87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?
-
Torres is a great card to have with his bat, but I’d take Tatis, Correa, and Lindor over him at SS for defensive reasons alone. Torres at 2B is probably best. 3B would be fine too but there’s already very good 3B options out there.
-
FOTF Correa
FOTF Tatis
FOTF Gleyber
LindorFor shortstop in that order
-
That TA Albies card is actually pretty dam good (The one positive I'll say about this game for the day).
-
Tatis>gleyber>lindor>>>>>>>>>>>>>correa
-
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
Tatis>gleyber>lindor>>>>>>>>>>>>>correa
That's wrong, Correa crushes the ball
-
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
Tatis>gleyber>lindor>>>>>>>>>>>>>correa
That's wrong, Correa crushes the ball
I wish I could upvote this 100 times. He has a ton of pop vs righties, and I’ve had no problems hitting doubles/bombs off lefties with him too. He’s a stud.
-
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
FOTF Correa
FOTF Tatis
FOTF Gleyber
LindorFor shortstop in that order
Adalberto Mondesi is solid as well.
But once you get to Silver 1.. 99 Larkin is the way to go.
-
TA Gleyber and Correa are both amazing, but I would slightly lean Gleyber.
-
@louieepthree said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
FOTF Correa
FOTF Tatis
FOTF Gleyber
LindorFor shortstop in that order
Adalberto Mondesi is solid as well.
But once you get to Silver 1.. 99 Larkin is the way to go.
Larkin is good but right now the outfield I feel is weaker so I went with Jackson
-
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@louieepthree said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
FOTF Correa
FOTF Tatis
FOTF Gleyber
LindorFor shortstop in that order
Adalberto Mondesi is solid as well.
But once you get to Silver 1.. 99 Larkin is the way to go.
Larkin is good but right now the outfield I feel is weaker so I went with Jackson
Who are you using at Catcher?
-
@genopolanco said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@louieepthree said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
FOTF Correa
FOTF Tatis
FOTF Gleyber
LindorFor shortstop in that order
Adalberto Mondesi is solid as well.
But once you get to Silver 1.. 99 Larkin is the way to go.
Larkin is good but right now the outfield I feel is weaker so I went with Jackson
Who are you using at Catcher?
Gary
-
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@genopolanco said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@louieepthree said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
FOTF Correa
FOTF Tatis
FOTF Gleyber
LindorFor shortstop in that order
Adalberto Mondesi is solid as well.
But once you get to Silver 1.. 99 Larkin is the way to go.
Larkin is good but right now the outfield I feel is weaker so I went with Jackson
Who are you using at Catcher?
Gary
Don’t sleep on that LS Grandal either! He’s a machine!
-
Jimmy rollins all day
-
@Harryhukari33 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
Tatis>gleyber>lindor>>>>>>>>>>>>>correa
That's wrong, Correa crushes the ball
I wish I could upvote this 100 times. He has a ton of pop vs righties, and I’ve had no problems hitting doubles/bombs off lefties with him too. He’s a stud.
Yeah, Correa has killed me this year. Him and Moncada
-
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
Tatis>gleyber>lindor>>>>>>>>>>>>>correa
That's wrong, Correa crushes the ball
There's nothing special about correa's card and saying "he crushes the ball" doesn't really provide any specific commentary on why he's good. There's nothing unique about that card. All the other's have something special going for them. I like Tatis for the speed, Torres easily has the best power if you want to talk about crushing the ball and lindor is a switch hitter. Correa's very average and has weird splits. There's nothing you get from that card that you can't get from one of the others.
I also think saying correa's great isn't really helpful to the OP who is specifically asking about Torres and lindor
-
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
Tatis>gleyber>lindor>>>>>>>>>>>>>correa
That's wrong, Correa crushes the ball
There's nothing special about correa's card and saying "he crushes the ball" doesn't really provide any specific commentary on why he's good. There's nothing unique about that card. All the other's have something special going for them. I like Tatis for the speed, Torres easily has the best power if you want to talk about crushing the ball and lindor is a switch hitter. Correa's very average and has weird splits. There's nothing you get from that card that you can't get from one of the others.
I also think saying correa's great isn't really helpful to the OP who is specifically asking about Torres and lindor
First of all, Correa is a far superior hitter to lindor, a stronger arm, better speed than Lindor and reverse splits to boot which means when guys bring in a right handed pitcher or you're facing a right handed starter, to which most of the starters you're going to face are right now as the only real good lefty is Snell, you're in a better spot than Lindor's 76/67 rating vs lefties.
To say he's very average shows a lack of knowledge of the game.
Also, not that it matters but through 129 plate appearances for Correa - .392/.434/.792 ops of 1.226 11 homeruns. So I think he's a little better than average..
-
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
Tatis>gleyber>lindor>>>>>>>>>>>>>correa
That's wrong, Correa crushes the ball
There's nothing special about correa's card and saying "he crushes the ball" doesn't really provide any specific commentary on why he's good. There's nothing unique about that card. All the other's have something special going for them. I like Tatis for the speed, Torres easily has the best power if you want to talk about crushing the ball and lindor is a switch hitter. Correa's very average and has weird splits. There's nothing you get from that card that you can't get from one of the others.
I also think saying correa's great isn't really helpful to the OP who is specifically asking about Torres and lindor
Also, read through the thread, multiple people recommended Correa, who's also a much much better fielder than Torres
-
I would use Correa, except he’s a lying douchebag.
-
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
Tatis>gleyber>lindor>>>>>>>>>>>>>correa
That's wrong, Correa crushes the ball
There's nothing special about correa's card and saying "he crushes the ball" doesn't really provide any specific commentary on why he's good. There's nothing unique about that card. All the other's have something special going for them. I like Tatis for the speed, Torres easily has the best power if you want to talk about crushing the ball and lindor is a switch hitter. Correa's very average and has weird splits. There's nothing you get from that card that you can't get from one of the others.
I also think saying correa's great isn't really helpful to the OP who is specifically asking about Torres and lindor
First of all, Correa is a far superior hitter to lindor, a stronger arm, better speed than Lindor and reverse splits to boot which means when guys bring in a right handed pitcher or you're facing a right handed starter, to which most of the starters you're going to face are right now as the only real good lefty is Snell, you're in a better spot than Lindor's 76/67 rating vs lefties.
To say he's very average shows a lack of knowledge of the game.
Also, not that it matters but through 129 plate appearances for Correa - .392/.434/.792 ops of 1.226 11 homeruns. So I think he's a little better than average..
88 Chris sale is decent, I know you probably crush him since most guys who play at your level do, but he’s doing decent for me so far
-
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@skepple15 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
@Mereel13 said in 87 Lindor VS 88 Gleyber . Best SS Option?:
Tatis>gleyber>lindor>>>>>>>>>>>>>correa
That's wrong, Correa crushes the ball
There's nothing special about correa's card and saying "he crushes the ball" doesn't really provide any specific commentary on why he's good. There's nothing unique about that card. All the other's have something special going for them. I like Tatis for the speed, Torres easily has the best power if you want to talk about crushing the ball and lindor is a switch hitter. Correa's very average and has weird splits. There's nothing you get from that card that you can't get from one of the others.
I also think saying correa's great isn't really helpful to the OP who is specifically asking about Torres and lindor
First of all, Correa is a far superior hitter to lindor, a stronger arm, better speed than Lindor and reverse splits to boot which means when guys bring in a right handed pitcher or you're facing a right handed starter, to which most of the starters you're going to face are right now as the only real good lefty is Snell, you're in a better spot than Lindor's 76/67 rating vs lefties.
To say he's very average shows a lack of knowledge of the game.
Also, not that it matters but through 129 plate appearances for Correa - .392/.434/.792 ops of 1.226 11 homeruns. So I think he's a little better than average..
This is consistent with my standpoint as well. He really hits and is a vacuum at short. Plus that extra arm strength is helpful on close plays too. I’d prefer to run Correa at short over Torres because of the defense, but Torres is an offensive machine, which is why he plays 2b for me.
