People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds
-
@Crimson_Monk said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
And why are you buying packs if you have mantle? Nothing in there that you need
I just want to see a diamond show up. Haha. Starting to think it’s not possible for my account.
-
@allmustfall16 said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
I’m sort of a whale or whatever they call it. I usually invest in a good team right off the bat. Bought Mays last year and Mantle this year.
With that being said, I’m not the only one running around with Mantle.
I’m a firm believer that if your account is known to spend money, that the game has something built in to nerf your odds with packs. I’ve opened more packs this year than I count and have got nothing. Same as last year.
SDS, just because I spend some money on your game, doesn’t mean you can’t throw a dog a bone. For once I’d like to see that diamond show up in a pack.
Maybe it’s just coincidence, but 3 years back when I was no money spent, I pulled Trout and everything else. Since I have bought the collections, I get nothing.
I’ve opened all the headliners, more packs than I can keep track of, and some of those prospect packs with no results.
If you’re like me, take my advice and don’t learn the hard way, stay away from packs that you buy.
It’s not worth it.
Only one way to test this theory from here forward. Spoiler: It won't cost you anything.
-
You already got Mantle there’s nothing to see here folks ... this like having a Ferrari and getting mad u can’t win a Toyota from you’re local lottery tournament lol.
-
@joeythebigboss said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
You already got Mantle there’s nothing to see here folks ... this like having a Ferrari and getting mad u can’t win a Toyota from you’re local lottery tournament lol.
Fair enough.
-
@allmustfall16 said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
@joeythebigboss said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
You already got Mantle there’s nothing to see here folks ... this like having a Ferrari and getting mad u can’t win a Toyota from you’re local lottery tournament lol.
Fair enough.
I’ll trade u my pack luck for Mantle any day of the week I’ve pulled a few diamonds let me know . -
@joeythebigboss said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
@allmustfall16 said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
@joeythebigboss said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
You already got Mantle there’s nothing to see here folks ... this like having a Ferrari and getting mad u can’t win a Toyota from you’re local lottery tournament lol.
Fair enough.
I’ll trade u my pack luck for Mantle any day of the week I’ve pulled a few diamonds let me know .Mantle was probably around $1,200. Maybe more. I’ve donated enough to the cause to deserve a little luck my way.
-
I have bought one 20 pack this year so far. Had a Scherzer and a Realmuto in those. So pretty much doubled my stubs. I am not pressing my luck further. Not until I can get all the LS collections done. But this year seems it may take a while. last year had Mays with no packs bought and no money spent by July. This year not only is the game economy not as good for us, but I dont have the desire to play this thing near as much.
-
I usually use my credit card reward points to buy stubs. I think im done unless a good headliner comes out. No point in ripping like in the past.
-
I haven't bought any stubs, but I have bought two 20 bundles and set 1 and 2 headliners (10 total) and gotten nothing.
Out of earning free packs through conquest, events and such, I've pulled 5 diamonds.I regret buying those packs because I'd be finished with the NL with those stubs, just need Bellinger and Kershaw
-
Man. People really don’t understand statistics.
-
@Bob_Loblaw1984 said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
Man. People really don’t understand statistics.
nor United States Law
-
@eatyum said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
I haven't bought any stubs, but I have bought two 20 bundles and set 1 and 2 headliners (10 total) and gotten nothing.
Out of earning free packs through conquest, events and such, I've pulled 5 diamonds.I regret buying those packs because I'd be finished with the NL with those stubs, just need Bellinger and Kershaw
Haha what’s funny iis I’ve now bought 4 50 bombs ( only two with purchased stubs) i got 3 drops one pack and 1 out the other 3 yet in free packs I’ve dropped 5 diamonds. Yesterday I got story and judge out free packs.
-
I have to update this post.
After not pulling [censored] all year,
Yesterday I got Kershaw from a twitch pack.
Then from the 20 pack box I got for getting 100 event wins, I packed three diamonds (Acuna, Strasburg, and Altuve).
Got all my luck back in a day.
-
I haven't spent a dime on this game since 17 and my pack luck is as bad as anyone.
-
The LS diamonds are still going for too much. Wait until they drop to about quick sell price and then you’ll start to pull more
-
I kind of agree with this. Last year was the first year I really played DD. I had decent pack luck, (pulled Trout early) especially with headliner packs. Could usually get one diamond out of the 5 offered.This year I preordered the $100 version and have spent $200 in stubs. I have bought a total of 5 50 bundles and numerous show packs and have only pulled Yelich, and Hader. Where I think the bigger issue is, would be the headliner packs. I've bought all of these and other than pulling George Springer, EVERY OTHER PACK HAVE BEEN SILVERS!! 7,500 stubs for a silver is not okay.
-
@allmustfall16 said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
I’m sort of a whale or whatever they call it. I usually invest in a good team right off the bat. Bought Mays last year and Mantle this year.
With that being said, I’m not the only one running around with Mantle.
I’m a firm believer that if your account is known to spend money, that the game has something built in to nerf your odds with packs. I’ve opened more packs this year than I count and have got nothing. Same as last year.
SDS, just because I spend some money on your game, doesn’t mean you can’t throw a dog a bone. For once I’d like to see that diamond show up in a pack.
Maybe it’s just coincidence, but 3 years back when I was no money spent, I pulled Trout and everything else. Since I have bought the collections, I get nothing.
I’ve opened all the headliners, more packs than I can keep track of, and some of those prospect packs with no results.
If you’re like me, take my advice and don’t learn the hard way, stay away from packs that you buy.
It’s not worth it.
I feel you ive only gotten 2 diamonds so far 1 thru a headliner pack which was hader spent more to get him that way then what he was worth and opened the pack on my phone not in game and the 2nd was cleets that showed up postgame i haven't dished a single dollar into the game yet i thought that might've been the reason why but looks like it really is just dumb luck no real odds to it like they claim
-
@ChuckCLC said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
I have bought one 20 pack this year so far. Had a Scherzer and a Realmuto in those. So pretty much doubled my stubs. I am not pressing my luck further. Not until I can get all the LS collections done. But this year seems it may take a while. last year had Mays with no packs bought and no money spent by July. This year not only is the game economy not as good for us, but I dont have the desire to play this thing near as much.
That makes up for the 50 pack I bought with zero diamonds. Probably netted 12-15k. After I purchased I had less than 500 stubs. After selling duplicates I had around $4,500. I did not sell the 4 golds I got but they were all between 1k and 2500k.
I think the majority of diamond pulls are reserved for streamers (marketing ploy), first time players (to get them hooked) and really bad players (to give them help). That is what I would do.
-
@maskedgrappler said in People that have a history of spending on the game have bad pack odds:
I haven't spent a dime on this game since 17 and my pack luck is as bad as anyone.
I could probably rival you. It was either 17 or 18, I went 433 packs without a diamond. Have never pulled Trout and only bought him in 17. I don't even think about collections. Finished 19 right when this came out because I wasn't planning on purchasing 20 and wanted to use Mays. Pandemic changed my mind on purchasing 20 since I had a lot more time to grind, hence the 6 TA players I have plus Mays from conquest.
-
A admin locked this topic on
