@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
@shuker23_psn said in Obviously not this year:
I think it could do with a full rethink. At this point I don't touch conquest as I find it super time consuming and boring.
There must be other ways of presenting single player?
Somtimes when i want a new approach to the mode i will set my lineup to match BR parameters. Or if there is an event i will set parameters to event type lineup, since both modes are 3-6 inning games.
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@shuker23_psn said in Obviously not this year:
I think it could do with a full rethink. At this point I don't touch conquest as I find it super time consuming and boring.
There must be other ways of presenting single player?Somtimes when i want a new approach to the mode i will set my lineup to match BR parameters. Or if there is an event i will set parameters to event type lineup, since both modes are 3-6 inning games.
I would just end up using random players I would never use online. The issue is the time consuming phases of conquering the map and the lack of variety in the matches. I think it's just boring.
@shuker23_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@shuker23_psn said in Obviously not this year:
I think it could do with a full rethink. At this point I don't touch conquest as I find it super time consuming and boring.
There must be other ways of presenting single player?Somtimes when i want a new approach to the mode i will set my lineup to match BR parameters. Or if there is an event i will set parameters to event type lineup, since both modes are 3-6 inning games.
I would just end up using random players I would never use online. The issue is the time consuming phases of conquering the map and the lack of variety in the matches. I think it's just boring.
I'm curious? Do you play every game of every territory is that why it's time consuming?
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@shuker23_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@shuker23_psn said in Obviously not this year:
I think it could do with a full rethink. At this point I don't touch conquest as I find it super time consuming and boring.
There must be other ways of presenting single player?Somtimes when i want a new approach to the mode i will set my lineup to match BR parameters. Or if there is an event i will set parameters to event type lineup, since both modes are 3-6 inning games.
I would just end up using random players I would never use online. The issue is the time consuming phases of conquering the map and the lack of variety in the matches. I think it's just boring.
I'm curious? Do you play every game of every territory is that why it's time consuming?
Reason i ask is b/c there are stategies of how to get to west coast fairly quick Montana Idaho area b/c it is the most open area.
The way it plays right now is it seems like always Boston or Blue jays the last team to beat. Which is why i would like to be able to start somewhere else so i can maybe attack east coast first if that makes sense.
I think the mode is under utilized which is a shame b/c conquest is also a great way to work on specific team affinity leveling. Which makes me think it isn't that appealing to most reason i made thread.
i like all the suggestions except maybe the 6 inning one, id still play it even if they did do 6 inning though.
my biggest change would be maybe the stamina of a pitcher in conquest, especially closers, where you cant even get through the required 3 batters without being in the red sometimes lol.
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
Solo battles were a thing that EA created in their DD style modes. You get 4 games per day vs other squads and gain points for how you play and whether you win or lose. There is a leaderboard and each week you get some kind of rewards. They could also allow you to play extra inning games vs other teams that users have created, that would be nice too
@lucas8181 said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@htonsecurity5x said in Obviously not this year:
I dunno..it gets pretty menotonous, but I do understand the importance of conquest to the offline playing crowd.
And why would you automatically call it a mode for the offline "crowd?"
So am i to assume the "online" crowd doesn't play it to gain points for Boss cards? Or the "Online Crowd" never plays it to gain points for the team affinity?
Get the hell outta here with your poor attempt of trying to split community into online or offline groups. Can't stand people like you that try present themselves as a superior to others. Why because you play MP? The game is Baseball the love of the game is why we all buy it.
And you even described it as "monotonous" so maybe all the more reason to maybe spruce it up.
Someones upset about the Nolan Arenado for two potatoes and a used ice cream cone trade.
weeps yet again
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
Solo battles were a thing that EA created in their DD style modes. You get 4 games per day vs other squads and gain points for how you play and whether you win or lose. There is a leaderboard and each week you get some kind of rewards. They could also allow you to play extra inning games vs other teams that users have created, that would be nice too
No thx i dot want SDS to follow EA or 2K there is a reason i dont play those games. SDS has accountability and integrity.
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
Solo battles were a thing that EA created in their DD style modes. You get 4 games per day vs other squads and gain points for how you play and whether you win or lose. There is a leaderboard and each week you get some kind of rewards. They could also allow you to play extra inning games vs other teams that users have created, that would be nice too
No thx i dot want SDS to follow EA or 2K there is a reason i dont play those games. SDS has accountability and integrity.
So you read that the things were made by EA so they shouldn't be used because of that? Regardless of EA doing it, squad battles are one of the best things that ever came from them even if their games are trash. I just have an ability to look past the creator to see the product instead of being blind to it due to a bias. To each their own
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@htonsecurity5x said in Obviously not this year:
I dunno..it gets pretty menotonous, but I do understand the importance of conquest to the offline playing crowd.
And why would you automatically call it a mode for the offline "crowd?"
So am i to assume the "online" crowd doesn't play it to gain points for Boss cards? Or the "Online Crowd" never plays it to gain points for the team affinity?
Get the hell outta here with your poor attempt of trying to split community into online or offline groups. Can't stand people like you that try present themselves as a superior to others. Why because you play MP? The game is Baseball the love of the game is why we all buy it.
And you even described it as "monotonous" so maybe all the more reason to maybe spruce it up.
What a sad little rant
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
Solo battles were a thing that EA created in their DD style modes. You get 4 games per day vs other squads and gain points for how you play and whether you win or lose. There is a leaderboard and each week you get some kind of rewards. They could also allow you to play extra inning games vs other teams that users have created, that would be nice too
No thx i dot want SDS to follow EA or 2K there is a reason i dont play those games. SDS has accountability and integrity.
So you read that the things were made by EA so they shouldn't be used because of that? Regardless of EA doing it, squad battles are one of the best things that ever came from them even if their games are trash. I just have an ability to look past the creator to see the product instead of being blind to it due to a bias. To each their own
Not just cuz of EA I read your post and didn't like the sound of format. Why wait a week for rewards when currently in conquest mode you find hidden packs, xp, and stubs right when you find it on map?
@drg179_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@htonsecurity5x said in Obviously not this year:
I dunno..it gets pretty menotonous, but I do understand the importance of conquest to the offline playing crowd.
And why would you automatically call it a mode for the offline "crowd?"
So am i to assume the "online" crowd doesn't play it to gain points for Boss cards? Or the "Online Crowd" never plays it to gain points for the team affinity?
Get the hell outta here with your poor attempt of trying to split community into online or offline groups. Can't stand people like you that try present themselves as a superior to others. Why because you play MP? The game is Baseball the love of the game is why we all buy it.
And you even described it as "monotonous" so maybe all the more reason to maybe spruce it up.
What a sad little rant
Ty! I appreciate it very much! That deserves a complment right back! What a sad sentence structure and a poor usage of puncuation. You have a great day!! 
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@drg179_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@htonsecurity5x said in Obviously not this year:
I dunno..it gets pretty menotonous, but I do understand the importance of conquest to the offline playing crowd.
And why would you automatically call it a mode for the offline "crowd?"
So am i to assume the "online" crowd doesn't play it to gain points for Boss cards? Or the "Online Crowd" never plays it to gain points for the team affinity?
Get the hell outta here with your poor attempt of trying to split community into online or offline groups. Can't stand people like you that try present themselves as a superior to others. Why because you play MP? The game is Baseball the love of the game is why we all buy it.
And you even described it as "monotonous" so maybe all the more reason to maybe spruce it up.
What a sad little rant
Ty! I appreciate it very much! That deserves a complment right back! What a sad sentence structure and a poor usage of puncuation. You have a great day!!
Lmao salty today are we?
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
Solo battles were a thing that EA created in their DD style modes. You get 4 games per day vs other squads and gain points for how you play and whether you win or lose. There is a leaderboard and each week you get some kind of rewards. They could also allow you to play extra inning games vs other teams that users have created, that would be nice too
No thx i dot want SDS to follow EA or 2K there is a reason i dont play those games. SDS has accountability and integrity.
So you read that the things were made by EA so they shouldn't be used because of that? Regardless of EA doing it, squad battles are one of the best things that ever came from them even if their games are trash. I just have an ability to look past the creator to see the product instead of being blind to it due to a bias. To each their own
Not just cuz of EA I read your post and didn't like the sound of format. Why wait a week for rewards when currently in conquest mode you find hidden packs, xp, and stubs right when you find it on map?
Just a shot in the dark, why not have both? Solo battles are quite fun for offline where FULL games actually mean something instead of the grind that conquest is. You get rewards after every game of DD regardless so what's the big deal about a weekly award system? You play online in seasons but don't get your rewards right away until you hit a certain level. You can play a bunch of games with no "reward" in seasons.
Thats the last ill respond to that though. Solo battles are a fun way to use the whole team, try out players offline with rewards for doing it. I cant see what's not to like. Have a good day
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
Solo battles were a thing that EA created in their DD style modes. You get 4 games per day vs other squads and gain points for how you play and whether you win or lose. There is a leaderboard and each week you get some kind of rewards. They could also allow you to play extra inning games vs other teams that users have created, that would be nice too
No thx i dot want SDS to follow EA or 2K there is a reason i dont play those games. SDS has accountability and integrity.
So you read that the things were made by EA so they shouldn't be used because of that? Regardless of EA doing it, squad battles are one of the best things that ever came from them even if their games are trash. I just have an ability to look past the creator to see the product instead of being blind to it due to a bias. To each their own
Not just cuz of EA I read your post and didn't like the sound of format. Why wait a week for rewards when currently in conquest mode you find hidden packs, xp, and stubs right when you find it on map?
Just a shot in the dark, why not have both? Solo battles are quite fun for offline where FULL games actually mean something instead of the grind that conquest is. You get rewards after every game of DD regardless so what's the big deal about a weekly award system? You play online in seasons but don't get your rewards right away until you hit a certain level. You can play a bunch of games with no "reward" in seasons.
Thats the last ill respond to that though. Solo battles are a fun way to use the whole team, try out players offline with rewards for doing it. I cant see what's not to like. Have a good day
That's fine if you wanna leave the convo. I was legitimately trying to get you to explain what solo battles were in depth. But you assumed i would shoot the idea down, but fact is i didn't like it based off info given.
How many weeks? How many teams? What would be the reward structure? What are paramater of your team build? Quick counts on or off? How many innings?What would be difficulty level?
I am open minded but it's you who did not go into depth about it so i based my thoughts off of info given. So if you wanna get butthurt and leave convo fine, but let it be known i was willing to hear about it. So you to have a great day!
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
Solo battles were a thing that EA created in their DD style modes. You get 4 games per day vs other squads and gain points for how you play and whether you win or lose. There is a leaderboard and each week you get some kind of rewards. They could also allow you to play extra inning games vs other teams that users have created, that would be nice too
No thx i dot want SDS to follow EA or 2K there is a reason i dont play those games. SDS has accountability and integrity.
So you read that the things were made by EA so they shouldn't be used because of that? Regardless of EA doing it, squad battles are one of the best things that ever came from them even if their games are trash. I just have an ability to look past the creator to see the product instead of being blind to it due to a bias. To each their own
Not just cuz of EA I read your post and didn't like the sound of format. Why wait a week for rewards when currently in conquest mode you find hidden packs, xp, and stubs right when you find it on map?
Just a shot in the dark, why not have both? Solo battles are quite fun for offline where FULL games actually mean something instead of the grind that conquest is. You get rewards after every game of DD regardless so what's the big deal about a weekly award system? You play online in seasons but don't get your rewards right away until you hit a certain level. You can play a bunch of games with no "reward" in seasons.
Thats the last ill respond to that though. Solo battles are a fun way to use the whole team, try out players offline with rewards for doing it. I cant see what's not to like. Have a good day
That's fine if you wanna leave the convo. I was legitimately trying to get you to explain what solo battles were in depth. But you assumed i would shoot the idea down, but fact is i didn't like it based off info given.
How many weeks? How many teams? What would be the reward structure? What are paramater of your team build? Quick counts on or off? How many innings?What would be difficulty level?
I am open minded but it's you who did not go into depth about it so i based my thoughts off of info given. So if you wanna get butthurt and leave convo fine, but let it be known i was willing to hear about it. So you to have a great day!
What exactly did you say to get me to explain anything? You response was no its an EA idea, don't want that because you want integrity in the company. Where was the dialog to keep that conversation going? The only question you asked before this response was why wait a week? Again, where was it you wanted further explanation?
From your responses just in this thread to others that have been here, it's not worth the time. Lol @ butthurt though when you flip out over someone saying the offline crowd. Get over yourself and you'll have better interactions.
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
gladly
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
Solo battles were a thing that EA created in their DD style modes. You get 4 games per day vs other squads and gain points for how you play and whether you win or lose. There is a leaderboard and each week you get some kind of rewards. They could also allow you to play extra inning games vs other teams that users have created, that would be nice too
No thx i dot want SDS to follow EA or 2K there is a reason i dont play those games. SDS has accountability and integrity.
So you read that the things were made by EA so they shouldn't be used because of that? Regardless of EA doing it, squad battles are one of the best things that ever came from them even if their games are trash. I just have an ability to look past the creator to see the product instead of being blind to it due to a bias. To each their own
Not just cuz of EA I read your post and didn't like the sound of format. Why wait a week for rewards when currently in conquest mode you find hidden packs, xp, and stubs right when you find it on map?
Just a shot in the dark, why not have both? Solo battles are quite fun for offline where FULL games actually mean something instead of the grind that conquest is. You get rewards after every game of DD regardless so what's the big deal about a weekly award system? You play online in seasons but don't get your rewards right away until you hit a certain level. You can play a bunch of games with no "reward" in seasons.
Thats the last ill respond to that though. Solo battles are a fun way to use the whole team, try out players offline with rewards for doing it. I cant see what's not to like. Have a good day
That's fine if you wanna leave the convo. I was legitimately trying to get you to explain what solo battles were in depth. But you assumed i would shoot the idea down, but fact is i didn't like it based off info given.
How many weeks? How many teams? What would be the reward structure? What are paramater of your team build? Quick counts on or off? How many innings?What would be difficulty level?
I am open minded but it's you who did not go into depth about it so i based my thoughts off of info given. So if you wanna get butthurt and leave convo fine, but let it be known i was willing to hear about it. So you to have a great day!
What exactly did you say to get me to explain anything? You response was no its an EA idea, don't want that because you want integrity in the company. Where was the dialog to keep that conversation going? The only question you asked before this response was why wait a week? Again, where was it you wanted further explanation?
From your responses just in this thread to others that have been here, it's not worth the time. Lol @ butthurt though when you flip out over someone saying the offline crowd. Get over yourself and you'll have better interactions.
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
Solo battles were a thing that EA created in their DD style modes. You get 4 games per day vs other squads and gain points for how you play and whether you win or lose. There is a leaderboard and each week you get some kind of rewards. They could also allow you to play extra inning games vs other teams that users have created, that would be nice too
No thx i dot want SDS to follow EA or 2K there is a reason i dont play those games. SDS has accountability and integrity.
So you read that the things were made by EA so they shouldn't be used because of that? Regardless of EA doing it, squad battles are one of the best things that ever came from them even if their games are trash. I just have an ability to look past the creator to see the product instead of being blind to it due to a bias. To each their own
Not just cuz of EA I read your post and didn't like the sound of format. Why wait a week for rewards when currently in conquest mode you find hidden packs, xp, and stubs right when you find it on map?
Just a shot in the dark, why not have both? Solo battles are quite fun for offline where FULL games actually mean something instead of the grind that conquest is. You get rewards after every game of DD regardless so what's the big deal about a weekly award system? You play online in seasons but don't get your rewards right away until you hit a certain level. You can play a bunch of games with no "reward" in seasons.
Thats the last ill respond to that though. Solo battles are a fun way to use the whole team, try out players offline with rewards for doing it. I cant see what's not to like. Have a good day
That's fine if you wanna leave the convo. I was legitimately trying to get you to explain what solo battles were in depth. But you assumed i would shoot the idea down, but fact is i didn't like it based off info given.
How many weeks? How many teams? What would be the reward structure? What are paramater of your team build? Quick counts on or off? How many innings?What would be difficulty level?
I am open minded but it's you who did not go into depth about it so i based my thoughts off of info given. So if you wanna get butthurt and leave convo fine, but let it be known i was willing to hear about it. So you to have a great day!
What exactly did you say to get me to explain anything? You response was no its an EA idea, don't want that because you want integrity in the company. Where was the dialog to keep that conversation going? The only question you asked before this response was why wait a week? Again, where was it you wanted further explanation?
From your responses just in this thread to others that have been here, it's not worth the time. Lol @ butthurt though when you flip out over someone saying the offline crowd. Get over yourself and you'll have better interactions.
@grizzbear55_psn said in Obviously not this year:
@rabid55wolverine said in Obviously not this year:
Not really sure what they can do to spruce up conquest, pretty much fine as it is in my opinion. 6 inning games to beat strongholds is too long and it is very dull after a while playing conquest and I'm an offline guy.
If they would come out with a solo battles type of idea, that would be 1000x better than conquest
Solo battles? Can you explain plz?
Lol, I responded to that, which obviously wasn't enough for you but instead of asking the questions, you made some idiotic post about EA and SDS keeping their integrity. Next time maybe post the questions you have instead of the smart [censored] nugget you dropped instead.