Parallel Grinding
-
@the_dragon1912 said in Parallel Grinding:
The quickest way is play vs CPU game, not conquest
100%. Honestly the hitting in vs CPU mode (to me) seems better (fewer crazy double play lineouts, just as an example). Not a scientific analysis but I've played both modes a lot and I feel a lot less screwed-over in vs CPU. Also, in vs CPU you get extra bonuses for pitching in the earned pxp (QS, CG, etc) that you won't get in conquest.
-
@the_dragon1912 said in Parallel Grinding:
The quickest way is play vs CPU game, not conquest
I would say no; in Conquest you get a tired pitcher every inning and you get to pick the CPU’s 5th starter every time. You also get 3 wins and possibly 3 saves for 9 innings
-
@yankblan_psn said in Parallel Grinding:
@the_dragon1912 said in Parallel Grinding:
The quickest way is play vs CPU game, not conquest
I would say no; in Conquest you get a tired pitcher every inning and you get to pick the CPU’s 5th starter every time. You also get 3 wins and possibly 3 saves for 9 innings
For starting pitchers quality starts, complete games, and shutouts count for PXP. You can't get any of those in conquest and they are worth more than 3 wins. Also in conquest you don't really get to choose your opponents very well. You only play the Rockies once in a full map play through. Coors field is more beneficial to parallels than facing the 5th starter IMO
-
@the_dragon1912 said in Parallel Grinding:
@yankblan_psn said in Parallel Grinding:
@the_dragon1912 said in Parallel Grinding:
The quickest way is play vs CPU game, not conquest
I would say no; in Conquest you get a tired pitcher every inning and you get to pick the CPU’s 5th starter every time. You also get 3 wins and possibly 3 saves for 9 innings
For starting pitchers quality starts, complete games, and shutouts count for PXP. You can't get any of those in conquest and they are worth more than 3 wins. Also in conquest you don't really get to choose your opponents very well. You only play the Rockies once in a full map play through. Coors field is more beneficial to parallels than facing the 5th starter IMO
Instead of simulating in Conquest, I play the hexagon games vs the Rockies in USA; dozens of games not only one
-
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Parallel Grinding:
@texasgambler33_psn said in Parallel Grinding:
@t-rox_09_mlbts said in Parallel Grinding:
@texasgambler33_psn said in Parallel Grinding:
@sbevans142_psn said in Parallel Grinding:
30 conquest games isn't worth whatever parallel and xp you're getting bro
You don't have to play all 30 at once... If you are gonna play a 9 inning game against the computer play 3 USA Conquest instead... Trust me this is the way to go math wise...
A big chunk of this community hates playing against the computer including myself. I completed the conquest map once in order to get those Prospect gold cards. Now I will just jump in when I have to do a daily admission and get Innings with a certain team. I despise playing the computer and I love playing human competition. So I wholeheartedly disagree with your statements. What's the point in having parallel cards when all you're doing is grinding against the computer?
My mind races so I'm continuing my previous thought... But baseball IRL and in this game is like 90% mental if I go into a game feeling more confident with a team full of all 99s all P4 or P5 it gives me a mental edge... And sometimes just ruins their confidence... I get offered a lot of friendly a
Understandable to each their own. This game is great because it is for online and offline players. Good luck pal.
You too
-
@the_dragon1912 said in Parallel Grinding:
The quickest way is play vs CPU game, not conquest
False same thing less reward
-
@cbpm72_psn said in Parallel Grinding:
@the_dragon1912 said in Parallel Grinding:
The quickest way is play vs CPU game, not conquest
100%. Honestly the hitting in vs CPU mode (to me) seems better (fewer crazy double play lineouts, just as an example). Not a scientific analysis but I've played both modes a lot and I feel a lot less screwed-over in vs CPU. Also, in vs CPU you get extra bonuses for pitching in the earned pxp (QS, CG, etc) that you won't get in conquest.
The marginal amount of xp you get different on pitchers only is far outweighed by the rewards of USA map...
-
@the_dragon1912 said in Parallel Grinding:
@yankblan_psn said in Parallel Grinding:
@the_dragon1912 said in Parallel Grinding:
The quickest way is play vs CPU game, not conquest
I would say no; in Conquest you get a tired pitcher every inning and you get to pick the CPU’s 5th starter every time. You also get 3 wins and possibly 3 saves for 9 innings
For starting pitchers quality starts, complete games, and shutouts count for PXP. You can't get any of those in conquest and they are worth more than 3 wins. Also in conquest you don't really get to choose your opponents very well. You only play the Rockies once in a full map play through. Coors field is more beneficial to parallels than facing the 5th starter IMO
Once again the xp difference is outweighed by the reward. Starting pitcher to slot 5 (mine are all 99 I realize most can't do that) I get 130 plus every game with starter x3 that's 390...
-
@cbpm72_psn said in Parallel Grinding:
@the_dragon1912 said in Parallel Grinding:
The quickest way is play vs CPU game, not conquest
100%. Honestly the hitting in vs CPU mode (to me) seems better (fewer crazy double play lineouts, just as an example). Not a scientific analysis but I've played both modes a lot and I feel a lot less screwed-over in vs CPU. Also, in vs CPU you get extra bonuses for pitching in the earned pxp (QS, CG, etc) that you won't get in conquest.
I actually feel the opposite. I hate playing CPU because I just constantly get screwed over all game. There’s at least one or two lineout double plays for me a game. Not to mention the diving grabs in the OF, never throwing strikes, anything hit on the ground is a double play, “a ball that’s carrying” 15 times in a game, good/goods going nowhere.
-
I am not too concerned with parallel grinding. I have taken the attitude that if I actually get something to P5 then great, if not that is fine.
With the diamond cards everyone is using now, the difference between say parallel 3 (which is pretty easily achieved) and parallel 5 is negligible.
-
A admin locked this topic on
