@HeadCoach11787 said in Debate:
@Kovz88 said in Debate:
The reasons you give for H2H being tough are actually the same reasons DD is more competetive. Holes in the lineup- in DD there are no weak spots in the lineup so you have to be locked in every at bat while pitching. Bad pitchers-in DD if you are seeing a pitcher below 90 you're in an event or facing someone lower leveled so again you can't take off any at bats, you have to be locked in from start to finish. H2H is more strategic you could say but DD is definitely more competetive.
I saw this.. yeah facing all 99 hitters In DD but using all 99 pitchers
H2H could have a 55 overall ranked pitcher against a 55 overall hitter, or a 95 overall hitter
So I don’t see ur argument..
The consensus is DD players are better with flawed justified reasons
I’ll give up on the thread as I enjoy playing with real teams and rosters, realistic baseball. And you all have your reasons to play with 99 overall players in a minor league stadium you never heard of.
Agree to disagree, MLB the show is great game regardless and that’s the main thing that matters
This is why its not a debate. You clearly think you're better no matter what anyone else says and you've been condescending about DD players as well. You also missed the point of my argument, in h2h sometimes you will have a good batter against a bad pitcher or vice versa. In DD that won't happen.