Community Forum

7 hours with no reply, so I'll keep adding on to the list of real world MLB games and their hits to homeruns ratio. I'll do all of this real time so I'm giving all the data and not just what backs up my case.

July 28th:
First I'll do the Braves vs Royals game. Braves defeat Royals 10-7. Between the two teams, there were 17 runs, 21 hits and 4 homeruns.

Next I'll do another high scoring affair. Orioles vs Blue Jays. Orioles win 11 to 4. Total runs between the teams: 15. Total hits: 27. Total homeruns: 6

Third and final for this run let's go with the Brewers vs the Cubs. Brewers win 8 to 4. Total runs: 12, Total hits: 16, Total homeruns: 3.

As promised, I was completely unbiased and I chose 3 random high scoring games from today. The 6 homers is admittedly a higher number... but I have yet to find a single game where 40-50% plus of the hits are homeruns, despite what MLB The Show and it's "real baseball" would have you believe.

Okay, just played a game that reminded me how trash The Show is. Usual setup, I'm playing a guy right around my skill level. Playing him super well and then next thing I know SDS is hanging my pitches like it was going out of style. I'd throw my sinker down and in, hitting the yellow bar on the meter. The sinker ended up down and away. Wasn't penalized there, but then they started hanging my changeups and slurves and now I find myself in a pretty big hole. Realizing I was being set up to lose by the game's engine, I decided to leave my SP in there so not to waste my RP's energy for future games... so the final score ballooned to 9-3. But here's the stat that I see WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too often. 15 hits, 7 of them were homeruns. He got his 15th hit in the 9th inning, so prior to that it was 14 hits and 7 homeruns.

The guy ends up sending me a party chat and reminds me of a lot of people who make excuses for the game playing poorly. I told him what I thought and then backed it up with real data. He defended all the random BS in the game with the generic "it's real baseball" excuse. Then I gave him some real baseball data from games that happened only yesterday. The two I pointed out. The Rangers beat the Braves 8-1. The Rangers had 10 hits and guess how many homeruns? Only 1. Then I looked at the box score for the Padres vs Cardinals game. The Padres beat the Cardinals 9-2 and had 16 hits! Surely they hit between 6-9 homeruns, right? Nope... just one. Two different games, 17 runs and 26 hits between the winning teams and only 2 homeruns hit. And people will be dead serious when they say they don't see a problem lol. Naturally he left the chat because that's how people who can't think or debate avoid feeling like a loser. His only play was to act like he didn't understand what I was saying and when I made it so clear he couldn't ignore it, he bolted.

I'll look up one more game in real time while I write this so it's not just me pigeon-holing those 2 games as an example. I'm going to look at the box score of the A's vs Astros game. The A's won 7-1 and had 11 hits. Clicking on the box score now... the A's had 2 homeruns this game. 11 hits, 2 were home runs. The winning team in the game I JUST played? 15 hits, 7 homeruns. This is not real baseball. Do away with excessive homeruns or do away with the randomness. The game having both is the kiss of death.

Man, that's rough to be wired that way haha. I wish I liked the over saturation of Marvel movies, but alas I only care about a handful of heroes and only need to see a movie about them once every 10 years.

Just a quick experience from a game last night. Usually I share when something goes AGAINST me, but since I've always done my best to be fair and impartial, I'll include a small example of when something worked FOR me. The game played out like so many do. There's one inning where a pitch I throw lands somewhere completely opposite of where I placed it. I threw a ball on the outside edge against Pete Alonso, only to have it followed with a no doubt homerun. The pitch landed right in the middle of the plate. My timing and everything with the pitch was fine, so why oh why did it need to land on a tee for my opponent? Then we have a few dinky hits and control issues from my pitcher (nothing related to my inputs, just randomness) next BS thing that happens is a grounder to Chipper with a man on third. Man runs home, I throw the ball home, Chipper stands there looking pretty and not moving a muscle. Now I'm down 2-0. To say my bat was hitting like a wet noodle this game would be disrespectful to wet noodles. Every single pop fly died halfway in the outfield. Good contact ceased to have meaning. This goes on for 8 innings. He has a no hitter going with John Donaldson. Then in the 9th inning, he removed Donaldson and puts in 97 Josh Hader. I'm pretty irritated in all honesty. I feel my chances have just taken a nose dive. A lefty ran through my lineup for 8 innings and now a fresh one was on the mound at a full 7 points higher in overall rating. While Donaldson was around 80 pitches and I understood why he took him out, I wanted to send the guy a message that he just chickened out on his own no-hitter. Well guess what. After getting up on me with 2 strikes, he starts having inexplicable command issues and Elly gets walked. Then I get a dinky hit and another. Then lefty on lefty, Jazz Chisolm walks up to the plate and bam... it's 4-2. I close it down in the bottom of the 9th after a few questionable hits from my opponent put my back against the wall.

This worked out in my favor, but how am I supposed to look at that and not think of game-scripting, RNG and pure randomness deciding the outcomes? I could NOT touch this guy all game, then when I needed it most my bats start working? I wasn't seeing him any better, I was truthfully frustrated which never helps my odds.... but I went from maybe like 1 or 2 baserunners all game to 4 in one inning as well as a home run? I don't think it had anything to do with him falling apart or me rising to the occasion... I think the game did everything in its power to help me come back and ultimately win. A win feels good, I'm glad I won... but I'd be lying if I credited that to my skill and resolve.

@fubar2k7_PSN I think that's what I am playing with. So the better I get, the harder the minor leagues get haha. I've kind of begun to move off The Show with College Football being out (although, my big complaint for offline dynasty is that my DE and DT's always win player of the year and break tackle for loss / sack records each season... so have to figure out how to tone that way down) College Football to Madden, even though they're both EA, is the closest sports gamers have in the way of competition. The Show could definitely use that.

@fubar2k7_PSN

Sounds like something specific to him, honestly... but kudos to pops for playing and texting! What I'm talking about has to do with modern sports video games in general. NBA 2K is one game I got so good at, I was beating people with the LeBron-less Cavs regularly (The Mo Williams and JJ Hickson team and later the Kyrie Irving and Dion Waiters team) Then around 2017/2018 I inexplicably became a .500 to sub .500 player. I think this has a lot to do with the RNG and Game Scripting elements people talk about. It's supposed to make the game seem more true to life, but in reality it just takes the control out of the player's hands to varying degrees. These games do not change enough for me to lose my abilities. There's more there and that's why I and many others seem to have constant problems. When it's fun it's a lot of fun. When it's not fun, it's infuriating and feels downright unfair.

@fubar2k7_PSN

I get it, but I don't get it lol. I Googled "competitive mode mlb the show" and the AI response sounded a lot like how a Developer would talk up a game before release. However, some things felt contradictory and there was subtle admission the people who see random nonsense or skill not being taken into account were correct. Such as:

Benefits of Competitive Mode:
More realistic outcomes: Offers a more authentic baseball experience, with fewer lucky hits and more emphasis on skill.

Fairer online experience: Ensures that player skill is the primary factor in determining success in online modes.

What that says to me is they're going to dial back the randomness, but it's still in the game and can still determine the outcome. If skill is the "primary factor" but my opponent and I are of a similar skillset, does this mean there are other factors that will determine the winner? On paper it sounds like they're giving the players more control, but they're also retaining some control and reserve the right to give me a random costly error that costs me a game.

It also said that competitive is the mode that gives players most control and puts their skill to the test. Simulation and Casual were using the ratings of players to determine success. So would that explain my struggles in Road to the Show? I'm an 80 or so and feel like I'm being nerfed with a sub .200 average after hitting like .240 the year prior. Is my rating what's costing me hits? If I switch to competitive, will the pitches I barrel up become hits and not line outs? Like I said, I kind of understand the difference in modes, but really, I don't. I feel The Show is one big inconsistent contradiction.

@x-814-x-MAFIA-x_PSN

I was thinking an option similar to turning off cross play. There would also be the option to play anyone with any setting, but for anyone who is like me, I would be able to select "catcher batter view and pitching meter." There might be more to this such as research and finances, but what I have in mind seems fairly simple. I wouldn't necessarily have to be paired up with someone who chose to filter out players with different settings, but someone who just happens to use the settings I do. But it does give me more to consider overall, so thank you for the examples.

It might not be a clear advantage like your power attributes become inflated, but I believe it makes it easier to distinguish balls and strikes and get the bat on the ball. I used it for a few innings and was fouling off pitches I previously would miss and was having an easier time seeing balls and strikes. Did I change my settings and instantly hit loads of home runs? No... but I did notice a slight difference in my success and imagine if I would have continued and worked at it, I'd only get better. However, I just don't enjoy the aesthetic of it. For me, the best analogy I can come up with was the argument Mark McGwire used to justify his juicing. His stance was essentially that while steroids made him stronger, they don't affect the timing of his swings, the placement of his bat, reading pitches and so on. I wouldn't say that these two things are completely related, but I think the comparison sticks. I personally haven't seen a point made yet that would have me reconsider my stance, but I'm open to it.

The majority of YouTubers and top players do use it. I think the fact that people use it is a Freudian admission that it makes hitting easier. Why would anyone switch to a less aesthetically pleasing view? I don't use it for that very reason. I like the batting stances and stadiums so I stick with the default view which for me was Catcher.

I'll admit, I have been having a bit more fun recently... albeit 2 out of my last 3 games have been ugly examples of why I've been calling out The Show. These games are a reminder that The Show still has lots of problems keeping it from being consistently fun. The problems aren't consistent (nothing with this game is consistent). I can play 10 games and sometimes 7 of them will be quite fun... other times I'm lucky if I get 1 or 2 fun games. Anyway...

First game I'm pitching, there's 1 out and Pete Crow-Armstrong on third. Opponent hits a hard grounder to Third and I make sure to look the runner back. He stays on third, I throw to first and get the man out. Thinking this guy is going to be stupid and try to run home, I input for Freddie Freeman to throw home almost instantly. Low and behold, the idiot takes off and I see Freddie Freeman stand there looking dumb. After about a second or two, Freddie Freeman finally throws home... but obviously it's too late and the guy scores the run. That basically decided the game. An unresponsive, wonky animation cost me the game. Yes, we're playing to have fun, but at a certain point late in the game, you're invested in winning. To see something like that throw out all the good things you did in the 30-60 minutes it takes to finish a game, it's a tough pill to swallow.

Second game was just nerfing me the whole time. I had 1 home run.... which to be honest wasn't a well hit ball... but that was the last thing I was given. Three perfect-perfect line outs to the short stop, Good contact hits being lazy pop flys. Hard hit balls that are "just late" are going way foul, so on and so forth. On the flip side, I'm pitching really well. High strikeout numbers, low pitch count. He can't seem to get contact for a good 5-6 innings. Then randomly, I give up a home run to someone who doesn't have great power numbers on a pitch that wasn't in a juicy location in the slightest. That ended up happening yet again a few innings later. It's one of those games where I don't know what I did to lose. I was seeing the ball well, working the count etc... just wasn't allowed to get a hit.

The second game to me is where SDS takes the "well, that's real baseball" thing too far. This is ultimately a video game and when people do things well they want to be rewarded as such and when they mess up, then they'll understand why something went wrong. I've been playing the game quite a bit recently, for better or worse. A lot of times I get the feeling the game is buffing me or nerfing me. The way I was seeing the ball/swinging the bat in the second game, would have lead me to having 3 to 5 runs in a different game, but as it went, I only had 2 hits.

Truth be told, I've noticed this big time in NBA 2K. I bought that game every single year. Now, much like The Show, I take breaks from it for years at a time. NBA 2K was one game I was POSITIVE I was good at. Keeping a cool head, taking smart shots, making smart passes, playing hard and controlled defense etc. I played every year and A LOT. I don't recall what my record was, but I was definitely winning 3/4's of my games. That started changing around 2k17 or 2k18. All of a sudden I'm a .500 player. It started feeling like the game was more in control than me. Smart shots with good releases are not falling, my opponent hitting shots he shouldn't be hitting with the level of defense I'm playing and so on. Then I'd play a few games where things felt the way they used to again, but it would always revert back. Call this RNG, game scripting or whatever. I just know there's something to that. I want to be in total control of my wins and my losses even if it sacrifices a little of those "that happens in real baseball" things.

The best way for me to handle The Show when it's more Hyde than Jekyll is to use those games to rest my relievers. Even if my SP is getting jacked up... I have some level of control in my loss and maybe a mercy gets it over with sooner. I also have to remind myself The Show is a bad game. This is not to troll, it just that works for me. I can't call it game a good game until it is that way consistently. Even if some of my reasonings didn't work for you, I'm sure we can all agree that being cost a game with unresponsive animations is not acceptable. I don't care if it has something to do with Freddie Freeman not being as strong a defender or something... I as the player anticipated and saw the runner going home and would have thrown him out if Freddie didn't take that 2 second pause. I don't believe I'm bad at this game and that it's not meant to be. Then again I wouldn't say I'm good at this game and that it is meant for me. I don't know what I am. My methods for winning also lose me games.

@xsdert34_PSN
And the great thing about what I'm proposing is, it doesn't take your choice away! Reading comprehension is huge. A lot of the heat I have coming my way is from people who fundamentally misunderstand what I'm saying.

@fubar2k7_PSN

I'm not sure I understand. How does competitive play different? Are there gameplay differences? The way I understand it, casual, simulation and competitive just switch things ups like timed or directional hitting instead of zone and meter pitching instead of pinpoint.

@yankblan_PSN

1. All I know is when I selected "competitive" on my friend's console, the exhibition game we tried to play had the batter using the ultra zoom / crotch view camera and the defender using pinpoint pitching.

2. Seeking clarification on this, not sure I'm wrapping my head around it yet.

3. I can see the potential pitfalls, but if the forum is representative of the community as a whole, then plenty of people don't see the issues I'm seeing and would not take advantage of the proposed filtering. I also turned off cross-play as I don't trust there will be no difference between playing a PS5 opponent and a Switch / XBOX opponent. That's not necessarily filtering as specifically as having the same settings, but regardless it hasn't made finding games slower.

4. True. This one is a bit trickier, but I'm sure there's ways to troubleshoot certain things. In MLB 25 I haven't even sniffed Championship Series let alone World Series (Though I used to be a CS, fringe WS level player) so don't know why I'm being matched with someone who has the "World Series" profile icon.

5. I do consider these things. More so than other games, The Show can hinge on how you feel that day. Kinda similar to say playing basketball IRL. Somedays my body is relaxed, loose and I have sweet shooting stroke... then somedays I'm sluggish, stiff, overthinking etc. and you'd think I rarely shot a basketball. However, I don't think this always explains the issues I experience. I could just talk about my last few games where I was pitching and hitting extremely well, only to fall apart in the 7th inning. I put a fresh reliever in the game and I'm virtually not allowed to get a ball in the strike zone unless it's hung. It's like clockwork. It really feels like it's a game mechanic to see your pitcher fall to pieces once you're in the 5th-7th inning range or at the very least a fresh reliever will come in but its already been pre-determined that today is going to be an off day for that player. It's happened so many times I can't chalk it up to any kind of coincidence or human element.

Thank you for the replies, gave me some different perspectives to consider.

After a few days of the game playing a little more consistently and feeling more fun in general, I just got done with one of those absolutely egregious games that needs to be talked about. I could talk about the excessive home runs, him using lower end diamonds + some golds and making my 96 pitcher look like a common free agent, the inconsistency with check swings benefitting him on offense and defense and doing the opposite for me etc.... but let's just chalk this one up to him being far better. And no doubt a user of Strikezone. My opinions on this are well known at this point, so I don't need to revisit previous thoughts, but rather add on to the growing argument that it needs to be addressed.

I could talk about the matchmaking, but I don't think I need to go too deep into that. He was averaging .320 something for batting and averaged a HR every 10 at bats. Lopsided matchups like that are only fun for 1 person and angers the other. I still maintain, he wouldn't have had that level of success if he was using the default catcher view. He might not regress a lot, but I don't think he'd continue his .320 BA and 10 HR/AB clip.

Then yesterday, I realized something. I was at a friend's house having a drink and we decided to play The Show. I logged into my account on his PS5 and we were hoping to play Co-Op Diamond Dynasty online. Long story short, we never got to play anything because the couch co-op for this game seems to be non-existent or at the very least too complicated (another issue for another day). We both did Google searches, played around with different solutions and nothing. Our final attempt, we decided we were just going to play exhibition with the real teams. When I logged into The Show, I was asked if I was a beginner, simulation gamer or competitive. On my PS5, I went with simulation. On his PS5, I chose competitive, not thinking anything of it. We get into the exhibition game and my batting view was set to Strikezone without me making that adjustment, and my friend had pinpoint as his pitching method. Neither of us play this way, and it appeared the game was not going to let either of us adjust... so we just said 'F' it and turned off the PS5.

My realization: Choosing "simulation" at the very beginning made my default settings "catcher view" and "meter pitching" when I selected "competitive" the defaults became "strikezone" and "pinpoint." I don't know what Casual is set to, but I can imagine it's "directional" and probably still the meter. Now, it can be concluded that competitive and ranked matches go hand in hand. Maybe the intention for simulation was to stick to franchise and other offline modes. Either way, I enjoy putting my skills to the test against people online with a lineup of players I like. I get the game wants to give people options on how to play it. I still maintain that casual players should play with casual players, simulation with simulation and competitive with competitive. I also believe the competitive category is set up as it is because SDS is telling us without telling us that these are the optimal settings, if you want to be able to compete with the best players. Master pinpoint and you'll have much more control over your pitches (instead of the random hangers that cost you a game when using meter) Master Strikezone and you can see pitches much better, whether it's balls and strikes or getting the bat on the ball. I don't believe I'm on equal footing with players using these settings. It's always obvious to me when I'm playing someone using Strikezone (and to a lesser degree, pinpoint)

This leads me to two things:

1. Just like turning off cross-play is an option, Players need the option to play people who are using the same settings. That's the only real way to know that the competitive balance is intact.

2. Much of the problems with this game are things I believe are under SDS's control. What I dislike most about this game is the inconsistency. That's because I've seen it be fun. I've had games that were and absolute blast... but inevitably I have a stretch of games that are the polar opposite. I feel like I'm being nerfed and my opponent's buffed. The ways in which I'm losing don't make a lot of sense. "Dotted" pitches being taken yard with early swing timing and below average contact, my poor contact is more successful than my good contact etc. Then I get those lopsided matchups against someone I know I can't compete with. My option is to either stick it out for 9 innings, if I'm not mercied before then or quit. Quitting is obviously punished. Less XP to advance in the game and your pitchers don't really recover their stamina. I'll be rewarded by the game if I stay and get thrashed and angry. And of course the difference in settings which I believe creates inconsistent outcomes. For example, how does the game decide when someone using "timing" based swinging gets a hit, home run, pop fly, whiff etc? Just time it up on a pitch that's somewhat in the zone and you can get a home run? To be fair, I haven't seen timed swinging be a huge problem for me, though I did get slaughtered by a timed batter in a previous Show. Regardless, having this many options is great for accessibility and giving you an option of how you want to play the game BUT it's horrible for a ranked / competitive environment. We need an option to play people using our settings.

All I want is to be able to say "The Show IS fun" and not "The Show CAN BE fun."

@SavageSteve74_PSN

While I do appreciate the gesture, I don't think I'm the right person you're looking for. I'm a lot like you. I'm a keen observer of human behavior. Just one example being a steak dinner I had with family around New Years Eve. I saw an older gentleman at a table with 4 seats, but was there by himself. Every table was occupied with families, couples and friends, but this gentleman was the only one by himself. It kept nagging at me before I placed my order, all the way up to getting my food. I invited the gentleman over to join us, though he politely declined. On his way out of the restaurant, he stopped by our table and thanked me again for the gesture. He then told me his wife had passed away a little more than a week ago. This isn't me donating money to a cause or anything like that, but not having tunnel vision, observing people and being an empath could go a long way to directly impact someone.

That said, there are legitimate problems with this game, so could never classify it as "nothing." But I'm going to focus on what I liked about your post. I hope you do this in your regular life as well!

@yankblan_PSN
I think that's only needed for @dap1234567890_PSN at the moment. I'm on my best behavior and exercising discipline not to take his bait.

@SDS_JoeK_PSN

@dap1234567890_PSN is going out of his way to hijack the thread and says virtually the same thing every time. I haven't seen him reply to a single point I brought up, and he's focused on discussing anything but the topic at hand. The thread isn't titled "What do you dislike about me and things I did in the past?" Just to be clear, he's not violating any rules by doing this?

@vinnis1_PSN @Dolenz_PSN @allday9128_PSN

Appreciate you guys!

@SDS_JoeK_PSN

I see at least 7 replies, many from the usual suspects, trying to bait me into responses to get the thread locked and me suspended (with @sbchamps17_NSW straight up calling for a lifetime ban. He straight up admitted he didn't read my post and then went on to make assumptions to back up his call for a ban.) I hope the enforcement of behavior goes both ways, because right now I'm not entirely sure it does.

@SDS_JoeK_PSN

As per your message before the previous thread was locked, I made alterations and changes to my original post. Am I going to continue to be silenced by people who don't like my opinion and discredit my experience with the game?

I hate to see this game going down the Madden path in the past 7 or 8 years. So many issues I could mention, but the recent tomfoolery this game committed was a game I lost yesterday to a guy I outhit 5 to 12. I gave up my 3-1 lead in the 7th inning, after shutting this dude down all game. A fastball I located outside the zone and had a release that was off only slightly, was inexplicably placed down the middle of the plate... BAM! 3 run home run. One of the two baserunners he had on got a dinky ground ball hit on a ball way inside and the other guy was gifted a walk. SDS randomly decided it was time for my pitcher to throw everything as a ball. I'd locate the ball more inside the zone when I saw this happening, but the balls still fell outside the zone, even if I had a good or perfect release. This highlights why there are game-scripting allegations. Anyway, I ended up tying the game in the 9th. Then in extras, my pitching accuracy was nerfed again. I couldn't throw strikes, so kept getting into deep counts. My opponent was given a few more dinky hits that would eventually hand him the win. This isn't the first nor will it be the last time I've felt this game do everything in its power to prevent me from winning. It's worked in my favor before, but against me on way too many occasions as well. It's to the point, I'd rather take out all the "baseball authenticity" like bad ump calls, random errors and dinky hits the player did not earn and just get back to finding out who the better player is... not who caught more breaks / took advantage of whatever nonsense they were given.

Now, to the list:

The List (feel free to add, if I missed anything!)

1. The only thing that's consistent with this game is how inconsistent it plays.
2. Freeze offs are still a thing. Same problem, different year.
3. No tattoos. NBA 2K + WWE games have been doing it for years. SDS has the $
4. Outdated graphics. Last big update I remember was The Show 17.
5. Same animations for YEARS (sliding, fielding, diving etc)
6. Diamond Dynasty doesn't have option to create alternate uniforms (or have sleeve patches!)
7. Removing features, likely to unveil as new down the road like EA does w/Madden
8. Pickoffs are random. I've had Elly get picked off on more than once after taking 1 extra step in my leadoff even though I didn't input a steal request. Meanwhile, I'm struggling to pick off Pete Alonso with the same leadoff.
9. Check swings are random. I often see a disparity between myself and my opponent. Sometimes it benefits me, other times it benefits my opponent.
10. Errors are random. Sure, you have the option to prioritize fielding stats, but even then I've had Pete Crow-Armstrong commit back to back errors that had nothing to do with me not controlling my player properly. Something that has nothing to do with player control shouldn't be deciding who wins or loses a game you've spend 40 minutes playing.
11. Sometimes I'll swing at a pitch in the zone (with timing), but my batter will only check swing, costing me a potential hit.
12. Franchise players largely ignored.
13. Road to the Show hasn't really evolved.
14. (Highly subjective) people are in competitive matches with each other but aren't playing the game the same way (strikezone hitting, pinpoint pitching) This creates a lack of balance and there's no option to play people using your settings. In a recent game, I switched to Strikezone (which I've never enjoyed) just to prove a point to my Strikezone using opponent (who could not miss a pitch) that it was easier. Even without being used to it, I was quickly able to see balls and strikes better, get contact on pitches I couldn't usually get contact on and getting hits, whereas I wasn't before.
15. Too much focus on gaming trends and getting people to spend money. Prioritizing bat skins, bat flip animations and unrealistic cards like ones that turn Brian Roberts into a power hitter.
16. Legendary players are largely the same over the years. It's the only thing they have to sell new games, so they take their time getting names like Jeter or McGwire. 17. Of course, once you get guys like that, they'll remove names like Ichiro or Roberto Alomar so they can use them as selling points later on.
17. Stadium Creator doesn't work all that well.
18. Excessive Home Runs!!! It's like they forgot that baseball has singles, doubles and triples too. I'd say 50-60% of hits I give up are home runs. Not in obvious locations either. I have pitches 2 feet from the dirt getting jacked, pitches that are a foot outside etc. Sometimes can't tell if I'm playing Slugfest or a simulation.
19. Stealing is also fairly random. It can be very easy to steal with someone like Pete Crow-Armstrong or Elly De La Cruz, but on occasion they'll get stuck in mud on their way to second and get thrown out, without a clear reason as to why that happened. It's just pure randomness.

I'm sure there's so much more lol... but I think this is a pretty good start.

Just to be fair, here's what I think the game does well:

1. It's easy to earn packs of cards so you don't have to spend real world money... just need to grind a little.
2. Collecting cards and trying out new lineups is fun.
3. It's nice they have a create a stadium mode.
4. The crack of the bat sound is a nice addition.
5. The foundation of this game is rock solid. This is the closest I've seen a game come to replicating baseball. I remember a time when no one would get walked.
6. 2 v 2 and 3 v 3 can be a lot of fun.
7. Supercharged cards are pretty cool.
8. Home Run Derby online is fun too.

@fubar2k7_PSN

Assuming that's true, that should bother all U.S citizens. Likely a recent development over the last 10-20 years with political correctness taking hold of so many people. The fear to say the wrong thing, resulting in being silenced / having your life ruined is real. This is the kind of thing people need to fight against. It has a real "fall in line" feel to it.

I remember being younger and reading about South Park or Family Guy being banned in countries like Vietnam, Saudi Arabia and Jordan (not the actual list, but you can get the idea) and thinking about how crazy that level of censorship was. Fast forward to today and episodes of South Park have been removed from American streaming platforms, Comedy Central and even the South Park website. You either have to find some questionable streaming sites or have the physical DVDs. Same goes with episodes of Workaholics, among others I'm sure. The Office has been edited / had scenes removed. People should not be okay with that. It's perfectly cool if you don't want to indulge in shows like that, but that doesn't mean other people should be stripped of the option. The constitution guarantees us these rights, and unless you want to live in a repressive society and drop lower than 9th... I suggest you defend them whenever you can. That includes people saying things you may not like or agree with (a'la "The Show is a Bad Game")

@yankblan_PSN

Where are you from, @yankblan_PSN ? Didn't realize baseball was so popular outside of the U.S! Strange to be amongst so many who don't want freedom to speak, but I guess I also assumed the majority of people here would be from the U.S.

@fubar2k7_PSN

Appreciate the heads up. Love me a nice, respectful exchange!

@YOSHI24_XBL

That's the playbook. Involve yourself in something, hear words you don't like, block people and/or run away. It's not like there were any lies told. You can be jailed for speech in Germany. While I may not agree with what people would have to say in order to be put into a German prison, I don't support the imprisonment of people saying words. That's a slippery slope, but hey... I'm on your block list, so you won't see this anyway lol. Being of German heritage, I loved Germany when I visited in the late 2000's. Witnessing German people become so soft since then has been really sad to see.

@PriorFir4383355_XBL
Unfortunately, people don't seem to want to acknowledge your presence which is beyond rude. Their focus is solely on me and getting this thread locked.

@YOSHI24_XBL

Way to get us off topic again. You don't have free speech in Germany, so of course you're in favor of restricting what people can say and think. As long as I'm not making threats, yelling choice words in a movie theater or airplane, and following the code of conduct, I'm good to go!

What we're talking about is what's wrong with The Show. As you can see, others do agree with what I'm saying, just too many SDS fanboy clones trying to muddy up the waters with unrelated posts and get this thread locked.