Wander Franco..dud?
-
@whitejw98_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
He better start hitting soon. I've had him stashed on my fantasy team for months so I'll be highly upset if he isn't worth the wait lol.
I drafted him. Released him in May, then picked up Brujon thinking he would be the one brought up first. Then Brujon went into a tailspin and I dropped him and stashed Jarren Duran. Stashing is always a leap of faith.
I think Franco will have a lot of success. I would have hung onto him if I really believed TB would bring him up this year. They just didn't act like they were gonna do that and I needed some roster space. Prob big mistake on my part.
-
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
This got me thinking. Why does this game put out all these cards for "prospects" so grossly over inflated? I mean, I get the marketing angle. But if anyone were to follow along and note up the top-rung these prospects hit it's never even close to the loosely strewn Gold/diamonds you see before they throw the first MLB pitch or swing a bat. Some of them will be life long minor leaguers. Yet they're getting shutouts in RS against some of the greatest major leaguers to ever play the game.
I would guess not one of this year's prospects ever live up to the card they've gotten. Throwing a 110 mph fastball or hitting 40 HR in Minor leagues just means you got potential. But, one old coach always said "you know what potential means..you ain't ever done it".
Totally agree. Imagine a game giving you Babe Ruth and Franco on the same team, so not relaistic.
If you want realistic, go to OOTP.
-
I just want a FS Michael Jordan, Russel Wilson, Bo Jackson, Kyler Murray, etc…. More the merrier
-
@kovz88_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
You would make a very poor GM if you made decisions on young players this quickly. Also as far as the cards go its fun to be able to play with the young guys you hear about all the time in the minors for your team. The cards are if the player reaches their absolute maximum potential which we can agree most won't but the cards need to be usable.
Wander Franco I get. He's a household name. MLB.com enshrined him in their front page the day he came up. I just don't get the Diamond card. He's an unproven player that should get a silver card at best and earn the rest depending on how he plays.
I'll never understand why, in this game, they go so crazy with Prospects. Some ppl probably love it, I personally would rather have cards based on real life players. Even if you have to release cards from a career year to make it relevant. At least it's based on some shred of truth.
Many complain about the abundance of diamonds in the game. Way over saturated to the point it just negates the entire experience of earning or packing a diamond. It's just ho-hum I've got another diamond in this pack.
So ,as opposed to maybe reducing the Diamonds, they open up this new channel..Future Stars..so they can inundate the Diamond market that much more.
And many of these other players, maybe you've heard of them but I haven't. Groshens, Priester, Crochet I've never ever heard of. Most of the so called "Future Stars" I haven't heard of. And, I may never hear of them except in this game this year.
Again, if you like it have fun with it. I personally think it's hokey (best word I can come up with).
-
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@kovz88_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
You would make a very poor GM if you made decisions on young players this quickly. Also as far as the cards go its fun to be able to play with the young guys you hear about all the time in the minors for your team. The cards are if the player reaches their absolute maximum potential which we can agree most won't but the cards need to be usable.
Wander Franco I get. He's a household name. MLB.com enshrined him in their front page the day he came up. I just don't get the Diamond card. He's an unproven player that should get a silver card at best and earn the rest depending on how he plays.
I'll never understand why, in this game, they go so crazy with Prospects. Some ppl probably love it, I personally would rather have cards based on real life players. Even if you have to release cards from a career year to make it relevant. At least it's based on some shred of truth.
Many complain about the abundance of diamonds in the game. Way over saturated to the point it just negates the entire experience of earning or packing a diamond. It's just ho-hum I've got another diamond in this pack.
So ,as opposed to maybe reducing the Diamonds, they open up this new channel..Future Stars..so they can inundate the Diamond market that much more.
And many of these other players, maybe you've heard of them but I haven't. Groshens, Priester, Crochet I've never ever heard of. Most of the so called "Future Stars" I haven't heard of. And, I may never hear of them except in this game this year.
Again, if you like it have fun with it. I personally think it's hokey (best word I can come up with).
Crochet has been in the majors since last year and created quite the buzz with his fastball when called up in 2020. Groshans is a top guy in the Jays farm system. Maybe the casual fan doesn't know names like that, but they aren't just some randoms.
-
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@kovz88_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
You would make a very poor GM if you made decisions on young players this quickly. Also as far as the cards go its fun to be able to play with the young guys you hear about all the time in the minors for your team. The cards are if the player reaches their absolute maximum potential which we can agree most won't but the cards need to be usable.
Wander Franco I get. He's a household name. MLB.com enshrined him in their front page the day he came up. I just don't get the Diamond card. He's an unproven player that should get a silver card at best and earn the rest depending on how he plays.
I'll never understand why, in this game, they go so crazy with Prospects. Some ppl probably love it, I personally would rather have cards based on real life players. Even if you have to release cards from a career year to make it relevant. At least it's based on some shred of truth.
Many complain about the abundance of diamonds in the game. Way over saturated to the point it just negates the entire experience of earning or packing a diamond. It's just ho-hum I've got another diamond in this pack.
So ,as opposed to maybe reducing the Diamonds, they open up this new channel..Future Stars..so they can inundate the Diamond market that much more.
And many of these other players, maybe you've heard of them but I haven't. Groshens, Priester, Crochet I've never ever heard of. Most of the so called "Future Stars" I haven't heard of. And, I may never hear of them except in this game this year.
Again, if you like it have fun with it. I personally think it's hokey (best word I can come up with).
Crochet has been in the majors since last year and created quite the buzz with his fastball when called up in 2020. Groshans is a top guy in the Jays farm system. Maybe the casual fan doesn't know names like that, but they aren't just some randoms.
Gotcha.
Don't know if I'm casual, but unless they appear to be someone that could potentially help me in one of the 3 Fantasy baseball leagues I'm in..they are invisible. No offense, it's just how out of touch I suppose I am.
Did look up Crochet. Appears to be a reliever for the White Sox that starts occasionally (not on most folks fantasy baseball radar screen). He's rostered on 13%. 6% start him.
I'm sure the casual White Sox fans know him...Casual Padres fans..prob not.
Honest question, do you think he deserves that 94 Diamond. Not trying to be "toxic", but I'll wager he never wins 10 games. That is not Diamond material.
But, 2 or 3 years from now I may be eating those words. Could be my #1 draft pick. Ha.
It's all relative..casual or expert..random or iconic. When you're trying to win money..like in FB..you better be a little more than casual. I've been fairly successful.
So do you know why some players are selected to be Future Stars? What's the criteria.
-
I personally don't get why people get upset with minor leaguers getting possible cards. This is 100% a fantasy mode and they pump out players as much as they can so that most teams have loads of good players. I don't remember what year it was, probably 18 where there was the same team and everyone had it. That's a lot more boring and annoying than some made up cards. They are different names, different players. I would rather have a bunch of minor leaguers that could potentially be what they show then 10 different levels of the same players.
I enjoy the legends, Topps now card, well actually, I enjoy them all. I don't watch baseball much anymore and other than the odd jays game, I rarely pay attention so this game has actually made me a fan of certain players just because they are in the game.
I'm in the camp of I dont care who they are, let's get loads and loads of variety and see so many different looming teams that can compete
-
Domonick Brown, Phillies fans.
Also, Kyle Drabek, Jeff Stone, Steve Jeltz, Rick Schu, ad infinitum.
There is no such thing as a "Can't Miss" baseball prospect. 80% of the players today are middle round picks from small schools.
90% of the "Prospect" card kids will never be every day players. Most of the rest will be mediocre.
Maybe 2 of them will be Superstars.
That's how baseball goes. -
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@kovz88_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
You would make a very poor GM if you made decisions on young players this quickly. Also as far as the cards go its fun to be able to play with the young guys you hear about all the time in the minors for your team. The cards are if the player reaches their absolute maximum potential which we can agree most won't but the cards need to be usable.
Wander Franco I get. He's a household name. MLB.com enshrined him in their front page the day he came up. I just don't get the Diamond card. He's an unproven player that should get a silver card at best and earn the rest depending on how he plays.
I'll never understand why, in this game, they go so crazy with Prospects. Some ppl probably love it, I personally would rather have cards based on real life players. Even if you have to release cards from a career year to make it relevant. At least it's based on some shred of truth.
Many complain about the abundance of diamonds in the game. Way over saturated to the point it just negates the entire experience of earning or packing a diamond. It's just ho-hum I've got another diamond in this pack.
So ,as opposed to maybe reducing the Diamonds, they open up this new channel..Future Stars..so they can inundate the Diamond market that much more.
And many of these other players, maybe you've heard of them but I haven't. Groshens, Priester, Crochet I've never ever heard of. Most of the so called "Future Stars" I haven't heard of. And, I may never hear of them except in this game this year.
Again, if you like it have fun with it. I personally think it's hokey (best word I can come up with).
Crochet has been in the majors since last year and created quite the buzz with his fastball when called up in 2020. Groshans is a top guy in the Jays farm system. Maybe the casual fan doesn't know names like that, but they aren't just some randoms.
Gotcha.
Don't know if I'm casual, but unless they appear to be someone that could potentially help me in one of the 3 Fantasy baseball leagues I'm in..they are invisible. No offense, it's just how out of touch I suppose I am.
Did look up Crochet. Appears to be a reliever for the White Sox that starts occasionally (not on most folks fantasy baseball radar screen). He's rostered on 13%. 6% start him.
I'm sure the casual White Sox fans know him...Casual Padres fans..prob not.
Honest question, do you think he deserves that 94 Diamond. Not trying to be "toxic", but I'll wager he never wins 10 games. That is not Diamond material.
But, 2 or 3 years from now I may be eating those words. Could be my #1 draft pick. Ha.
It's all relative..casual or expert..random or iconic. When you're trying to win money..like in FB..you better be a little more than casual. I've been fairly successful.
So do you know why some players are selected to be Future Stars? What's the criteria.
I play in 6 fantasy leagues, I write and do podcasts for fantasy baseball, especially the dynasty side of it. I would bet he wins more then 10 games, he's following the Chris Sale route, Sale was a reliever to. And here's the thing, so many players don't deserve 90s diamonds that get them, if we go by "deserve" as criteria, then we get how DD was in 2018, widely regarded as the worse content ever.
-
@lucas8181_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
This got me thinking. Why does this game put out all these cards for "prospects" so grossly over inflated? I mean, I get the marketing angle. But if anyone were to follow along and note up the top-rung these prospects hit it's never even close to the loosely strewn Gold/diamonds you see before they throw the first MLB pitch or swing a bat. Some of them will be life long minor leaguers. Yet they're getting shutouts in RS against some of the greatest major leaguers to ever play the game.
I would guess not one of this year's prospects ever live up to the card they've gotten. Throwing a 110 mph fastball or hitting 40 HR in Minor leagues just means you got potential. But, one old coach always said "you know what potential means..you ain't ever done it".
Totally agree. Imagine a game giving you Babe Ruth and Franco on the same team, so not relaistic.
If you want realistic, go to OOTP.
Dude, not trying to split hairs but every year this game is billed as the most realistic sports simulation in the universe. Couple pulls from some of the past reviews:
MLB The Show is loyal to a system that tries to achieve as much realism as possible.
Honed over two decades, the algorithms and the developers implementing them have come to figure out how to make a balanced game based mostly on the numbers. But, there are outliers, and fans find them quickly once the game rolls out to the public. “Someone will tell us that a pitcher’s sinker is unhittable,” says Gill. “Then we’ll go home and play the retail version and realize that they’re right and even we can’t touch it, so we make tweaks.”
More of the same - Every year, the crew gathers three years of stats for players when it begins to curate athlete attributes. They come from the MLB as well as third-party stat companies. For pitchers, they gather familiar stats like strike-outs, pitch speeds, and pitching arsenal. Hitters get batting average, on-base percentage, and other familiar numbers. But, as stat tracking has advanced, the game integrates even more variables into its algorithms.
And, from Popular Science:
How MLB The Show became the most realistic baseball simulatorSo anyway, amigo, ya ought to be careful saying this game isn't realistic you might get some demerits.
But if you really pay attention you realize all the above is false relative to these "Future Superstars". Because there are no numbers, data, blah-blah to project these diamond cards with the outlandish ratings on them.
Not toxic..truth..don't confuse the 2. Sometimes when people say things you don't want to hear..whether truth or not..you interpret as toxic. Just saying.
-
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@kovz88_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
You would make a very poor GM if you made decisions on young players this quickly. Also as far as the cards go its fun to be able to play with the young guys you hear about all the time in the minors for your team. The cards are if the player reaches their absolute maximum potential which we can agree most won't but the cards need to be usable.
Wander Franco I get. He's a household name. MLB.com enshrined him in their front page the day he came up. I just don't get the Diamond card. He's an unproven player that should get a silver card at best and earn the rest depending on how he plays.
I'll never understand why, in this game, they go so crazy with Prospects. Some ppl probably love it, I personally would rather have cards based on real life players. Even if you have to release cards from a career year to make it relevant. At least it's based on some shred of truth.
Many complain about the abundance of diamonds in the game. Way over saturated to the point it just negates the entire experience of earning or packing a diamond. It's just ho-hum I've got another diamond in this pack.
So ,as opposed to maybe reducing the Diamonds, they open up this new channel..Future Stars..so they can inundate the Diamond market that much more.
And many of these other players, maybe you've heard of them but I haven't. Groshens, Priester, Crochet I've never ever heard of. Most of the so called "Future Stars" I haven't heard of. And, I may never hear of them except in this game this year.
Again, if you like it have fun with it. I personally think it's hokey (best word I can come up with).
Crochet has been in the majors since last year and created quite the buzz with his fastball when called up in 2020. Groshans is a top guy in the Jays farm system. Maybe the casual fan doesn't know names like that, but they aren't just some randoms.
Gotcha.
Don't know if I'm casual, but unless they appear to be someone that could potentially help me in one of the 3 Fantasy baseball leagues I'm in..they are invisible. No offense, it's just how out of touch I suppose I am.
Did look up Crochet. Appears to be a reliever for the White Sox that starts occasionally (not on most folks fantasy baseball radar screen). He's rostered on 13%. 6% start him.
I'm sure the casual White Sox fans know him...Casual Padres fans..prob not.
Honest question, do you think he deserves that 94 Diamond. Not trying to be "toxic", but I'll wager he never wins 10 games. That is not Diamond material.
But, 2 or 3 years from now I may be eating those words. Could be my #1 draft pick. Ha.
It's all relative..casual or expert..random or iconic. When you're trying to win money..like in FB..you better be a little more than casual. I've been fairly successful.
So do you know why some players are selected to be Future Stars? What's the criteria.
I play in 6 fantasy leagues, I write and do podcasts for fantasy baseball, especially the dynasty side of it. I would bet he wins more then 10 games, he's following the Chris Sale route, Sale was a reliever to. And here's the thing, so many players don't deserve 90s diamonds that get them, if we go by "deserve" as criteria, then we get how DD was in 2018, widely regarded as the worse content ever.
Great credentials, you should be proud. No doubt, based on that resume, you are less casual than me. And we're probably significantly more non-casual than 90% of your customers. These "future Stars" are being rolled out to a majority of customers that haven't a clue who they are.
Sometime you'll have to share why 2018 was such as disaster in the content area. If you have time.
-
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@kovz88_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
You would make a very poor GM if you made decisions on young players this quickly. Also as far as the cards go its fun to be able to play with the young guys you hear about all the time in the minors for your team. The cards are if the player reaches their absolute maximum potential which we can agree most won't but the cards need to be usable.
Wander Franco I get. He's a household name. MLB.com enshrined him in their front page the day he came up. I just don't get the Diamond card. He's an unproven player that should get a silver card at best and earn the rest depending on how he plays.
I'll never understand why, in this game, they go so crazy with Prospects. Some ppl probably love it, I personally would rather have cards based on real life players. Even if you have to release cards from a career year to make it relevant. At least it's based on some shred of truth.
Many complain about the abundance of diamonds in the game. Way over saturated to the point it just negates the entire experience of earning or packing a diamond. It's just ho-hum I've got another diamond in this pack.
So ,as opposed to maybe reducing the Diamonds, they open up this new channel..Future Stars..so they can inundate the Diamond market that much more.
And many of these other players, maybe you've heard of them but I haven't. Groshens, Priester, Crochet I've never ever heard of. Most of the so called "Future Stars" I haven't heard of. And, I may never hear of them except in this game this year.
Again, if you like it have fun with it. I personally think it's hokey (best word I can come up with).
Crochet has been in the majors since last year and created quite the buzz with his fastball when called up in 2020. Groshans is a top guy in the Jays farm system. Maybe the casual fan doesn't know names like that, but they aren't just some randoms.
Gotcha.
Don't know if I'm casual, but unless they appear to be someone that could potentially help me in one of the 3 Fantasy baseball leagues I'm in..they are invisible. No offense, it's just how out of touch I suppose I am.
Did look up Crochet. Appears to be a reliever for the White Sox that starts occasionally (not on most folks fantasy baseball radar screen). He's rostered on 13%. 6% start him.
I'm sure the casual White Sox fans know him...Casual Padres fans..prob not.
Honest question, do you think he deserves that 94 Diamond. Not trying to be "toxic", but I'll wager he never wins 10 games. That is not Diamond material.
But, 2 or 3 years from now I may be eating those words. Could be my #1 draft pick. Ha.
It's all relative..casual or expert..random or iconic. When you're trying to win money..like in FB..you better be a little more than casual. I've been fairly successful.
So do you know why some players are selected to be Future Stars? What's the criteria.
I play in 6 fantasy leagues, I write and do podcasts for fantasy baseball, especially the dynasty side of it. I would bet he wins more then 10 games, he's following the Chris Sale route, Sale was a reliever to. And here's the thing, so many players don't deserve 90s diamonds that get them, if we go by "deserve" as criteria, then we get how DD was in 2018, widely regarded as the worse content ever.
Great credentials, you should be proud. No doubt, based on that resume, you are less casual than me. And we're probably significantly more non-casual than 90% of your customers. These "future Stars" are being rolled out to a majority of customers that haven't a clue who they are.
Sometime you'll have to share why 2018 was such as disaster in the content area. If you have time.
Because they limited the 99s to the biggest legends, I think the only current players who got one was Pujols and Trout. There wasn't even 2 99s at some positions. This meant you were facing the same lineup every single time, if you think the Edward Cabrera or Crochet spam in ranked in 21 is bad, it was nothing compared to facing the same 8 batters over and over and over because they stuck to giving only the best of the best 99s
Also those consumers are probably pretty happy about it, if the casual 90% customer base didn't like the future stars, they would have stopped after MLB 20, but clearly they have data that shows those cards are a success.
-
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@mrwonderful95 said in Wander Franco..dud?:
I’m all for having prospects in the game but I think they should have a cap to their rating. Something like 85 or so. Make them useful early on, in BR and events. They shouldn’t be 99 and dominant in ranked like Cabrera is.
The cap idea has some merit.
My whole point is, how do they (whoever they is) decide who's going to be the next 95 Diamond single A player. Priester is a 20 year old at single A that is not even in the Top 25 BA prospects. He's 43rd last I heard. I had never heard of him until he obliterated me in RS. Yet he's a 95 Diamond flame thrower in The Show.
Had it ever been explained on here, in podcast, newsletter or anything like that how these decisions are made. Would think us paying customers would have some little bit of interest in it.
I’ve never heard an exact answer as to why these cards are so juiced. I would suspect it’s just a reason for SDS to put out content, which I’m fine with, but these cards shouldn’t be dominant like they are.
-
Dud just like that Mariners guy
-
I get the point about prospect cards not being as deserving of 90s diamonds as the all-time greats, but it’s a fantasy game mode and I’ll never complain about having more options for players to use.
-
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@kovz88_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
You would make a very poor GM if you made decisions on young players this quickly. Also as far as the cards go its fun to be able to play with the young guys you hear about all the time in the minors for your team. The cards are if the player reaches their absolute maximum potential which we can agree most won't but the cards need to be usable.
Wander Franco I get. He's a household name. MLB.com enshrined him in their front page the day he came up. I just don't get the Diamond card. He's an unproven player that should get a silver card at best and earn the rest depending on how he plays.
I'll never understand why, in this game, they go so crazy with Prospects. Some ppl probably love it, I personally would rather have cards based on real life players. Even if you have to release cards from a career year to make it relevant. At least it's based on some shred of truth.
Many complain about the abundance of diamonds in the game. Way over saturated to the point it just negates the entire experience of earning or packing a diamond. It's just ho-hum I've got another diamond in this pack.
So ,as opposed to maybe reducing the Diamonds, they open up this new channel..Future Stars..so they can inundate the Diamond market that much more.
And many of these other players, maybe you've heard of them but I haven't. Groshens, Priester, Crochet I've never ever heard of. Most of the so called "Future Stars" I haven't heard of. And, I may never hear of them except in this game this year.
Again, if you like it have fun with it. I personally think it's hokey (best word I can come up with).
Crochet has been in the majors since last year and created quite the buzz with his fastball when called up in 2020. Groshans is a top guy in the Jays farm system. Maybe the casual fan doesn't know names like that, but they aren't just some randoms.
Gotcha.
Don't know if I'm casual, but unless they appear to be someone that could potentially help me in one of the 3 Fantasy baseball leagues I'm in..they are invisible. No offense, it's just how out of touch I suppose I am.
Did look up Crochet. Appears to be a reliever for the White Sox that starts occasionally (not on most folks fantasy baseball radar screen). He's rostered on 13%. 6% start him.
I'm sure the casual White Sox fans know him...Casual Padres fans..prob not.
Honest question, do you think he deserves that 94 Diamond. Not trying to be "toxic", but I'll wager he never wins 10 games. That is not Diamond material.
But, 2 or 3 years from now I may be eating those words. Could be my #1 draft pick. Ha.
It's all relative..casual or expert..random or iconic. When you're trying to win money..like in FB..you better be a little more than casual. I've been fairly successful.
So do you know why some players are selected to be Future Stars? What's the criteria.
I play in 6 fantasy leagues, I write and do podcasts for fantasy baseball, especially the dynasty side of it. I would bet he wins more then 10 games, he's following the Chris Sale route, Sale was a reliever to. And here's the thing, so many players don't deserve 90s diamonds that get them, if we go by "deserve" as criteria, then we get how DD was in 2018, widely regarded as the worse content ever.
Great credentials, you should be proud. No doubt, based on that resume, you are less casual than me. And we're probably significantly more non-casual than 90% of your customers. These "future Stars" are being rolled out to a majority of customers that haven't a clue who they are.
Sometime you'll have to share why 2018 was such as disaster in the content area. If you have time.
Because they limited the 99s to the biggest legends, I think the only current players who got one was Pujols and Trout. There wasn't even 2 99s at some positions. This meant you were facing the same lineup every single time, if you think the Edward Cabrera or Crochet spam in ranked in 21 is bad, it was nothing compared to facing the same 8 batters over and over and over because they stuck to giving only the best of the best 99s
Also those consumers are probably pretty happy about it, if the casual 90% customer base didn't like the future stars, they would have stopped after MLB 20, but clearly they have data that shows those cards are a success.
I didn't experience 2018, but I like the idea of 99's being nearly unattainable.
FIFA, imo, has got a pretty good system when it comes to cards. If you want some top-shelf awesome player you have to give up the farm for it.
There are no gimmes. It's semi-difficult to swindle the auction market. Can be frustrating but it really ensures a player can't just walk in and build a super team in a couple hours.
The process is so very difficult in FIFA that when you get a walk-out from a pack you nearly jump for joy. I actually do a screen-save because it's so rare and meaningful.
All teams you played are composed of tons of different players. Rarely do you play any other team with even close to the same line-up as you. In fact, generally they won't be starting any of the same players you start. That's pretty cool.
Also, FIFA UT has NOTHING like "Future Stars" which is so fortunate I can't even put it into words. If they did it would be like releasing a card for some hyped-prospect from Walsall with a better card than Messi. They will never-ever do that because that fan-base and community is a bit more seasoned and discriminating.
-
I think most of the Show community would agree that the less it is like Fifa or Madden the better
-
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@eatyum_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@kovz88_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
You would make a very poor GM if you made decisions on young players this quickly. Also as far as the cards go its fun to be able to play with the young guys you hear about all the time in the minors for your team. The cards are if the player reaches their absolute maximum potential which we can agree most won't but the cards need to be usable.
Wander Franco I get. He's a household name. MLB.com enshrined him in their front page the day he came up. I just don't get the Diamond card. He's an unproven player that should get a silver card at best and earn the rest depending on how he plays.
I'll never understand why, in this game, they go so crazy with Prospects. Some ppl probably love it, I personally would rather have cards based on real life players. Even if you have to release cards from a career year to make it relevant. At least it's based on some shred of truth.
Many complain about the abundance of diamonds in the game. Way over saturated to the point it just negates the entire experience of earning or packing a diamond. It's just ho-hum I've got another diamond in this pack.
So ,as opposed to maybe reducing the Diamonds, they open up this new channel..Future Stars..so they can inundate the Diamond market that much more.
And many of these other players, maybe you've heard of them but I haven't. Groshens, Priester, Crochet I've never ever heard of. Most of the so called "Future Stars" I haven't heard of. And, I may never hear of them except in this game this year.
Again, if you like it have fun with it. I personally think it's hokey (best word I can come up with).
Crochet has been in the majors since last year and created quite the buzz with his fastball when called up in 2020. Groshans is a top guy in the Jays farm system. Maybe the casual fan doesn't know names like that, but they aren't just some randoms.
Gotcha.
Don't know if I'm casual, but unless they appear to be someone that could potentially help me in one of the 3 Fantasy baseball leagues I'm in..they are invisible. No offense, it's just how out of touch I suppose I am.
Did look up Crochet. Appears to be a reliever for the White Sox that starts occasionally (not on most folks fantasy baseball radar screen). He's rostered on 13%. 6% start him.
I'm sure the casual White Sox fans know him...Casual Padres fans..prob not.
Honest question, do you think he deserves that 94 Diamond. Not trying to be "toxic", but I'll wager he never wins 10 games. That is not Diamond material.
But, 2 or 3 years from now I may be eating those words. Could be my #1 draft pick. Ha.
It's all relative..casual or expert..random or iconic. When you're trying to win money..like in FB..you better be a little more than casual. I've been fairly successful.
So do you know why some players are selected to be Future Stars? What's the criteria.
I play in 6 fantasy leagues, I write and do podcasts for fantasy baseball, especially the dynasty side of it. I would bet he wins more then 10 games, he's following the Chris Sale route, Sale was a reliever to. And here's the thing, so many players don't deserve 90s diamonds that get them, if we go by "deserve" as criteria, then we get how DD was in 2018, widely regarded as the worse content ever.
Great credentials, you should be proud. No doubt, based on that resume, you are less casual than me. And we're probably significantly more non-casual than 90% of your customers. These "future Stars" are being rolled out to a majority of customers that haven't a clue who they are.
Sometime you'll have to share why 2018 was such as disaster in the content area. If you have time.
Because they limited the 99s to the biggest legends, I think the only current players who got one was Pujols and Trout. There wasn't even 2 99s at some positions. This meant you were facing the same lineup every single time, if you think the Edward Cabrera or Crochet spam in ranked in 21 is bad, it was nothing compared to facing the same 8 batters over and over and over because they stuck to giving only the best of the best 99s
Also those consumers are probably pretty happy about it, if the casual 90% customer base didn't like the future stars, they would have stopped after MLB 20, but clearly they have data that shows those cards are a success.
I didn't experience 2018, but I like the idea of 99's being nearly unattainable.
FIFA, imo, has got a pretty good system when it comes to cards. If you want some top-shelf awesome player you have to give up the farm for it.
There are no gimmes. It's semi-difficult to swindle the auction market. Can be frustrating but it really ensures a player can't just walk in and build a super team in a couple hours.
The process is so very difficult in FIFA that when you get a walk-out from a pack you nearly jump for joy. I actually do a screen-save because it's so rare and meaningful.
All teams you played are composed of tons of different players. Rarely do you play any other team with even close to the same line-up as you. In fact, generally they won't be starting any of the same players you start. That's pretty cool.
Also, FIFA UT has NOTHING like "Future Stars" which is so fortunate I can't even put it into words. If they did it would be like releasing a card for some hyped-prospect from Walsall with a better card than Messi. They will never-ever do that because that fan-base and community is a bit more seasoned and discriminating.
FIFA FUT does have a line of cards called FUT Future Stars. What are you talking about? Everyone knows Curtis Jones is one of the better players in the PL, right?
-
Wander Franco might be the WORST player in history
__
I also need to say that I LIKE more fantasy cards. Not something like 125/125 power ichiro or Speedster Albert Pujols, but having a line of cards that somewhat realistically juices a player's attributes. Like if you had some super defense line, and Kevin Keirmaier had a card that was like his 87 defensively, but had better offensive stats. Doesn't have to be Buxton levels, but 80s contact would make it a fun card -
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@lucas8181_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
@ironeyes_cody_psn said in Wander Franco..dud?:
This got me thinking. Why does this game put out all these cards for "prospects" so grossly over inflated? I mean, I get the marketing angle. But if anyone were to follow along and note up the top-rung these prospects hit it's never even close to the loosely strewn Gold/diamonds you see before they throw the first MLB pitch or swing a bat. Some of them will be life long minor leaguers. Yet they're getting shutouts in RS against some of the greatest major leaguers to ever play the game.
I would guess not one of this year's prospects ever live up to the card they've gotten. Throwing a 110 mph fastball or hitting 40 HR in Minor leagues just means you got potential. But, one old coach always said "you know what potential means..you ain't ever done it".
Totally agree. Imagine a game giving you Babe Ruth and Franco on the same team, so not relaistic.
If you want realistic, go to OOTP.
Dude, not trying to split hairs but every year this game is billed as the most realistic sports simulation in the universe. Couple pulls from some of the past reviews:
MLB The Show is loyal to a system that tries to achieve as much realism as possible.
Honed over two decades, the algorithms and the developers implementing them have come to figure out how to make a balanced game based mostly on the numbers. But, there are outliers, and fans find them quickly once the game rolls out to the public. “Someone will tell us that a pitcher’s sinker is unhittable,” says Gill. “Then we’ll go home and play the retail version and realize that they’re right and even we can’t touch it, so we make tweaks.”
More of the same - Every year, the crew gathers three years of stats for players when it begins to curate athlete attributes. They come from the MLB as well as third-party stat companies. For pitchers, they gather familiar stats like strike-outs, pitch speeds, and pitching arsenal. Hitters get batting average, on-base percentage, and other familiar numbers. But, as stat tracking has advanced, the game integrates even more variables into its algorithms.
And, from Popular Science:
How MLB The Show became the most realistic baseball simulatorSo anyway, amigo, ya ought to be careful saying this game isn't realistic you might get some demerits.
But if you really pay attention you realize all the above is false relative to these "Future Superstars". Because there are no numbers, data, blah-blah to project these diamond cards with the outlandish ratings on them.
Not toxic..truth..don't confuse the 2. Sometimes when people say things you don't want to hear..whether truth or not..you interpret as toxic. Just saying.
Those reviews are all talking about the actual gameplay being realistic. It’s fairly obvious if you read them. They don’t say anything about the fantasy cards being rated realistically. So none of the reviews you posted have anything to do with your argument. Just saying.
