How was MLBTS 20 aka, covid Show?
-
@vk_ratliff_psn said in How was MLBTS 20 aka, covid Show?:
I seriously read an article that said the Show has a separate agreement and they'll be fine. I was surprised when I couldn't find it on google.
I mean, I just hope MLB and the players union aren't stupid enough to actually miss a portion of the season due to this. They would lose a lot of money and worse, a lot of fans. They can't use steroids to win them back this time.
-
@ericulous1_psn said in How was MLBTS 20 aka, covid Show?:
@vk_ratliff_psn said in How was MLBTS 20 aka, covid Show?:
I seriously read an article that said the Show has a separate agreement and they'll be fine. I was surprised when I couldn't find it on google.
I mean, I just hope MLB and the players union aren't stupid enough to actually miss a portion of the season due to this. They would lose a lot of money and worse, a lot of fans. They can't use steroids to win them back this time.
no, steroids won't win the fans back this time. They're banking on endless, expanded playoffs to win the fans back this time. They want a gigantic bracket you can compete with your buddies with in pools, just like March Madness, and I'm directly quoting Rob Manfred on that. The MLB's latest proposal is 14 teams get in, which is more than half of all teams.
My question is, what is the point of playing 162 games? Just to eliminate less than half of the field? I hate it. But I'm old and out of touch so maybe it will work perfectly. Couldn't hate the idea more, myself.
-
About 3/4 into the article is a blurb about the agreement and that it wouldn't affect the games spring release. This was shared on Ance Larmstrongs Twitter page. Not his biggest fan but I'll give him credit for finding this first
-
A admin locked this topic on
