Hamels, Scott, or Grienke
-
I had success with Hamels, but sold him when his price was up before Ducks. My only complaint is his 2-seamer.
I’ve had one start with Scott. 1 hit shutout. Opponent was bad. Looking forward to more.
-
-
Scott is never great imo. Don't let the 99 fool ya. He can't throw his fastball by anyone. You can sit on his splitter and adjust, and his player model is embarrassing.
-
@Nanthrax_1 said in Hamels, Scott, or Grienke:
Scott is never great imo. Don't let the 99 fool ya. He can't throw his fastball by anyone. You can sit on his splitter and adjust, and his player model is embarrassing.
Still the ginormous noggin?
Can’t wait to see a Scott vs Ellsbury matchup. Battle of the Bobbleheads
-
Lol Scott's head is huge/weird looking, but I have had success with him in the two starts I tried him in.
-
Scott plays very well in higher levels tho IMO
But all star he is easy to hit ..
-
Scott looks horrible. Fastball is too slow. Splitter and change up are basically the same pitch. And the slider is meh. Pitch speed differentials aren’t there either. Holy frick I’m squashing a spider and it won’t die...I’m legit stepping on it! I’ve never seen it before...
-
@olivegarden2 said in Hamels, Scott, or Grienke:
Scott looks horrible. Fastball is too slow. Splitter and change up are basically the same pitch. And the slider is meh. Pitch speed differentials aren’t there either. Holy frick I’m squashing a spider and it won’t die...I’m legit stepping on it! I’ve never seen it before...
He doesn't have a changeup. SPL, 4SFB, SL, CB.
-
Thanks guys. Think I'm going to go Hamels, Grienke, Scott. Shouldn't take too long since I just finished Mantle and don't need to save for LS anymore, thank the lord.
-
Scott was dominant for me in a ranked game today. He’s much better than last year. Felt very accurate.
-