This Game Became Biast Towards .....
-
@tonythetiger2k16 said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@sevisonjn_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@eatyum_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
If they change that, the community will be so outraged that it might actually drive people to quit instead of threatening to quit. Hard no from me, the more difficult inputs should absolutely be rewarded over the simpler ones.
I understand your viewpoint, and I'm sorry, but that is not a reasonable solution to "competitiveness', in fact it's the opposite.
There are rewards like "more accuracy for exceptional input in all PPP pitching input" which I am fine with and then there is the reward of pitchers not holding stamina in other modes compared with PPP that are unacceptable. Fielding should not be rewarded with user input IMO. I do not want to play a game where every single thing I need to do in the game requires interaction on my end. You already got me for hitting while you are pushing PPP. Please don't reward people for hitting a button to start and stop a throw meter. If you are going to go that way make them use the sticks to point towards the area that you want to throw.
What difference should it matter to you which mode is being used by your opponent. Can ANYONE really tell who is using which mode? What matters to you is how you are actually playing & are you within a fair level chance of beating your opponent just as he is of beating you. PinPoint vs Meter, Meter vs Analog, Analog vs Pinpoint, ETC. each have it's fair level of play to beat the other. But with Directional/Classic that is NOT the case. If Someone is a better player. then they should be able to beat their opponent no matter which mode they are using. BOTTOM LINE !!!!!
if they are better why arent they using the better input, usually the better players make adjustments and learn new things rather then complain and doing the same old thing over and over. Definition of insanity.
-
@tonythetiger2k16 said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
I can see that several of you are posting against this. But I am a "Paying Customer", I spent money to buy this game like everyone else did & I have my right to give my own personal feedback in hopes SDS developers will read it & see if it warrants any change. There are many out there that feel as I do about Directional/Classic, but are probably NOT within The Show Nation Community Forums.
Hearing what most of you are saying. It just leaves me to believe that most of you are bunch of wusses & chickens. Are you guys are that afraid & scared that if Directional & Classic was made more fairly equally leveled that now your [censored]'s will easily be kicked? That is so sad & pathetic if that's how most of you feel & think.
Like I said earlier, The "Competitiveness" comes from "PROPER" Game Play Strategy & Execution. Which Pitch to throw & where within the count & pending the Hitter facing. When to Steal, Hit & Run, when to go for a HR or just a line drive opposite field hit. When to give your starter the hook, who to warm up & why, when to pinch hit & with who. ETC, ETC. .... If Someone is a better player. then they should be able to beat their opponent no matter which mode they are using. BOTTOM LINE !!!!!
Just because if Directional/Classic was made more fairly equally leveled it does NOT mean I will win EVERY game. It will just ONLY put me on a leveled play where my chances are now 50/50 being able to win. Who I am facing may easily find a flaw within my play he could exploit. Or picks ups on my pitching tendencies & exploit that. Anyone can beat anyone at any given time as long as the game is FAIR to ALL!!!!!!!!! REGARDLESS which Mode 1 choses to use & why.
paying customer is fine, you can have all the success in the world offline, play how you play, but when it comes to online COMPETITIVE game modes, then no, they should not cater to inputs that require just one click of the button, goodness with how crazy accuarate pinpoint is, classic pitcing getting a buff would ruin the game, it'd take no skill. It takes skill to be good in a competitive setting.
-
@guccigangchuck said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@tonythetiger2k16 said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@sevisonjn_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
if they are better why arent they using the better input, usually the better players make adjustments and learn new things rather then complain and doing the same old thing over and over. Definition of insanity.
You are missing my point & context. What I mean by being "Better" is with overall general Baseball Knowledge & Strategy. My opponent beating me because he just out played me better with Pitch locations, changing speeds, throwing right pitch in the right moment within the count. How he hit & chose when to bunt, hit & run, steal, tag up, etc. He knew when to pinch hit & with who & why. He knew when to give his starter the hook & who to replace him with & why. Combination of all those factors he just out played me.
That is a VERY BIG DIFFERENCE from him beating me ONLY because he was more skilled with using a controller. Any 10 year old that does NOT know the game well, but uses a controller extremely well can beat me just because he was able to place the PCI accurately enough & time his swing to get several "Perfect-Perfect's" for 3 to 5 HR's.
-
@tonythetiger2k16 said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@guccigangchuck said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@tonythetiger2k16 said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@sevisonjn_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
if they are better why arent they using the better input, usually the better players make adjustments and learn new things rather then complain and doing the same old thing over and over. Definition of insanity.
You are missing my point & context. What I mean by being "Better" is with overall general Baseball Knowledge & Strategy. My opponent beating me because he just out played me better with Pitch locations, changing speeds, throwing right pitch in the right moment within the count. How he hit & chose when to bunt, hit & run, steal, tag up, etc. He knew when to pinch hit & with who & why. He knew when to give his starter the hook & who to replace him with & why. Combination of all those factors he just out played me.
That is a VERY BIG DIFFERENCE from him beating me ONLY because he was more skilled with using a controller. Any 10 year old that does NOT know the game well, but uses a controller extremely well can beat me just because he was able to place the PCI accurately enough & time his swing to get several "Perfect-Perfect's" for 3 to 5 HR's.
every game requires skill movements on a controller now a days, this isnt 2006, where taping buttons and using a power swing with guess pitch turned on rewars you, Having skill on the sticks sets people apart not just for mlb but for all games.
-
@guccigangchuck said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
if they are better why arent they using the better input, usually the better players make adjustments and learn new things rather then complain and doing the same old thing over and over. Definition of insanity.
Not only is that regurgitated stupidity and not the definition of insanity (rolling dice--same thing, different results), this comment is purely subjective [censored]; some people think a reticle has no place in a baseball game, especially as it represents nothing useful. If learning new things means taking the enjoyment out of something I love, then it ceases to be something I love.
This is a game. Games are made to be fun. For those who find enjoyment chasing little targets around with a reticle, there's a whole genre built around that, but some of us want a baseball simulation, and really don't feel that controlling the batter's eyes adds realism or enjoyment. Sure, it makes it harder, but I really don't need a contrived system of control to make things unnecessarily difficult so I can tell myself I'm better than someone else.
If someone actually likes that system, great. But forcing it on others who find it ridiculous isn't the answer.
-
If u could actually hut high fastballs in directional it would be cool. Zone hitting still sucks cuz the pci is retarded
-
@the_joneser_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@guccigangchuck said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
if they are better why arent they using the better input, usually the better players make adjustments and learn new things rather then complain and doing the same old thing over and over. Definition of insanity.
Not only is that regurgitated stupidity and not the definition of insanity (rolling dice--same thing, different results), this comment is purely subjective [censored]; some people think a reticle has no place in a baseball game, especially as it represents nothing useful. If learning new things means taking the enjoyment out of something I love, then it ceases to be something I love.
This is a game. Games are made to be fun. For those who find enjoyment chasing little targets around with a reticle, there's a whole genre built around that, but some of us want a baseball simulation, and really don't feel that controlling the batter's eyes adds realism or enjoyment. Sure, it makes it harder, but I really don't need a contrived system of control to make things unnecessarily difficult so I can tell myself I'm better than someone else.
If someone actually likes that system, great. But forcing it on others who find it ridiculous isn't the answer.
The pci is not a reticle. It represents the barrel of the bat, and specifically the center pci. A reticle is a sighting system for a gun. Two totally different systems. And sorry to break this to you the pci represents the most realistic aspect of this game. The movement of it mimics where the barrel will be when the bat is swung.
-
Nope. Clearly not the barrel of the bat. The barrel of a bat is less than 3” wide, and the reticle covers a third of the strike zone. You can try to explain how it ought to behave, if that were the case, but it isn’t at all consistent, hence all the bad placement HRs and “no reward” contact with good placement.
It’s an odds generator, based on where the batter is looking to cover the plate (it’s in the name, for Christ’s sake - plate coverage indicator). Sometimes you get good contact, and sometimes you don’t. A barrel is real and solid and precise; that reticle is not.
-
SDS has actually repeatedly said the pci is NOT the barrel of the bat.
-
The squeeky wheel gets the grease. Most players use Zone hitting and are the loudest with their disdain when it isn't working correctly. So The Show will put more attention to it. They will want to appease the largest crowd before those in the minority. So directional will get neglected and honestly, it shouldn't be on the same level. Zone hitting is made to be more accurate, to really pinpoint where you want to swing. Directional is a....I guess swing up that way. It's not fair to get the same output from someone who accurately places a pci, to someone who blanket covers a directional section of the strike zone.
-
@the_joneser_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
Nope. Clearly not the barrel of the bat. The barrel of a bat is less than 3” wide, and the reticle covers a third of the strike zone. You can try to explain how it ought to behave, if that were the case, but it isn’t at all consistent, hence all the bad placement HRs and “no reward” contact with good placement.
It’s an odds generator, based on where the batter is looking to cover the plate (it’s in the name, for Christ’s sake - plate coverage indicator). Sometimes you get good contact, and sometimes you don’t. A barrel is real and solid and precise; that reticle is not.
you realize the barrel is those diamonds/dots/sybols in the middle of the PCI right? When you are perfect, thats a perfect barrell.
-
@guccigangchuck said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
you realize the barrel is those diamonds/dots/sybols in the middle of the PCI right? When you are perfect, thats a perfect barrell.
So, first off, I owe you an apology... my last comment directed your way was written immediately after something at work put me in a foul mood and I ended up going a little ad hominem on you. I didn't like what you were saying, but the vitriol was a little much. I'm sorry.
Back to the subject at hand; I respectfully disagree. If those little symbols were all you had to work with, and anything off those symbols resulted in a big whiff, then you might have something there. Even still, those three symbols would be more than the equivalent of 2.75 inches, so still too big for a barrel.
Considering the size of the reticle as it appears and the fact that contact can be made anywhere within it (and often outside of it), if it were a bat, the barrel would be about the equivalent of a foot and a half thick, and about as long--insisting on it being a barrel, you'd have to accept that as good contact is likely with the ball on any part of that massive "barrel." As anyone who has played this game for more than 20 minutes can clearly find for themselves, it's possible to hit fly balls when the ball is lower than the top symbol, and, conversely, ground balls higher than the low symbol. Left/right seem to matter less than swing timing in determining direction.
Considering that, how can it not be interpreted as an odds generator? The closer you get to the middle, the better the odds are of getting solid contact, and the closer to the top symbol, the better your odds of getting hard contact on a fly. Again, though, we all know that result is not a given. We've all seen a contact point lower than the middle symbol and way to one side of the reticle result in a ball being launched way over the wall... how do you explain that? Well, you can either whine and complain about "bad placement" and "broken" mechanics because the contact didn't match the barrel position, or you can give up the ghost on the whole reticle-as-barrel theory and accept that while the odds of that happening were lower than they would have been had the ball been center-up, the possibility of that particular roll was there all along.
The PCI allows you to better your odds in a more manual way than other interfaces, but it's still a roll of the dice. There's no way around that without slowing pitches down to a snail's crawl and chasing the ball with a reticle that is representative of the width and length of an actual barrel; creating a true input-based result in a hitting engine would make for a terrible game. For all the fast-twitch junkies that need to feel that their stick skills are not muted by RNG, perhaps a baseball game isn't the place to scratch that itch.
Back to the OP's point - I think he's absolutely correct that Directional got the screw, and it's my contention that Zone is ridiculously overpowered. Sure, get a little boost by controlling your odds a bit more in exchange for the difficulty, but it doesn't have to be like it is now. I don't think I'm the only one who feels like this.
-
@arvcpa_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@mam8a-245300_xbl said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
This take is like saying people who drive stick shifts unfairly get too much control of their cars.
I will drive a stick shift until the day I die.
Is that what we're talking about? I hope so, because I love a good manual transmission.
6 speed no less
-
@the_joneser_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@guccigangchuck said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
you realize the barrel is those diamonds/dots/sybols in the middle of the PCI right? When you are perfect, thats a perfect barrell.
So, first off, I owe you an apology... my last comment directed your way was written immediately after something at work put me in a foul mood and I ended up going a little ad hominem on you. I didn't like what you were saying, but the vitriol was a little much. I'm sorry.
Back to the subject at hand; I respectfully disagree. If those little symbols were all you had to work with, and anything off those symbols resulted in a big whiff, then you might have something there. Even still, those three symbols would be more than the equivalent of 2.75 inches, so still too big for a barrel.
Considering the size of the reticle as it appears and the fact that contact can be made anywhere within it (and often outside of it), if it were a bat, the barrel would be about the equivalent of a foot and a half thick, and about as long--insisting on it being a barrel, you'd have to accept that as good contact is likely with the ball on any part of that massive "barrel." As anyone who has played this game for more than 20 minutes can clearly find for themselves, it's possible to hit fly balls when the ball is lower than the top symbol, and, conversely, ground balls higher than the low symbol. Left/right seem to matter less than swing timing in determining direction.
Considering that, how can it not be interpreted as an odds generator? The closer you get to the middle, the better the odds are of getting solid contact, and the closer to the top symbol, the better your odds of getting hard contact on a fly. Again, though, we all know that result is not a given. We've all seen a contact point lower than the middle symbol and way to one side of the reticle result in a ball being launched way over the wall... how do you explain that? Well, you can either whine and complain about "bad placement" and "broken" mechanics because the contact didn't match the barrel position, or you can give up the ghost on the whole reticle-as-barrel theory and accept that while the odds of that happening were lower than they would have been had the ball been center-up, the possibility of that particular roll was there all along.
The PCI allows you to better your odds in a more manual way than other interfaces, but it's still a roll of the dice. There's no way around that without slowing pitches down to a snail's crawl and chasing the ball with a reticle that is representative of the width and length of an actual barrel; creating a true input-based result in a hitting engine would make for a terrible game. For all the fast-twitch junkies that need to feel that their stick skills are not muted by RNG, perhaps a baseball game isn't the place to scratch that itch.
Back to the OP's point - I think he's absolutely correct that Directional got the screw, and it's my contention that Zone is ridiculously overpowered.
Then use zone, i believe a Jeter Cover N64 all stars baseball game even had a form of zone hitting in it. Zone is a skll gap, online games need a skill gap, you can still be successful with directional, its not the best input becuase when you're using directional, you're pretty much depending on RNG.
-
@the_joneser_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
Nope. Clearly not the barrel of the bat. The barrel of a bat is less than 3” wide, and the reticle covers a third of the strike zone. You can try to explain how it ought to behave, if that were the case, but it isn’t at all consistent, hence all the bad placement HRs and “no reward” contact with good placement.
It’s an odds generator, based on where the batter is looking to cover the plate (it’s in the name, for Christ’s sake - plate coverage indicator). Sometimes you get good contact, and sometimes you don’t. A barrel is real and solid and precise; that reticle is not.
Wow you don’t read too well do you or you just glance over what you want. How bout going back and re-read what I wrote where I specifically stated that the center pci is what actually represents the barrel.
-
@halfbutt_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
SDS has actually repeatedly said the pci is NOT the barrel of the bat.
This is not true!!! But you routinely make false statements in these forums. Have a nice day bud.
-
@killerpresence4 said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
Wow you don’t read too well do you or you just glance over what you want.
Perhaps you'd like another go at that sentence before using it to criticize someone's language skills?
How bout going back and re-read what I wrote where I specifically stated that the center pci is what actually represents the barrel.
I'd actually written this, in response to the person who stated that more clearly:
If those little symbols were all you had to work with, and anything off those symbols resulted in a big whiff, then you might have something there. Even still, those three symbols would be more than the equivalent of 2.75 inches, so still too big for a barrel.
Probably not fair, considering you had to mouth your way through so many words while dragging your finger along, but it seems that one of us does indeed have a comprehension problem.
-
@the_joneser_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@killerpresence4 said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
Wow you don’t read too well do you or you just glance over what you want.
Perhaps you'd like another go at that sentence before using it to criticize someone's language skills?
Perhaps you want to go back to third grade grammar class where you obviously struggled. The statement that you are criticizing is 100% grammatically correct but hey, anything to deflect from your lack of comprehension by criticizing someone’s grammar and still screwed it up. Congratulations clown!!!
-
@killerpresence4 said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@halfbutt_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
SDS has actually repeatedly said the pci is NOT the barrel of the bat.
This is not true!!! But you routinely make false statements in these forums. Have a nice day bud.
I wish I could also get by in life by just speaking my opinion louder than everyone else’s.
I also do not routinely make false statements in these forums, but at least now I know you’re just a troll.
Also, I’m definitely not your buddy, so don’t call me me bud anymore ok?
K.
-
@halfbutt_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@killerpresence4 said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
@halfbutt_psn said in This Game Became Biast Towards .....:
SDS has actually repeatedly said the pci is NOT the barrel of the bat.
This is not true!!! But you routinely make false statements in these forums. Have a nice day bud.
I wish I could also get by in life by just speaking my opinion louder than everyone else’s.
I also do not routinely make false statements in these forums, but at least now I know you’re just a troll.
Also, I’m definitely not your buddy, so don’t call me me bud anymore ok?
K.
If you don’t want to be called out or “trolled” for making false statements then stop making those false statements. You blatantly made up a lie to justify your position and all I did was call your BS. Next time think twice BUD!!!
P.S. This is not the first time I’ve called you out. So from my perspective it’s becoming routine. Have a nice night.
