Youtubers are all going in
-
Again, there are no absolutes in baseball.
Runners on first and third and one out. Hitter strikes a sharp hit but is defended by an infielder leading to a double play to end the inning. In hindsight, a walk to load the bases would have worked better for the offense. Point is there are no absolutes in baseball. There are only probabilities and outliers with an excellent defensive play can upset even those probabilities.
The adage "a walk is as good as a hit," has a context. It doesn't mean a walk is as good as any hit in any situation.
Sabermetrics is also a measuring tool, nothing more and nothing less. BTW: The movie Moneyball glossed over many truths in the A's that season, and also engaged in a lot of outright lies about real people. The movie barely acknowledged the existence of the A's starting pitchers. That ignored a heck of a lot given that the game of baseball is primarily pitching and defense.
Driving up pitch counts by trying to earn walks only works when your pitching staff keeps you in the game so that the one or two runs you can work this way can make the difference.
Another flawed adage is that "a strikeout is just another out." This is context based. A strikeout in a first and third situation is better than a double play to end the inning. But, overall, putting the ball in play is better than walking when there are runners in scoring position, but a walk always is better than an out.
A third adage: "There is no defense against the base on balls!"
-
no one has ever contended walks are not important, you never swing at bad pitches, my only contention is hits are better because you are taking control of the situation, thats how was taught to play, thats the baseball I prefer. I think the three outcomes of HR, SO or BB are boring. I can appreciate a patient hitter, Joey Votto is one of my favorite players and he walked a lot, but he went up there looking for his pitch with the idea of hitting. I read Ted Williams and Charlie Lau's books when I was playing, and I led the independent league I was in in walks, that doesn't change my philosophy of hits are better... I'll die on that hill
-
I wonder what Ted Williams would say about the notion that walks are not important
His philosophy centered on a core rule: "Get a good pitch to hit." Imparted by Hall of Famer Rogers Hornsby and detailed in his book "The Science of Hitting", Williams believed a hitter who never walks is simply swinging at the pitcher's pitch rather than controlling the at-bat.
If Ted watched me play the game, he'd be disappointed in my approach.
-
@victoryphoenix_mlbts
Maybe contributing to your boredom is flaws, mistakes or other unnecessary unwanted elements included in the game itself by the creators (e.g. like CPU pitchers never giving you a pitch to hit). I don’t think a commitment to sabermetrics is causing this. Tell me something about the game that suggests they are heavily influenced by sabermetrics or are forcing it upon us. -
@TripleH-4481_PSN
Yes, these are the reasons. Not sabremetrics. -
I think they value home runs above all else. They push players with 125 power. When they create a moment, most of them hit a home run. That's my opinion as an old-school ball player and a proponent of the old-school game.
-
@MarioMendoza935_XBL
It's good to be seen. After my heart attack in 24 and reduced playing time, and then only playing very little in 25, I skipped 26 altogether. I was thinking of coming back for 27, but now I'll just wait and see. It's good to see some of the ol' peeps are still around. -
CJ12K just put out a GREAT video on the problems with the game. CJ sometimes has some specialized views because he comes at it from the perspective of what's important for a top-ranked player (which most of us, including me, are never gonna be). But, the most recent video is dead on....
Basically saying what I've said over and over - this game is not pay to win, and it's not super hard to do NMS, but it still stinks in SO many ways.
-
I agree that it is not pay to win. I've been saying that for years
But on the NMS front it is a matter of perspective. Maybe it's easier than before but I still would not say easy.
It requires some combination of flipping, investing, pack luck and skill. Offline players are hindered by everything they earn being "No Sell". Meanwhile online players get to sell all of those rewards
Skilled players can make bank rerunning Diamond Quests and selling rewards while those with lesser skills may have to run it multiple times just to get 1 card.
Flipping and investing is fine way to get stubs but I am not going to do it I bought this game to play some baseball now and again not to spend my time on the marketplace or gambling my stubs that a player gets a deserved upgrade (waves at Jordan Walker).
So easier? Maybe.
Easy? Not for everyone. -
I agree that it is not pay to win. I've been saying that for years
But on the NMS front it is a matter of perspective. Maybe it's easier than before but I still would not say easy.
It requires some combination of flipping, investing, pack luck and skill. Offline players are hindered by everything they earn being "No Sell". Meanwhile online players get to sell all of those rewards
Part of the reason this game is NMS friendly is skill has a big advantage, and great cards aren't an effective crutch if you don't have the skill. If you are easily fooled into swinging at pitches outside of the zone or cant catch up to inside heat better cards arent going to solve that. If you are predictable with your pitches even someone like me will start smacking you around by the 6th inning.
Completing the big collections NMS requires dedication for sure, but you can make WS without collection cards.
