Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
@NicholasHowardT5 said in Don't Act Shocked SDS Screwed 20 Up Already:
It’s not ruined. Holy [censored]. Y’all whine more than children
Well for the likes of those who can get all the great cards from the jump I guess a lot of people would be whiners in your eyes..This yrs game is really no different than last yrs..Sure some things are better but a lot of things overlooked or never fixed...I'm also tired of Mike Trout being the hardest card to obtain from a pack and always being the most expensive to obtain...It's all about the DD money card slot machines than anything else..Don't flatter yourself for sticking up with the only mode of baseball just like the Madden franchise no competition so they don't have to fix anything or give good rewards for your time and effort..We can't all be good at the game or afford to keep up with the money ball effect and youtubers..
@HeartMan818 said in anyone else just suck? lol:
I've been playing MLB the show for several years now. I've never made World Series and don't think I will again this year. My average has fallen to just above the mendoza line. I love the content, and love playing all the different modes. I watch all the top guys' videos on YouTube and try their techniques, but I still just SUCK!! lol I did manage to beat March to October and win the world series which was cool. Anyways, for those of you that suck like me what are your favorite game modes to play? Or, do you just keep plugging away online and hope to get better? Thanks all and cheers!
I've been playing MLB the show for several years now. I've never made World Series and don't think I will again this year. My average has fallen to just above the mendoza line. I love the content, and love playing all the different modes. I watch all the top guys' videos on YouTube and try their techniques, but I still just SUCK!! lol
I did manage to beat March to October and win the world series which was cool.
Anyways, for those of you that suck like me what are your favorite game modes to play? Or, do you just keep plugging away online and hope to get better?
Thanks all and cheers!
I play them all I suck to and will never reach WS or go 12-0 in BR but it's the chance of getting lucky and maybe 1 day doing it..At my age reflexes slowed eyesight diminished but as long as your having fun..To me it's a marathon not a race and I didn't have to buy my way to the top to brag I'm the best because even with all 99 cards I would still suck lol!!
Gonna hammer a topic on cheating but your not gonna hammer yourself for being unethical for cheesing a 2 1/2 minute pause whatever your reasons or intentions were..That's about as bush league as the cheater just play the game it's not life or death and don't be shrewd doing those pausing and R2 [censored] and the bunt dance..Sure we all want to win but losing is gonna happen just do it with grace and dignity..
@Jholla31 said in Pay to win is annoying:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Pay to win is annoying: This game is not pay to win You didn't read the post
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Pay to win is annoying:
This game is not pay to win
You didn't read the post
Ummm a lot of those 99 cards say different because u only get them by turning in team sets at 30 teams and most cost you in the 100k range or more to complete yeah I say buying cards has an advantage but yes I understand we get the stars cards the exp cards and the FOTF cards at cheap prices if we are skilled enough to beat the challenges but the man is right 7-24 but has m Mantle Biggio and Sheffield already 2 weeks in u spent freaking money and u can't tell me they didn't otherwise.
@xXChopChop21Xx said in Pay to win is annoying: @Jholla31 said in Pay to win is annoying: @DriveByTrucker17 said in Pay to win is annoying: This game is not pay to win You didn't read the post Ummm a lot of those 99 cards say different because u only get them by turning in team sets at 30 teams and most cost you in the 100k range or more to complete yeah I say buying cards has an advantage but yes I understand we get the stars cards the exp cards and the FOTF cards at cheap prices if we are skilled enough to beat the challenges but the man is right 7-24 but has mantle Biggio and Sheffield already 2 weeks end u spent freaking money and u can't tell me they didn't otherwise.. Punctuation exists for a reason
@xXChopChop21Xx said in Pay to win is annoying:
@Jholla31 said in Pay to win is annoying: @DriveByTrucker17 said in Pay to win is annoying: This game is not pay to win You didn't read the post Ummm a lot of those 99 cards say different because u only get them by turning in team sets at 30 teams and most cost you in the 100k range or more to complete yeah I say buying cards has an advantage but yes I understand we get the stars cards the exp cards and the FOTF cards at cheap prices if we are skilled enough to beat the challenges but the man is right 7-24 but has mantle Biggio and Sheffield already 2 weeks end u spent freaking money and u can't tell me they didn't otherwise..
Ummm a lot of those 99 cards say different because u only get them by turning in team sets at 30 teams and most cost you in the 100k range or more to complete yeah I say buying cards has an advantage but yes I understand we get the stars cards the exp cards and the FOTF cards at cheap prices if we are skilled enough to beat the challenges but the man is right 7-24 but has mantle Biggio and Sheffield already 2 weeks end u spent freaking money and u can't tell me they didn't otherwise..
Punctuation exists for a reason
Thank you grammar police
I try to pick a team that needs help at the position I'm making I grab 3 and pick a team blindly and go to that team..It's still random and those teams are usually not the best ones but to each his own as long as your having fun
@mrwonderful95 said in SDS you need to fix collection rewards:
I also don’t understand the decision not to allow us to sell the duplicate rewards from TA. That’s straight up weird
It's simple they don't want to give you stubs back for the extra cards that u may use to buy other cards u need or want so you would have to grind the game for..In a nutshell they want you buying stubs..This Corona Virus thing didn't help and now their scrambling because of no roster updates or inside edge they have to have a plan b as far as rewards and cards due to no statistics from MLB as of now..But the #1 issue on the buy backs and quicksell is the money plain and simple
@ejwik13 said in Draft:
I think it sucks that no matter how well I do in the showcase I’m drafted in the 15th round irregardless. Like when I’m playing a mode like road to the show I want to have the option of being that prodigy number one overall pick. I think it would make the game a lot more enjoyable
That's really a personal preference.I'd rather be the diamond in the rough and prove the doubters wrong.I do get that we play better than most of the players chosen way ahead of us but our stats say we suck so it's a no win situation..I like the idea of being #1 pick or a top 50 prospect pick but they really have dropped the ball on the draft in RTTS the last few yrs and never changed it..DD is their baby so I don't think they really care..
I don't even play the showcase games..They're a wast of time..I just enter the game sim/quit out and go straight to the draft..You get no attributes towards your player nor rewarded with a high draft stock...At least in NBA2K it matters about how well you do to improve your draft stock..
@BigCedDibiase said in How are you supposed to hit 1000 stars?:
I just hit 400. I’m opening my pack after I finish the last 2 games on conquest. And I haven’t finished my 10 ranked games or Granderson HRs it’s possible. I gained a lot of points doing the 1st inning showdown
Did you just keep doing the 1st inning showdown over and over?? or do you only get those stars once??
@UrbaneArcher107 said in Quicksell Golds:
Think these will ever bounce back in price?? Seems way too early for them to be at QS for the rest of the year ik partially due to no season but still..
all I want is other players who low ball bid less than 1111 stubs on those golds.the game offers me a 1000 if I QS so if u want a gold I always make my sell bid 1111 so that 10% hit I take for selling it gives me my 1000 the game offers.Sure I get the fact you want it as cheap as possible but I want exactly what the game offers to since it doesn't always reward u.
anybody else get their drops?I did not as to why I'm asking is all.
@nymets1987 said in Showdown is definitely off.:
@smalltownkid1990 said in Showdown is definitely off.: I’ve beat like 40 showdowns. Sure they are a challenge, but haven’t been off for me. Each time you beat then how many team affinity points do you get? I am at 20 with Yankees so thinking of doing to get Torres.
@smalltownkid1990 said in Showdown is definitely off.:
I’ve beat like 40 showdowns. Sure they are a challenge, but haven’t been off for me.
Each time you beat then how many team affinity points do you get? I am at 20 with Yankees so thinking of doing to get Torres.
u need 50 so 5 vouchers =4 points that's a total of 20 so do it twice
@VEGAS__T said in Ignorant Bosses/Innings Questions:
And the only way to get the other bosses you didn’t pick is from the market. You can’t earn a second boss pack yet. Maybe they’ll add that later at like 1000 stars but for now you get one boss pack and have to buy the other two with stubs.
Hence u said buy?! Yes of course u want those 75 stars towards the next inning boss to be easy you must PAY!! Pay is the key word.SDS knows what it's doing and you must pay anywhere from 80 to 150k stubs for those other 2 or more just another money hungry attempt to squeeze extra dollars or your hard earned stubs by playing a mediocre game u try to be patient with but yet get penalized more than your rewarded..Not a jab at your comment btw just how it's done to obtain the other 2 bosses.
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense. I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players? I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it.. To put it into a real life situation what you’re saying is Mike Trout should only have to face pitchers like Jacob Degrom and Max Scherzer every at bat because he’s the best and someone like say Randall Grichuk should only have to face someone like Chris Archer again your trying to put RL aspect into a video GAME..It's not a competition for all of us.You maybe me no.I play all modes and do the best I can but should that limit me from being rewarded?Your saying yes because you really don't care because you have already been to the mountain top so instead of reaching down to lend a hand you cut the rope and let them fall so again tell me how you really feel.My money for a GAME should fund your rewards and good game play because your better than me right? BR is supposed to be “competitive” though, they’ve stated as such on a stream 2 years ago when they called it there most competitive game mode. That’s why it offers the best rewards, you’re not limited in being rewarded, you have just as much of a chance as the next guy, if you want to be “lent a hand” go play events, but if BR is going to offer the best rewards then the difficulty should adjusted accordingly, what you’re saying is like “hey I’m at 890 right now playing to get into World Series this game should be in veteran to give me a better chance”
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense. I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players? I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it.. To put it into a real life situation what you’re saying is Mike Trout should only have to face pitchers like Jacob Degrom and Max Scherzer every at bat because he’s the best and someone like say Randall Grichuk should only have to face someone like Chris Archer again your trying to put RL aspect into a video GAME..It's not a competition for all of us.You maybe me no.I play all modes and do the best I can but should that limit me from being rewarded?Your saying yes because you really don't care because you have already been to the mountain top so instead of reaching down to lend a hand you cut the rope and let them fall so again tell me how you really feel.My money for a GAME should fund your rewards and good game play because your better than me right?
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense. I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players? I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it.. To put it into a real life situation what you’re saying is Mike Trout should only have to face pitchers like Jacob Degrom and Max Scherzer every at bat because he’s the best and someone like say Randall Grichuk should only have to face someone like Chris Archer
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense. I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players? I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense. I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense. I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:
I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...
What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.
Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.
why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$
In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.
I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business
But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?
I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..
To put it into a real life situation what you’re saying is Mike Trout should only have to face pitchers like Jacob Degrom and Max Scherzer every at bat because he’s the best and someone like say Randall Grichuk should only have to face someone like Chris Archer
again your trying to put RL aspect into a video GAME..It's not a competition for all of us.You maybe me no.I play all modes and do the best I can but should that limit me from being rewarded?Your saying yes because you really don't care because you have already been to the mountain top so instead of reaching down to lend a hand you cut the rope and let them fall so again tell me how you really feel.My money for a GAME should fund your rewards and good game play because your better than me right?
BR is supposed to be “competitive” though, they’ve stated as such on a stream 2 years ago when they called it there most competitive game mode. That’s why it offers the best rewards, you’re not limited in being rewarded, you have just as much of a chance as the next guy, if you want to be “lent a hand” go play events, but if BR is going to offer the best rewards then the difficulty should adjusted accordingly, what you’re saying is like “hey I’m at 890 right now playing to get into World Series this game should be in veteran to give me a better chance”
No of course not but playing a guy my skill set with and 890 score is more doable than say against you who happens to be very good at the game stats and statistics could even that out until dudes start sandbagging like they did COD..I've been playing since 2011 this is my 1st yr trying online RS and BR but it shouldn't pit me against the top players at anytime unless I'm that good we live in the age of technology not that hard to figure out those by the numbers..I mean the government tracks our every move and such why can't SDS track players statistics records and skill lvl I could be 890 batting 200 that doesn't mean I'm good
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense. I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players? I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it.. The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc. That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it You do have every chance to get the best rewards, you just need to be better to get them I'm 50 yrs old my eyes and reflexes will only take me so far and that is all you top tier guys have to say get good it's funny but I'm sure your not out there with your hands raised to play the best because then you would look silly and then be told to go get good I have played the best, I have beaten guys in the top 20 before, I’ve lost to guys in the top 20 before, the difference between you and I is if I match up with a top player in a BR game I know I have to be at my best to get it done, I’m not thinking “I shouldn’t have to play this player to get a great reward”
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense. I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players? I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it.. The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc. That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it You do have every chance to get the best rewards, you just need to be better to get them I'm 50 yrs old my eyes and reflexes will only take me so far and that is all you top tier guys have to say get good it's funny but I'm sure your not out there with your hands raised to play the best because then you would look silly and then be told to go get good
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense. I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players? I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it.. The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc. That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it You do have every chance to get the best rewards, you just need to be better to get them
@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense. I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players? I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it.. The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc. That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it
@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF: @skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF: @Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF: @ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF: I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller... What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance. Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win. why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$ In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense. I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players? I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it.. The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc.
The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc.
That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it
You do have every chance to get the best rewards, you just need to be better to get them
I'm 50 yrs old my eyes and reflexes will only take me so far and that is all you top tier guys have to say get good it's funny but I'm sure your not out there with your hands raised to play the best because then you would look silly and then be told to go get good
I have played the best, I have beaten guys in the top 20 before, I’ve lost to guys in the top 20 before, the difference between you and I is if I match up with a top player in a BR game I know I have to be at my best to get it done, I’m not thinking “I shouldn’t have to play this player to get a great reward”
well that's because your in the WS bracket of people who should be playing guys in that type of bracket.Do you just win WS and quit playing until the next inning?Just because I have the same rewards doesn't make me better than you my skill would have to come into play if we ever faced each other and you being the better player should win and most likely would 99% unless I got stupid lucky