Ranked and BR Change Explanation
-
@TripleH-4481_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
All 99s are not equal. You are a World Series player so significantly better than most of the player base. This gives you easier access to a good chunk of the elite 99s and you can sell them for stubs and earn them again whenever you want. The game is a much different animal for most players. I’m not faulting you for being good just stating your argument doesn’t apply to players that aren’t World Series caliber.
so why can't players that are non wS players push themselves to try to make WS? Why not try? I work and coach every single day and barely get the time as of late, but I dont understand why some players just not try to motivate themselves or push themselves.
-
@DemIsE4_XBL said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@JiggidyJJ_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
I find the explanation infuriating for the change to Ranked and BR. More snobbish elitism. The basic answer is only those who go 12-0 or make 900 should have stubs. Nobody else is allowed only the 1% is allowed to get richer in stubs. The program is not cost-efficient enough for an average to causal player to do the program. You lose too many stubs with 100 million stubs per attempt cost to enter the BR Program. The stupid pack you get for each entry gives about 150-250 stubs back normally max. This explanation will not help anything but will further divide between snobbish elites and everyone else. Even if those who go 12-0 or make 900 are not snobbish elites, that is the impression. Taking away from those in the middle to bottom to cater to those at the very top seldom goes over well. Take away the ability for anyone to sell or reverse this decision is the only fair answer.
click the link and scroll to the bottom for official explanation of change
https://theshow.com/news/game23-update-7/You know it's real easy to flip stubbs. Prolly could have made 10k by the time it took you to write this.
Nothing against people that flip but I have zero interest in playing a fake stock market. I want to play the game and get stubs from playing the game. They are making this game where you have to do stuff you really don't want to if you want a good competitive team online. This includes flipping, conquests, mini seasons and playing the computer.
exactly mate - flipping all day is absolutely a bore - what a waste of life - anyone who is decent at flipping in this videogame should try penny stocks - at least that is real
-
@baseball229056_XBL said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
I like the change. The way it was before, there was no value in the reward cards. I think the ws rewards last season were going for about 40k. There should be some incentive and reward for doing something good in the game. Not everyone should get a trophy.
Couldn’t agree more. The OP wants a participation award. He is just too blind to see that they have given him a participation award (the actual flawless and WS card). Instead he whines and cries across multiple threads that he wants the MVP trophy (figuratively speaking) when he rides the pine on his hometown little leagues bench (more metaphoric rhetoric for idiots like the OP) because he can’t hit the ball that is placed on a tee for him.
-
@X-FREEZE-OFF-X_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
I find the explanation infuriating for the change to Ranked and BR. More snobbish elitism. The basic answer is only those who go 12-0 or make 900 should have stubs. Nobody else is allowed only the 1% is allowed to get richer in stubs. The program is not cost-efficient enough for an average to causal player to do the program. You lose too many stubs with 100 million stubs per attempt cost to enter the BR Program. The stupid pack you get for each entry gives about 150-250 stubs back normally max. This explanation will not help anything but will further divide between snobbish elites and everyone else. Even if those who go 12-0 or make 900 are not snobbish elites, that is the impression. Taking away from those in the middle to bottom to cater to those at the very top seldom goes over well. Take away the ability for anyone to sell or reverse this decision is the only fair answer.
click the link and scroll to the bottom for official explanation of change
https://theshow.com/news/game23-update-7/They could've saved a bunch of time by just saying that they don't want people to earn stubs; they want them to buy them.
I don’t think that’s the case bud, I think they are trying to control the stub market and eliminate inflation and over saturation of elite cards on the market. Which completely makes sense.
-
@killerpresence4_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@X-FREEZE-OFF-X_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
I find the explanation infuriating for the change to Ranked and BR. More snobbish elitism. The basic answer is only those who go 12-0 or make 900 should have stubs. Nobody else is allowed only the 1% is allowed to get richer in stubs. The program is not cost-efficient enough for an average to causal player to do the program. You lose too many stubs with 100 million stubs per attempt cost to enter the BR Program. The stupid pack you get for each entry gives about 150-250 stubs back normally max. This explanation will not help anything but will further divide between snobbish elites and everyone else. Even if those who go 12-0 or make 900 are not snobbish elites, that is the impression. Taking away from those in the middle to bottom to cater to those at the very top seldom goes over well. Take away the ability for anyone to sell or reverse this decision is the only fair answer.
click the link and scroll to the bottom for official explanation of change
https://theshow.com/news/game23-update-7/They could've saved a bunch of time by just saying that they don't want people to earn stubs; they want them to buy them.
I don’t think that’s the case bud, I think they are trying to control the stub market and eliminate inflation and over saturation of elite cards on the market. Which completely makes sense.
i agree with everything you said too - this thread is filled with people who think that garbage play grinding should reward top tier cards - they disregard rarity for the sake of a grind
-
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@SaveFarris_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
The program is not cost-efficient enough for an average to causal player to do the program.
It was never supposed to be. The fact is was becoming that is why they changed it.
Want to sell the rewards? Get Gooder. (I'm not. But then again, I was never selling the rewards anyway.)
It was only supposed to be profitable for the 1%? well, let's see...I think I will call that ...Elitist and snobbish
I wish there was a way to downvote a post and have their rep take a hit when they post garbage like this
-
The biggest problem is in what they advertise vs what they actually do.
"Play as you want to play" is fair if it's part of an XP path; but it's false for about 95% of content. Online players have to grind stupid programs, and offline players are cutoff from some rewards by either not wanting to put themselves through the aggravation of competing against showerbags, or being forced to spend money because they're squeezing the market.
-
@TEXAS10PT_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@nashbandicoot1_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
Exclusivity is a good thing. I want to be able to use a card that not many others have. Game was watered down and constantly catering to the general public. This is a massive W
Catering to the general public? WTF? Who do you think buys this game? Where is your flex World Series Banner like the rest?
I'm about to take mine off and put on like all star. I can't even stay in the 700's this season. Think I've been shut out twice in my last 2 HOF games. Couldn't tell what the pitch was last night, good times.
-
@killerpresence4_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
I find the explanation infuriating for the change to Ranked and BR. More snobbish elitism. The basic answer is only those who go 12-0 or make 900 should have stubs. Nobody else is allowed only the 1% is allowed to get richer in stubs. The program is not cost-efficient enough for an average to causal player to do the program. You lose too many stubs with 100 million stubs per attempt cost to enter the BR Program. The stupid pack you get for each entry gives about 150-250 stubs back normally max. This explanation will not help anything but will further divide between snobbish elites and everyone else. Even if those who go 12-0 or make 900 are not snobbish elites, that is the impression. Taking away from those in the middle to bottom to cater to those at the very top seldom goes over well. Take away the ability for anyone to sell or reverse this decision is the only fair answer.
click the link and scroll to the bottom for official explanation of change
https://theshow.com/news/game23-update-7/Dude, give it a rest. We all know what your opinion is on this subject. It’s obvious they don’t give a flying you know what. They explained it very clearly why they did it. There is no amount of whining and crying that is going to change their minds. And why should they. It’s their game. They have every right to limit who gets what in the game. It what you agree to when you accept their terms and conditions for playing the game. It’s called an end user licensing agreement. And you must agree to it if you want to play. If you don’t like it you can go elsewhere to be entertained. Presumably no one is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to play. So get over it or leave. It’s really that simple
Could be wrong but I think a drop in BR numbers will get their attention.
-
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@SaveFarris_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
The program is not cost-efficient enough for an average to causal player to do the program.
It was never supposed to be. The fact is was becoming that is why they changed it.
Want to sell the rewards? Get Gooder. (I'm not. But then again, I was never selling the rewards anyway.)
It was only supposed to be profitable for the 1%? well, let's see...I think I will call that ...Elitist and snobbish
I’d like to know where you are getting this 1% number. Is this an actual stat? And if it is, please leave a citation as to where we can go to find this info. And if it is just some arbitrary number that you pulled from your nether regions please say so so we can move on and completely discount anything you say as bull—— because that’s what people do to those who fudge numbers just to justify their position or make a point.
-
Yeah I was fine with it until reading how they were upset people would get the reward and sell it to use those stubs elsewhere…. You mean playing the game and maybe have 3-4 good players instead of one? Especially it’s bothersome some of these rewards are replacing previous or just not useable
-
@DemIsE4_XBL said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@killerpresence4_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
I find the explanation infuriating for the change to Ranked and BR. More snobbish elitism. The basic answer is only those who go 12-0 or make 900 should have stubs. Nobody else is allowed only the 1% is allowed to get richer in stubs. The program is not cost-efficient enough for an average to causal player to do the program. You lose too many stubs with 100 million stubs per attempt cost to enter the BR Program. The stupid pack you get for each entry gives about 150-250 stubs back normally max. This explanation will not help anything but will further divide between snobbish elites and everyone else. Even if those who go 12-0 or make 900 are not snobbish elites, that is the impression. Taking away from those in the middle to bottom to cater to those at the very top seldom goes over well. Take away the ability for anyone to sell or reverse this decision is the only fair answer.
click the link and scroll to the bottom for official explanation of change
https://theshow.com/news/game23-update-7/Dude, give it a rest. We all know what your opinion is on this subject. It’s obvious they don’t give a flying you know what. They explained it very clearly why they did it. There is no amount of whining and crying that is going to change their minds. And why should they. It’s their game. They have every right to limit who gets what in the game. It what you agree to when you accept their terms and conditions for playing the game. It’s called an end user licensing agreement. And you must agree to it if you want to play. If you don’t like it you can go elsewhere to be entertained. Presumably no one is putting a gun to your head and forcing you to play. So get over it or leave. It’s really that simple
Could be wrong but I think a drop in BR numbers will get their attention.
Yeah I don’t think it’s going to matter, and I don’t think that there will be a significant drop in how many people play BR. You know why? Because these kids who scream the loudest about this stuff always come back for more. Then they get mad and come crawling to the forums to complain some more. It’s a vicious cycle of self depreciation.
-
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
I find the explanation infuriating for the change to Ranked and BR. More snobbish elitism. The basic answer is only those who go 12-0 or make 900 should have stubs. Nobody else is allowed only the 1% is allowed to get richer in stubs. The program is not cost-efficient enough for an average to causal player to do the program. You lose too many stubs with 100 million stubs per attempt cost to enter the BR Program. The stupid pack you get for each entry gives about 150-250 stubs back normally max. This explanation will not help anything but will further divide between snobbish elites and everyone else. Even if those who go 12-0 or make 900 are not snobbish elites, that is the impression. Taking away from those in the middle to bottom to cater to those at the very top seldom goes over well. Take away the ability for anyone to sell or reverse this decision is the only fair answer.
click the link and scroll to the bottom for official explanation of change
https://theshow.com/news/game23-update-7/I like the change, now I have a reason to grind to 900. I can get the stubs to complete the collections for free. For me it brought life to ranked. I definitely am not elite at this game by any means but I have a reason to play that mode. 99 Lou for 30k is a joke.
-
@nashbandicoot1_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
Exclusivity is a good thing. I want to be able to use a card that not many others have. Game was watered down and constantly catering to the general public. This is a massive W
AGREED!
-
I really can see the point of both sides, but I feel that the biggest problem goes back to the programs have been there for three years. BR especially has been a well designed program. RS has never quite found the correct design...wins, innings, points, etc. Season one was way too easy and then significant overcorrection occurred.
I think the bigger issue with this game is with what it is doing to the player base. There have always been disagreements, but these forums are like a Civil War now. There are a few on here that will defend at all costs and some that will express their issues at all costs, but it really seems like more are unhappy than happy. I would imagine this game has already lost more of the player base than normal, but that may not be an issue for SDS if their profits are higher. There is still an issue though if the player base is daily engaging in a war of words. They obviously have a formula that is not working for a decent percentage of the player base, which is causing the other side to defend. It just doesn't seem like a good look.
-
@aam34_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@nashbandicoot1_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
Exclusivity is a good thing. I want to be able to use a card that not many others have. Game was watered down and constantly catering to the general public. This is a massive W
AGREED!
i agree completely too with Nash - i am tired of everyone thinking they can just grind to get the best cards - there should be rewards for those who achieve great results in game - everyone else can either practice, cry about it, or both
-
@killerpresence4_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@SaveFarris_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
The program is not cost-efficient enough for an average to causal player to do the program.
It was never supposed to be. The fact is was becoming that is why they changed it.
Want to sell the rewards? Get Gooder. (I'm not. But then again, I was never selling the rewards anyway.)
It was only supposed to be profitable for the 1%? well, let's see...I think I will call that ...Elitist and snobbish
I’d like to know where you are getting this 1% number. Is this an actual stat? And if it is, please leave a citation as to where we can go to find this info. And if it is just some arbitrary number that you pulled from your nether regions please say so so we can move on and completely discount anything you say as bull—— because that’s what people do to those who fudge numbers just to justify their position or make a point.
If you really want, you could look at the number of people that make WS and then look at all the people that that have played an RS game. This doesn't even include the offline people. I think you would find that number less than 1%. 12-0 is even a more rare accomplishment.
There really is no reason to make both of those programs non-sellable. BR program was fine. RS program was too easy and that is why the rewards were 30k. They just needed to make the RS program a little tougher which they did while also making reward unsellable. The end result will be the elite gets richer and less people will play those modes.
-
@TheHungryHole said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@aam34_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@nashbandicoot1_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
Exclusivity is a good thing. I want to be able to use a card that not many others have. Game was watered down and constantly catering to the general public. This is a massive W
AGREED!
i agree completely too with Nash - i am tired of everyone thinking they can just grind to get the best cards - there should be rewards for those who achieve great results in game - everyone else can either practice, cry about it, or both
Actually, the best card in the game is behind a 75k pack with a horrible chance to get this reward. Mantle is hands down the best card in the game right now imo.
-
@Dolenz_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
I have used the phrase before and I am sure that I will use it again.
Aggressive Monetization.
Everything about this years game seems to be pushing people to buy stubs.
- 99's in very expensive packs that are sold for a very short time, ensuring their rarity and higher prices.
- Expiration dates on cards, which means you may have to pay a lot of stubs for a 99 of your favorite players multiple times.
- No Sell POTM cards
- No Sell BR program rewards
- Pitiful Stubs payouts in programs, moments, and now Showdowns. In showdown you used to be able to make your stubs back after three or four bosses. Not so in the Kaiju showdown.
So more expensive cards than ever before + less opportunities to earn stubs = Aggressive Monetization.
i noticed that too. The stub rewards are smaller than last year. If i buy a pack or a card off the market it seems to take me twice as long to recover it. My pack luck has sucked for the most part, so that doesnt help either lol. I did manage to pull trout, but none of the other gatekeepers so far. I am normally done with collections by now but the stubs just arent there this year.
-
@DemIsE4_XBL said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@killerpresence4_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@SaveFarris_PSN said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
@Firestormx_MLBTS said in Ranked and BR Change Explanation:
The program is not cost-efficient enough for an average to causal player to do the program.
It was never supposed to be. The fact is was becoming that is why they changed it.
Want to sell the rewards? Get Gooder. (I'm not. But then again, I was never selling the rewards anyway.)
It was only supposed to be profitable for the 1%? well, let's see...I think I will call that ...Elitist and snobbish
I’d like to know where you are getting this 1% number. Is this an actual stat? And if it is, please leave a citation as to where we can go to find this info. And if it is just some arbitrary number that you pulled from your nether regions please say so so we can move on and completely discount anything you say as bull—— because that’s what people do to those who fudge numbers just to justify their position or make a point.
If you really want, you could look at the number of people that make WS and then look at all the people that that have played an RS game. This doesn't even include the offline people. I think you would find that number less than 1%. 12-0 is even a more rare accomplishment.
I’m not saying that this isn’t true, but if we are going to use numbers and percentages then it is always best to include where this info can found otherwise we probably shouldn’t be using statistical information because it just doesn’t make your argument plausible. It’s more likely he just made this number up to justify his point which makes his argument implausible. I’ve made this point numerous times. There is a way to present a legitimate argument without using statistics that haven’t been vetted. For example, the OP could have used the term “Majority” rather than assigning an exact value. But this particular poster has used multiple threads to pedal this temper tantrum they are having even after the explanation was delivered by the company that makes this title. It has gotten old.
