Lack of consistency needs to be addressed
-
MLBTS 18 and 19 have epitomized mediocrity... at best. I know that this complaint is getting repetitive, but we need to go back to the MLBTS 16, and prior days, where user input was much more consistent. I'm a fan of having a game that is playable for everyone. However, having ambiguous outcomes isn't a good long term solution.
-
Yeah MLB 16 was very consistent. Every time I bunted it was a base hit!
-
@GOtexas1 said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
MLBTS 18 and 19 have epitomized mediocrity... at best. I know that this complaint is getting repetitive, but we need to go back to the MLBTS 16, and prior days, where user input was much more consistent. I'm a fan of having a game that is playable for everyone. However, having ambiguous outcomes isn't a good long term solution.
The problem with 16 was the fact that if you put the PCI on the ball with good timing it was a hr almost every time, which isn't realistic at all.
-
@cvogsfashow said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@GOtexas1 said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
MLBTS 18 and 19 have epitomized mediocrity... at best. I know that this complaint is getting repetitive, but we need to go back to the MLBTS 16, and prior days, where user input was much more consistent. I'm a fan of having a game that is playable for everyone. However, having ambiguous outcomes isn't a good long term solution.
The problem with 16 was the fact that if you put the PCI on the ball with good timing it was a hr almost every time, which isn't realistic at all.
I don’t know about that but 17 was real good
-
@Maverick31762 said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@cvogsfashow said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@GOtexas1 said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
MLBTS 18 and 19 have epitomized mediocrity... at best. I know that this complaint is getting repetitive, but we need to go back to the MLBTS 16, and prior days, where user input was much more consistent. I'm a fan of having a game that is playable for everyone. However, having ambiguous outcomes isn't a good long term solution.
The problem with 16 was the fact that if you put the PCI on the ball with good timing it was a hr almost every time, which isn't realistic at all.
I don’t know about that but 17 was real good
The above is a joke right? 17 was a terrible game to play. Just late be great!
-
@cvogsfashow said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@Maverick31762 said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@cvogsfashow said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@GOtexas1 said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
MLBTS 18 and 19 have epitomized mediocrity... at best. I know that this complaint is getting repetitive, but we need to go back to the MLBTS 16, and prior days, where user input was much more consistent. I'm a fan of having a game that is playable for everyone. However, having ambiguous outcomes isn't a good long term solution.
The problem with 16 was the fact that if you put the PCI on the ball with good timing it was a hr almost every time, which isn't realistic at all.
I don’t know about that but 17 was real good
The above is a joke right? 17 was a terrible game to play. Just late be great!
I suppose it's all relative... I'd rather have the gameplay of 17 over the gameplay of 19...
-
@cvogsfashow said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@Maverick31762 said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@cvogsfashow said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@GOtexas1 said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
MLBTS 18 and 19 have epitomized mediocrity... at best. I know that this complaint is getting repetitive, but we need to go back to the MLBTS 16, and prior days, where user input was much more consistent. I'm a fan of having a game that is playable for everyone. However, having ambiguous outcomes isn't a good long term solution.
The problem with 16 was the fact that if you put the PCI on the ball with good timing it was a hr almost every time, which isn't realistic at all.
I don’t know about that but 17 was real good
The above is a joke right? 17 was a terrible game to play. Just late be great!
I forgot about that. Maybe it was 16 then. The bunting was the only issue I remember
-
@Maverick31762 said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@cvogsfashow said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@Maverick31762 said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@cvogsfashow said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
@GOtexas1 said in Lack of consistency needs to be addressed:
MLBTS 18 and 19 have epitomized mediocrity... at best. I know that this complaint is getting repetitive, but we need to go back to the MLBTS 16, and prior days, where user input was much more consistent. I'm a fan of having a game that is playable for everyone. However, having ambiguous outcomes isn't a good long term solution.
The problem with 16 was the fact that if you put the PCI on the ball with good timing it was a hr almost every time, which isn't realistic at all.
I don’t know about that but 17 was real good
The above is a joke right? 17 was a terrible game to play. Just late be great!
I forgot about that. Maybe it was 16 then. The bunting was the only issue I remember
Yeah, I remember fellow MLB The Show players complaining about the bunt cheese in MLB The Show 16.
-
I’ll comment on this. I played 3 ranked games where it was 1-0 which I won. The first myself and my opponent dealt with constant hard outs. My last two game I had at least 40 plus good goods that were hard outs.
-
A admin locked this topic on
