Future stats cards
-
Aside from an adley Rutschman and maybe some draft cards (if possible) I feel like we’ve seen enough future star cards/ prospect cards. Like we need more current players flashback cards/ and legends
-
This is such a new and fresh take. Wow! This is probably the hottest take I’ve ever seen! So controversial and bold!
-
I'm so sick of the same old big-headed and goofy looking legends that they put out every. single. year. How many people are using Mike Scott? Who gives a [censored] about Bret Saberhagen? I'm happy with the Future Stars. Complaining about it won't stop SDS from releasing them.
-
@MadderBumgarner said in Future stats cards:
I'm so sick of the same old big-headed and goofy looking legends that they put out every. single. year. How many people are using Mike Scott? Who gives a [censored] about Bret Saberhagen? I'm happy with the Future Stars. Complaining about it won't stop SDS from releasing them.
I like Saberhagen.. more than Some top 100-120 ranked prospect that won't even reach the majors
-
@Nanthrax_1 said in Future stats cards:
@MadderBumgarner said in Future stats cards:
I'm so sick of the same old big-headed and goofy looking legends that they put out every. single. year. How many people are using Mike Scott? Who gives a [censored] about Bret Saberhagen? I'm happy with the Future Stars. Complaining about it won't stop SDS from releasing them.
I like Saberhagen.. more than Some top 100-120 ranked prospect that won't even reach the majors
We can't all agree on everything, that's the beauty of variety.
-
Content is content which is all I can ask for. I just wished they added more current players that had one or two special years and juice them up a little bit from there.
-
@MadderBumgarner said in Future stats cards:
I'm so sick of the same old big-headed and goofy looking legends that they put out every. single. year. How many people are using Mike Scott? Who gives a [censored] about Bret Saberhagen? I'm happy with the Future Stars. Complaining about it won't stop SDS from releasing them.
I use both of them and they've been great for me. Much more fun bringing back someone that doesn't play anymore than using someone who will either a.) never play or b.) play until I'm in my forties
-
It’s a fantasy game and I liked future stars at first. But my problems are that they get diamond duplicated (for example Bohm and Madrigal) and that some get 99’s which is to high in my opinion, 90-95’s are cool, I like Clarke Schmidt but the 99’s are out of hand. The card art is also sick
-
@MadderBumgarner said in Future stats cards:
I'm so sick of the same old big-headed and goofy looking legends that they put out every. single. year. How many people are using Mike Scott? Who gives a [censored] about Bret Saberhagen? I'm happy with the Future Stars. Complaining about it won't stop SDS from releasing them.
Such a terrible take. The same could be said about 90% of these future stars. Who gives a sh*t about Kevin Smith for example.
The difference is that the legends you stated actually played in the major leagues while most of these future stars with 90+ stats will never play a game in the show. That's why most players dislike the way the future stars were implemented in the game this year.
-
I'm cool w/ Legends and so-called Future Stars alike. Do think the glorification of most of the FS is getting outta hand tho.
But really just wanna see more 'exciting' - if not controversial - Legends.
IDK bout rights-n-licenses-n-such, but releasing a 80s/90s/00s Tandem Series would be fun: Gooden/Strawberry, Canseco/McGwire, Bonds/Bonilla (or Kent), Belle/Thome (or Manny), Big Unit/Schilling, Mattingly/Winfield, Ripken/Palmeiro, etc. -
@dpo13mri said in Future stats cards:
@MadderBumgarner said in Future stats cards:
I'm so sick of the same old big-headed and goofy looking legends that they put out every. single. year. How many people are using Mike Scott? Who gives a [censored] about Bret Saberhagen? I'm happy with the Future Stars. Complaining about it won't stop SDS from releasing them.
I use both of them and they've been great for me. Much more fun bringing back someone that doesn't play anymore than using someone who will either a.) never play or b.) play until I'm in my forties
I think that future stars are a bit played out obviously, but generally I don’t have a problem with it. The thing is I think a lot of the Future stars hate posts come from guys on here that are in their 30s and are very clearly not SDS’ target demographic for this game
-
I wish SDS would go further into the fantasy/projection card realm. FoTF was great for that. But I still think they could have programs with more cartoonish stat sets that are loosely set in reality (So no 99 spd Yadi or 125 power Kenny Lofton memes). They obviously shouldn't take over the game(Just like Future stars hasn't taken over the game), but they should still be relevant options. They could also make cool card art from it, which I think is just as important as player stats
-
Welcome to Double A The Show!
You too get to use fake FS cards and play 60% of your games at ShitPit! Order Now!
-
@FranklinSabers16 said in Future stats cards:
This is such a new and fresh take. Wow! This is probably the hottest take I’ve ever seen! So controversial and bold!
It wasn’t supposed to be new, controversial, or bold. But if only one person posts it. Then SDs isn’t gonna do anything. They only way they will change is if people continue to post about it. That’s the only way anything will change. So congrats to you for missing the entire point
-
@FranklinSabers16 said in Future stats cards:
This is such a new and fresh take. Wow! This is probably the hottest take I’ve ever seen! So controversial and bold!
Milwaukee is only one of six teams to never win the world series. Now thats a fresh hot take!
-
[censored] Future stars. The initial gold prospects were cool, didn't mind them, the occasional diamond, cool. The rest of the FS should have been November releases.
-
A admin locked this topic on
