I Have Possibly a Horrible Idea

[halfbutt_PSN]

I mean it could be fun but considering how much bad connections can impact the gameplay already, imagine what 6 players instead of 2 connected could do.

[mr_pin_em_down07]

@writetoshawn_psn said in I Have Possibly a Horrible Idea:

But to me, it sounds good:

Right now we’re playing 1 on 1 games online. What if there was a way that we could team up and play people 2-on-2 (alternate at-bats, watch your partner bat while you’re on deck), or 3-on-3 and so on... much of the way you can in NBA2K and other games, which would increase comraderie and could decrease toxicity because there would be less anonymity and you’re exposed to the community more.

Could be a horrible idea, but I’ve had worse ones.

i just saw this was from 5 months ago RIP

[GrizzBear55_PSN]

@ikasnu_psn said in I Have Possibly a Horrible Idea:

3v3.

P1 OF
P2 IF
P3 C and P

P3 is team captain and handles all bullpen and pinch run/hit.

Thing that worries me and i've seen in other games. Rocket league, Madden, and i'm sure others.

For one Quitters that are "Captains" if they quit u could no longer use play book it only used audible plays. So pitcher quits just witness meatballs down middle?

2nd quitter just b/c opposing team took lead? Now you rank gets effected?

3rd trolls who literally will do anything and everything to sabotage game?

So i am ok with COOP idea as long as it isn't in a competitive environment where rewards can be earned until i see or hear of a way to alleviate concerns. But something i could see bee introduced into league play where Commish has settings perhaps.

But as of right now i oppose any idea of competitive COOP that gives out rewards or leaderboard.

[A_PerfectGame_PSN]

If it were casual play that’s fine. This has to stay away from ranked completely.