because you have already been to the mountain top so instead of reaching down to lend a hand you cut the rope and let them fall so again tell me how you really feel.My money for a GAME should fund your rewards and good game play because your better than me right?
BR is supposed to be “competitive” though, they’ve stated as such on a stream 2 years ago when they called it there most competitive game mode. That’s why it offers the best rewards, you’re not limited in being rewarded, you have just as much of a chance as the next guy, if you want to be “lent a hand” go play events, but if BR is going to offer the best rewards then the difficulty should adjusted accordingly, what you’re saying is like “hey I’m at 890 right now playing to get into World Series this game should be in veteran to give me a better chance”
No of course not but playing a guy my skill set with and 890 score is more doable than say against you who happens to be very good at the game stats and statistics could even that out until dudes start sandbagging like they did COD..I've been playing since 2011 this is my 1st yr trying online RS and BR but it shouldn't pit me against the top players at anytime unless I'm that good we live in the age of technology not that hard to figure out those by the numbers..I mean the government tracks our every move and such why can't SDS track players statistics records and skill lvl I could be 890 batting 200 that doesn't mean I'm good
-
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
To put it into a real life situation what you’re saying is Mike Trout should only have to face pitchers like Jacob Degrom and Max Scherzer every at bat because he’s the best and someone like say Randall Grichuk should only have to face someone like Chris Archer
again your trying to put RL aspect into a video GAME..It's not a competition for all of us.You maybe me no.I play all modes and do the best I can but should that limit me from being rewarded?Your saying yes because you really don't care because you have already been to the mountain top so instead of reaching down to lend a hand you cut the rope and let them fall so again tell me how you really feel.My money for a GAME should fund your rewards and good game play because your better than me right?
BR is supposed to be “competitive” though, they’ve stated as such on a stream 2 years ago when they called it there most competitive game mode. That’s why it offers the best rewards, you’re not limited in being rewarded, you have just as much of a chance as the next guy, if you want to be “lent a hand” go play events, but if BR is going to offer the best rewards then the difficulty should adjusted accordingly, what you’re saying is like “hey I’m at 890 right now playing to get into World Series this game should be in veteran to give me a better chance”
No of course not but playing a guy my skill set with and 890 score is more doable than say against you who happens to be very good at the game stats and statistics could even that out until dudes start sandbagging like they did COD..I've been playing since 2011 this is my 1st yr trying online RS and BR but it shouldn't pit me against the top players at anytime unless I'm that good we live in the age of technology not that hard to figure out those by the numbers..I mean the government tracks our every move and such why can't SDS track players statistics records and skill lvl I could be 890 batting 200 that doesn't mean I'm good
Nah, the system that they have right now is good, ranked seasons you usually match up near your skill level, battle royale is open forum, anyone can play for the best rewards, which means you’re going to have to beat great players to get those rewards.
