Hitting Frustrations
-
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@xxfireflyxx69 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Why don’t we actually play on 19 @A_PerfectGame .. shippett July 1 pm legend difficulty, god squads, I’ll stream. No excuses with that
19 is a bad version of the game. I’d play you in it— It proves nothing about player skill though...not impressive if I win or vice versa. I’ll play you day 1 on 20
I think if you played Mitch, you may realise that skill will win out more often than you think. I haven't played him, but I watched the last stream that happened through this forum and he is a beast. My online win record is 61 percent and I realised after watching that stream that it doesn't deserve to be higher because I'm simply not that good.
Are there faults with this game? For sure. Should those faults mean that you lose a third of your games? No! That's why the guys at the top of the leaderboards are there, consistently.
Is there any point to obsessing over those faults? No, not at this point of the cycle when they are not going to change anything.
I have played him. And I’ve won. And he made excuses and had a million reasons and never followed through with the deal of posting the results and giving the opponent credit which is what we played for. His excuse was “I had the better team.”
And “you had a god squad”. But it’s not my job in a competitive game to pick my opponents team. I play to win.And btw. He also claimed that I was hitting oppo field homers and he was lining out. Ironic. Ain’t it?
Oh yeah a late hit hr with Ted Williams off my common pitcher congratulations
-
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@JustASeal0 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Why don’t we actually play on 19 @A_PerfectGame .. shippett July 1 pm legend difficulty, god squads, I’ll stream. No excuses with that
19 is a bad version of the game. I’d play you in it— It proves nothing about player skill though...not impressive if I win or vice versa. I’ll play you day 1 on 20
I think you underestimate how good Mitch is
He’s very good. I played him. And I won. I think the underestimating is of me. Everyone knows a top 25 player is very good. But I’ve seen top 10 players quit second inning down a few runs. (Not saying Thats mitch). I’m not saying Id smoke him. I can beat him. And I have. He’s down 0-1 right now in games played against me
It’s really lame that ur gonna act like beating me by 1 run with the team I had is a real win but whatever. I’ll mercy ur [censored] in 4 innings on 20 or on 19. Your choice. Literally no one else considers that a legitimate win but whatever.. be happy with it.. I sure wouldn’t tho. Kinda pathetic u didn’t mercy me with my common pitchers lmao
-
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@xxfireflyxx69 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Why don’t we actually play on 19 @A_PerfectGame .. shippett July 1 pm legend difficulty, god squads, I’ll stream. No excuses with that
19 is a bad version of the game. I’d play you in it— It proves nothing about player skill though...not impressive if I win or vice versa. I’ll play you day 1 on 20
I think if you played Mitch, you may realise that skill will win out more often than you think. I haven't played him, but I watched the last stream that happened through this forum and he is a beast. My online win record is 61 percent and I realised after watching that stream that it doesn't deserve to be higher because I'm simply not that good.
Are there faults with this game? For sure. Should those faults mean that you lose a third of your games? No! That's why the guys at the top of the leaderboards are there, consistently.
Is there any point to obsessing over those faults? No, not at this point of the cycle when they are not going to change anything.
I have played him. And I’ve won. And he made excuses and had a million reasons and never followed through with the deal of posting the results and giving the opponent credit which is what we played for. His excuse was “I had the better team.”
And “you had a god squad”. But it’s not my job in a competitive game to pick my opponents team. I play to win.And btw. He also claimed that I was hitting oppo field homers and he was lining out. Ironic. Ain’t it?
Oh yeah a late hit hr with Ted Williams off my common pitcher congratulations
Stop with the common team fairy tale please. WHY would you had picked a common team in a competitive game?
-
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@xxfireflyxx69 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Why don’t we actually play on 19 @A_PerfectGame .. shippett July 1 pm legend difficulty, god squads, I’ll stream. No excuses with that
19 is a bad version of the game. I’d play you in it— It proves nothing about player skill though...not impressive if I win or vice versa. I’ll play you day 1 on 20
I think if you played Mitch, you may realise that skill will win out more often than you think. I haven't played him, but I watched the last stream that happened through this forum and he is a beast. My online win record is 61 percent and I realised after watching that stream that it doesn't deserve to be higher because I'm simply not that good.
Are there faults with this game? For sure. Should those faults mean that you lose a third of your games? No! That's why the guys at the top of the leaderboards are there, consistently.
Is there any point to obsessing over those faults? No, not at this point of the cycle when they are not going to change anything.
I have played him. And I’ve won. And he made excuses and had a million reasons and never followed through with the deal of posting the results and giving the opponent credit which is what we played for. His excuse was “I had the better team.”
And “you had a god squad”. But it’s not my job in a competitive game to pick my opponents team. I play to win.And btw. He also claimed that I was hitting oppo field homers and he was lining out. Ironic. Ain’t it?
Oh yeah a late hit hr with Ted Williams off my common pitcher congratulations
Stop with the common team fairy tale please. WHY would you had picked a common team in a competitive game?
Because I had never played 16 before and that was the only team I had. You were saying how 16 was the only good game and [censored] like that, so I knew it was the game u wanted to play
-
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@JustASeal0 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Why don’t we actually play on 19 @A_PerfectGame .. shippett July 1 pm legend difficulty, god squads, I’ll stream. No excuses with that
19 is a bad version of the game. I’d play you in it— It proves nothing about player skill though...not impressive if I win or vice versa. I’ll play you day 1 on 20
I think you underestimate how good Mitch is
He’s very good. I played him. And I won. I think the underestimating is of me. Everyone knows a top 25 player is very good. But I’ve seen top 10 players quit second inning down a few runs. (Not saying Thats mitch). I’m not saying Id smoke him. I can beat him. And I have. He’s down 0-1 right now in games played against me
It’s really lame that ur gonna act like beating me by 1 run with the team I had is a real win but whatever. I’ll mercy ur [censored] in 4 innings on 20 or on 19. Your choice. Literally no one else considers that a legitimate win but whatever.. be happy with it.. I sure wouldn’t tho. Kinda pathetic u didn’t mercy me with my common pitchers lmao
You wouldn’t mercy me bro. I’ve never been mercied...koogs beat me 10-9.
Edit* actually 10-7 sorry
-
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@JustASeal0 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Why don’t we actually play on 19 @A_PerfectGame .. shippett July 1 pm legend difficulty, god squads, I’ll stream. No excuses with that
19 is a bad version of the game. I’d play you in it— It proves nothing about player skill though...not impressive if I win or vice versa. I’ll play you day 1 on 20
I think you underestimate how good Mitch is
He’s very good. I played him. And I won. I think the underestimating is of me. Everyone knows a top 25 player is very good. But I’ve seen top 10 players quit second inning down a few runs. (Not saying Thats mitch). I’m not saying Id smoke him. I can beat him. And I have. He’s down 0-1 right now in games played against me
It’s really lame that ur gonna act like beating me by 1 run with the team I had is a real win but whatever. I’ll mercy ur [censored] in 4 innings on 20 or on 19. Your choice. Literally no one else considers that a legitimate win but whatever.. be happy with it.. I sure wouldn’t tho. Kinda pathetic u didn’t mercy me with my common pitchers lmao
You wouldn’t mercy me bro. I’ve never been mercied...koogs beat me 10-9.
Let’s play on 19. Mark my words I will mercy u within 4 innings.
-
Koogs is not a top player by any stretch of the imagination. Not sure why you’re bringing him up, but it’s certainly not impressive that u lost 10-9.
-
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@xxfireflyxx69 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Why don’t we actually play on 19 @A_PerfectGame .. shippett July 1 pm legend difficulty, god squads, I’ll stream. No excuses with that
19 is a bad version of the game. I’d play you in it— It proves nothing about player skill though...not impressive if I win or vice versa. I’ll play you day 1 on 20
I think if you played Mitch, you may realise that skill will win out more often than you think. I haven't played him, but I watched the last stream that happened through this forum and he is a beast. My online win record is 61 percent and I realised after watching that stream that it doesn't deserve to be higher because I'm simply not that good.
Are there faults with this game? For sure. Should those faults mean that you lose a third of your games? No! That's why the guys at the top of the leaderboards are there, consistently.
Is there any point to obsessing over those faults? No, not at this point of the cycle when they are not going to change anything.
I have played him. And I’ve won. And he made excuses and had a million reasons and never followed through with the deal of posting the results and giving the opponent credit which is what we played for. His excuse was “I had the better team.”
And “you had a god squad”. But it’s not my job in a competitive game to pick my opponents team. I play to win.And btw. He also claimed that I was hitting oppo field homers and he was lining out. Ironic. Ain’t it?
Oh yeah a late hit hr with Ted Williams off my common pitcher congratulations
Stop with the common team fairy tale please. WHY would you had picked a common team in a competitive game?
Because I had never played 16 before and that was the only team I had. You were saying how 16 was the only good game and [censored] like that, so I knew it was the game u wanted to play
I gave you game choice bro.
-
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Koogs is not a top player by any stretch of the imagination. Not sure why you’re bringing him up, but it’s certainly not impressive that u lost 10-9.
I’m gonna give you a rematch dude relax. And I’ll give you respect if you win too. I don’t make excuses in competitive games I make excuses on allstar when I line out 40 balls and my opponent wins on late weak 0-2 counts he couldn’t track.
-
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@xxfireflyxx69 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Why don’t we actually play on 19 @A_PerfectGame .. shippett July 1 pm legend difficulty, god squads, I’ll stream. No excuses with that
19 is a bad version of the game. I’d play you in it— It proves nothing about player skill though...not impressive if I win or vice versa. I’ll play you day 1 on 20
I think if you played Mitch, you may realise that skill will win out more often than you think. I haven't played him, but I watched the last stream that happened through this forum and he is a beast. My online win record is 61 percent and I realised after watching that stream that it doesn't deserve to be higher because I'm simply not that good.
Are there faults with this game? For sure. Should those faults mean that you lose a third of your games? No! That's why the guys at the top of the leaderboards are there, consistently.
Is there any point to obsessing over those faults? No, not at this point of the cycle when they are not going to change anything.
I have played him. And I’ve won. And he made excuses and had a million reasons and never followed through with the deal of posting the results and giving the opponent credit which is what we played for. His excuse was “I had the better team.”
And “you had a god squad”. But it’s not my job in a competitive game to pick my opponents team. I play to win.And btw. He also claimed that I was hitting oppo field homers and he was lining out. Ironic. Ain’t it?
Oh yeah a late hit hr with Ted Williams off my common pitcher congratulations
Stop with the common team fairy tale please. WHY would you had picked a common team in a competitive game?
Because I had never played 16 before and that was the only team I had. You were saying how 16 was the only good game and [censored] like that, so I knew it was the game u wanted to play
I gave you game choice bro.
After seeing u talk so much [censored] on the other games, I knew it wasn’t a good idea to play u on those games. pathetic that u lost 7-6 with the matchup we had. Play me tomorrow on 19 and I will mercy u within 4 innings
-
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Koogs is not a top player by any stretch of the imagination. Not sure why you’re bringing him up, but it’s certainly not impressive that u lost 10-9.
18 and 19 were where you made Youre Mark bro. The two most noob friendly versions of the game...
-
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Koogs is not a top player by any stretch of the imagination. Not sure why you’re bringing him up, but it’s certainly not impressive that u lost 10-9.
18 and 19 were where you made Youre Mark bro. The two most noob friendly versions of the game...
Because that’s when I started playing... I’ll show u skill brotha. You can’t hit .400 in a season while playing mostly on legend and be a noob
-
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Koogs is not a top player by any stretch of the imagination. Not sure why you’re bringing him up, but it’s certainly not impressive that u lost 10-9.
18 and 19 were where you made Youre Mark bro. The two most noob friendly versions of the game...
Because that’s when I started playing... I’ll show u skill brotha. You can’t hit .400 in a season while playing mostly on legend and be a noob
You’re no noob. You’re good in the game. But this version of the game is very random. I’ve seen chance take precedence more then skill on a ridiculous amount of games. Wins and losses. They took player skill more out of the game in the last two seasons then all of the other games...so to boast about your player skill not having played anything besides 18 and 19 is not that impressive.
That’s like br winners. Br is complete chance. Literally the skill on allstar is not there it’s totally random. You can smash 8, 9, 10 balls in a row and then get early swing by some scrub just swinging at everything until you make a mistake and foul off 20 balls. Those used to be strike outs. That was never a thing
-
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Koogs is not a top player by any stretch of the imagination. Not sure why you’re bringing him up, but it’s certainly not impressive that u lost 10-9.
18 and 19 were where you made Youre Mark bro. The two most noob friendly versions of the game...
Because that’s when I started playing... I’ll show u skill brotha. You can’t hit .400 in a season while playing mostly on legend and be a noob
You’re no noob. You’re good in the game. But this version of the game is very random. I’ve seen chance take precedence more then skill on a ridiculous amount of games. Wins and losses. They took player skill more out of the game in the last two seasons then all of the other games...so to boast about your player skill not having played anything besides 18 and 19 is not that impressive.
That’s like br winners. Br is complete chance. Literally the skill on allstar is not there it’s totally random. You can smash 8, 9, 10 balls in a row and then get early swing by some scrub just swinging at everything until you make a mistake and foul off 20 balls. Those used to be strike outs. That was never a thing
I disagree. I think it’s more impressive to have a very good record on a more random game, because it shows that your skill level is high enough to overcome the bs in the game. Why do u think the top players are still at the top?
-
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Koogs is not a top player by any stretch of the imagination. Not sure why you’re bringing him up, but it’s certainly not impressive that u lost 10-9.
18 and 19 were where you made Youre Mark bro. The two most noob friendly versions of the game...
Because that’s when I started playing... I’ll show u skill brotha. You can’t hit .400 in a season while playing mostly on legend and be a noob
You’re no noob. You’re good in the game. But this version of the game is very random. I’ve seen chance take precedence more then skill on a ridiculous amount of games. Wins and losses. They took player skill more out of the game in the last two seasons then all of the other games...so to boast about your player skill not having played anything besides 18 and 19 is not that impressive.
That’s like br winners. Br is complete chance. Literally the skill on allstar is not there it’s totally random. You can smash 8, 9, 10 balls in a row and then get early swing by some scrub just swinging at everything until you make a mistake and foul off 20 balls. Those used to be strike outs. That was never a thing
I disagree. I think it’s more impressive to have a very good record on a more random game, because it shows that your skill level is high enough to overcome the bs in the game. Why do u think the top players are still at the top?
Actually a lot of the top players don’t play anymore because the game was that bad.
You haven’t even seen some of the players that played 10-12 years straight.
-
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Koogs is not a top player by any stretch of the imagination. Not sure why you’re bringing him up, but it’s certainly not impressive that u lost 10-9.
18 and 19 were where you made Youre Mark bro. The two most noob friendly versions of the game...
Because that’s when I started playing... I’ll show u skill brotha. You can’t hit .400 in a season while playing mostly on legend and be a noob
You’re no noob. You’re good in the game. But this version of the game is very random. I’ve seen chance take precedence more then skill on a ridiculous amount of games. Wins and losses. They took player skill more out of the game in the last two seasons then all of the other games...so to boast about your player skill not having played anything besides 18 and 19 is not that impressive.
That’s like br winners. Br is complete chance. Literally the skill on allstar is not there it’s totally random. You can smash 8, 9, 10 balls in a row and then get early swing by some scrub just swinging at everything until you make a mistake and foul off 20 balls. Those used to be strike outs. That was never a thing
I disagree. I think it’s more impressive to have a very good record on a more random game, because it shows that your skill level is high enough to overcome the bs in the game. Why do u think the top players are still at the top?
Actually a lot of the top players don’t play anymore because the game was that bad.
You haven’t even seen some of the players that played 10-12 years straight.
Ik that but if they did play they would still be at the top like Rebel, who since we’re boasting about who we’ve lost to, ive lost to by 1 run twice
-
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Koogs is not a top player by any stretch of the imagination. Not sure why you’re bringing him up, but it’s certainly not impressive that u lost 10-9.
18 and 19 were where you made Youre Mark bro. The two most noob friendly versions of the game...
Yet, and you can't win 80 percent of your games. Go figure!
-
@xxfireflyxx69 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Koogs is not a top player by any stretch of the imagination. Not sure why you’re bringing him up, but it’s certainly not impressive that u lost 10-9.
18 and 19 were where you made Youre Mark bro. The two most noob friendly versions of the game...
Yet, and you can't win 80 percent of your games. Go figure!
That’s because the games an RNG fest until you get to legend. No secret. Anyone denying that is in complete denial.
-
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@xxfireflyxx69 said in Haha:
@A_PerfectGame said in Haha:
@mitchhammond24 said in Haha:
Koogs is not a top player by any stretch of the imagination. Not sure why you’re bringing him up, but it’s certainly not impressive that u lost 10-9.
18 and 19 were where you made Youre Mark bro. The two most noob friendly versions of the game...
Yet, and you can't win 80 percent of your games. Go figure!
That’s because the games an RNG fest until you get to legend. No secret. Anyone denying that is in complete denial.
That's a bit of circular reasoning no? Anyone denying that is in denial? Isn't that already said by denying that once? If you deny something, aren't you in denial about it?
-
Even I've beaten Koogs. Was an event game but... I'm pretty average lol
But hey I've beaten mitch too. Played his God squad on legend last night, mercied him. Nyquil is a hell of a drug indeed!
