Directional hitters are Cancer
-
@nflman2033_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
To this day, I will never understand this complaint. If using Directional is so easy and gives people an advantage, why aren't more people using it? If it's so easy why do I hit worse with it?
My experience with Directional, is that certain hitters I hit better with using Directional than zone and other hitters I hit better using zone. It is to much wasted time to go back and forth between the 2. Zone is 100% the option to use. I do suck at hitting. If you leave one in the middle of the plate or high even some hitters can hit the low ones out with good timing but overall zone hitting is the way to go.The players who are good with using Directional wait for that one pitch.
-
@tezzmaniandevil_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
Directional hitters are malignant tumors
This dude is practicing necromancy. GUARDS!
-
@kovz88_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
Cancer is cancer. Directional hitting is something that annoys you in a video game. Big difference
I never understood why ppl use terms like this to describe things. The "this game is AIDS" comment makes me cringe. AIDS is wayyy worse than MLB the show.
-
@aam34_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@kovz88_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
Cancer is cancer. Directional hitting is something that annoys you in a video game. Big difference
I never understood why ppl use terms like this to describe things. The "this game is AIDS" comment makes me cringe. AIDS is wayyy worse than MLB the show.
I mean... have you played MLBTS18?
-
@ikasnu_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@aam34_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@kovz88_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
Cancer is cancer. Directional hitting is something that annoys you in a video game. Big difference
I never understood why ppl use terms like this to describe things. The "this game is AIDS" comment makes me cringe. AIDS is wayyy worse than MLB the show.
I mean... have you played MLBTS18?
This is so wrong...
-
@spin_doctor01_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@ikasnu_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@aam34_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@kovz88_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
Cancer is cancer. Directional hitting is something that annoys you in a video game. Big difference
I never understood why ppl use terms like this to describe things. The "this game is AIDS" comment makes me cringe. AIDS is wayyy worse than MLB the show.
I mean... have you played MLBTS18?
This is so wrong...
Is that a no?
-
@aam34_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@kovz88_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
Cancer is cancer. Directional hitting is something that annoys you in a video game. Big difference
I never understood why ppl use terms like this to describe things. The "this game is AIDS" comment makes me cringe. AIDS is wayyy worse than MLB the show.
Yeah, it's pretty insensitive considering that there are probably more than a few people in the forum who have dealt with or are dealing with family or friends that have cancer. I lost both my parents to cancer and one of my friends is currently dealing with it.
It is not something to trivialize by using it in this context.
-
@ikasnu_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@aam34_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@kovz88_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
Cancer is cancer. Directional hitting is something that annoys you in a video game. Big difference
I never understood why ppl use terms like this to describe things. The "this game is AIDS" comment makes me cringe. AIDS is wayyy worse than MLB the show.
I mean... have you played MLBTS18?
LMAO That was an abomination. Yes I did.
-
@suntlacrimae50_mlbts said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@the_joneser_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@the_fools_sip_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
Squaring up the location along with timing is much more skilled than choosing your swing type
and having the batters vision determine the accuracy of the swing.It also takes a lot more skill to walk on your hands than it does to walk on your feet, but is it really necessary, other than to say that you did the harder thing as opposed to the more natural thing?
Nothing that the game does is "natural." Please. They're all video game conventions. One is more complex, the other simpler. That's all.
And if you want good results more consistently based on good user input, then yes: zone really is "necessary." Whether it's unnatural in your eyes or not.
If you suck at zone (like me) and use directional (not me), you're letting the computer RNG your "good input" based on hitter-pitchers attributes. That, in the context of competitive mode, seems like the most "unnatural" thing of all.
Dude, I wrote the comment you quoted like a year ago... maybe "natural" wasn't the best choice of words, but the point is just as true today; moving a targeting reticle to simulate eye movement while batting is a convention that doesn't belong in a baseball video game. I don't know that I could come up with something more stupid if I were paid to complete the task.
I don't use directional anymore because I found analog stride to be a better simulation of a swing, so I use timing with analog input now (for those about to say timing is just pushing a single button, it isn't on analog; that input on timing uses the same inside/center/outside directional control as "pure analog" from games past). To claim that is somehow not user input is just silliness... if the argument is that moving the targeting reticle is more difficult to line up, then, whatever. I disagree, but for those that don't, then congrats on choosing to do something ridiculous because they think it's harder (though they get better results... which actually belies that).
It's simply a personal choice. I like the way it "feels" when I time the stride just right and then time an inside swing to belt one into the stands. I get no satisfaction using the PCI, which besides being silly, clearly doesn't work as people think it should (hence the incessant complaints). And, for the record, aiming and pushing a button is not somehow more "complex" than timing a stride, a swing, and choosing a direction.
-
@the_joneser_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@suntlacrimae50_mlbts said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@the_joneser_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
@the_fools_sip_psn said in Directional hitters are Cancer:
Squaring up the location along with timing is much more skilled than choosing your swing type
and having the batters vision determine the accuracy of the swing.It also takes a lot more skill to walk on your hands than it does to walk on your feet, but is it really necessary, other than to say that you did the harder thing as opposed to the more natural thing?
Nothing that the game does is "natural." Please. They're all video game conventions. One is more complex, the other simpler. That's all.
And if you want good results more consistently based on good user input, then yes: zone really is "necessary." Whether it's unnatural in your eyes or not.
If you suck at zone (like me) and use directional (not me), you're letting the computer RNG your "good input" based on hitter-pitchers attributes. That, in the context of competitive mode, seems like the most "unnatural" thing of all.
Dude, I wrote the comment you quoted like a year ago... maybe "natural" wasn't the best choice of words, but the point is just as true today; moving a targeting reticle to simulate eye movement while batting is a convention that doesn't belong in a baseball video game. I don't know that I could come up with something more stupid if I were paid to complete the task.
I don't use directional anymore because I found analog stride to be a better simulation of a swing, so I use timing with analog input now (for those about to say timing is just pushing a single button, it isn't on analog; that input on timing uses the same inside/center/outside directional control as "pure analog" from games past). To claim that is somehow not user input is just silliness... if the argument is that moving the targeting reticle is more difficult to line up, then, whatever. I disagree, but for those that don't, then congrats on choosing to do something ridiculous because they think it's harder (though they get better results... which actually belies that).
It's simply a personal choice. I like the way it "feels" when I time the stride just right and then time an inside swing to belt one into the stands. I get no satisfaction using the PCI, which besides being silly, clearly doesn't work as people think it should (hence the incessant complaints). And, for the record, aiming and pushing a button is not somehow more "complex" than timing a stride, a swing, and choosing a direction.
And I'll respond to it again NEXT YEAR, too!
That's funny, didn't realize it...
-
A admin locked this topic on
