The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.
-
@Chuck_Dizzle29 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@WillTheThrill_7 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
That's not how it works in life pal. YOU made the claim that there is comeback logic, thus YOU need to provide evidence for your claim.
You beat me to it lol.
“You’re cheating on me until you show me evidence you’re not”
Yup, these guys are a hoot. Make unprovable claims, then say it must be true unless you prove them wrong.
Sorry guys, its not someone else's job to do your work.
How is it unproveable? The source code would clear up all confusion. Seems proveable to me......
Nah, your 500 RS games is plenty of proof
Don't understand your condescension here. A RS game takes about an hour. That's 500 hours worth of data. Thousands of pitches, thousands of swings, thousands of results. That's a pretty good sample size. Are you trying to say otherwise?
-
Here's source code.
Href = git gud
-
@hoboadam said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
Here's source code.
Href = git gud
Source code wouldn't compile.
-
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@Chuck_Dizzle29 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@WillTheThrill_7 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
That's not how it works in life pal. YOU made the claim that there is comeback logic, thus YOU need to provide evidence for your claim.
You beat me to it lol.
“You’re cheating on me until you show me evidence you’re not”
Yup, these guys are a hoot. Make unprovable claims, then say it must be true unless you prove them wrong.
Sorry guys, its not someone else's job to do your work.
How is it unproveable? The source code would clear up all confusion. Seems proveable to me......
Nah, your 500 RS games is plenty of proof
Don't understand your condescension here. A RS game takes about an hour. That's 500 hours worth of data. Thousands of pitches, thousands of swings, thousands of results. That's a pretty good sample size. Are you trying to say otherwise?
Lol that is such a small sample size compared to the telemetry data they collect for RS gameplay by itself, not including other modes.
Fun fact for you, the game isn't coded different across the different modes. The sliders are adjusted to compensate between a 3 inning game and a 9 inning game though. RS has different slider adjustments across the difficulty levels as well.
There is nothing in 500 games, or 5 million, that would suggest there is any sort of comback code in this game. You haven't even taken the opportunity to provide one example from your gameplay experience to suggest otherwise.
-
Can you prove any of that or are you just spouting stuff you think is true?
Because what I think is true is different than what you think is true. But we both are just thinking, and since I don't know you, I'm going to go with my own gut on this one.
I'm sure you're a great, smart, insightful guy. My only interactions with you, though, have been with you being an [censored]. So no thanks.@Chuck_Dizzle29
-
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
Can you prove any of that or are you just spouting stuff you think is true?
Because what I think is true is different than what you think is true. But we both are just thinking, and since I don't know you, I'm going to go with my own gut on this one.
I'm sure you're a great, smart, insightful guy. My only interactions with you, though, have been with you being an [censored]. So no thanks.@Chuck_Dizzle29
They've admitted sliders are different. They have to be other wise you'd have SP in a 3 inning game with the stamina ability as if they were pitching in a 9 inning game.
Again, it's not my or anyone else's job to prove you wrong. You made the post looking for attention, you admitted so when you said you weren't actually requesting the source code.
I gave you some attention, don't be so picky. Next time just drum up some Mahomes magic
and move on if you take an L. -
No, you confuse my comments. I don't expect some random person to get me source code for a major video game. I'd LOVE to look at the source code, though. It would be [censored] great to see the code and how the mechanics are supposed to work. Because right now, the mechanics seem to be:
If (user is losing && game_inning > 6): userRNG * 5
-
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@WillTheThrill_7 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
That's not how it works in life pal. YOU made the claim that there is comeback logic, thus YOU need to provide evidence for your claim.
You beat me to it lol.
“You’re cheating on me until you show me evidence you’re not”
Yup, these guys are a hoot. Make unprovable claims, then say it must be true unless you prove them wrong.
Sorry guys, its not someone else's job to do your work.
How is it unproveable? The source code would clear up all confusion. Seems proveable to me......
Because you KNOW you will never see the source code, that's ridiculous to assume otherwise. Because we KNOW SDS will never give up the code, your entire argument is pointless, yet here we are.
-
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@WillTheThrill_7 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
That's not how it works in life pal. YOU made the claim that there is comeback logic, thus YOU need to provide evidence for your claim.
You beat me to it lol.
“You’re cheating on me until you show me evidence you’re not”
Yup, these guys are a hoot. Make unprovable claims, then say it must be true unless you prove them wrong.
Sorry guys, its not someone else's job to do your work.
How is it unproveable? The source code would clear up all confusion. Seems proveable to me......
Because you KNOW you will never see the source code, that's ridiculous to assume otherwise. Because we KNOW SDS will never give up the code, your entire argument is pointless, yet here we are.
Ah, it's not pointless though. It's just pointless for you. I'm venting frustrations and making my day better by not holding it in.
You can move along if you'd like. It won't affect me one bit.
-
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@WillTheThrill_7 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
That's not how it works in life pal. YOU made the claim that there is comeback logic, thus YOU need to provide evidence for your claim.
You beat me to it lol.
“You’re cheating on me until you show me evidence you’re not”
Yup, these guys are a hoot. Make unprovable claims, then say it must be true unless you prove them wrong.
Sorry guys, its not someone else's job to do your work.
How is it unproveable? The source code would clear up all confusion. Seems proveable to me......
Because you KNOW you will never see the source code, that's ridiculous to assume otherwise. Because we KNOW SDS will never give up the code, your entire argument is pointless, yet here we are.
even if they did, how many of us have the degrees in advanced mathematics to even understand it? it would just be numbers and symbols to me.
-
@PAinPA said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@WillTheThrill_7 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
That's not how it works in life pal. YOU made the claim that there is comeback logic, thus YOU need to provide evidence for your claim.
You beat me to it lol.
“You’re cheating on me until you show me evidence you’re not”
Yup, these guys are a hoot. Make unprovable claims, then say it must be true unless you prove them wrong.
Sorry guys, its not someone else's job to do your work.
How is it unproveable? The source code would clear up all confusion. Seems proveable to me......
Because you KNOW you will never see the source code, that's ridiculous to assume otherwise. Because we KNOW SDS will never give up the code, your entire argument is pointless, yet here we are.
even if they did, how many of us have the degrees in advanced mathematics to even understand it? it would just be numbers and symbols to me.
It's just a language. Just like any other. You're making it harder than it is.
-
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
Whats more important is show you the code that there is. No one has to prove there isnt. Burden of proof is always on the accuser.
-
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@the_dragon1912 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
While I do agree BR plays better than RS there is no such thing as comeback logic
When I can read the source code I'll concede to that. Otherwise, I have to go off the evidence presented to me, which is about 500 games of RS
hahahah 'the evidence presented to me"
dude where is your Tin foil hat, where is the potatoe hooked up to a bunch of cables to provide your electricity too
i bet you also believe in the flat earth model
you have 0 evidence of anything more than playing 500 RS games = dork mode supreme
-
@TheHungryHole said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@the_dragon1912 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
While I do agree BR plays better than RS there is no such thing as comeback logic
When I can read the source code I'll concede to that. Otherwise, I have to go off the evidence presented to me, which is about 500 games of RS
hahahah 'the evidence presented to me"
dude where is your Tin foil hat, where is the potatoe hooked up to a bunch of cables to provide your electricity too
i bet you also believe in the flat earth model
you have 0 evidence of anything more than playing 500 RS games = dork mode supreme
I’m surprised his potato lasted for 500 ranked games. Now that’s impressive.
-
@WillTheThrill_7 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@TheHungryHole said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@the_dragon1912 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
While I do agree BR plays better than RS there is no such thing as comeback logic
When I can read the source code I'll concede to that. Otherwise, I have to go off the evidence presented to me, which is about 500 games of RS
hahahah 'the evidence presented to me"
dude where is your Tin foil hat, where is the potatoe hooked up to a bunch of cables to provide your electricity too
i bet you also believe in the flat earth model
you have 0 evidence of anything more than playing 500 RS games = dork mode supreme
I’m surprised his potato lasted for 500 ranked games. Now that’s impressive.
lol it was grown in montana
-
-
@ChArTeRBuS said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
Lmao stop
https://mobile.twitter.com/HiImSerenity/status/1261107755135365120?s=19
Guy needs to trim his bush
-
I don't know what's funnier in this thread believing comeback logic is a thing or believing the game plays better in BR lolll
-
How can someone prove comeback logic isn’t real?
-
@ChuckCLC said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
Whats more important is show you the code that there is. No one has to prove there isnt. Burden of proof is always on the accuser.
https://mobile.twitter.com/HiImSerenity/status/1261107755135365120?s=19
Not me, explain it. You're saying I'm wrong, so prove me wrong. There's my proof that comeback logic exists. Burden of proof has now shifted to you
