Commons shouldn’t be 2,500 stubs
-
is there a way to know what number order you are/were? ive been waiting for two days and im seeing more peoples orders go through now
-
@blumememes_xbl said in Commons shouldn’t be 2,500 stubs:
is there a way to know what number order you are/were? ive been waiting for two days and im seeing more peoples orders go through now
Now Serving #1787
-
I was order #2700 something for Diaz. Got him about a week ago and finally got chipper
-
Jhonathan Diaz is the last player I need to complete all live series cards
I’ve had an order for him for 3 days… over 13,000 orders now. Frustrating -
bought 100 packs and pulled him in the last one! holy moly!
-
@pickleddilltx_psn said in Commons shouldn’t be 2,500 stubs:
Jhonathan Diaz is the last player I need to complete all live series cards
I’ve had an order for him for 3 days… over 13,000 orders now. FrustratingPatience is a virtue.
At the current queue length, if one card sells every minute then it will take 9 or 10 days to reach the front of the queue
-
I got shot down for this suggestion before but to resolve this either
A. Take away the max cap of 2500
Or
B. Release a single 5k stub pack containing the all the new releases/players post roster update day
-
C. Finish the Live Series collection before September.
-
They used to not have caps on cards commons sold for much more a few years ago
-
Why is there a large amount of commons with no buy nows available on the market? They are commons they should be in packs!
If you're talking about Jhonathan Diaz, I quicksold him.
-
You know, if they weren't 2,500 stubs when released, people wouldn't sell them on the market because typical commons are only worth 5 stubs. People would overlook them. It is actually a good thing because it gives an incentive for the new cards to be seen and worthwhile to sell.
-
Their shouldn't be a cap. Commons should be wroth based of demand. Let the market decide the price
-
@tylerslikewhoa_xbl said in Commons shouldn’t be 2,500 stubs:
Their shouldn't be a cap. Commons should be wroth based of demand. Let the market decide the price
That's the way it should be. Unfortunately, some were taking advantage of no cap, and transferring stubs. All it takes is a few, to ruin it for the rest of us.
-
@dcmo3_psn said in Commons shouldn’t be 2,500 stubs:
@tylerslikewhoa_xbl said in Commons shouldn’t be 2,500 stubs:
Their shouldn't be a cap. Commons should be wroth based of demand. Let the market decide the price
That's the way it should be. Unfortunately, some were taking advantage of no cap, and transferring stubs. All it takes is a few, to ruin it for the rest of us.
^ This right here. People were abusing it for stub transfers to move millions of stubs from one account to another. Now and then I would be a lucky person that was there when one was happening and someone would be buying up all the orders where I would make a killing on garbage cards.
-
I have to admit that I am starting to be baffled on this one. It has been two weeks since he was added to the game and the buy orders are still above 13,000
Assuming that the card has been selling at a reasonable pace that means that probably 30,000 or more players need him for the collection. Did that many people really all decide to finish the Angels collection at the same time this late into the year?
-
@dolenz_psn said in Commons shouldn’t be 2,500 stubs:
I have to admit that I am starting to be baffled on this one. It has been two weeks since he was added to the game and the buy orders are still above 13,000
Assuming that the card has been selling at a reasonable pace that means that probably 30,000 or more players need him for the collection. Did that many people really all decide to finish the Angels collection at the same time this late into the year?
With Trout dropping below 100 k yes. surprising its not double that.
-
A admin locked this topic on
