• Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
Skins
  • Default (The Show 25)
  • No Skin
  • The Show 23
  • Dark
  • The Show 24
  • The Show 25
Collapse
THESHOW.COM
Game Game Support Support My Account My Account

Community Forum

Ellsbury Reveal....

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Diamond Dynasty
33 Posts 16 Posters 1.6k Views
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Nanthrax_1_PSNN Offline
    Nanthrax_1_PSNN Offline
    Nanthrax_1_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #22

    @T-Rox_09 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @DriveByTrucker17 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @T-Rox_09 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @DriveByTrucker17 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @T-Rox_09 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @DriveByTrucker17 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    What an absolute joke lmao

    It is better than some future stars fantasy card

    Yes, Future Stars are bad. We all know this.

    But there’s no reason for Jacoby Ellsbury to have a Prime 96 card. Just give us his 2011 card and that’s it. That’s all his Prime was.

    But let’s make Ben Zobrist’s prime card a 94. Makes no sense whatsoever. I’d understand if this Ellsbury card was an Awards series based on 2011, but it isn’t.

    I don't fully understand the "prime" cards this year. Obviously sig series is their overall career. Awards is a specific year they won a major award. Prime means the prime of their career? Is that similar to a sig series? Can someone have a 95 prime then a 99 sig series? Wouldn't prime mean the best they were in their career?

    I was under the impression that Signature Series was based on a player’s entire career, Prime was based on a player’s best consecutive years, and obviously Awards is one of their best seasons boosted.

    Apparently my idea of “prime” is not the same as SDS’s idea of “prime”

    How many good years did he have? One maybe two?

    1 elite year. 2011 - 9.5 fWAR (that's elite!)
    3 good/okay years. 2008/2013/2014 - 4.2, 4.6, 3.6.

    Everything else is literally nothing. Useless. Either hurt or almost replacement level

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DriveByTrucker17D Offline
    DriveByTrucker17D Offline
    DriveByTrucker17
    replied to Guest on last edited by DriveByTrucker17
    #23

    @T-Rox_09 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @DriveByTrucker17 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @T-Rox_09 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @DriveByTrucker17 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @T-Rox_09 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @DriveByTrucker17 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    What an absolute joke lmao

    It is better than some future stars fantasy card

    Yes, Future Stars are bad. We all know this.

    But there’s no reason for Jacoby Ellsbury to have a Prime 96 card. Just give us his 2011 card and that’s it. That’s all his Prime was.

    But let’s make Ben Zobrist’s prime card a 94. Makes no sense whatsoever. I’d understand if this Ellsbury card was an Awards series based on 2011, but it isn’t.

    I don't fully understand the "prime" cards this year. Obviously sig series is their overall career. Awards is a specific year they won a major award. Prime means the prime of their career? Is that similar to a sig series? Can someone have a 95 prime then a 99 sig series? Wouldn't prime mean the best they were in their career?

    I was under the impression that Signature Series was based on a player’s entire career, Prime was based on a player’s best consecutive years, and obviously Awards is one of their best seasons boosted.

    Apparently my idea of “prime” is not the same as SDS’s idea of “prime”

    How many good years did he have? One maybe two?

    His three best seasons were:
    2011: 9.5 fWAR
    2013: 4.6 fWAR
    2008: 4.2 fWAR

    He never even touched 4 fWAR at any other point in his career, and basically the only reason he even had 4 in 2013 and 2008 was because of his very good base running.

    Talk about maximum disrespect towards Zobrist though. First Kemp, then Ellsbury of all people are given higher cards then him.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • Harrisville318_PSNH Offline
    Harrisville318_PSNH Offline
    Harrisville318_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #24

    @DriveByTrucker17 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @T-Rox_09 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @DriveByTrucker17 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    What an absolute joke lmao

    It is better than some future stars fantasy card

    Yes, Future Stars are bad. We all know this.

    But there’s no reason for Jacoby Ellsbury to have a Prime 96 card. Just give us his 2011 card and that’s it. That’s all his Prime was.

    But let’s make Ben Zobrist’s prime card a 94. Makes no sense whatsoever. I’d understand if this Ellsbury card was an Awards series based on 2011, but it isn’t.

    If they actually did it for his prime years he should be around 90 ovr at best. 1 good season and he gets a 96. With it being his prime card I hope they drop his power some. Dude hit double digit hr twice in his career(32 in '11 & 16 in '14). We already have to pitch Adalberto like hes Raul Sr.

    DriveByTrucker17D 1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • DriveByTrucker17D Offline
    DriveByTrucker17D Offline
    DriveByTrucker17
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #25

    @Harrisville318 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @DriveByTrucker17 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @T-Rox_09 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @DriveByTrucker17 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    What an absolute joke lmao

    It is better than some future stars fantasy card

    Yes, Future Stars are bad. We all know this.

    But there’s no reason for Jacoby Ellsbury to have a Prime 96 card. Just give us his 2011 card and that’s it. That’s all his Prime was.

    But let’s make Ben Zobrist’s prime card a 94. Makes no sense whatsoever. I’d understand if this Ellsbury card was an Awards series based on 2011, but it isn’t.

    If they actually did it for his prime years he should be around 90 ovr at best. 1 good season and he gets a 96. With it being his prime card I hope they drop his power some. Dude hit double digit hr twice in his career(32 in '11 & 16 in '14). We already have to pitch Adalberto like hes Raul Sr.

    You’d see zero complaints from me if they just made it an awards card based on 2011 alone. That season was incredible, so I’d understand if they boosted just it. But to say he had any kind of a prime that was worthy of being a 96 is just asinine.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • MadderBumgarnerM Offline
    MadderBumgarnerM Offline
    MadderBumgarner
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    Prime is for guys who don’t deserve Signature cards though right?

    DriveByTrucker17D Nanthrax_1_PSNN 2 Replies Last reply
    0
  • DriveByTrucker17D Offline
    DriveByTrucker17D Offline
    DriveByTrucker17
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #27

    @MadderBumgarner said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    Prime is for guys who don’t deserve Signature cards though right?

    You’re saying Reggie Jackson doesn’t deserve a Signature Series?

    MadderBumgarnerM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • Nanthrax_1_PSNN Offline
    Nanthrax_1_PSNN Offline
    Nanthrax_1_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #28

    @MadderBumgarner said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    Prime is for guys who don’t deserve Signature cards though right?

    Nope. It's more Sig is for guys who had multiple prime periods. Or periods which they excelled differently

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • MadderBumgarnerM Offline
    MadderBumgarnerM Offline
    MadderBumgarner
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #29

    @DriveByTrucker17 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @MadderBumgarner said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    Prime is for guys who don’t deserve Signature cards though right?

    You’re saying Reggie Jackson doesn’t deserve a Signature Series?

    It was in the form of a question because I wasn't sure about them this year. But yeah I guess old Reg deserves both.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    allmustfall16
    wrote on last edited by
    #30

    I hate to complain on here. But I’ve completely lost interest in the game.

    Getting Mantle early has nothing to do with it. I had Mays early last year and loved it until September.

    Can’t see myself buying the Show next year. Which sucks. Because I love baseball.

    Everything about this year is a step backwards.

    1 Reply Last reply
    2
  • wingspan1985_PSNW Offline
    wingspan1985_PSNW Offline
    wingspan1985_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #31

    So if Prime is for one good year are we going to get a Prime Matt Harvey?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • halfbutt_PSNH Offline
    halfbutt_PSNH Offline
    halfbutt_PSN
    wrote on last edited by
    #32

    At this point, I think it’s safe to say they are just making this stuff up.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
  • James97M_PSNJ Offline
    James97M_PSNJ Offline
    James97M_PSN
    replied to Guest on last edited by
    #33

    @D27J said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @the_dragon1912 said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    @D27J said in Ellsbury Reveal....:

    Looks like he'll basically be LS Yelich w/ much better SPD & FLD.

    Or just Lofton with more power.

    ... and much less DUR

    Have you seen Stantons durability quirk? 😂

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
  • A admin locked this topic on

X Instagram Facebook YouTube Twitch Discord TikTok
Major League Baseball Players Association Major League Baseball Sony Interactive Entertainment PlayStation Studios San Diego Studio ESRB ESRB Certificate
Terms of Use Privacy Policy TheShow.com Community Code of Conduct MLB The Show Online Code of Conduct MLB The Show Games

Stubs is a registered trademark or trademark of Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

"PlayStation Family Mark", "PlayStation", "PS5 Logo", and "PS4 Logo" are registered trademarks or trademarks of Sony Interactive Entertainment Inc.

Microsoft, the Xbox Sphere mark, Series X|S logo, and Xbox Series X|S are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies.

Nintendo Switch is a trademark of Nintendo.

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com. The Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum, Inc., as applicable. Visit the official website of the Hall of Fame at BaseballHall.org

Officially Licensed Product of MLB Players, Inc. MLBPA trademarks, copyrighted works and other intellectual property rights are owned and/or held by MLBPA and may not be used without the written consent of MLBPA or MLB Players, Inc. Visit MLBPLAYERS.com, the Players Choice on the web.

© 2024 Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC.

  • Login

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Popular
  • Dev Tracker
  • Login

  • Login or register to search.