Trout worth it over Acuna?
-
Trout is so good he almost plays for you.
-
Trouts better but they're both top 5 OF options right now.
-
Trout is better but for the cost? If you plan on doing the LS set go with Trout, if you just want an awesome OF keep Acuna. Trout was my first big purchase this year, no regrets. I have 4 AL east team left and then I can start working on the NL.
-
@mubby_33_psn said in Trout worth it over Acuna?:
Trout is better but for the cost? If you plan on doing the LS set go with Trout, if you just want an awesome OF keep Acuna. Trout was my first big purchase this year, no regrets. I have 4 AL east team left and then I can start working on the NL.
Caveat here from my perspective....if you are doing ENTIRE collection, go with trout. If you’re not sure, stick with Acuna and finish NL which gets you Soriano.
-
@tmichae10_psn said in Trout worth it over Acuna?:
@mubby_33_psn said in Trout worth it over Acuna?:
Trout is better but for the cost? If you plan on doing the LS set go with Trout, if you just want an awesome OF keep Acuna. Trout was my first big purchase this year, no regrets. I have 4 AL east team left and then I can start working on the NL.
Caveat here from my perspective....if you are doing ENTIRE collection, go with trout. If you’re not sure, stick with Acuna and finish NL which gets you Soriano.
True! Soriano is clearly the better card than Ortiz. I guess I started with the AL simply because even with Trout being 360k it was the cheaper league to complete. WIth that said Im still looking forward to running an OF of Trout, Finley and Acuna with Soriano at 2nd if I ever get the full collection completed.
-
@twisted-_-tea-_psn said in Trout worth it over Acuna?:
Have 120k and can get 160k from Acuna and a few more sales put me at enough for trout. I've been an awful 2-24 to start with Acuna. Is trout really worth the stubs over Acuna?
If you can't hit with Acuna, I'm not sure you're gonna hit with Trout either?
-
Trout is the best player in the game
-
@mubby_33_psn said in Trout worth it over Acuna?:
@tmichae10_psn said in Trout worth it over Acuna?:
@mubby_33_psn said in Trout worth it over Acuna?:
Trout is better but for the cost? If you plan on doing the LS set go with Trout, if you just want an awesome OF keep Acuna. Trout was my first big purchase this year, no regrets. I have 4 AL east team left and then I can start working on the NL.
Caveat here from my perspective....if you are doing ENTIRE collection, go with trout. If you’re not sure, stick with Acuna and finish NL which gets you Soriano.
True! Soriano is clearly the better card than Ortiz. I guess I started with the AL simply because even with Trout being 360k it was the cheaper league to complete. WIth that said Im still looking forward to running an OF of Trout, Finley and Acuna with Soriano at 2nd if I ever get the full collection completed.
Definitely a killer OF. I’d hate losing that arm at 2nd, but if that’s what it takes to get him in lineup. I’d be contending the same thing if I get NL complete: Finley, Griffey, Acuna, Soriano.
I’ll make that call when the time comes to pass.
-
Trout is great and his lifespan will last the whole game.
-
@gixxerryder750 said in Trout worth it over Acuna?:
@twisted-_-tea-_psn said in Trout worth it over Acuna?:
Have 120k and can get 160k from Acuna and a few more sales put me at enough for trout. I've been an awful 2-24 to start with Acuna. Is trout really worth the stubs over Acuna?
If you can't hit with Acuna, I'm not sure you're gonna hit with Trout either?
well I mean I'm a World Series player so I can hit with anyone. Just off to a cold streak. Just comes down to if I like someones swing more...
-
A admin locked this topic on
