Franchise logic & feedback on QoL changes
-
UI Changes.
In franchise, being able to see your rosters stats is pretty vital yet with the current UI.
https://i.imgur.com/qVAi9qe.jpeg
( yea its a screen shot of a video, it still works for my example )For instance looking at your roster, you can only fit a 5 players on the screen and then its endless scrolling to the right to see their stats. Want the next 5 players? Scroll down and then back to endless scrolling to the right to go through their season stats.
IMHO This page should be a lot bigger. When you are at the seasons stats page for position players, R1 and R2 should be used to toggle between defensive, offensive and baserunning/misc stats. I should not have to scroll to the right through 30 stats just to find what i want.
- The whole player stats page has a lot of wasted space. There is no need for the top left ( RED BOX ) of the screen to be so big with how little stats it shows ( this should be customizable too or add OBS SLG OPS to that area too )
- In the GREEN BOX, make use of L2 R2 to have 3 tabs to go between for OFFENSIVE/DEFENSIVE/BASERUNNING stats. so we aren't having to spend extra time scrolling to the right constantly
- Minimize the RED BOX to to allow MORE players to be seen instead of just LISTING 5 players at a time. Should be able to fit at least 10 on there.
- Why is there only a season of minor league stats tracked? if I have two prospects that are similar in rating but i can't see how they performed the past 2 seasons ( unless i spend time actually having to WRITE down their stats before each the past 2 seasons end ) who do i call up?
- Why can't i go back and see how a person performed during ST while IN season?
- The ability to sort and lock one stat while being able to sort another stat at the same time. EG - Lock in HRs so i can sort it from most to least, to see who has 20+ HRs. Then lock in say Ks to see out of those 20+ HR guys, who has the most and least Ks
Same with free agency and all other sections. I shouldn't have to click and open each players profile just to see how they performed the past few years and then go back to the screen, rinse repeat.
The current UI design would work for all that online play but for franchise solo offline play, yea this is as bare bones as you can get and frankly a bit insulting
EDIT:
Just now advance to regular season from spring training and I'm at the FREE AGENCY screen because I need to fill AAA and AA and all it does is list
PLAYER, POS, AGE, OVERALL
That is absolute horrible. Why is everything that matters so minimal and basic? How did any of this make it out of testing? Its like this for a lot of stages of franchise.
-
Wow, there's a lot here to unpack. I'm just going to touch on a few things:
-
Sub 70 players on MLB rosters.
There are no where near enough 'decent' players to go around. I control all 30 teams on my game and try to even out the rosters. Every team will end up with 2 or 3 stinkers on the club to fill out the bench. Even with all teams using all 13 pitcher slots, it's hard to have good bench players. -
Watered down talent after a few seasons.
The reason for this is twofold. First, the young players on the default rosters are all underrated for potential. You might have 5 guys with an 'A', 10 or so with a 'B' and the rest are 'C' and lower. You have to go in and make major changes before you start a season.
Second, the draft is absolute junk. Again, far too few 'good' prospects. I sometimes see only 1 or 2 'A' players per draft. -
Bad trades.
Relief pitchers are valued at zero. Tied into my previous comment about bench players, a 70+ prospect is FAR more valuable than a decent relief pitcher. There just is not enough good position players to go around. -
CPU Roster changes.
The CPU will ALWAYS move your 40 man roster to the MLB for spring training. There is no way to stop this. It's very frustrating, because you have to use an option to send the players down to AAA. And, I think they will bring players up for September call-ups as well.
-
-
@sds_joek_psn look at all of these posts that will help franchise.
-
@StinkyMcPooter_XBL Just to clarify, MLB rules are that all 40 man players are considered on the MLB roster at the beginning of each "new year". I believe the new year begins the day after the WS ends. That's one way MLB uses to keep some teams from accumulating too many good players and just stashing them in the minors.
Lots of good information in this post to digest. Haven't spent enough time on MLBTS26, but for all prior years the one problem I always see is the CPU promoting good prospects to the 40 man too early and way before required. By the time their 3 option years are up, some still aren't MLB ready. This not only takes up 40 man spots but eventually causes the 26 man to have the sub 70 players mentioned. As this keeps happening it continues to get worse. Maybe the game should have a default that players aren't added to the 40 man until they get to 70 OVR or are Rule 5 eligible. Maybe the 70 can be a moving target based on the overall OVR of the league.
For teams classified as rebuilding, CPU logic should be the team signs veteran players to 1-2 year deals to fill out their 40 man rather than filling with in-house prospects that have lower OVRs. For rebuilding teams the logic needs to be build this team to win in 3 years, not this year. Any vets signed this year are expressly for the purpose of trade capital at the deadline. Continue to groom prospects so they are ready to contribute in 3 years.
-
Exactly. AFAIK, players have 3 years of professional service before they are eligible for the Rule 5 draft. There is absolutely no reason to place these players on the 40 man roster, unless you plan to move them to the MLB roster.
-
Well, this is where the not having non-roster invites in the game comes into play because iirc you can have non-R5 eligible guys at spring training without adding them to the 40
-
Exactly. AFAIK, players have 3 years of professional service before they are eligible for the Rule 5 draft. There is absolutely no reason to place these players on the 40 man roster, unless you plan to move them to the MLB roster.
And to find a players service time, have to view their player profile, scroll up one and it shows it, instead of just having it listed next to their name in the upper RED BOX https://i.imgur.com/qVAi9qe.jpeg
-
Actually, it's even worse than that. That number only shows MLB service time. Eligibility for the Rule 5 draft is professional service time. That includes all the time spent in the minor leagues.
The only way to figure that one out, is to go to the contract screen and see if it shows them eligible.
And, I have to correct my earlier post, it's 5 years of professional service, not 3.
-
I want to bring up something I saw posted earlier tonight over at youtube. I was watching Mr Hurricane's LPs and during it he was discussing about future players to bring up. In the comments someone mentioned how one of the players he talked bringing up didn't seem like he had the ratings for it but the game viewed the players ETA as READY NOW
https://youtu.be/vp10ldvihK4?si=GE5CtF5JAA7N6M7a&t=3742
It shows a catcher, Eduardo Tait. Young prospect and according to the TOP PROSPECTS page, he has a MLB ETA of 2027. That is the season that current LP is in.
Now this is the problem. I mentioned it before about how there seems to be a lot of low attribute players in the majors.
The player has
CONTACT v R 43
CONTACT v L 51
VISION 51
CLUTCH 48If the game is viewing players with these ratings as MLB ready, that is a serious problem. I noticed it a lot in my franchises. A player with those ratings I would view as at least 2 years away yet the game is showing them with an ETA of the current season. Now I may be alone here but those offensive ratings scream AA first half/AAA send half until his contact hits at least the 60s.
-
He's a catcher. That's pretty much it.
Go up and down the major league rosters and you'll see all kinds of catchers with low bat skills. Catchers fielding skills are more highly rated. Especially catchers who play more positions.
I don't know if this is intended or if it's just because catchers have more traits leading to a higher score.
