Market Bots?
-
@yankblan said in Market Bots?:
Ridiculous; sure a company will expose itself to millions in damages just to get what, a couple hundred thousands more in potential revenue? Not profit, revenue...
No it wouldn't if we signed off on it.
Not saying a believe it, just playing devil's advocate.
-
@yankblan said in Market Bots?:
Ridiculous; sure a company will expose itself to millions in damages just to get what, a couple hundred thousands more in potential revenue? Not profit, revenue...
It's not ridiculous. And there's no way shape or form it would expose them to "millions in damages", so no idea where you came up with that... You can be the slimiest businessman around, but if it's all legal, which this is...you can do it all you want. Doesn't mean it's the way to go.
It's entirely within the realm of possibilities SDS is doing that, again with the heavy emphasis on the pack/stub store this year...it's 100% possible.
-
@Sarge1387 Nope, not legal. Yes they can restrict how you make stubs all you want, even do away with the market if they want to.
But market manipulation (with bots or other means), which is misleading your customers, THAT will expose you to a [censored] ton of legal trouble.
-
@TripleH-4481 that and he is a SDS employee
-
@yankblan said in Market Bots?:
@Sarge1387 Nope, not legal. Yes they can restrict how you make stubs all you want, even do away with the market if they want to.
But market manipulation (with bots or other means), which is misleading your customers, THAT will expose you to a [censored] ton of legal trouble.
It's not "misleading" though...if it's even there it's utilizing the power of suggestion and capitalizing on consumer's impatience. Predatory? Yup. Unethical? Yup. Illegal? Not a chance. Nobody's claiming that's the case, what we are saying is there's enough evidence to at least acknowledge that "hey, maybe they are doing something funky with the market to keep margins small as possible, not likely...but maybe"
Your "legality" argument might stand on a leg with the way they're doing packs now. Which is the EA "Lootbox" style of gambling on packs, which IS something they got in massive trouble for.
-
it's legal. I've heard someone admit it back in the day, also, if you've ever flipped cards, you can plainly see it. no biggie, there's work arounds.
edit: and I'm not sure even if it's bots or just employees. but definitely manipulation.
-
@Tylerslikewhoa said in Market Bots?:
I feel like I should put on a tin foil hat reading this nonsense.
what are you blabbering about now
-
if you doubt this, go put a bid on Jordan Beck right now
-
More incentives to not play DD thanks guys
-
@jake98833 said in Market Bots?:
More incentives to not play DD thanks guys
it's nothing new -
@BLAISEBLAISE said in Market Bots?:
@jake98833 said in Market Bots?:
More incentives to not play DD thanks guys
it's nothing newIt may not be new but considering how little DD I have played the last 2 years it certainly helps me not go back
-
@jake98833 yea dd has gotten some bad press recently, and rightfully so.. I don't discourage your decision. it's an ever evolving system, Im adapting.
-
@yankblan said in Market Bots?:
@Sarge1387 Nope, not legal. Yes they can restrict how you make stubs all you want, even do away with the market if they want to.
But market manipulation (with bots or other means), which is misleading your customers, THAT will expose you to a [censored] ton of legal trouble.
ONLY IF we never signed off on it. The small print, you know.
