@The_Canuckler said in I Ran an Experiment...:
@Misfits_138_1_PSN said in I Ran an Experiment...:
@TheHungryHole said in I Ran an Experiment...:
@Misfits_138_1_PSN said in I Ran an Experiment...:
I played someone today who was either blind or messing around. He literally swung at every pitch I threw.
So starting in the 2nd inning, I threw every pitch in the dirt (bouncing) or 2ft above his head.
I won 5-0 (he was a decent pitcher), but here are the results...-16 K's
-32 balls in the dirt fouled off.
-1 single on a slider to Donaldson in the left handed batters box.
-1 bunt single on a fastball in the dirt.
-1 ball to the warning track on a fastball up and in and well off the plate, head level.Do I need to explain my point?
These results are nothing short of silly.
The debate should be, which baseball game feels more realistic-- Mario Super Sluggers or The Show 23?I encourage you all to run this experiment as well, lest I be accused of shenanigans.
you know i read your subject header first and thought to myself "wow this thread is going to be absolute [censored]"
so i get into the thread, read your post, and besides how cringy it reads - i beg to ask of you good sir - what in gods name is wrong with you?
So, the point of my op was that contact swing can keep the worst players competitive.
And if I actually threw the fella strikes, he might have scored a few runs by accident.
The big red wiffle bat keeps everyone in the game!It’s not even contact swings normal swings produce too much contact and too many foul balls.
On the flip side, too many pitches that catch a large chunk of the strike zone end in weak fly balls despite good timing.