Content stagnation
-
SDS, why can you add more Mini Season and Conquest content? Are you light on devs atm? Maybe you moved most to work on the Show 25. That's fine.
Just please give us something to do on Tuesday drops other then event or br.
I'm bored!
-
Right there with you. Tired of getting my rear end kicked online and nothing to play for off line
-
I agree. Last week would have been a perfect time to add a new mini season for a card and lots of packs with most people done with TA and another TA still a ways a way.
-
They have already rebooted a Conquest map. Might as well do a few others with different cards. And get rid of OOPs cards. They were definitly an Oops. Right up there with the monster and "look at my suit" cards from last year
-
@rageincage007_XBL I hope they keep the OOP coming every year.
-
It really seems like a missed opportunity for them to not release a new Mini Seasons every month with a new player reward. Very simple to do and it would offer the offline grinders some substantial content to grind regularly. Maybe even make the reward card sellable so it can still be attained by online only people and would be even more incentive for people to hop on that mode.
-
@SakAttack87_PSN There’s so many things they could do with mini seasons and they don’t seem to care about that mode at all anymore.
-
I'm curious as to what you 'offline only' people played before DD was introduced?
You can't play RTTS?
You can't play Franchise?
You can't play part of an MTO?
You can't field 26 of your favorite cards and try to P5 them by playing 9 inn Play vs CPU games? -
@rageincage007_XBL said in Content stagnation:
They have already rebooted a Conquest map. Might as well do a few others with different cards. And get rid of OOPs cards. They were definitly an Oops. Right up there with the monster and "look at my suit" cards from last year
100
on Oops cards. Just a big miss for me -
@Cubsfan217_XBL After finishing that tedious TA, I refuse to use any of them on principle. Horrible notion for a supposed “simulation” game.
-
That TA had so many ways to get it done fast. Not tedious, at least compared to any other TA in the last two years. this was by far the quickest and provided multiple options.
Conquest was viable for the first time all year really. Extreme showdown was worth it. missions were fast and allowed you to use any cards.
-
@Alaric919_PSN Tedious? That was the easiest TA they’ve ever had.
-
It was definitely the easiest TA so far especially with the conquest map that gives you 125k points toward each TA Division and the fact you can use any card towards the missions
-
@sbchamps17_NSW said in Content stagnation:
It was definitely the easiest TA so far especially with the conquest map that gives you 125k points toward each TA Division and the fact you can use any card towards the missions
Conquest Map: 125K
50K with a team's pitchers 50KThat's 175/200K. Easy-peasy.
-
@sbchamps17_NSW said in Content stagnation:
It was definitely the easiest TA so far especially with the conquest map that gives you 125k points toward each TA Division and the fact you can use any card towards the missions
They need to keep the use any card forever in TA that made it fun
-
@X-FREEZE-OFF-X_PSN said in Content stagnation:
@sbchamps17_NSW said in Content stagnation:
It was definitely the easiest TA so far especially with the conquest map that gives you 125k points toward each TA Division and the fact you can use any card towards the missions
Conquest Map: 125K
50K with a team's pitchers 50KThat's 175/200K. Easy-peasy.
Don't forget, you just need to complete 4 of the Team "50 strikeout" missions (50,000 per mission) per TA and you're done.
-
yea last year we got so many conquests, which are great for mission grinds too. I don't get why the content is so sparce this year.
-
Spent too much time on realistic hair that doesn't really look realistic
-
@xXCHAOSmnkyXx_PSN said in Content stagnation:
Spent too much time on realistic hair that doesn't really look realistic
Which has zero to do with in season content so not sure why you even mention it.
