The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.
-
@PAinPA said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@WillTheThrill_7 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@lucas8181 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
That's not how it works in life pal. YOU made the claim that there is comeback logic, thus YOU need to provide evidence for your claim.
You beat me to it lol.
“You’re cheating on me until you show me evidence you’re not”
Yup, these guys are a hoot. Make unprovable claims, then say it must be true unless you prove them wrong.
Sorry guys, its not someone else's job to do your work.
How is it unproveable? The source code would clear up all confusion. Seems proveable to me......
Because you KNOW you will never see the source code, that's ridiculous to assume otherwise. Because we KNOW SDS will never give up the code, your entire argument is pointless, yet here we are.
even if they did, how many of us have the degrees in advanced mathematics to even understand it? it would just be numbers and symbols to me.
It's just a language. Just like any other. You're making it harder than it is.
-
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
Whats more important is show you the code that there is. No one has to prove there isnt. Burden of proof is always on the accuser.
-
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@the_dragon1912 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
While I do agree BR plays better than RS there is no such thing as comeback logic
When I can read the source code I'll concede to that. Otherwise, I have to go off the evidence presented to me, which is about 500 games of RS
hahahah 'the evidence presented to me"
dude where is your Tin foil hat, where is the potatoe hooked up to a bunch of cables to provide your electricity too
i bet you also believe in the flat earth model
you have 0 evidence of anything more than playing 500 RS games = dork mode supreme
-
@TheHungryHole said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@the_dragon1912 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
While I do agree BR plays better than RS there is no such thing as comeback logic
When I can read the source code I'll concede to that. Otherwise, I have to go off the evidence presented to me, which is about 500 games of RS
hahahah 'the evidence presented to me"
dude where is your Tin foil hat, where is the potatoe hooked up to a bunch of cables to provide your electricity too
i bet you also believe in the flat earth model
you have 0 evidence of anything more than playing 500 RS games = dork mode supreme
I’m surprised his potato lasted for 500 ranked games. Now that’s impressive.
-
@WillTheThrill_7 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@TheHungryHole said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@the_dragon1912 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
While I do agree BR plays better than RS there is no such thing as comeback logic
When I can read the source code I'll concede to that. Otherwise, I have to go off the evidence presented to me, which is about 500 games of RS
hahahah 'the evidence presented to me"
dude where is your Tin foil hat, where is the potatoe hooked up to a bunch of cables to provide your electricity too
i bet you also believe in the flat earth model
you have 0 evidence of anything more than playing 500 RS games = dork mode supreme
I’m surprised his potato lasted for 500 ranked games. Now that’s impressive.
lol it was grown in montana
-
-
@ChArTeRBuS said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
Lmao stop
https://mobile.twitter.com/HiImSerenity/status/1261107755135365120?s=19
Guy needs to trim his bush
-
I don't know what's funnier in this thread believing comeback logic is a thing or believing the game plays better in BR lolll
-
How can someone prove comeback logic isn’t real?
-
@ChuckCLC said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
Whats more important is show you the code that there is. No one has to prove there isnt. Burden of proof is always on the accuser.
https://mobile.twitter.com/HiImSerenity/status/1261107755135365120?s=19
Not me, explain it. You're saying I'm wrong, so prove me wrong. There's my proof that comeback logic exists. Burden of proof has now shifted to you
-
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@ChuckCLC said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
Whats more important is show you the code that there is. No one has to prove there isnt. Burden of proof is always on the accuser.
https://mobile.twitter.com/HiImSerenity/status/1261107755135365120?s=19
Not me, explain it. You're saying I'm wrong, so prove me wrong. There's my proof that comeback logic exists. Burden of proof has now shifted to you
That is not proof. That is 1 example which isn't even comeback logic, its just crappy luck and pitch sequencing. Also he deserved it for bringing in Kluber. You would make a terrible lawyer.
-
@Kovz88 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@ChuckCLC said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
Whats more important is show you the code that there is. No one has to prove there isnt. Burden of proof is always on the accuser.
https://mobile.twitter.com/HiImSerenity/status/1261107755135365120?s=19
Not me, explain it. You're saying I'm wrong, so prove me wrong. There's my proof that comeback logic exists. Burden of proof has now shifted to you
That is not proof. That is 1 example which isn't even comeback logic, its just crappy luck and pitch sequencing. Also he deserved it for bringing in Kluber. You would make a terrible lawyer.
.. what proof would you accept? You can say that about ANYTHING. You can show me a video of you squaring up and I'll say "you didn't do that that's just the comeback logic".. Sorry, but you're a random person with no access to the back-end code, so you really don't know. You know as much as I do, which is nothing.
-
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@Kovz88 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@ChuckCLC said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
Whats more important is show you the code that there is. No one has to prove there isnt. Burden of proof is always on the accuser.
https://mobile.twitter.com/HiImSerenity/status/1261107755135365120?s=19
Not me, explain it. You're saying I'm wrong, so prove me wrong. There's my proof that comeback logic exists. Burden of proof has now shifted to you
That is not proof. That is 1 example which isn't even comeback logic, its just crappy luck and pitch sequencing. Also he deserved it for bringing in Kluber. You would make a terrible lawyer.
.. what proof would you accept? You can say that about ANYTHING. You can show me a video of you squaring up and I'll say "you didn't do that that's just the comeback logic".. Sorry, but you're a random person with no access to the back-end code, so you really don't know. You know as much as I do, which is nothing.
If you dont want random people responding to and refuting your argument maybe don't post on a public forum? You're free to do whatever you want but dont get salty when most people don't agree with you.
-
@Kovz88 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@Kovz88 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@ChuckCLC said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
Whats more important is show you the code that there is. No one has to prove there isnt. Burden of proof is always on the accuser.
https://mobile.twitter.com/HiImSerenity/status/1261107755135365120?s=19
Not me, explain it. You're saying I'm wrong, so prove me wrong. There's my proof that comeback logic exists. Burden of proof has now shifted to you
That is not proof. That is 1 example which isn't even comeback logic, its just crappy luck and pitch sequencing. Also he deserved it for bringing in Kluber. You would make a terrible lawyer.
.. what proof would you accept? You can say that about ANYTHING. You can show me a video of you squaring up and I'll say "you didn't do that that's just the comeback logic".. Sorry, but you're a random person with no access to the back-end code, so you really don't know. You know as much as I do, which is nothing.
If you dont want random people responding to and refuting your argument maybe don't post on a public forum? You're free to do whatever you want but dont get salty when most people don't agree with you.
I'm free to do whatever I'm want, except get salty?
Also thanks for not answering my question, I guess no proof would sway you.
-
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@Kovz88 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@Kovz88 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@ChuckCLC said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
Whats more important is show you the code that there is. No one has to prove there isnt. Burden of proof is always on the accuser.
https://mobile.twitter.com/HiImSerenity/status/1261107755135365120?s=19
Not me, explain it. You're saying I'm wrong, so prove me wrong. There's my proof that comeback logic exists. Burden of proof has now shifted to you
That is not proof. That is 1 example which isn't even comeback logic, its just crappy luck and pitch sequencing. Also he deserved it for bringing in Kluber. You would make a terrible lawyer.
.. what proof would you accept? You can say that about ANYTHING. You can show me a video of you squaring up and I'll say "you didn't do that that's just the comeback logic".. Sorry, but you're a random person with no access to the back-end code, so you really don't know. You know as much as I do, which is nothing.
If you dont want random people responding to and refuting your argument maybe don't post on a public forum? You're free to do whatever you want but dont get salty when most people don't agree with you.
I'm free to do whatever I'm want, except get salty?
Also thanks for not answering my question, I guess no proof would sway you.
It would take probably over 100 examples of someone being practically no hit and then starting to to hit perfectly placed pitches and making the comeback in the late innings. Also you are completely free to get salty it just makes you look like a baby.
-
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@Kovz88 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@Kovz88 said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@ChuckCLC said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
@KCMahomies said in The Tournament is BR Style Because RS is coded differently.:
LIKE I SAID SHOW ME THE SOURCE CODE THAT THERE IS NO COMEBACK LOGIC
Whats more important is show you the code that there is. No one has to prove there isnt. Burden of proof is always on the accuser.
https://mobile.twitter.com/HiImSerenity/status/1261107755135365120?s=19
Not me, explain it. You're saying I'm wrong, so prove me wrong. There's my proof that comeback logic exists. Burden of proof has now shifted to you
That is not proof. That is 1 example which isn't even comeback logic, its just crappy luck and pitch sequencing. Also he deserved it for bringing in Kluber. You would make a terrible lawyer.
.. what proof would you accept? You can say that about ANYTHING. You can show me a video of you squaring up and I'll say "you didn't do that that's just the comeback logic".. Sorry, but you're a random person with no access to the back-end code, so you really don't know. You know as much as I do, which is nothing.
If you dont want random people responding to and refuting your argument maybe don't post on a public forum? You're free to do whatever you want but dont get salty when most people don't agree with you.
I'm free to do whatever I'm want, except get salty?
Also thanks for not answering my question, I guess no proof would sway you.
You're still going on about this? My man, know when to fold 'em and head home. Let the thread die, live to see another day. And as was previously stated, don't consider a career in law!
-
@lucas8181 you stalking me now? I already know @Kovz88 is
-
Why is it always the average or bad players that believe comeback logic exists?
-
Again, I urge you to look at my previous years. Be sure you're looking up vultrun for 2017 and prior
-
A admin locked this topic on
