Community Forum

@UrbaneArcher107 said in Quicksell Golds:

Think these will ever bounce back in price?? Seems way too early for them to be at QS for the rest of the year ik partially due to no season but still..

all I want is other players who low ball bid less than 1111 stubs on those golds.the game offers me a 1000 if I QS so if u want a gold I always make my sell bid 1111 so that 10% hit I take for selling it gives me my 1000 the game offers.Sure I get the fact you want it as cheap as possible but I want exactly what the game offers to since it doesn't always reward u.

anybody else get their drops?I did not as to why I'm asking is all.

@nymets1987 said in Showdown is definitely off.:

@smalltownkid1990 said in Showdown is definitely off.:

I’ve beat like 40 showdowns. Sure they are a challenge, but haven’t been off for me.

Each time you beat then how many team affinity points do you get? I am at 20 with Yankees so thinking of doing to get Torres.

u need 50 so 5 vouchers =4 points that's a total of 20 so do it twice

@VEGAS__T said in Ignorant Bosses/Innings Questions:

And the only way to get the other bosses you didn’t pick is from the market. You can’t earn a second boss pack yet. Maybe they’ll add that later at like 1000 stars but for now you get one boss pack and have to buy the other two with stubs.

Hence u said buy?! Yes of course u want those 75 stars towards the next inning boss to be easy you must PAY!! Pay is the key word.SDS knows what it's doing and you must pay anywhere from 80 to 150k stubs for those other 2 or more just another money hungry attempt to squeeze extra dollars or your hard earned stubs by playing a mediocre game u try to be patient with but yet get penalized more than your rewarded..Not a jab at your comment btw just how it's done to obtain the other 2 bosses.

1. I had 8 good/squared up hits with velos of 100+ all we're for outs
2. I had 2 that were perfect/perfect velos of over 100 1 was a liner the other a perfect grounder both were outs.
3. 1 good/ok that went out for a HR and 1 early/okay went out for a HR
4. The LF has 60 fielding and 62 reaction but made ESPN top 10 on the perfect liner and the SS made ESPN on a perfect grounder ranging to his left on a guy with 64 speed dove got the ball threw from deep in the hole on the grass and gunned down said runner with 49 arm strength from his knees Semien I believe was the SS.
5. How on God's green earth does this formula work?You guys say it's real baseball at times yes with certain players absolutely no complaints but when you need that 1 run with 3 outs to go and these things snowball on you in that amount of time there is no possible way it happens like that none.
6. You that do this easy and are good at the game can defend it all you want it's horse [censored] you know it and SDS knows it and no one can tell me different it's gimme your stubs and money but this [censored] is set up.
7. I'm not great I wouldn't even consider myself good but on veteran lvl with a decent line-up against Liem Hendricks who throws 97 and I'm patient I shouldn't be failing where is the reward for the good/goods and the perfect/perfects?? You reward for bad swings and timing and penalize for perfect half [censored] backwards if u ask me..

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:

I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...

What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.

Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.

why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$

In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.

I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business

But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?

I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..

To put it into a real life situation what you’re saying is Mike Trout should only have to face pitchers like Jacob Degrom and Max Scherzer every at bat because he’s the best and someone like say Randall Grichuk should only have to face someone like Chris Archer

again your trying to put RL aspect into a video GAME..It's not a competition for all of us.You maybe me no.I play all modes and do the best I can but should that limit me from being rewarded?Your saying yes because you really don't care because you have already been to the mountain top so instead of reaching down to lend a hand you cut the rope and let them fall so again tell me how you really feel.My money for a GAME should fund your rewards and good game play because your better than me right?

BR is supposed to be “competitive” though, they’ve stated as such on a stream 2 years ago when they called it there most competitive game mode. That’s why it offers the best rewards, you’re not limited in being rewarded, you have just as much of a chance as the next guy, if you want to be “lent a hand” go play events, but if BR is going to offer the best rewards then the difficulty should adjusted accordingly, what you’re saying is like “hey I’m at 890 right now playing to get into World Series this game should be in veteran to give me a better chance”

No of course not but playing a guy my skill set with and 890 score is more doable than say against you who happens to be very good at the game stats and statistics could even that out until dudes start sandbagging like they did COD..I've been playing since 2011 this is my 1st yr trying online RS and BR but it shouldn't pit me against the top players at anytime unless I'm that good we live in the age of technology not that hard to figure out those by the numbers..I mean the government tracks our every move and such why can't SDS track players statistics records and skill lvl I could be 890 batting 200 that doesn't mean I'm good

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:

I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...

What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.

Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.

why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$

In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.

I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business

But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?

I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..

The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc.

That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it

You do have every chance to get the best rewards, you just need to be better to get them

I'm 50 yrs old my eyes and reflexes will only take me so far and that is all you top tier guys have to say get good it's funny but I'm sure your not out there with your hands raised to play the best because then you would look silly and then be told to go get good

I have played the best, I have beaten guys in the top 20 before, I’ve lost to guys in the top 20 before, the difference between you and I is if I match up with a top player in a BR game I know I have to be at my best to get it done, I’m not thinking “I shouldn’t have to play this player to get a great reward”

well that's because your in the WS bracket of people who should be playing guys in that type of bracket.Do you just win WS and quit playing until the next inning?Just because I have the same rewards doesn't make me better than you my skill would have to come into play if we ever faced each other and you being the better player should win and most likely would 99% unless I got stupid lucky

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:

I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...

What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.

Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.

why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$

In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.

I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business

But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?

I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..

To put it into a real life situation what you’re saying is Mike Trout should only have to face pitchers like Jacob Degrom and Max Scherzer every at bat because he’s the best and someone like say Randall Grichuk should only have to face someone like Chris Archer

again your trying to put RL aspect into a video GAME..It's not a competition for all of us.You maybe me no.I play all modes and do the best I can but should that limit me from being rewarded?Your saying yes because you really don't care because you have already been to the mountain top so instead of reaching down to lend a hand you cut the rope and let them fall so again tell me how you really feel.My money for a GAME should fund your rewards and good game play because your better than me right?

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:

I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...

What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.

Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.

why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$

In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.

I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business

But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?

I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..

The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc.

That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it

You do have every chance to get the best rewards, you just need to be better to get them

I'm 50 yrs old my eyes and reflexes will only take me so far and that is all you top tier guys have to say get good it's funny but I'm sure your not out there with your hands raised to play the best because then you would look silly and then be told to go get good

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:

I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...

What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.

Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.

why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$

In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.

I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business

But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?

I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..

The best at things usually get the most reward, that’s just life, the best players get the best contracts, the best actors/actresses get the most movies etc.

That is real life but this is still a video game that people enjoy to play.Why should I spend money to just obtain silver and golds and not have the same chance as the rest.Maybe make a competitive bracket and I casual bracket.It's not that hard.I shouldn't have to play the likes of KyleNextDoor,Pitching Rebel or even close to those guys because they are straight up monsters and way better but that doesn't mean I shouldn't have the chance to play guys my level and get those same rewards this isn't real life as much as u guys want it in the game and then boom after the 1st week all heck breaks loose on forums and whiners everywhere.I don't see people jumping up to play the top guys to ruin their records or stats we all lose it's just how we take it

@eatyum said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@eatyum said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@eatyum said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@CanucksNoCups said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@eatyum said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@CanucksNoCups said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

Its realistic for a super speedy guy to take an extra step leadoff it's what they do. It's not realistic to throw to that base 30 times.

It's pretty realistic for pitchers to keep speedy guys close. Because in real life if pitchers throw over a couple times, the runner doesn't just take the same lead everytime, He'll stay a little closer to the bag if he knows the pitcher is watching.

Yes but if that speedy guy can take 1 extra step and still avoid being thrown out at 1st then its something the pitcher has to deal with and perhaps do a pitch out or a quick pitch. Not throw 20 more times.

Except that doesn't happen in real life, it's a fact that a runner will stay closer to the bag if he knows the pitcher is watching. He doesn't take the same lead every single time,

You wanted to bring the real life argument into this, well that's real life, they don't take the same lead every single solitary time if a pitcher throws over.

I get that point and well taken but the game doesn't allow u to inch closer to the bag.There are 2 options only stay put or take the bigger lead no in between so again it's not realistic regardless

I get that, still doesn't mean the answer is to take the same lead 40 times

also true but etiquette of games is a lost art these days but also throwing over 30 times because your worried about 1 base runner is crazy also.Yes that 1 run can mean the difference between winning and losing I get it all and the points from both sides it all comes down to the individual player period and these days we can throw sportsmanship out the window..

I'm not saying throwing over a million times is good sportsmanship, neither side shows good sportsmanship, that's not the argument.
Doesn't mean I'm gonna let anyone take a lead with their 99 speed Cobb.

I get why you done it and honestly I agree u thought he was gonna steal and he probably would have with 99 speed no doubt.You did nothing wrong nor did he the argument here is invalid because it comes down to the players.There is no winner and loser here just a time consuming play from both players in a game both we're trying to win..

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:

I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...

What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.

Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.

why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$

In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.

I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business

But, and this is not meant as a slight it is just a legit question, if you can’t beat really good players why should you be eligible to get the same rewards against lesser players?

I get that but than why should my $100 copy help fund your DD because your better than me and will get all the good cards playing a game we both bought exactly the same just maybe a different version in price.Just match the WS players against WS players and the lower tiers vs those in that same tier and if I hold or do better than expected move me up or drop me down depending on how I do.It's like that now somewhat so might as well go all the way with it..

@eatyum said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@eatyum said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@CanucksNoCups said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@eatyum said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@CanucksNoCups said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

Its realistic for a super speedy guy to take an extra step leadoff it's what they do. It's not realistic to throw to that base 30 times.

It's pretty realistic for pitchers to keep speedy guys close. Because in real life if pitchers throw over a couple times, the runner doesn't just take the same lead everytime, He'll stay a little closer to the bag if he knows the pitcher is watching.

Yes but if that speedy guy can take 1 extra step and still avoid being thrown out at 1st then its something the pitcher has to deal with and perhaps do a pitch out or a quick pitch. Not throw 20 more times.

Except that doesn't happen in real life, it's a fact that a runner will stay closer to the bag if he knows the pitcher is watching. He doesn't take the same lead every single time,

You wanted to bring the real life argument into this, well that's real life, they don't take the same lead every single solitary time if a pitcher throws over.

I get that point and well taken but the game doesn't allow u to inch closer to the bag.There are 2 options only stay put or take the bigger lead no in between so again it's not realistic regardless

I get that, still doesn't mean the answer is to take the same lead 40 times

also true but etiquette of games is a lost art these days but also throwing over 30 times because your worried about 1 base runner is crazy also.Yes that 1 run can mean the difference between winning and losing I get it all and the points from both sides it all comes down to the individual player period and these days we can throw sportsmanship out the window..

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@xXChopChop21Xx said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:

I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...

What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.

Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.

why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$

In a game mode where they give out the best rewards, the gameplay should play accordingly aka hall of fame or legend, why should a lesser mode like events which gives out worse rewards play on a harder difficulty than the mode that currently gives out the best rewards? Logically that doesn't make any sense.

I get that but to be real honest then they need to do skill base match making then go by records or stats or by who makes WS and stays at a certain point of 700,800 and so forth and match those people up so it gives the lesser a chance period with guys on their level. I'm not ever gonna make WS or do a 12-0 BR run playing against the likes of the top players ever but if I get match on Legend or HOF with guys my speed or playing lvl at least I have a chance and if I lose it was on me not because I got mashed by a top 5 player which I did the other night by McGuigan but I understand the top guys deserve the best rewards but win it against guys on your level not at my expense I paid for the game just as you did and as I said without the trash players buying this game you wouldn't be playing this anyway because 1 your going against the best and getting stomped or not enough sales to keep SDS is business

@skepple15 said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@Vipersneak said in BR Should Be On HOF:

@ImDFC said in BR Should Be On HOF:

I'm not saying you're wrong. I just can't play HoF online. the PCI is too small for me to use with an analog stick. Kudos to you fellas who can, but I making precise movements is just not something these thumbs were built for. Now if I had some sort of twin stick controller...

What they mean is that they would be able to win easier in BR if it were on HoF. It makes it harder for people with less reaction time. That is all they care about. Same discussion every year and these guys have to same old argument. I personally do not care either way, but them saying the game plays better on HoF just means it plays better for them on HoF. They are not looking out for the community like they want you to believe. They just cant say, "Make BR HoF so that I can win more often." Does not sound as nice. They HATE the fact that they can lose on All Star and that it gives other people with slower reflexes a chance.

Despite your hate for the premise, a smaller pci makes for less inconsistency in results, hence the “game plays better on hall of fame” comments, if BR is going to give out to give out the best rewards then yes worse players should have less of a chance to win.

why? Because you say so or it should just be so.?I believe even the lesser players buy the more expensive versions of the game than just standard so they should not get a chance at any of the good rewards or just settle for buying packs and try and get those diamonds.You can't have your cake and eat it to so to speak.This wouldn't be a video game if it was that way because they would sell less copies that way because you want it to be a competition just for the good players.I'm not saying the better player shouldn't win at all but it just can't be that way or SDS loses money and we know they're not gonna do that..BTW who always wants to win and beat their chest all the time and say I'm the best losing only makes u a more gracious winner or an absolute A$$

@eatyum said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@CanucksNoCups said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@eatyum said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

@CanucksNoCups said in Stealing online vs anyone remotely good is impossible.:

Its realistic for a super speedy guy to take an extra step leadoff it's what they do. It's not realistic to throw to that base 30 times.

It's pretty realistic for pitchers to keep speedy guys close. Because in real life if pitchers throw over a couple times, the runner doesn't just take the same lead everytime, He'll stay a little closer to the bag if he knows the pitcher is watching.

Yes but if that speedy guy can take 1 extra step and still avoid being thrown out at 1st then its something the pitcher has to deal with and perhaps do a pitch out or a quick pitch. Not throw 20 more times.

Except that doesn't happen in real life, it's a fact that a runner will stay closer to the bag if he knows the pitcher is watching. He doesn't take the same lead every single time,

You wanted to bring the real life argument into this, well that's real life, they don't take the same lead every single solitary time if a pitcher throws over.

I get that point and well taken but the game doesn't allow u to inch closer to the bag.There are 2 options only stay put or take the bigger lead no in between so again it's not realistic regardless

or have them run to 3rd for no reason and get thrown our trying when the cutoff man had the ball already

DeGrom and a common final 2 I guess u can figure out which 1 I got.Post game diamonds are harder to get than actually buying a girl an expensive diamond ring lol

Or when you have them go to 2nd on a clear double but they somehow want 3rd and they have 43 speed and I quit hitting the button after halfway to 2nd.got to love these players with smart AI brains lol

1.It seems to me as a below avg player I have more time to see all of what happens during a game or a segment that a great player wouldn't.
This is for the little guys not the big boppers and top players u wouldn't notice because u don't struggle enough at the game to even see it so stand in the back and be quiet for a minute.
2.Check swings are broken
You check a ball outside the zone I find more often than not it's a strike anyway cause you guy can't hold the swing supposedly.
When it's in the zone and going to be a strike same said guy decides I can check it and hold it for a strike anyway as I said broken.

3.It always seems to me the PCI can't move fast enough the ball is just inside the top of the PCI or the bottom part of the PCI thus dealing with a lot of roll overs liners for outs pop ups for outs but my swing indicator (so-called as it is) says good/good,good/okay but all for nothing.

4.Perfect liners perfect ground ball perfect pop up all have been outs for about 85% for me I don't know about anyone else but I have lost games due to late good early ok on HR's so the swing indicator is broken also I think.

5.The fielding attributes were suppose to matter how exactly?
I can't have 54 fielding and be on ESPN top 10 for making Mike Trout plays in the outfield and gosh forbid with a 53 arm throw from the corner on a rope to gun down a 58 speed guy going for 2nd.Show me the logical real baseball stats on that % I want to see it for myself.Not every player has a cannon as the game would have you believe.

Crappy bronze pitchers dotting is horrible yet my gold to diamond pitcher on perfect/good perfect/perfect serves up a bowl of Capt.Crush it.

I try not to complain or quit when getting pounded but these things need to be fix addressed or a simple FU we're not gonna change it so play it and shut up or quit..The ones who are good always tell the little guy to quit crying get good practice.Sure when u don't struggle it's easy to say but also remember it's not the best players that keep this game moving it's the guys who can't afford or win every top card in the game.The blue collar people and there are many like this country there are more crappy players who buy the game than the top say 500 players out of over 1 million people who buy it.
5.I don't mid losing just give me a fair chance to play the game and if I lose due to skill fine but when it's set up for certain situations to fail that's where I have a problem and Showdown is a perfect example of that.

Sorry for the rant but I love the game but no one said I had to like everything about how it plays..