Debate
-
Guys I feel like you’re all missing the point. He’s doing all this while using Texas and Miami. Texas and Miami! Good “debate”.
-
@JellyRoll198 said in Debate:
Guys I feel like you’re all missing the point. He’s doing all this while using Texas and Miami. Texas and Miami! Good “debate”.
And dont forget everyone else only picks good teams like the Doyers lmao
-
@IIJACKINTHBOXII said in Debate:
There are currently 97,135 players who have played a game of H2H this year. There are 348,086 players who have played a game of DD this year. That's about 3.6 times as many DDers than H2Hers. Even if talent was equally distributed between both modes (which I doubt is the case) there would be approximately 360 players in DD that are as good or better than the top 100 in H2H. IMO this is inaccurate though because DD is more popular and would attract the best talent due to it's marketability.
348k people playing at least 1 game of DD just seems kinda sad to me. That just seems pretty low for a worldwide number. How does that compare to other years? Does anyone know? If that's all the player base they have and it's about the only mode they focus on that just seems, I don't know, low I guess lol
-
The “debate“ is the fact that ur saying DD players are miles better
So if that is the case if a top DD player played a Top H2H guy and the DD player was the Orioles and the top H2H player was the Yankees ur saying the DD player would win?
My opinion is that if the skill gap was not huge it would be very difficult for the DD player overcoming the horrible ratings of the Orioles players against a great team like the Yanks
Trying to get the Yankees overpowered lineup out with pitchers ranked in the 50’s and 60’s
And then trying to hit with guys ranked in the 60’s instead of 90+ ranked overall players like they are used using in DD
And yeah I’m proud of my accomplishments when I have 55 overall Taylor Hearn and Stephen Tarpley coming out of the bullpen and I still mow down the yanks and doyers but I see ur point of no point in saying that in what is meant to be a honest debate
-
@HeadCoach11787 said in Debate:
The “debate“ is the fact that ur saying DD players are miles better
So if that is the case if a top DD player played a Top H2H guy and the DD player was the Orioles and the top H2H player was the Yankees ur saying the DD player would win?
My opinion is that if the skill gap was not huge it would be very difficult for the DD player overcoming the horrible ratings of the Orioles players against a great team like the Yanks
Trying to get the Yankees overpowered lineup out with pitchers ranked in the 50’s and 60’s
And then trying to hit with guys ranked in the 60’s instead of 90+ ranked overall players like they are used using in DD
And yeah I’m proud of my accomplishments when I have 55 overall Taylor Hearn and Stephen Tarpley coming out of the bullpen and I still mow down the yanks and doyers but I see ur point of no point in saying that in what is meant to be a honest debate
An honest debate has back and forth, you have not acknowledged any of the points people have made you just constantly say how you win with bad players. I'm not honna repeat myself, scroll up to my last comment to read why your argument actually proves DD is more competetive.
-
@Kovz88 said in Debate:
The reasons you give for H2H being tough are actually the same reasons DD is more competetive. Holes in the lineup- in DD there are no weak spots in the lineup so you have to be locked in every at bat while pitching. Bad pitchers-in DD if you are seeing a pitcher below 90 you're in an event or facing someone lower leveled so again you can't take off any at bats, you have to be locked in from start to finish. H2H is more strategic you could say but DD is definitely more competetive.
I saw this.. yeah facing all 99 hitters In DD but using all 99 pitchers
H2H could have a 55 overall ranked pitcher against a 55 overall hitter, or a 95 overall hitter
So I don’t see ur argument..
The consensus is DD players are better with flawed justified reasons
I’ll give up on the thread as I enjoy playing with real teams and rosters, realistic baseball. And you all have your reasons to play with 99 overall players in a minor league stadium you never heard of.
Agree to disagree, MLB the show is great game regardless and that’s the main thing that matters
-
@HeadCoach11787 said in Debate:
@John3221 said in Debate:
@HeadCoach11787 said in Debate:
True I’m just curious as a top player who plays with Texas and Miami online and dosent like DD bc I like playing with real rosters and teams and realistic as possible, how I would do against top DD players
I’m already facing the yanks, doyers, astros in most of my games with Texas and Miami and I’m 41-3 my last 44
You not playing on HOF or legend enough. Stop choosing any difficulty. Play on higher difficulties then I'll respect your record more.
I’ll set it off any difficulty and put it on legend. I doubt anyone will score on me as I hit the corners Basically every pitch
Regardless when it’s on any difficulty as I set it so I can find game quicker, it’s human vs human so I don’t see how that should make a difference
Jesus Christ no offense but I feel like the way you’re talking you wouldn’t make it past pennant race in DD Ranked
-
@Malikeve said in Debate:
Br 12-0 are the best! Just joking haha
I actually agree with that. 12-0 would be crazy difficult.
-
So as someone who has played over 100 games of h2h and diamond dynasty, I can honestly say DD has the better overall players. DD is simply more fun as you get to build your team, and there is so much content that keeps you grinding for new cards and through new events. The sheer amount of content keeps people invested in it rather than simply popping in and out of h2h matches. Just the numbers means the potential for having a larger pool of good players would be increased.
I will say, hitting on HOF with normal teams is WAY harder than in DD. You actually have to hit on HOF or Legend in DD to prevent a shippett derby. I do remember YFK losing to Lucas giolito when he was forced to use a normal team rather than his DD team. So it isn't as simply DD better th.an H2H. Both would have to adjust. DD player would have have to adjust to incredibly smaller PCI, H2H player would have to adjust to constant 90-99 pitching from starter to closer
-
@HeadCoach11787 said in Debate:
@Kovz88 said in Debate:
The reasons you give for H2H being tough are actually the same reasons DD is more competetive. Holes in the lineup- in DD there are no weak spots in the lineup so you have to be locked in every at bat while pitching. Bad pitchers-in DD if you are seeing a pitcher below 90 you're in an event or facing someone lower leveled so again you can't take off any at bats, you have to be locked in from start to finish. H2H is more strategic you could say but DD is definitely more competetive.
I saw this.. yeah facing all 99 hitters In DD but using all 99 pitchers
H2H could have a 55 overall ranked pitcher against a 55 overall hitter, or a 95 overall hitter
So I don’t see ur argument..
The consensus is DD players are better with flawed justified reasons
I’ll give up on the thread as I enjoy playing with real teams and rosters, realistic baseball. And you all have your reasons to play with 99 overall players in a minor league stadium you never heard of.
Agree to disagree, MLB the show is great game regardless and that’s the main thing that matters
This is why its not a debate. You clearly think you're better no matter what anyone else says and you've been condescending about DD players as well. You also missed the point of my argument, in h2h sometimes you will have a good batter against a bad pitcher or vice versa. In DD that won't happen.
-
A admin locked this topic on
