Request to Return Long Term Investing via Back Orders
-
What they could do is just gray out the sell button unless they are getting back quick sell value or greater after market tax.
This move seems more player friendly than that as now players buy orders cant get permanently tied up
-
It is pretty simple. When you list an order it tells you right on the screen what you will get after tax. If you care about stubs sell for the highest after tax amount. QS has no tax. If quick sell is 500 and the sell now price is lower than 556 then you want to QS. If the sell now price is higher...than go list it on the market because the buy now amount will be higher and therefore you will make more profit. If you are an impulsive, rash, or thoughtless person just keep mashing buttons until you get to the next screen.
-
@theBlindRhino_PSN Why? Does this help anything?
-
@LHUBison58_XBL Does what help anything?
-
@theBlindRhino_PSN Calling me a loser. It doesn’t add anything to the discourse in this thread.
-
@LHUBison58_XBL said in Request to Return Long Term Investing via Back Orders:
@theBlindRhino_PSN Calling me a loser. It doesn’t add anything to the discourse in this thread.
Where did I call you that?
-
This is one of the silliest things anyone could argue about.
-
@theBlindRhino_PSN said in Request to Return Long Term Investing via Back Orders:
@ShDynasty1227_XBL The only losers here were SDS, who are well within their right to change this, and people who don't like math or reading...or proof reading to make sure auto correct doesn't alter what they intend to say thus saying things that don't make sense.
What purpose did that serve? I corrected it as soon as I saw it. I’m sure lots of people don’t proof read their board posts.
-
@LHUBison58_XBL said in Request to Return Long Term Investing via Back Orders:
@theBlindRhino_PSN said in Request to Return Long Term Investing via Back Orders:
@ShDynasty1227_XBL The only losers here were SDS, who are well within their right to change this, and people who don't like math or reading...or proof reading to make sure auto correct doesn't alter what they intend to say thus saying things that don't make sense.
What purpose did that serve? I corrected it as soon as I saw it. I’m sure lots of people don’t proof read their board posts.
Wait you thought that this was directed at you? I apologize. I can see now why you thought that but I was talking about someone else that isn't you. I don't know you but you seem like a winner. Not a loser.
-
I don’t need an apology, but accept it, I just have usually found this board to be rather civil, unlike many places in the internet. I like being able to read meaningful conversations on a game I find to be integral to unwinding each day. Maybe I over thought this, for that I apologize.
-
@LHUBison58_XBL In hindsight I can certainly see how you felt that. I wasn't even giving it much thought so I was truly at a loss at the time. Now I see it clear as day.
-
@SchnauzerFace_MLBTS to be fair, that's why I've been trying really hard to be respectful about it, speak my piece and try to come to fair compromises that help both parties. Sorry it's come across as an argument. I felt as though I was being attacked pretty aggressively at first when I believe there is fair reason to retain back orders.
-
@ShDynasty1227_XBL said in Request to Return Long Term Investing via Back Orders:
@SchnauzerFace_MLBTS to be fair, that's why I've been trying really hard to be respectful about it, speak my piece and try to come to fair compromises that help both parties. Sorry it's come across as an argument. I felt as though I was being attacked pretty aggressively at first when I believe there is fair reason to retain back orders.
I gotcha. But what I really meant was that it’s a silly thing to even have an opinion on. Of all the things I could spend my limited, precious time on this earth thinking about, this is basically at the very, very bottom of the list.
-
@theBlindRhino_PSN no, most NMS have not completed LS, that is a bold assumption because you need either an incredible amount of luck in pulls or flipping.
-
@yankblan_PSN Yeah I meant NMS flippers have completed. No way would I be near completion without out it.
-
@SchnauzerFace_MLBTS that is fair. I was pretty bummed out about it because I've also used this to try to help out new players who don't know how to invest over the years, so I was a bit bummed yesterday. It is what it is, I suppose. I won't lose sleep over it, but I am still disappointed.
-
@PAinPA_PSN said in Request to Return Long Term Investing via Back Orders:
Wow,Google translate really is amazing.
This is how this post reads after being filtered by translate.
We are very unhappy that we can no longer rip people off by listing for less than the minimum and taking advantage of the gullible and those unaware of how it works.please give us back the ability to steal from these people so we can have a sense of contentment againRip people off? Didn't realize we were supposed to coddle morons.
-
@aaronjw76_PSN hey man, let's not do this. It's completely reasonable not to penalize people for making a mistake. The function could return without hurting others. Preventing that is a reasonable ask.
-
@ShDynasty1227_XBL No, not sole, but one … that is enough … and you know that backorders were waaaaayyyy easier than investing. Build up a stock amount and invest everything in 2000 stub orders on Corbin Carroll and you can make hundres of thousands stubs within a couple of days. You did it, I did it … And the fact does not make it any better
. I still like it, solely on the thing that an unknown user cannot make a mistake and keeping stubs out of the systemEDIT: Last statement … They even mentioned it on the stream … so, an advice: Save your time, it is here to stay
… It is time for some real investments … the next one is coming in 4 weeks
