RS innings is a fail
-
Goal was to make teams that are losing stay in the game. I have played — games I think and one game has gone 9 innings, 2 - 7 innings, all
The others less than 4.They have to go back to the drawing board.
-
Goal was to stop people from tanking, not stopping people from quitting. The only realistic way to cut down on quits is to give players increasing timeouts every time they quit
-
@the_dragon1912 said in RS innings is a fail:
Goal was to stop people from tanking, not stopping people from quitting. The only realistic way to cut down on quits is to give players increasing timeouts every time they quit
How would it influence people not to tank?
-
@genopolanco_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@the_dragon1912 said in RS innings is a fail:
Goal was to stop people from tanking, not stopping people from quitting. The only realistic way to cut down on quits is to give players increasing timeouts every time they quit
How would it influence people not to tank?
When wins mattered, you tanked to play easier opponents
-
@genopolanco_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@the_dragon1912 said in RS innings is a fail:
Goal was to stop people from tanking, not stopping people from quitting. The only realistic way to cut down on quits is to give players increasing timeouts every time they quit
How would it influence people not to tank?
They won't get any progress. You are going to get more innings losing a game on legend than scoring 8 runs in the first against a 450 player and having them quit. There were plenty of world series players that would get the pack from making world series, and then quit games until they found someone who quit first to get wins faster
-
They just need a reduction in the amount of innings required. They'll modify it for the next program. If they don't, the metadata says we aren't playing enough.
TSN is represented by less than 3% of the game population. What we say here versus what their back end data shows, will rarely make an impact
-
@oreorockstar_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
Goal was to make teams that are losing stay in the game. I have played — games I think and one game has gone 9 innings, 2 - 7 innings, all
The others less than 4.They have to go back to the drawing board.
I've been lucky - my average is over 7 innings per game.
-
It’s simple a quit/rage quit = 9 innings counted for the opposing player hopefully they find a way to implement that.
-
Can you only make WS through innings or can you still do it based on Wins or rank?
-
@ericulous1_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
Can you only make WS through innings or can you still do it based on Wins or rank?
Yes get your wins problem solved
-
@joeythebigboss said in RS innings is a fail:
It’s simple a quit/rage quit = 9 innings counted for the opposing player hopefully they find a way to implement that.
This is spot on. They quit, you get 9 innings. Not hard to implement.
-
@oreorockstar_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@joeythebigboss said in RS innings is a fail:
It’s simple a quit/rage quit = 9 innings counted for the opposing player hopefully they find a way to implement that.
This is spot on. They quit, you get 9 innings. Not hard to implement.
@oreorockstar_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@joeythebigboss said in RS innings is a fail:
It’s simple a quit/rage quit = 9 innings counted for the opposing player hopefully they find a way to implement that.
This is spot on. They quit, you get 9 innings. Not hard to implement.
Then it will be back to the tanking…..but if they made it “quit and get no innings” then it would reduce the amount of quits
-
@crimson_monk_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@oreorockstar_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@joeythebigboss said in RS innings is a fail:
It’s simple a quit/rage quit = 9 innings counted for the opposing player hopefully they find a way to implement that.
This is spot on. They quit, you get 9 innings. Not hard to implement.
@oreorockstar_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@joeythebigboss said in RS innings is a fail:
It’s simple a quit/rage quit = 9 innings counted for the opposing player hopefully they find a way to implement that.
This is spot on. They quit, you get 9 innings. Not hard to implement.
Then it will be back to the tanking…..but if they made it “quit and get no innings” then it would reduce the amount of quits
Then they would dashboard instead, and SDS wouldn't penalize them for the innings or give you the credit either.
Unfortunately, good idea but no way to implement.
-
The happy middle would be that once you reach a new level you don't fall back to a prior level so you have to keep winning to get to the next teir. By doing this you will be forced to keep playing cause you have to try and win versus those who are in your division and only way to get out is to win and keep moving up. Also innings can stay for the program as more people should stay in game cause quiting out does nothing for them cause you stay were you are
-
@cdnmoneymaker93_nsw said in RS innings is a fail:
The happy middle would be that once you reach a new level you don't fall back to a prior level so you have to keep winning to get to the next teir. By doing this you will be forced to keep playing cause you have to try and win versus those who are in your division and only way to get out is to win and keep moving up. Also innings can stay for the program as more people should stay in game cause quiting out does nothing for them cause you stay were you are
People would just quit out when their rating gets close to the next tier.
-
@raylewissb47_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@cdnmoneymaker93_nsw said in RS innings is a fail:
The happy middle would be that once you reach a new level you don't fall back to a prior level so you have to keep winning to get to the next teir. By doing this you will be forced to keep playing cause you have to try and win versus those who are in your division and only way to get out is to win and keep moving up. Also innings can stay for the program as more people should stay in game cause quiting out does nothing for them cause you stay were you are
People would just quit out when their rating gets close to the next tier.
Why you would just be quiting as you don't fall back so what purpose would.quiting be at that point other then "I don't like losing cause my mommy always let me win" kinda moment
-
@cdnmoneymaker93_nsw said in RS innings is a fail:
@raylewissb47_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@cdnmoneymaker93_nsw said in RS innings is a fail:
The happy middle would be that once you reach a new level you don't fall back to a prior level so you have to keep winning to get to the next teir. By doing this you will be forced to keep playing cause you have to try and win versus those who are in your division and only way to get out is to win and keep moving up. Also innings can stay for the program as more people should stay in game cause quiting out does nothing for them cause you stay were you are
People would just quit out when their rating gets close to the next tier.
Why you would just be quiting as you don't fall back so what purpose would.quiting be at that point other then "I don't like losing cause my mommy always let me win" kinda moment
Maybe I’m misunderstanding this. My thought was as you were approaching the next tier, people would start losing to lower their rating to avoid going up to the next tier. For example, I’m in CS and my rating is starting to approach WS, I would start losing yo get back to the bottom of the CS rating tier in order to stay there and not go to WS. I know that’s a bad example but I hope you get the idea.
-
@joeythebigboss said in RS innings is a fail:
It’s simple a quit/rage quit = 9 innings counted for the opposing player hopefully they find a way to implement that.
THAT……would be great!
-
@raylewissb47_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@cdnmoneymaker93_nsw said in RS innings is a fail:
@raylewissb47_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@cdnmoneymaker93_nsw said in RS innings is a fail:
The happy middle would be that once you reach a new level you don't fall back to a prior level so you have to keep winning to get to the next teir. By doing this you will be forced to keep playing cause you have to try and win versus those who are in your division and only way to get out is to win and keep moving up. Also innings can stay for the program as more people should stay in game cause quiting out does nothing for them cause you stay were you are
People would just quit out when their rating gets close to the next tier.
Why you would just be quiting as you don't fall back so what purpose would.quiting be at that point other then "I don't like losing cause my mommy always let me win" kinda moment
Maybe I’m misunderstanding this. My thought was as you were approaching the next tier, people would start losing to lower their rating to avoid going up to the next tier. For example, I’m in CS and my rating is starting to approach WS, I would start losing yo get back to the bottom of the CS rating tier in order to stay there and not go to WS. I know that’s a bad example but I hope you get the idea.
Sorry if I am not being super clear I'm saying if you lose you don't lose point you stay where you are so of you quit cause your losing it does nothing for you cause you remain right were you are so of you want to progress you have to win. The idea is people play full games cause either A you hit innings an get the pack or reach the goal and get the pack or grind it out for both
-
@cdnmoneymaker93_nsw said in RS innings is a fail:
@raylewissb47_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@cdnmoneymaker93_nsw said in RS innings is a fail:
@raylewissb47_psn said in RS innings is a fail:
@cdnmoneymaker93_nsw said in RS innings is a fail:
The happy middle would be that once you reach a new level you don't fall back to a prior level so you have to keep winning to get to the next teir. By doing this you will be forced to keep playing cause you have to try and win versus those who are in your division and only way to get out is to win and keep moving up. Also innings can stay for the program as more people should stay in game cause quiting out does nothing for them cause you stay were you are
People would just quit out when their rating gets close to the next tier.
Why you would just be quiting as you don't fall back so what purpose would.quiting be at that point other then "I don't like losing cause my mommy always let me win" kinda moment
Maybe I’m misunderstanding this. My thought was as you were approaching the next tier, people would start losing to lower their rating to avoid going up to the next tier. For example, I’m in CS and my rating is starting to approach WS, I would start losing yo get back to the bottom of the CS rating tier in order to stay there and not go to WS. I know that’s a bad example but I hope you get the idea.
Sorry if I am not being super clear I'm saying if you lose you don't lose point you stay where you are so of you quit cause your losing it does nothing for you cause you remain right were you are so of you want to progress you have to win. The idea is people play full games cause either A you hit innings an get the pack or reach the goal and get the pack or grind it out for both
Ok. I get you now. I’m not sure how some will feel about that.
