Jim Thome π€¦ββοΈ
-
He will absolutely destroy righties. That's all a Thome card should be
-
65 vision will be brutal in higher levels
-
@Soda_Pop_Curtis_ said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
65 vision will be brutal in higher levels
Sure. But it's Thome. He wasn't going to have high vision...
-
Right just saying based on this post. He stated bad card for a 99. If your good with PC that will be the key. Higher levels 65 is tough as nails
-
@Soda_Pop_Curtis_ said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
65 vision will be brutal in higher levels
People still think vision matters this year? The inner PCIβs size is directly correlated to contact, not vision
-
@BalsamicArrow88 said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
What in the world lol this has to be the worst 99 ovr card in the game Iβd think.
some people just wanna complain to complain, because its free to do so....much like this card.....un real
-
Iβll be honest heβs really not that much of an upgrade over Nolan Jones at 1B, plus Jones can play multiple positions with a rocket arm. Just my opinion but overall these new legends are pretty exciting to see.
-
People overvalue vision this year. Itβs nowhere near as important as in past years.
-
@TheMoShow__ oh stop it lol Iβm allowed to have an opinion and Thomes is one of my favorites thatβs why I wanted to say something but you literally just complained about somebody complaining
-
Heβs like an upgraded Gorman or Nolan Jones at 1B, and both of those cards rake as is.
-
@Soda_Pop_Curtis_ said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
65 vision will be brutal in higher levels
I don't know about that, I strike out my fair share with guys like trout and bellinger but I also don't make as many weak outs early in the count with them so I think vision is not very important at all
-
Could they not find a picture of him wearing a hat or a helmet or a bucket? Something
-
@Soda_Pop_Curtis_ said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
65 vision will be brutal in higher levels
Vision is irrelevant
-
@vagimon said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
Could they not find a picture of him wearing a hat or a helmet or a bucket? Something
All the hats or helmets he would have worn had chief Wahoo on them. The MLB banned using that image anywhere. It would have had to been blanked out anyway. This is why Choo has no logo on his helmet on his Prime card.
-
@pbake12 said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
@vagimon said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
Could they not find a picture of him wearing a hat or a helmet or a bucket? Something
All the hats or helmets he would have worn had chief Wahoo on them. The MLB banned using that image anywhere. It would have had to been blanked out anyway. This is why Choo has no logo on his helmet on his Prime card.
I see.
-
@the_dragon1912 said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
@Soda_Pop_Curtis_ said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
65 vision will be brutal in higher levels
People still think vision matters this year? The inner PCIβs size is directly correlated to contact, not vision
@the_dragon1912 said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
@Soda_Pop_Curtis_ said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
65 vision will be brutal in higher levels
People still think vision matters this year? The inner PCIβs size is directly correlated to contact, not vision
Yup, i guess old habits die hard for these folks. I completely ignore vision, in fact i am finding i hit better with guys who have lower vision.
-
Well, this may look like a bad card to you, but it looks like a good card Thome.
-
Skepple the expert. Lol. Sure vision does not matter.
@skepple15 said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
@Soda_Pop_Curtis_ said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
65 vision will be brutal in higher levels
Vision is irrelevant
-
@SchnauzerFace said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
Well, this may look like a bad card to you, but it looks like a good card Thome.
Nice.
-
@Soda_Pop_Curtis_ said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
Skepple the expert. Lol. Sure vision does not matter.
@skepple15 said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
@Soda_Pop_Curtis_ said in Jim Thome βοΈ:
65 vision will be brutal in higher levels
Vision is irrelevant
Skepple is a very good player and is correct. Vision only affects the outer PCI which is only useful for fouling off pitches and not striking out