Jimmie Foxx is unjammable
-
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
-
-
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
I honestly think he has the best swing in the game, Babe has a slight edge in ratings to go with a good swing so I give him the edge for best hitter but Jimmie has the best swing.
I assume you’ve probably used a fair amount of the 12-0 rewards, is he the best one in your opinion?
-
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
This is an accurate depiction of what this thread (or any thread with maverick) is.
Ugh...remind me again if your educational background when it comes to math or stats. I mean this pic implies i am a half brain and you and your buddies are smarter. But I have yet to hear that you have ever studied math or stats let alone used then in any meaningful way.
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
wRC+ uses weighted runs above average and league averages but to say that because it uses those it is therefore based on WAR and the entire summation that makes up WAR is a ridiculous statement.
-
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
This is an accurate depiction of what this thread (or any thread with maverick) is.
Ugh...remind me again if your educational background when it comes to math or stats. I mean this pic implies i am a half brain and you and your buddies are smarter. But I have yet to hear that you have ever studied math or stats let alone used then in any meaningful way.
You are a halfbrain because you are unable to comprehend that you’re wrong on so many levels. Not being able to recognize or admit being wrong is a sign of true stupidity.
If you think stats are so complicated that somebody needs a math degree to understand them, that tells a lot about you.
-
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
Ok I am sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to put it into your own words. Ok...last word is yours. You are just not knowledgeable enough to have a conversation about sabermetrics. This is just silly at this point. Like I said like explaining a lightning to a baboon
-
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
Ok I am sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to put it into your own words. Ok...last word is yours. You are just not knowledgeable enough to have a conversation about sabermetrics. This is just silly at this point. Like I said like explaining a lightning to a baboon
Why would he need to put a mathematical formula into his own words? Who does that benefit? What’s the point?
It’s a formula
-
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
Ok I am sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to put it into your own words. Ok...last word is yours. You are just not knowledgeable enough to have a conversation about sabermetrics. This is just silly at this point. Like I said like explaining a lightning to a baboon
I'll say it again because you missed the 2nd half of the comment.
wRC+ uses weighted runs above average and league averages but to say that because it uses those it is therefore based on WAR and the entire summation that makes up WAR is a ridiculous statement.
-
-
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
This is an accurate depiction of what this thread (or any thread with maverick) is.
Ugh...remind me again if your educational background when it comes to math or stats. I mean this pic implies i am a half brain and you and your buddies are smarter. But I have yet to hear that you have ever studied math or stats let alone used then in any meaningful way.
You are a halfbrain because you are unable to comprehend that you’re wrong on so many levels. Not being able to recognize or admit being wrong is a sign of true stupidity.
If you think stats are so complicated that somebody needs a math degree to understand them, that tells a lot about you.
Oh, now I get it. Thanks for letting me know that I am wrong. Not all stats are complicated but sabermetrics is. Can you explain the methodology to get WAR? If not then clearly you need a larger knowledge base.
If they aren’t complicated could you calculate it Right now if you had to? Or would you need to get more educated on the topic
-
@tommynachoes said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
I honestly think he has the best swing in the game, Babe has a slight edge in ratings to go with a good swing so I give him the edge for best hitter but Jimmie has the best swing.
I assume you’ve probably used a fair amount of the 12-0 rewards, is he the best one in your opinion?
Him, Gagne and posada are the best in my opinion
-
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
Ok I am sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to put it into your own words. Ok...last word is yours. You are just not knowledgeable enough to have a conversation about sabermetrics. This is just silly at this point. Like I said like explaining a lightning to a baboon
I'll say it again because you missed the 2nd half of the comment.
wRC+ uses weighted runs above average and league averages but to say that because it uses those it is therefore based on WAR and the entire summation that makes up WAR is a ridiculous statement.
-
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
Ok I am sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to put it into your own words. Ok...last word is yours. You are just not knowledgeable enough to have a conversation about sabermetrics. This is just silly at this point. Like I said like explaining a lightning to a baboon
I'll say it again because you missed the 2nd half of the comment.
wRC+ uses weighted runs above average and league averages but to say that because it uses those it is therefore based on WAR and the entire summation that makes up WAR is a ridiculous statement.
That's great.
Also, you requesting me to rephrase a mathematical formula is downright ridiculous.
It's like requesting me to rephrase a2+b2=c2...
-
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
This is an accurate depiction of what this thread (or any thread with maverick) is.
Ugh...remind me again if your educational background when it comes to math or stats. I mean this pic implies i am a half brain and you and your buddies are smarter. But I have yet to hear that you have ever studied math or stats let alone used then in any meaningful way.
You are a halfbrain because you are unable to comprehend that you’re wrong on so many levels. Not being able to recognize or admit being wrong is a sign of true stupidity.
If you think stats are so complicated that somebody needs a math degree to understand them, that tells a lot about you.
Oh, now I get it. Thanks for letting me know that I am wrong. Not all stats are complicated but sabermetrics is. Can you explain the methodology to get WAR? If not then clearly you need a larger knowledge base.
If they aren’t complicated could you calculate it Right now if you had to? Or would you need to get more educated on the topic
It’s amazing how you still don’t understand. It’s a formula, and you plug numbers into it. Nobody needs to remember the entire formula, that’s why we have webisites that do it for us. I don’t understand why that’s so hard for you to comprehend.
It just seems like you’re the one that doesn’t understand any of it, because you keep asking us even after multiple people have given you the formula and explained how it’s calculated and what it means.
-
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
This is an accurate depiction of what this thread (or any thread with maverick) is.
Ugh...remind me again if your educational background when it comes to math or stats. I mean this pic implies i am a half brain and you and your buddies are smarter. But I have yet to hear that you have ever studied math or stats let alone used then in any meaningful way.
You are a halfbrain because you are unable to comprehend that you’re wrong on so many levels. Not being able to recognize or admit being wrong is a sign of true stupidity.
If you think stats are so complicated that somebody needs a math degree to understand them, that tells a lot about you.
Oh, now I get it. Thanks for letting me know that I am wrong. Not all stats are complicated but sabermetrics is. Can you explain the methodology to get WAR? If not then clearly you need a larger knowledge base.
If they aren’t complicated could you calculate it Right now if you had to? Or would you need to get more educated on the topic
It’s amazing how you still don’t understand. It’s a formula, and you plug numbers into it. Nobody needs to remember the entire formula, that’s why we have webisites that do it for us. I don’t understand why that’s so hard for you to comprehend.
It just seems like you’re the one that doesn’t understand any of it, because you keep asking us even after multiple people have given you the formula and explained how it’s calculated and what it means.
You don’t seem to understand that if you only know how to plug the number in without understanding the underlying operations and why they are relevant than you Don’t know why a number is relevant or what it’s measuring.
For example mean, median and mode are all methods to find central tendency in a data set. But understanding when each is relevant to use is as important as knowing what numbers to plug in. If you took a basic stats class you would understand that.
-
Same [censored] different year. Same guy that wanted MTO removed before the game was even released because he didn’t think he could finish team affinities without winning a WS on Legend but really just had no clue what he was talking about AGAINNNNNN
People can see your game history.
People on here WILL go check your game history.
Don’t LIE about your game history. -
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@DriveByTrucker17 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
This is an accurate depiction of what this thread (or any thread with maverick) is.
Ugh...remind me again if your educational background when it comes to math or stats. I mean this pic implies i am a half brain and you and your buddies are smarter. But I have yet to hear that you have ever studied math or stats let alone used then in any meaningful way.
You are a halfbrain because you are unable to comprehend that you’re wrong on so many levels. Not being able to recognize or admit being wrong is a sign of true stupidity.
If you think stats are so complicated that somebody needs a math degree to understand them, that tells a lot about you.
Oh, now I get it. Thanks for letting me know that I am wrong. Not all stats are complicated but sabermetrics is. Can you explain the methodology to get WAR? If not then clearly you need a larger knowledge base.
If they aren’t complicated could you calculate it Right now if you had to? Or would you need to get more educated on the topic
It’s amazing how you still don’t understand. It’s a formula, and you plug numbers into it. Nobody needs to remember the entire formula, that’s why we have webisites that do it for us. I don’t understand why that’s so hard for you to comprehend.
It just seems like you’re the one that doesn’t understand any of it, because you keep asking us even after multiple people have given you the formula and explained how it’s calculated and what it means.
You don’t seem to understand that if you only know how to plug the number in without understanding the underlying operations and why they are relevant than you Don’t know why a number is relevant or what it’s measuring.
For example mean, median and mode are all methods to find central tendency in a data set. But understanding when each is relevant to use is as important as knowing what numbers to plug in. If you took a basic stats class you would understand that.
None of which useful in demonstrating how wRC+ is allegedly based on WAR.
This is another instance where you've made an oversimplified and exaggerated statement with which you are now stuck with because you are physically unable to admit when you're wrong.
It's an interesting psychological phenomenon which we are witnessing.
-
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
Ok I am sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to put it into your own words. Ok...last word is yours. You are just not knowledgeable enough to have a conversation about sabermetrics. This is just silly at this point. Like I said like explaining a lightning to a baboon
I'll say it again because you missed the 2nd half of the comment.
wRC+ uses weighted runs above average and league averages but to say that because it uses those it is therefore based on WAR and the entire summation that makes up WAR is a ridiculous statement.
That's great.
Also, you requesting me to rephrase a mathematical formula is downright ridiculous.
It's like requesting me to rephrase a2+b2=c2...
Nope i am requesting nothing from you. I am done if you are done...
Btw that formula states that there is a specific and constant relationship that exists between the sides of a right triangle.
More importantly, this is based on proofs and theorems that exist objectively in geometry and algebra.WAR is NOT something that has the necessary underlying proof work or theorems that would make it valid. Trust me when I say that WAR has not gone under the level of scrutiny via proofs that Pythagorean’s theorem has. Wait did you just compare the Pythagorean theorem with sabermetrics.
Oh wait, I am sorry I went over your head.
Anyway. To answer your question..I request nothing. I have nothing left to add that you could comprehend
-
-
@ChArTeRBuS said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Same [censored] different year. Same guy that wanted MTO removed before the game was even released because he didn’t think he could finish team affinities without winning a WS on Legend but really just had no clue what he was talking about AGAINNNNNN
People can see your game history.
People on here WILL go check your game history.
Don’t LIE about your game history.So sorry if I misread this. So many people attacking me that I assume people are coming at me when I see hostility.
But are you talking about me? If so none of that seems to apply to me. Once again if you meant someone else I apologize i get nonsensical stuff thrown at me constantly
-
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
Ok I am sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to put it into your own words. Ok...last word is yours. You are just not knowledgeable enough to have a conversation about sabermetrics. This is just silly at this point. Like I said like explaining a lightning to a baboon
I'll say it again because you missed the 2nd half of the comment.
wRC+ uses weighted runs above average and league averages but to say that because it uses those it is therefore based on WAR and the entire summation that makes up WAR is a ridiculous statement.
That's great.
Also, you requesting me to rephrase a mathematical formula is downright ridiculous.
It's like requesting me to rephrase a2+b2=c2...
Nope i am requesting nothing from you. I am done if you are done...
Btw that formula states that there is a specific and constant relationship that exists between the sides of a right triangle.
More importantly, this is based on proofs and theorems that exist objectively in geometry.WAR is NOT something that has the necessary underlying proof work or theorems that would make it. Trust me when I say that WAR has not gone under the level of scrutiny via proofs that Pythagorean’s theorem has.
Oh wait, I am sorry I went over your head.
Anyway. To answer your question..I request nothing. I have nothing left to add that you could comprehend
Nope, and I never asserted that WAR is comparable to Pythagora's statement. Whether or not you agree with its usability as a metric for measuring the abilities of a baseball player is irrelevant. It is a mathematical formula just the same. (The fact that you actually believe that what you just said is somehow complicated is hilarious - this is literally first grade elementary school material)
Again, none of that shows how wRC+ is - allegedly - based on WAR.
Keep dancing around it though because we all know why you're doing it.
Alternatively, you can also simply not respond and thus demonstrate how you've been wrong all along.
-
-
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@SefarR said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@Maverick31762 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
@skepple15 said in Jimmie Foxx is unjammable:
Guys! Stop! Unless you’ve taken college statistics it is impossible for you to understand a stat in regards to sports so just stop! It’s impossible.
Sabermetrics is using some complex statistical analysis. Possibly too complex. And for most people not only do they not understand HOW some of them are conceived but the underlying principles that go into it.
For example being that you wanted to comment. Please answer the following
-
What is the TOTAL formula used to determine WAR.
-
What statistical procedure are used and why.
-
What are some principles used to determine which procedures to use.
Most people including yourself can’t answer that
Here is the formula for WAR
I've already shared the formula for wRC+.
Now show me how wRC+ is BASED on WAR (not just use some of the same components).
Your Copy paste skills are next level. Yeah but to truly understand it you need to explain or at least understand the how the component variables are created and the reason why. Do you understand league adjustment. Why are those stats added. Do they have equal bake and how do you know this. If not should there be a coefficient.
Whatever dude, you have no idea clearly. But please talk amongst yourselves. You all seem to have a clue.
Yes, like I said - I'm copy pasting it because it saves me time.
You asked for the full formula so I gave it to you.
Ok I am sure it has nothing to do with you not being able to put it into your own words. Ok...last word is yours. You are just not knowledgeable enough to have a conversation about sabermetrics. This is just silly at this point. Like I said like explaining a lightning to a baboon
I'll say it again because you missed the 2nd half of the comment.
wRC+ uses weighted runs above average and league averages but to say that because it uses those it is therefore based on WAR and the entire summation that makes up WAR is a ridiculous statement.
That's great.
Also, you requesting me to rephrase a mathematical formula is downright ridiculous.
It's like requesting me to rephrase a2+b2=c2...
Nope i am requesting nothing from you. I am done if you are done...
Btw that formula states that there is a specific and constant relationship that exists between the sides of a right triangle.
More importantly, this is based on proofs and theorems that exist objectively in geometry.WAR is NOT something that has the necessary underlying proof work or theorems that would make it. Trust me when I say that WAR has not gone under the level of scrutiny via proofs that Pythagorean’s theorem has.
Oh wait, I am sorry I went over your head.
Anyway. To answer your question..I request nothing. I have nothing left to add that you could comprehend
Nope, and I never asserted that WAR is comparable to Pythagora's statement. Whether or not you agree with its usability as a metric for measuring the abilities of a baseball player is irrelevant. It is a mathematical formula just the same.
Again, none of that shows how wRC+ is - allegedly - based on WAR.
Keep dancing around it though because we all know why you're doing it.
Alternatively, you can also simply not respond and thus demonstrate how you've been wrong all along.
This is becoming comical. Sure you got it bro. You have used your superior mastery of statistical analysis to twist me into a pretzel. I am wrong about whatever it is your sweet little heart thinks I am wrong about. I hope this makes you feel complete now.
. Are we done here so Skepple can tell everyone how good Foxx is. Or do you need to add to how right about something you are? -
