I intentionally spoke and outlined that the participants in the zero-sum game were the player’s potential activities, not other players. You wanting to frame the discussion to ignore that doesn’t make me unaware of what a zero-sum game is. It’s just disingenuous [censored] because you don’t want to admit that SDS removed the value for time spent for a lot of players because you almost certainly didn’t spend the time yourself and you don’t care if SDS screws over others to benefit yourself.
I’m not really going to reply to any of these issues going forward though. We’re on three straight years of SDS drastically overhauling the content/design and as of two weeks ago, four straight years of SDS abandoning their intended content/design mid-cycle because of how bad their metrics are doing.
At this point, people who show up on the forums to defend their decision-making are just a lost cause. It’s incredibly clear that SDS has no confidence in what they’re doing. None. Yet magically, someone like you does.
I look forward to seeing how they screw up 26’s content/design overhaul.
Maybe then they’ll realize relying primarily on the feedback of less than 30 people, an incredibly homogenous group of content creators, will continue to result in the same problem over and over again. They’ll do something that appeals to that group, while completely ignoring how it impacts people that aren’t in it and then have to abandon the design/content once that impact to other people becomes obvious.
I won’t hold my breath as them figuring that out is as likely as you waking up and developing critical thinking skills tomorrow.
Have a nice day.