Community Forum

Noticed that too...

@davisonkj17 said in May 23rd:

@BJDUBBYAH the new event says it ends Friday May 23rd

And, there’s a new program and ranked update on May 23rd.

@davisonkj17 said in Collection error they should’ve seen coming:

Too many cards for collection screen, it has happened before, happened with free agent collection this year and they didn’t plan for this with the mass release of cards today? With the few things they got right today and may have steered the ship in the right direction, this is a catastrophic failure, luckily for me I don’t lock in any cards unless they are no sell, but just feel bad for all those who have

I'm assuming this will be fixed. If not; may be the 'straw that breaks the camel's back' for a lot of people.

Howdy,

the Programs page appears to be loading correctly. Is the issue solved for you now?

Wow that was the fasted fix in SDS history!!!!! 👏

@ibonafidescrub_ said in Mazeika #4:

So many gameplay issues and we are worried about one player’s jersey number… smh!

So we just shouldn’t talk about anything besides gameplay until it’s “fixed”?

Just add the awards to inning two in the early levels along with what's already here.

@nymets1987_psn said in Extending the 1st Programs:

@pbake12_psn said in Extending the 1st Programs:

@stewart1465_psn said in Extending the 1st Programs:

Probably be easier to ramp up ways to earn XP.

This! Daily missions being 200 xp is a complete joke and worthless. If they made these around 2000 instead (equivalent to previous years) it would help.

Yes first time I said to myself who cares about daily missions

I completed one accidentally,but have ignored them otherwise.

Gotten 2 of them already - they are non sellable. Hopefully the 90+ pack will be sellable as it was in the Prestige Path at least.

I could see you having to have all the Griffeys in the game to unlock Ken Griffey's Jedi card...

Its what ppl wanted, more variety. Do I love getting a better versions of prospect cards that was out at launch, no but Dane Dunning having a better rated card then Nate Pearson is even worse then not getting a better version of Nate Pearson.

@Oski_1-9-9-6 said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

@phillydave35 said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

@Oski_1-9-9-6 said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

@phillydave35 said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

@copassatguy said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

@phillydave35 said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

@copassatguy said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

@Untchable704 said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

@copassatguy said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

@Untchable704 said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

@copassatguy said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

@phillydave35 said in More Free Packs=Lower Odds:

The 1 in 50? Don’t think so, but if it is, it’s not accurate at all.

98% chance per each individual pack not having a diamond player is accurate

Having more packs does not increase your odds. Same chance per pack

What theory are you using to say this? Based on a 2% per pack odds, How many packs would you say ia diamond should come out using your math expertise? Interested to hear it.

No expertise or theory needed to explain... every pack has same odds 1:50 of having a diamond in it.

There is no magical number of packs to buy that will produce a diamond player. Sure the more packs you buy the likelihood of getting a diamond from a pack is certain to happen at some point but the odds are not in your favor

That really doesn’t say anything tho. It’s basically says 1:50 odds shouldn’t produce 1 in 50 with nothing to actually prove that. I’d like to see what it’s based on.

Ok... get a standard deck of 52 cards and take 2 out. Let's say the ace of spades is in the 50 cards and this represents a diamond player. Have someone shuffle the cards and you choose one card and your goal is to select the ace of spades. After selecting the card you put it back in the deck and it is reshuffled for the next card draw. Do this 50 times and let me know how many times you select the ace of spades. This is what the odds are based on.

and this was confirmed where?

This is confirmed everywhere as this is how probability works. Not really hard to understand. The probability of getting a diamond player is around 2% but the probability of not getting a diamond player is 98% PER PACK.

It even says on the pack odds screen about the probability of getting diamond, gold, silver, or bronze players.

I understand probability, but the math doesn't add up, by your "probability" diamonds would be pulled roughly once every 1000 packs or so. I don't get one every 50 packs, but if i totaled up my packs i'd say it been close to 1 in every 60-65 packs, which shoots your claim to shame. So once again, where is it confirmed? Are the odds they list per pack or....what they're claiming the amount of packs to pull one is?

Dave: You don't understand how probability works.

I knew there was a high probability that some twit would reply to a thread that’s 3 weeks old.

And 3 weeks from now and so on, your ignorance of how probability works will still be displayed

you take everything a bit too literal a-hat. my point was even though the packs suck, the odds aren't as bad as what he was saying either. honestly though, does anyone really believe their posted pack odds?

Still not FIXED!!??!?!

@ImDFC said in A Summery of everything I'm seeing on this Forum:

summary*

Found the fun guy at parties