My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player
-
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument" -
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
-
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
-
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells" -
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
-
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
That is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
-
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
-
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the government.
And the government actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
-
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
-
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
Why are you avoiding this exemption to the anti-trust act?
If the government and economic experts agree that MLB is a monopoly, I'm pretty safe in claiming that is in fact a monopoly.
You can hold onto your 1800's monopoly view, that's fine, but it's evolved beyond that.
-
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
Why are you avoiding this exemption to the anti-trust act?
If the government and economic experts agree that MLB is a monopoly, I'm pretty safe in claiming that is in fact a monopoly.
You can hold onto your 1800's monopoly view, that's fine, but it's evolved beyond that.
Because it is a legal loophole for the government to call it a monopoly even though by actual definition it is not a monopoly. Not my fault our government doesn't actually read the dictionary to know what a monopoly actually is.
-
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
Why are you avoiding this exemption to the anti-trust act?
If the government and economic experts agree that MLB is a monopoly, I'm pretty safe in claiming that is in fact a monopoly.
You can hold onto your 1800's monopoly view, that's fine, but it's evolved beyond that.
Because it is a legal loophole for the government to call it a monopoly even though by actual definition it is not a monopoly. Not my fault our government doesn't actually read the dictionary to know what a monopoly actually is.
Again, it's on you for holding onto the antiquated idea of monopolies. It's not the 1800s anymore, please take some economic classes or even just read up on the subject.
If it's not a monopoly, why would the government care to call it one and then give it an exemption and do nothing anyway? That would be pointless
-
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
Why are you avoiding this exemption to the anti-trust act?
If the government and economic experts agree that MLB is a monopoly, I'm pretty safe in claiming that is in fact a monopoly.
You can hold onto your 1800's monopoly view, that's fine, but it's evolved beyond that.
So let me put it this way....if the government and economic "experts" agree that McDonalds was a monopoly right, would that make it one? No because we know that there's Burger King, Wendy's, In-N-Out, Checkers and plenty of other restaurants to choose from.
-
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
Why are you avoiding this exemption to the anti-trust act?
If the government and economic experts agree that MLB is a monopoly, I'm pretty safe in claiming that is in fact a monopoly.
You can hold onto your 1800's monopoly view, that's fine, but it's evolved beyond that.
So let me put it this way....if the government and economic "experts" agree that McDonalds was a monopoly right, would that make it one? No because we know that there's Burger King, Wendy's, In-N-Out, Checkers and plenty of other restaurants to choose from.
That it not comparable seeing that Mcdonalds marketshare is 21.4%, so give me a more reasonable analogy.
-
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
Why are you avoiding this exemption to the anti-trust act?
If the government and economic experts agree that MLB is a monopoly, I'm pretty safe in claiming that is in fact a monopoly.
You can hold onto your 1800's monopoly view, that's fine, but it's evolved beyond that.
Because it is a legal loophole for the government to call it a monopoly even though by actual definition it is not a monopoly. Not my fault our government doesn't actually read the dictionary to know what a monopoly actually is.
Again, it's on you for holding onto the antiquated idea of monopolies. It's not the 1800s anymore, please take some economic classes or even just read up on the subject.
If it's not a monopoly, why would the government care to call it one and then give it an exemption and do nothing anyway? That would be pointless
No I go by the literal definition of a monopoly. Not the loose definition of one nowadays.
-
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
Why are you avoiding this exemption to the anti-trust act?
If the government and economic experts agree that MLB is a monopoly, I'm pretty safe in claiming that is in fact a monopoly.
You can hold onto your 1800's monopoly view, that's fine, but it's evolved beyond that.
Because it is a legal loophole for the government to call it a monopoly even though by actual definition it is not a monopoly. Not my fault our government doesn't actually read the dictionary to know what a monopoly actually is.
Again, it's on you for holding onto the antiquated idea of monopolies. It's not the 1800s anymore, please take some economic classes or even just read up on the subject.
If it's not a monopoly, why would the government care to call it one and then give it an exemption and do nothing anyway? That would be pointless
No I go by the literal definition of a monopoly. Not the loose definition of one nowadays.
Just because you deem it so does not make it the literal definition today, I think i'll stick with experts and the government in this case over someone who doesn't seem to grasp basic economic ideas and concepts.
-
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
Why are you avoiding this exemption to the anti-trust act?
If the government and economic experts agree that MLB is a monopoly, I'm pretty safe in claiming that is in fact a monopoly.
You can hold onto your 1800's monopoly view, that's fine, but it's evolved beyond that.
So let me put it this way....if the government and economic "experts" agree that McDonalds was a monopoly right, would that make it one? No because we know that there's Burger King, Wendy's, In-N-Out, Checkers and plenty of other restaurants to choose from.
That it not comparable seeing that Mcdonalds marketshare is 21.4%, so give me a more reasonable analogy.
Fine. I can do this [censored] all day bud. If the government up and said WWE was a monopoly which by your loose definition it easily could've been because it makes a [censored] ton of money..doesn't mean it is. You have countless other wrestling promotions across the country and world.
-
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
Why are you avoiding this exemption to the anti-trust act?
If the government and economic experts agree that MLB is a monopoly, I'm pretty safe in claiming that is in fact a monopoly.
You can hold onto your 1800's monopoly view, that's fine, but it's evolved beyond that.
So let me put it this way....if the government and economic "experts" agree that McDonalds was a monopoly right, would that make it one? No because we know that there's Burger King, Wendy's, In-N-Out, Checkers and plenty of other restaurants to choose from.
That it not comparable seeing that Mcdonalds marketshare is 21.4%, so give me a more reasonable analogy.
Fine. I can do this [censored] all day bud. If the government up and said WWE was a monopoly which by your loose definition it easily could've been because it makes a [censored] ton of money..doesn't mean it is. You have countless other wrestling promotions across the country and world.
Just because it makes a lot of money doesn't make it a monopoly in terms of the WWE, because it's competitors also make a lot of money to, so give me another reasonable analogy please.
Mcdonalds makes a lot of money to, so you are essentially just using the same argument repackaged.
-
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
Why are you avoiding this exemption to the anti-trust act?
If the government and economic experts agree that MLB is a monopoly, I'm pretty safe in claiming that is in fact a monopoly.
You can hold onto your 1800's monopoly view, that's fine, but it's evolved beyond that.
Because it is a legal loophole for the government to call it a monopoly even though by actual definition it is not a monopoly. Not my fault our government doesn't actually read the dictionary to know what a monopoly actually is.
Again, it's on you for holding onto the antiquated idea of monopolies. It's not the 1800s anymore, please take some economic classes or even just read up on the subject.
If it's not a monopoly, why would the government care to call it one and then give it an exemption and do nothing anyway? That would be pointless
No I go by the literal definition of a monopoly. Not the loose definition of one nowadays.
Just because you deem it so does not make it the literal definition today, I think i'll stick with experts and the government in this case over someone who doesn't seem to grasp basic economic ideas and concepts.
I think I'll trust the only person I can not to manipulate the literal definition of something to fit my narrative and instead use it the way it was meant to be used. Me!
-
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@eatyum_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
@bigdadt92_psn said in My thoughts on the hitting engine as a consistent World Series player:
A monopoly would imply it's the only league in the US [censored]...
You: "Point to the flaws in my argument"
Me: "Okay here's this, this and this"
You: "Okay, but point to where I had a flaw in my argument"No, you just have a very simplistic view of a monopoly, while the word mono suggests one, it's really more complicated then that, I would suggest you to read up on the history and evolution of monopolies and the laws created around them.
Mono is literally the prefix for one.
mo·nop·o·ly
/məˈnäpəlē/
Learn to pronounce
noun
1.
the exclusive possession or control of the supply of or trade in a commodity or service.MLB the Show is the definition of a monopoly. MLB is not
Do you even read?
You are telling me what mono means when I literally said "while the word mono suggests one, "
and again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"Do you?
I did read, and I will repeat what I said regarding the definition you showed me
nd again, that is the simplistic view, the term and how it applies to businesses in today's world has evolved, both in terms of laws, (such as the anti-trust act that MLB is exempt from), The goverment has the authority to bust what it deems a monopoly, even if that business technically doesn't have SOLE position of all the resources it sells"
You are not the government though. So you do not deem MLB a monopoly. They do not deem it a monopoly either soooooooooo.....you're dumb?
I never claimed to be the goverment.
And the goverment actually does, why do you think they gave them an exemption from the anti-trust act? Why would you need an exemption if you weren't one?
You sure as hell claim to think MLB is a monopoly even though it clearly isn't though...lol
Why are you avoiding this exemption to the anti-trust act?
If the government and economic experts agree that MLB is a monopoly, I'm pretty safe in claiming that is in fact a monopoly.
You can hold onto your 1800's monopoly view, that's fine, but it's evolved beyond that.
Because it is a legal loophole for the government to call it a monopoly even though by actual definition it is not a monopoly. Not my fault our government doesn't actually read the dictionary to know what a monopoly actually is.
Again, it's on you for holding onto the antiquated idea of monopolies. It's not the 1800s anymore, please take some economic classes or even just read up on the subject.
If it's not a monopoly, why would the government care to call it one and then give it an exemption and do nothing anyway? That would be pointless
No I go by the literal definition of a monopoly. Not the loose definition of one nowadays.
Just because you deem it so does not make it the literal definition today, I think i'll stick with experts and the government in this case over someone who doesn't seem to grasp basic economic ideas and concepts.
I think I'll trust the only person I can not to manipulate the literal definition of something to fit my narrative and instead use it the way it was meant to be used. Me!
So just to be clear, you don't believe in words and languages evolving over time and carrying different meaning?
