Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
This card is incredibly nerfed considering how they scaled the stats from 17 to 19. I was not expecting 125 power against lefties (99 vs LHP in '17) but Jesus, 79 against Righties? And also removed the 1B secondary. (He didn't play 1B for Dodgers that year, but was given that secondary in '17) Smh. Not the same card at all.
He didn’t play 1b and you’re mad he doesn’t have a secondary position as 1B? Weird flex.
@brycespalding24 said in Hanley Ramirez Nerfed:
I acknowledged that. I'm pointing out the differences from the last time we had this card and that's one of them. Doesn't have to do with what makes sense, just pointing out that both cards are wildly different.
You don't understand how to use the phrase "weird flex".
The way they decide positions has changed, the way they figure out stats has changed.
@maskedgrappler said in Hanley Ramirez Nerfed:
True
@LankyRyan said in Hanley Ramirez Nerfed:
@brycespalding24 said in Hanley Ramirez Nerfed: He didn’t play 1b and you’re mad he doesn’t have a secondary position as 1B? Weird flex. You don't understand how to use the phrase "weird flex".
Part of the joke mate. My apologies.
Calling someone out for using term "weird flex" wrong .....Weird Flex bro!
Contact over 100 for both sides, vision 79 power 79/100. That’s not a bad card hitting wise. His fielding is trash so it’s a pass for me
@Mightysourdough said in Hanley Ramirez Nerfed:
@LankyRyan said in Hanley Ramirez Nerfed: @brycespalding24 said in Hanley Ramirez Nerfed: He didn’t play 1b and you’re mad he doesn’t have a secondary position as 1B? Weird flex. You don't understand how to use the phrase "weird flex". Calling someone out for using term "weird flex" wrong .....Weird Flex bro!
This guy gets it